To be honest I was also really amazed by the Ethective and Aleth.io data services because to call them only Ethereum explorers is really not enough.

I even have written a special, detailed review about Aleth.io in a separate thread because this data service has so many tools that I wasn't able to introduce all of them properly in this compilation.

If you are interested here is the link to this thread: Aleth.io - make Ethereum data work for you, best analytics & visualization.


What a coincidence  .

I don't know if you really tried all of them because there are for sure at least a few with a lot better interfaces and much more detailed, in deep information, but you are right and I agree fully that despite everything Ethplorer and Etherscan are still the most used and recognized Ethereum explorers and that is why they are at place one and two in my compilation.

Etherscan is in this great position that almost all wallets and exchanges provide links to transaction details that point users exactly to Etherscan. This is a great advertisement and they managed to take a big share of the explorer data market because this was the first known ETH explorer and we have to admit that it was very professional from the start.

People have really a hard time when they have to change something, especially, if it works well for them and this is exactly the case with Etherscan and Ethplorer, despite there are many better ETH explorers out there people stick to both of them because are used to. As we can see, many times not the product is the most important thing but timing, user experience, and great marketing are the keys to success.

I think it would change when people will need more detailed information about transactions or tokens, especially, when we will switch to the ETH 2.0 network with sharding and PoS rewards, but we have to calmly wait and see if I was right with my assumption.


Great job, I'm always happy when my threads are translated into other languages, because it shows the real value and is a tribute to my work.

I have read your thread and it looks like you have gathered the most useful information there, so your local members should be pleased with such a waterfall of knowledge .


Thank you very much. I will review them ASAP.

I wonder how you found them and if it was easy to do? I wasn't able to find new once for some time and that is why I asked community for help.

Thanks one more time, I really appreciate this.

Masz zupełną rację chodzi o 32ETH i wielokrotności.

Ja też tylko słuchałem tego filmiku, kiedy byłem zajęty, jeszcze czymś innym, a Vitalik niestety sepleni trochę i stąd mi się wzięło 37ETH.

Teraz kiedy oglądałem jeszcze raz, żeby znaleźć dokładnie ten moment, w którym mówi o ilościach ETH potrzebnych do PoS okazuje się, że faktycznie minimum 32ETH

https://youtu.be/l6RQ0x02QA8?t=255 Tutaj moment, w którym mówi o 32ETH.

https://youtu.be/l6RQ0x02QA8?t=622 Tutaj mówi o wielokrotnościach i potrzebnym sprzęcie.

What is the politics of the Digital Gold team regarding new exchanges?

Are you involved actively in searching for new, better-established exchanges like: Binance, Coinbase Pro or Kraken to list the GOLD token there?

Or you are not involved anymore and let the exchanges decide if they want GOLD token or not, without any influence from your site, like paying listing fees, etc?

I think I have never heard a detailed answer to this question and in my opinion, both ways are good.

The second one (no influence) works great when there is a good product and use case for a coin or token and that is exactly what GOLD token has to offer.

Anyways, detailed answer from the team would be great in my opinion.

Despite OP would not find any sympathy on the forum about his lost money it could be a great example for all not experienced newbies to not fall in these types of scams.

No matter what: carding forum, a super deal for iPhone (50% cheaper or even 70% if bought in bulk 5 - 10 pieces), Paypal and Western Union transfers, accounts with money for 50% less and so on.

As we can see, OP did all that was possible to check the forum and the deal he made, anyway, he was scammed not only for the initial 500$, but they managed to get additional 200$ from him.

These are already well-known scams, but I can imagine that newbies can still fall into these because a lot of them are really unprepared for something like this. These forums look 100% legit and everything is mastered to the last detail.  

There were a few of such "established" carding forums in the past, which offered carding services and had marketplaces with carded cheap equipment, but very soon they turned out to be full scam when they realized that there is a lot more money to be made from scamming not experienced scammers (forum users) as from managing a "genuine" carding forum.

Of course, all of these forums now are 100% fake, especially if one has found them with no problem using Google  . Believe me, legit carding forum would be very deep hidden in the dark web, accessible only via TOR with full communication, messages encryption, only accessible via invite link from already established long time members.

Jako, ze to altkoins Hyde Park chciałbym trochę przybliżyć/podyskutować o ETH 2.0. Co już jest wiadomo? A czego możemy się domyślać?

Mnie zaskoczyła propozycja PoS. który będzie oczywiście zupełnie inny niż wszędzie.

Jeżeli nie będziesz miał minimum 37ETH, to niestety, nie będziesz się mógł starać o dodatkowe dochody z PoSu w sieci ETH 2.0  .

Trochę szkoda, bo to będzie dość wysoka bariera dla wielu ludzi, ponieważ, tylko przy aktualnej cenie Ethereum, jest to jakieś 9300$. Całkiem drogi ten najtańszy nod muszę przyznać.

Dodatkowo, będą różne wymagania sprzętowe dla nodów i tak wykładniczo, jak to opisywał sam Vitalik Buterin:
- przy 37 ETH wystarczy telefon, laptop,
- przy 370 ETH koparka, specjalny serwer,
- przy 3700 ETH mała kopalnia,
- powyżej 3700 ETH czekają inwestora nie tylko wydatki na sam ETH, ale także aby nastarczyć kilohaszy do zabezpieczenia nowego łańcucha PoS.

Co wy na to? Czy wiedzieliście o tym?

Czy wiecie o innych zmianach, jak to będzie działało? Prędkości, ilości transakcji. itd?

PS
Tutaj link do filmu, na którym Vitalik bardzo szczegółowo omawia ETH 2.0, całkiem niedawno, bo tylko, kilka miesięcy temu, więc są to najnowsze informacje:
https://youtu.be/l6RQ0x02QA8?t=73

If there are any other Bitcoin forks I have missed, then please share them here because I have told already that this list could be not actual.

I was only able to find slightly old information (until the end of 2019) and still there can be more forks I haven't mentioned yet.


Right.


This is why I have created this thread and we have discussed already that only Bitcoin has so many forks and this is for sure some kind of record here.

Have I already found them all   .

In the beginning, it was easy to find ETH explorers and I was surprised, how many of them are there, but with every new review, this task becomes harder to accomplish.

This is why I will repeat my announcement and ask one more time members from the community to share the explorers I still haven't found and reviewed already.

If you have any, please, just share in the comments section and I will be happy to review them, as always best as possible.

Indeed  

I see almost the same reaction by 90% of people who just found out about this fact and I am not surprised at all because my reaction was exactly the same .

I was sure there are few of these alts, which popped suddenly from BTC hard and soft forks, but when I first heard the number 40 and after recheck found that there are more as 100 of them, I was overwhelmed too because there is no way to know the exact number without proper research, there is no actual info available on the web.

To know exactly how the situation looks like (how much worse it is   ) one has to do a really in deep research and spend many hours checking all these shitcoins to find the exact number.

Despite all negativity to all these alts, I think BTC has nothing to be ashamed of because, in my opinion, this shows only how strong and valuable BTC is in reality.
Only BTC was forked so many times to a new coin, only BTC forks (few of them) are in the top 50 on CMC, despite all these forks BTC is still unbeaten and owns the longest chain.
We have to focus on the positive side of things  .

The only bad thing is the confusion which these copycats generate around BTC, but if to look from the positive side of things, even this is good because people will learn very fast, that they have to research first a little and check everything twice before they even start to think about investing (hard-earned) money in crypto.

Great summary of Bitcointalk gangs and written in such a funny way that I couldn't stop to read.

Of course, it is quite surprising how many gangs actually are active on the forum right now because I was aware only about 4 of them.

Never thought to see my username in a gang, but surprise, surprise I am in the Spambusters Gang, which is true, only we have called it always club (Spambusters Club), anyways, I have to admit that "gang" sounds a lot better in my opinion  .

It has to be a lot of work to find all these gangs, with proper ANN threads, first mentions, members, dates and so on, tremendous work OP, kudos and merit for that from me.

Nic się nie zmienia i od długiego czasu Bithub.pl, jest moim ulubionym polskojęzycznym serwisem o kryptowalutach.

Podoba mi się to, że trzymacie rękę na pulsie i na prawdę publikowane artykuły, to sama esencja ostatnich wydarzeń w świecie krypto.

Oczywiście, czasem nie podobają mi się niektóre tytuły, itd. ale rozumiem, że jako serwis informacyjny, musicie używać takich tricków, żeby przyciągnąć czytelnika, bo bez tego ani rusz, więc przymykam oko i czytam dalej  .

Na pewno, analiza techniczna kryptowalut, to jeden z największych atutów Bithub.pl w ostatnim czasie i jestem pewien, że wielu czytelników czeka na każdą kolejną analizę J. Stokarza.
To jest po prostu wodospad wiedzy dla każdego kto chce próbować sił w trejdingu.

Oby tak dalej Bithub.pl, a niedługo będziecie największym serwisem krypto w Polsce!!!

Of course, you haven't said literally that it would be "impossible" to change boards, only this is how I understood this comment:


And that is why I have said to my friend on Telegram, that:


I think that was the sense of your comment quoted above and if I misunderstand you, then sorry.

I already answered in Chipmixer that I would never try to post in any section if I have no knowledge or enough experience and here I agree with you fully that it will be easy to notice, especially for a member who is frequently there.


I only wanted to prove that in my case it's a different story because I'm not new to mining, only an old returning veteran with a lot of passion and knowledge, I would say.


This is also not my intention (and never was) to remove any moderator from any board and of course mistakes can happen, but it wasn't a mistake, only conscious action under the influence of emotions, on which the moderator should not be dependent at all.


And after Frodocooper has written his totally false reasoning full of sucked from finger accusations, discussion about abuse of power started.


I am very sorry, already edited what I only could. I will pay more attention to usernames from now on. I understand that this can be annoying, sorry one more time.

---

This is not true that I have written these posts in mining or post at all only for financial gain and I already provided proofs to back this up in this thread.

From few months I am enrolled in the GOLD signature campaign, which is very good managed and CM looks for very high-quality posts, additionally, it has only 50 posts in month requirement (lowest from all signature campaigns) and I am posting at least five times more, another obvious proof that I am not doing this only for the incentive.

This is even not possible to prove somebody that he is writing for financial gain (even if he is) and all members who are actually in any bounty or signature campaign are equal against this accusation.

In my opinion, such reasoning on this forum where bounties and signature campaigns were born is just insane.

I spent long hours posting without any signature in my empty local board a few years ago (when Frodocooper was not even here) because I wanted to help and when I hear all these insults now, it really makes me sad. Don't mention all the additional "work" I did for the forum without any incentive, during all these years.
One really can't judge someone, only after reading a couple of posts, when literally don't know me at all and this isn't the responsibility of moderator in the first place.

Only the quality of the post should matter for the moderator and be the most important measure, period.

I have only asked if there are any special needs, is this wrong?

If actually, they would need more posts in any section which suites me, but I don't write there much because of the limited time we all have, it would be a great piece of information, not only for me but for many members who want to get a spot there.

I don't understand why my question is such a big problem? Many signature campaigns literally ask members to post 10 or 20 posts/week in Gambling or somewhere else, how different is that?
Are they posting there because they like it? Of course not? Are they signature spammers? In my opinion, only if their posts are spam and any other reasons shouldn't be important for a moderator.

I can quote here multiple comments from members who are complaining that they have to write in some special sections only because of the signature, why nobody targets them?
In my opinion, because it is not what the moderator should focus on. Quality, on topic, forum rules, add to the discussion, etc., this is what makes post good or not, not the other motives whatever they are.


Of course, I would and I have posted even more without any signature in the past.

I am posting a lot and sometimes I have to stop myself from posting even more, so really signature is for me only some extra money and why not to take it if I am here on the forum constantly every day.

You are also in the Chipmixer campaign, are you a worse poster because of that? Would you post differently if you would be not enrolled?

Now you say that I express myself incoherently, exactly that is the reason why I have written such a long post and answered all questions, to not leave any room for self-interpretation anymore.

I truly don't know how you could understand me wrongly? I have stated many times, that I never have and never will start to post on any board if I would not have enough knowledge and experience.

I only asked for advice, as I did already before and because I was already writing much, I could easily spread this to many more boards. I truly don't know what is hard here to understand?

I will not quote these posts one more time here to not make this answer "long-winded" again, but you can easily find them back in Chipmexer thread and read one more time with little more understanding, would be great if your fillings could be neutral when/if you do this and not against me (as always), maybe this will open your eyes little wider sometimes.

And I haven't either, but I knew it has nothing to do with the quality of my posts or forum rules, only somebody is targeting me after my posts in Chipmixer and I was fully right.

So tell me, if somebody will remove your posts on purpose, then you will do nothing, especially, when additionally he will accuse you to be a signature spammer with no proof at all?


My preferred pad is escalation? Because I answered to all sucked from finger accusations?


Moderator abusing his power of course.

Don't understand you really.

Have you seen the mining board lately? I was able to read all active threads in this section in 1 hour before I have posted there.

I really don't know what I have to read there a couple of months, are you serious? And why I have to do this? Am I a newbie here or something? Is this new requirement before posting in a new board?

So, that doesn't matter that moderator deletes posts because he assumed after reading two of my posts that I am signature spammer? Where are these spammy posts of mine, show me one?

I wonder why you don't discuss this issue further?

Have you seen these deleted posts? Please look at the OP.


If I don't answer every single question when somebody is accusing me, then I hear that I should do it. When I answer all accusations one by one to not miss anything, then it is too much.

This is not the first time I am doing this and is always not good. There is no easy way to answer so many accusations and I think you should focus on that.


I know it is but this does not change the narrative, doesn't it?

I thought so, that my posts were deleted because of my latest posts in the Chipmixer campaign and that somebody is doing this for a purpose and don't take the normal measures like posts quality, usability, etc.

For me itis obvious abuse of power by a moderator.

How could I write these posts to qualify in Chipmixer, if I already was not accepted and only talked with DS about the reasons for my removal?

Additionally, I stated in my posts that even if I would be enrolled, I would not take this place because it will be unfair!!!


To be honest I know that I will be never enrolled in the Chipmixer campaign and that is why I am not afraid to ask openly if I have questions or doubts. If there will be a place for me then I would be already enrolled at one of my many failed attempts during all these years. So to now implying me that I have written two posts on the mining board because of Chipmixer campaign is just something I can't believe.

---

Because you are a moderator from very short time and when I have posted in mining you haven't even by a member of this forum.

Few of my posts from 2014:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441448.msg4893296#msg4893296
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441448.msg4892803#msg4892803
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441448.msg4888917#msg4888917


Again not true.

This quoted response of mine refers to my talk with DarkStar after last recruitment to Chipmixer (not actual) which was some time ago and I already was posting for a long time in the Gambling and few other sections because DS advised me to post on more boards when we have talked in PMs and on my local section about reasons for my rejection very long time ago and that was exactly what I was referring to.

This has nothing to do with my actual 2 posts in the mining section and already happened a very long time ago.

---

Of course, you took my words out of the context. All I wanted to say was that hours of our writing (which is literally work) are deleted without any possibility to retrieve it. That's all!!!

Even for a single second, I haven't thought about work per se, so all the next conclusions which you bring up after this statement are fully made up and sucked again from a finger, but let's go further with this.

---

I just can't believe what I am reading here. It is forbidden to apply for signature campaigns or bounty on this forum?

What is wrong with the GOLD project? If there is anything wrong you should start a scam accusation thread or put a flag on them.

The majority of high-rank members are enrolled in many bounties and signature campaigns, so this above statement suites almost all members of this forum.

Now, I only want to say, that I never told that this forum is as work for me, but other high-rank members did it in the past, what is funny in this same Chipmixer thread just a couple of pages back and I haven't seen any problem because of this.

I thought very long if I should add this quote here, but to prove my words I will have to.


Of course, I don't have any problems with Hilariousandco's statement, but as we can see many even established members (global mods) see this opportunity as work and until this is not wwzsocki everything is ok, despite I never said something like this in the first place.




Again totally out of context and that is why I would not elaborate on this.


Again pure insinuations without any proof or at least some reasoning. I am here on this forum for so long and was enrolled in so many campaigns, but never thought about them or this forum as of work. These are your private conclusions after reading one or two of my posts in the Chipmixer campaign, which tells nothing about my 7 years here. And to be honest you are the only one who is working here in the first place.


Again the same BS about money, work, bounties and in the end even threats that "...Unless wwzsocki is deemed to exhibit a genuine interest in bitcoin mining...", so I understand that from now moderator Frodocooper will decide if can write in mining section and only if he believes that I stopped to work on the forum and have genuine interest in mining (whatever that means?).

I can't understand something here, please explain to me what I am missing? It is clear that we have an abuse of mod power here, or not?
It should be the post quality what matters, despite all this BS about work and incentive, that it is on topic, merited, high quality, add to the subject, not against forum rules, etc. and both of my posts fulfill all these requirements.

---

As always to be fully honest with the community I will prove that I haven't posted in the mining section, not because of signature campaign, incentive, work or anything else that Frodocooper stated in his reasoning.

I just wanted to prove that I am right and somebody is wrong and thought it will be great to visit the mining board because I wasn't there for a while, that's it.

When I was looking for help with deleted posts I talked with Bitcointalk members I know on Telegram and one of them asked me 28 January:



Translation:


As you can see Mikeywith suggested that it will be impossible for someone to start posting in the mining without noticing and I wanted to prove him wrong because I was sure that quality is all that matters and mining is still a subject in which I have a lot of knowledge from the early days when I have mined BTC and LTC solo with laptops and later with masternodecoins and staking PoS coins. I still keep following all mining news on a daily basis.



So no incentive, no work, no nothing, only wanted to prove that I am right, that anybody can start to post in a new section or come back to old one if he has enough knowledge, experience and post are good enough. Even for a second, I wasn't thinking about work, Chipmixer campaign, incentive or any other thrown on me accusation by Frodocooper , who deleted my posts and abused his moderator power in my opinion.

TBH I opened this thread


It would be great if you read the OP because there are all the needed details.

I have already sent two weeks ago few PMs to mods from the mining section and only received a reply from Gmaxwell, but he hasn't removed my posts and also can't see the clear reason for deletion.

Despite that he is a mod from this section, he couldn't help much either (at least answered my PM after just one day, thanks Gmaxwell).


Removed posts are also there in the OP, together with links to threads and all other info, so if you would be so kind to check them and answer here in the thread what you found it would be also great.

Gdzieś wczoraj czy dzisiaj czytałem, że jest jakiś gap niedomknięty na 8500$ i może cena spadnie do tej wartości, żeby rynek mógł zamknąć niedokończone sprawy przed następnym rajdem.

Ja sam nie mogę się tego GAPU nigdzie doszukać i mam nadzieję, że aktualne wsparcie na 9700$ wytrzyma.

Z drógiej strony jak spadnie do 8800$ lub nawet niżej, to na prawdę niezła okazja dla tych, którzy jeszcze nie kupili, bo to może być ostatnia taka przecena przed halvingiem.