I think it is time to end the drama about the issue concerning FTX. For sure many of us are aware of the risk of putting your assets on exchangers but still, people still continue such habbit. But I won't force them not to do so 'coz they might be trusting their exchanger that much. If we would look back to past, scams were on projects and rarely with exchangers. To my awareness, it is only FTX which became careless of their funds which yield to irreponsibility and collapse but that does not conclude that every exchanger would also do so. Indeed there is the slightest tendency, but generalizing will just result to FUD and bigger problems.

Going back with the topic, indeed this technology would make you aware of things, mentally. From planning, controlling oneself with actions, to speculating. But I doubt that is only due to this technology. It is applicable to lmost everything, it is just more emphasized on this blockchain because volatility is too high.

It is a matter of consistency with what you are believing in the first place. As long as you have your own reason to continue with the thing you are passionate about, then you're good. It is just that people would doubt something they are not really aware of until they see the fruit of your 'labor'. As others have mentioned, many of us experienced such doubts from people around us regarding this technology. But on a broad perspective, it is just a misconception and misunderstanding. Since you are the one who knows well of this industry, it is somewhat not surprising to know that you are the only to be amazed of the potential for this technology. Just continue as you believe.

Indeed this platform opened new opportunities for both investors and non-investors of cryptocurrency. This is also where most of the users here learned more about this technology and ways of being aware of the advantages such as with profit making and transactions. Topics having different concerns and to how users share their opinions about it.Everything which is open to masses would be 'dangerous'. Not all informations you would read, will be based on facts especially if it is opinionated. As you learn new things you'd be able to identify which information should you keep and use , as well as info you should disregard. That is a part of learning process I think.

I'm fine with Kyc procedures especially the casino has a good reputation. The only risk involve in this process is that your identities might be used on things without your consent right? But that I think would be somehow impossible. There are as well many advantages of it which I lately realized such as not allowing quick withrawals in connection with hacked accounts. Also, it would limit those players (depends on the kyc requirement 'coz IDs could be somewhat faked) especially minors to be able to play in casinos. From engaging to many sites with KYC, I had no problem so far so maybe it just depends on the sites you are choosing. A site with no kyc is not enough I guess to be interesting to the eyes of players.

Making them aware won't be enough to persuade them on using this technology. Their accessibility, capability and preference would be the bottomline. Many people are aware of the potential of this industry as well as its advantages over fiat but why are those people still using fiat? Because it is more convenient on a daily basis; not everyone owns a crypto and even if they do, they'd have guilt on using it on a daily basis because of the potential profit it has, from holding and waiting for the market price to go up. We are simply not ready for it yet as long as the market is showing high level of volatility which could generate profit, people won't be using it as a normal currency for normal transactions.

At first I though he's referring to sportsbetting such as bookies which made me confused when OP said that it is not what he is looking for then mentioned about ben-football.  A broker in real estate field is simply the one who mediates transactions between a company and a tenant or investor. So if there's such thing in gambling, it might be the bookmakers he's trying to point out or those whoch are managing fixed betting (hopefully it is not). But still, I don't get its relevance with this industry wherein a player could simply bet on sports without the need of such specific person given that gambling sites has their own team to run the betting procedures.

Also, depositing fiat to a crypto casino would cost more in transactions because of convertion unlike with direct cryptocurrency transaction wherein fees are simply lower, same with withdrawals by the way. But I doubt with being outdated, it is more focused on the present. People are still using it simply because they prefer it more over cryptocurrencies for daily transactions and we cannot blame them from doing so.We do have preferences, I guess.On my end I am using crypto by means of depositing into casinos simply to avoid additional taxes and also delays because oayments would undergo through chains.

Jake Paul has the edge on this one I guess. If it is true that Fury have dodged Paul a couple of times maybe confidence is lacking on his end, and that is an important thing. But since hype is there already, this would be for sure exciting to watch. But quite of an interest, I'd like to see salt papi vs jake paul for some reason. They're on heat together with KSI which I think would rain bets to whoever would be able to land a match up on these three. In terms of skills, PAPI I guess would be on advantage. But going back with this match up, Fury has the potential as well but it is just that Jake has more exposure with fights with 'tougher' opponents which could be his biggest advantage.

There are many to choose from mistly offering bonuses (often they are competing which one would be higher), same set of games, and other alike features. But what for me, would make a player stay is the technical support or the response of the gambling platform towarda the concerns of its players. You may seek for advantages such as those huge bonuses as they promote but not all gambling platforms would mind the existing problems on their site, worse? there will be isolated cases of non paying related issues and they won't make an action about it. Ither features to consider are speed of transactions, accessibility, and odds (matters to some players).

Definitely would be the impression by most people in this industry. If OP is not an affiliate, why would he invite people to play on their platform? more likely because of the referral bonus, unless the $10 reward is in token form of that particular site which could only be used inside but is not withdrawable.

If you are not an affiliate and you are doing this for the sake of bonuses through referral, we would have no problem with that just say so. Referral bonus in the first place would be given to both invitee and inviter. 'coz if you will hide hidden motives you are just putting other players at risk if that particular site would turn out to be a scam. Please don't be like that.

Better in terms of what? If as an investment I think Ethereum would be more of a better candidate but if it is with fees (not sure tho') I think Cardano would be be one since it has a lower market value. Ethereum on the other hand is a huge network already from being used to most of the projects and transactions in this industry which makes it capable to withstand every downfall with the market prices and be able to recover afterwards. It has proven "itself" for years as being the next to Bitcoin, thus, this would be a mismatch to compare. Cardano is really promising but that won't make it a better cryptocurrency than ethereum. But these two are really a good investment.

More of a trap I guess. It is too early to assume a bullish season given that not all coins had an increase with the recent pump, opposite of what happens during an actual bull trend. So for now, it would be better to be careful of being caught by it. Investing would be a good idea and so is waiting for a more clear trend line. The actual increase, I believe, is more anticipated next year but that is not to exclude this year. The only point is to not hope that much just because the market was from a bad situation and it is just now wherein it is having signs of recovery. Would be a long way to go I guess before this market fully recover. But ofcourse if it would as this early, then that would be better.

FUDs will never be removed from a demand based project because there are investors who gain profit from it more of "reverse psychology" wherein big investors will spread FUD and take advantage of the situation they have created. Unfortunately, new ones and small investors suffer the most from such ideology because they are the ones being easily fooled.This is already an example of FUD. The increase recently with the market prices is a good thing indeed but never assume that it would already be continuous given that there are no concrete reason for the market to sustain the increase for the whole year. Spikes would normally occur due to various reasons but if the condition in general is not good, spikes won't be consistent.

Apologies but this sounds delusional. Over foreign currency? Never, i guess. If this technology will be emphasized the least thing to happen is co-existence between cryptocurrencies and digital fiat. This industry indeed has  continuous nd progressive groth over the past years. But I guess such thing as a price increse would be an enough reason for governments to trust this industry in an instant if they won't even be able to track every transaction. Plus with the risk that would be exposed of, for norml citizens. It is either people are still not ready for total adoption or individuals won't be ready even in the future because of differences with every perspective bout this technology.

Helps an individual who won from trading or investing but with the economy I doubt  Bitcoin is not even widely accepted by consumers. Also, this is somehow blurry. This crypto industry generates profit for the investors due to its market price volatility. But since that is volatility we were talking about, imagine how big the loss could be if your assets are store into it. The idea is already there but if this would be a decision from government leader, that would be one sided.  Because there is a higher tendency for them ( as evident with the present( to restrict its usage if taxation will be off with their hands despite of years or  decade of progress.

Right now, only 20% I guess unlike before wherein most of my assets are into Bitcoin. One reason of diversifying is the rate of increase. The rate of increase on smaller tokens are higher although more risky. But things could be lessen by right technical analysis so fortunately, things work fine for me. But before this year end, I might be accumulating more for Bitcoin because of the anticipated halving for next year. It is just that I want to take more advantage of the price volatility of other cryptocurrencies; more of maximizing the opportunity to earn more. But if you prefer to not worry that much by monitoring the price, engage with long term investments in huge names of this industry.

There is definitely a better way to promote projects. Especially in this industry wherein many people are aware of the possible negative outcomes of engaging to new projects and platforms. The concept is already there, they just have to actualize things in a way that the though would be more organized. A player to player betting has been mentioned for quite a while but only a few are making it really possible. So in order to rise with the existing, this gambling platform should have an edge nd atleast that would be with the process of accumulating investors first. In order to do that, presenting in a more credible manner would be really a help other than just presenting something 'new'.

Problem is we tend to forget the meaning of a "gamble". No matter how huge our chance is, if luck would play on both ends, anticipated outcomes or tables may still be turned. Playing safely would help players to avoid such things. But to somehow see the player's end, I guess such thing is not new to him; it seems that he's used to such situations of betting huge amount. So we may assume he also won big time before. It would be more unfortunate if he bet all that he has and turned into a huge loss. Think of how huge jackpot became a huge learned lesson. So to those who are planning to do the same thing, please know your limits as a player. Always use an amount you can afford to lose because anything could happen even the impossible, in gambling industry.

That is simply how influence works. For sure they are aware of it and they are just doing it to earn money from promoting those projects by disregarding the risk the are exposing to their audiences. If you would observe, they'd be deleting contents of such project once scam is already obvious, like they never did they part to promote it. That's just how money works for them. It is guilt which would be their problem afterwards but most of them are simply used to it, and will continue such scheme project after project. This also the reason why people should stop relying that much from influencers simply because they are doing their job. We, as investors, would be the one incharge still, with our funds.

Well it is a good thing that you are seeking alternatives on the game you are playing often simply because you won't win in a consistent manner to any kind of gambling you engage yourself with as long as it is gambling. I am also into sportsbetting but I was doing dice games before. The thing I liked about sportsbetting is somehow allowing the players to minimize the tendency of losing through analyzing the teams I am interested with; past matches, players'performance and such. To answer the question whether you should go back to slots, that is really on you as @Oshosondy have said. One's preference is the answer. We are all aiming to win in this industry so choose what would push you near that purpose. You may also alternate from the two categories if you enjoy both.