|
I'm trying to judge the seriousness of this project. The fact that there are so many Newbie and Junior Members enthusiastic comments in this thread I find quite suspicious - it's unlikely to have expecially such a "young" public in a thread, and that's a pattern I've seen in many ICOs. They are probably just sockpuppet accounts of some paid bumping service. Not very encouraging.
|
|
|
|
In the OP you are mentioning: digital change of every cryptocurrency pair Does it mean that all 1000+ existing cryptocurrencies are to be enchanged one against each of the other ones? This seems to me extremely unlikely, but that's the meaning of your statement in the OP. |
|
|
|
When will the whitepaper be ready? The Hadrom project really appears to be one of the most promising new crypto projects out there, but an extensive and detailed whitepaper is what it really would need to make the big leap from appearence to an established reality.  It may not be a for a bit CryptoRobert: we are updating it rather extensively. That's a good news, because it's the symptom of a serious, complex and especially an evolving project. I know how that feels since I'm developing myself a project where the ongoing changes are making it impossible to finalize its whitepaper, which has been 90% ready for over six months now, but the final 10% is continuously changing. All the best with your work! |
|
|
|
That's very cool indeed. Do you have any links to the RollingStone article? That should be shared also on social media.
You can retrieve a file from www.oysterstorage.com or with help of telegram bot @pearlbot : Rowlings610a524190db8fb35168560e059202049f6286fe8098949451cce7039f5337c4Hw6obkd H Thanks, nice article indeed, and it was nice to get the file from Oysterstorage, even though I've then discovered that the magazine is called RoWlingstone and not Rollingstone |
|
|
|
|
There has been no new content for DSTRA's social media for ages. No more tweets and no more Facebook posts. Why is that? What should people republish on gleam?
|
|
|
|
This is a statement by Nemo of the team which I've copied from Discord: You should be able to see the full conference online via the Bloomberg site as it was broadcast live. We exchanged contact details with the majority of speakers including the sponsors during the networking lunch as well as pitching the concept behind TWIST, alongside our current progress/future development plans. We'll know within the next few weeks whether anything will materialize into potential investments , however this event is only one of the first and you can expect the team to get involved in further conferences in the coming months. which leads me to the question: does someone have/find any links of that part of the Bloomberg conference where Twist has been presented? |
|
|
|
If the founders won the court case, now they should start the mining operations immediately as investors are already dissatisfied with the delay of dividends payments and drop of token's price. Founders have to work hard to get back the reputation which is tarnished due to this issue between Woestmann and them.
Its far from over the real court case hasn't even started yet . Really? I thought that Envion founders won the court case. It seems investors are really lost money for an ICO which has no real outcome. Whoever holds the funds collected from this ICO should be refunded back to investors at the ICO price as they don't want to wait for years without any return on the investment. Why do you say the real court case hasn't started yet? Why there is no clear statement from the team explaining what's going on and even more, what it is going to happen next? They absolutely owe it to their investors. |
|
|
|
|
Did someone already check the new wallet and could he tell us his impressions? Do masternodes work the same? I'm also curious on why it is version 4.0 instead of 3.0
|
|
|
|
45Mh/s and 79Mh/s  That's not good. It would be good it that hashpower would come from a huge number of people mining, but evidence is suggesting that instead there are less and less miners with more and more hashpower - which means huge and expensive server farms. In other words, WebDollar is getting more and more centralized - JUST AS BITCOIN DID. We all know that the majority of Bitcoins are nowadays produced by less and less players with bigger and bigger mining farms, like Bitmain. The same is starting to happen to Webdollar, and what's bad is that it's happening even BEFORE mass adoption has ever started, and this can in fact jeopardize mass adoption. It has been a big strategic mistake to release the mainnet without already working pools. I had suggested the need of pools even before the mainnet went live, pity I was not listened to. Let's see if the upcoming pools will allow Webdollar to slowly climb back to a wider adoption and resque the project. For sure, it will be hard now, as the majority of the coins are getting in very few hands. To have a great tech is a waste of value if then you mess up everything with poor strategic thinking and unprecise and chaotic planning. The big miners were going to get in no matter what. Maybe even faster if pools were around. In fact, that's what I've noticed with other coins. And there was a lengthy window of time where anyone with a quad core cpu could get a block a day or more. So i think things are going as well as they can in this day and age. If the big miners get in when you already have tens or hundreds of thousands of little miners, their impact is less catastrophic. Now we are having a situation where all webdollars are mined by just a few subjects. And it gets worse and worse. Difficult to escape from such a situation. How will you now motivate ordinary people to mine? Not in this day and age. I see coins show up and they are completely unminable day 1. At least with webdollar there were weeks of opportunity to get blocks with a regular quad core. Yes, it would've been ideal to get pools as soon as the hashrate jumped... But considering the kind of design they're going for, I can see why it's not as easy as with some other coins. The ease of use and mainstream appeal they're going for, give it a huge potential for decentralization, compared to other coins I've seen. Of course it still has a huge potential. But a lot of potential has been wasted by releasing an uncomplete platform, a condition which has given an insane advantage to a few big data centers. I am personallty quite happy to have mined a nice stack of webdollars in the early days, but here we are speaking of the goals of mass adoption, which is a very delicate task to accomplish nowadays. Do the coins which show up and they are completely unminable day 1 then achieve mass adoption? I don't think so. The more you want to have an enduring success, the more you have to stay away from centralization. This is not happening right now - on the contrary! Obviously. Would've been ideal to have the pools ready as soon as the hashrate started going up. But they can't go back in time and change that. All we can do is wait for the pools and support the network once they're out. AT THIS POINT this is indeed all and the best that we can do. But the reason why I'm remembering the mistakes which have been done is to encourage the team to be more humble and to realize their points of weakness and to find solutions to them. A great tech can be revolutionary, something never seen before, but a bad management can tank any Titanic. By acknowledging their points of weakness and their mistakes, hopefully they could avoid further mistakes in future. |
|
|
|
45Mh/s and 79Mh/s That's not good. It would be good it that hashpower would come from a huge number of people mining, but evidence is suggesting that instead there are less and less miners with more and more hashpower - which means huge and expensive server farms. In other words, WebDollar is getting more and more centralized - JUST AS BITCOIN DID. We all know that the majority of Bitcoins are nowadays produced by less and less players with bigger and bigger mining farms, like Bitmain. The same is starting to happen to Webdollar, and what's bad is that it's happening even BEFORE mass adoption has ever started, and this can in fact jeopardize mass adoption. It has been a big strategic mistake to release the mainnet without already working pools. I had suggested the need of pools even before the mainnet went live, pity I was not listened to. Let's see if the upcoming pools will allow Webdollar to slowly climb back to a wider adoption and resque the project. For sure, it will be hard now, as the majority of the coins are getting in very few hands. To have a great tech is a waste of value if then you mess up everything with poor strategic thinking and unprecise and chaotic planning. The big miners were going to get in no matter what. Maybe even faster if pools were around. In fact, that's what I've noticed with other coins. And there was a lengthy window of time where anyone with a quad core cpu could get a block a day or more. So i think things are going as well as they can in this day and age. If the big miners get in when you already have tens or hundreds of thousands of little miners, their impact is less catastrophic. Now we are having a situation where all webdollars are mined by just a few subjects. And it gets worse and worse. Difficult to escape from such a situation. How will you now motivate ordinary people to mine? Not in this day and age. I see coins show up and they are completely unminable day 1. At least with webdollar there were weeks of opportunity to get blocks with a regular quad core. Yes, it would've been ideal to get pools as soon as the hashrate jumped... But considering the kind of design they're going for, I can see why it's not as easy as with some other coins. The ease of use and mainstream appeal they're going for, give it a huge potential for decentralization, compared to other coins I've seen. Of course it still has a huge potential. But a lot of potential has been wasted by releasing an uncomplete platform, a condition which has given an insane advantage to a few big data centers. I am personallty quite happy to have mined a nice stack of webdollars in the early days, but here we are speaking of the goals of mass adoption, which is a very delicate task to accomplish nowadays. Do the coins which show up and they are completely unminable day 1 then achieve mass adoption? I don't think so. The more you want to have an enduring success, the more you have to stay away from centralization. This is not happening right now - on the contrary! |
|
|
|
45Mh/s and 79Mh/s That's not good. It would be good it that hashpower would come from a huge number of people mining, but evidence is suggesting that instead there are less and less miners with more and more hashpower - which means huge and expensive server farms. In other words, WebDollar is getting more and more centralized - JUST AS BITCOIN DID. We all know that the majority of Bitcoins are nowadays produced by less and less players with bigger and bigger mining farms, like Bitmain. The same is starting to happen to Webdollar, and what's bad is that it's happening even BEFORE mass adoption has ever started, and this can in fact jeopardize mass adoption. It has been a big strategic mistake to release the mainnet without already working pools. I had suggested the need of pools even before the mainnet went live, pity I was not listened to. Let's see if the upcoming pools will allow Webdollar to slowly climb back to a wider adoption and resque the project. For sure, it will be hard now, as the majority of the coins are getting in very few hands. To have a great tech is a waste of value if then you mess up everything with poor strategic thinking and unprecise and chaotic planning. The big miners were going to get in no matter what. Maybe even faster if pools were around. In fact, that's what I've noticed with other coins. And there was a lengthy window of time where anyone with a quad core cpu could get a block a day or more. So i think things are going as well as they can in this day and age. If the big miners get in when you already have tens or hundreds of thousands of little miners, their impact is less catastrophic. Now we are having a situation where all webdollars are mined by just a few subjects. And it gets worse and worse. Difficult to escape from such a situation. How will you now motivate ordinary people to mine? |
|
|
|
Is there any re-registration needed on Discord for DSTRA #5 round airdrop campaigning? Kindly update.
I don't think so, but to be sure you should go on Discord and check your status with the bot - this will for sure make it clear if you have to do anything. |
|
|
|
at this point almost nothing will help you; without pool at least is a definitely waste of time and energy.
global hash rate was today between 45Mh/s and 79Mh/s
one i7 gen6 processor, 8 cores at 95%, overclocked at 4GHz give you 1.5-1.7Kh/s; so do your math from here
45Mh/s and 79Mh/s That's not good. It would be good it that hashpower would come from a huge number of people mining, but evidence is suggesting that instead there are less and less miners with more and more hashpower - which means huge and expensive server farms. In other words, WebDollar is getting more and more centralized - JUST AS BITCOIN DID. We all know that the majority of Bitcoins are nowadays produced by less and less players with bigger and bigger mining farms, like Bitmain. The same is starting to happen to Webdollar, and what's bad is that it's happening even BEFORE mass adoption has ever started, and this can in fact jeopardize mass adoption. It has been a big strategic mistake to release the mainnet without already working pools. I had suggested the need of pools even before the mainnet went live, pity I was not listened to. Let's see if the upcoming pools will allow Webdollar to slowly climb back to a wider adoption and resque the project. For sure, it will be hard now, as the majority of the coins are getting in very few hands. To have a great tech is a waste of value if then you mess up everything with poor strategic thinking and unprecise and chaotic planning. |
|
|
|
When will the whitepaper be ready? The Hadrom project really appears to be one of the most promising new crypto projects out there, but an extensive and detailed whitepaper is what it really would need to make the big leap from appearence to an established reality. |
|
|
|
the net is working fine and i m working at V3.0.0.0 with one key bounty function ,new version will be released next week .
This is the news everybody has been expecting for quite some time Hopefullt this will help driving us out of this ice age, as far as confidence and prices is concerned. |
|
|
|
Looks good. However meanwhile the network hashpower has grown so much up to 23 Mh/s that even pools may be not enough to get some stakes if the pool doesn't contain enough people mining - so only the big pools will eventually survive This is a stable version for the experimental pool, we're working to release the official mining pools and allow everyone to make a pool. We designed our mining pools to be very competitive I am just trying it. Looks very good. Are the fractions of Webdollars which rise non-stop in the wallet real or are they an extimate of future earnings when the block will be found? I'm asking that because I see there are still zero condirmed blocks. And what does this mean: "Online Hosts: 0 / 1"? EDIT: Something not working fine with the pool though. After 1 day of mining in it I'm still having no certain webdollars in my wallet. The coins slowly appear only to disappear after a while. After a few hours I had 5 websollars which became zero after a while and now they are 1.2. What's happening exactly? |
|
|
|
|
Now that the court has established who is right and who is wrong, will the CEO really lose control of the tokens and the funds - and of Envion? What if he has meanwhile stolen and hidden the funds? How do these things work from the PRACTICAL point of view?
|
|
|
|
Too many coins held by a few whales. Look elsewhere.
Top 100 owns 76.78 %.
This is NOT exactly what I would call decentralization. It sounds just like a little community coin of a 100 people community + plus an uncertain number of people deluded into being part of something BIG which is actually very LITTLE... |
|
|
|
I have tried to join Storeplex Telegram group but it seems it didn't work out. Even looking for Storeplex on Telegram gives me no results. I won't waist more time trying. Why do you make it so difficult for users to join your social networks? WHich is the purpose?
If you click on the Telegram icon or link in the ANN thread, it will take you straight to the Telegram channel. I have no idea what you're talking about as its incredibly easy to join and the links work..... The link ( https://t.me/joinchat/HkVaF0cOO4clBNwv8i4VcQ) works IF it works. In my case it just opens my Telegram but it gives me no option to join any channel. Moreover, if I do a manual seach of the Storeplex channel, I'm finding absolutely nothing. Since I have already joined tens if not hundreds of other crypto-related Telegram channels with no problem, I assume that the problem resides entirely on your side. This is what I am talking about. |
|
|
|
What has happened to TWIST, the price of TWIST has increased a lot in recent weeks, TWIST's price has been around 50 Satoshis in the previous few months, but recently it has quickly doubled.
TWIST's price is quite volatile due to the scarce volumes. It has surged quite a lot due to the cryptopia listing and now it has been retreating as some airdrop recipients has likely dumped their coins. But this all doesn't really matter, people dumping are just decentralizing the coin more and more, so in the long term that's all very good for Twist, since the project is super-cool, the roadmap is cool and the team is serious. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
