Thanks Goldie, very kind from you (sorry I didn't the message in Slack). I'll PM you my address.

Yeah, I really think they should look for a way. Look: we're into crytos because we like a trustless system where no-one can decide your money is not yours any more, and here we have a situation where you stay away from your coins for a while and then you find out they've made a new release of your coins and what you have in your bag has become worthless. Come on, this is shit that central banks do. If they have some decency they should find a way not to let anyone of the community down. I've read they're preparing an ICO? Well, would be a good occasion for another swap of old coins.

68573 coins, quite something.
Is there still a way to do the swap?

A few questions: When you do a full backup, are you backuping all wallets inside your Byteball app or just the wallet that you happened to be in? What do you have to do EXACTLY to be sure you don't lose your blackbytes?

I've got only 1X reward in the PEN-ICO, so either this 1.0 LoL algorithm is flawed or I don't belong here.
Either way, by by, enjoy playing with your E-peen.
And now who will translate your thread in Klingon?

I suspect that the Stox ICO is probably the reason of the price's recovery. People start to invest now thinking at the fact that Stox WILL HAVE to buy BNT to build its reserve and therefore BNT's price WILL HAVE to rise (BNT price rises everytime someone creates token for making a reserve) and so price is already rising. Just like Ether's price rose dramatically before Bancor's ICo because people needed Eth for buying BNT.
This being said, you can start to imagine what will happen with the price when many other coins will start to build their reserves with Bancor. 
And if you have just a bit more of imagination, you can also start to imagine what will happen with the price if all other other coins would start to build their reserves with Bancor, once it becomes the new standard of the industry. 

+1
Than would be quite a good idea

Not really, at least according to their rules, which are still standing on the front page:

"- Participants are not allowed to change their signature until the crowdsale officially closes."

I think the team should change this rule since it's not fair. It's not a matter of the bounty hunters being interested either in the project or in the reward, it's a matter of not changing the rules in the mid of the play or - if you have to change them - then doing all what it is necessary not to end up screwing anyone. Some bounty hunter could have decided to promote this project for a certain time, having in mind some other use for their signature after a certain date, or others just wouldn't like to put all their eggs in one basket - which is what you'd do if you support a single project for a very long time - if that project would fail, you'd have lost months of other opportunities, while working on many short projects means diversifying risks and opportunities.
So if the rules have been changed the team should give the chance to anyone to leave without losing their little stake which they have earned till that moment. Of course, it's also advisable that the team raises the bounties proportionally with the rise of the campaign duration, since the value of the ICO doesn't necessarily increase by happening later. If people would wear the signature for twice the time declared initially and then get the same reward of a shorter campaign, they would simply have been given half of the promised money - which basically would be cheating.
I am really intrigued by this project and I see all its potential, and I'm totally into futuristic visions too, so I'm not saying that I will necessarily leave this campaign. But the choice must be given to everyone since what people have agreed on is apparently not any more valid in the same original terms.

Actually right now Bancor has already almost climbed back to ICO's price vs Ether. That's a very good sign.

Will the release of this new Wallet-DEX interface also involve changes in the way ICOs can be organised? I see there is a crowdfunding option visible and somewhere I've read there there is the plan to make ICO's safer to avoid scammers.

Yes, it certainly looks great and cool. But are there any clues on WHEN it should go live?

Of course. Once you activate Proof of LoL there's no way to extinguish it apart from death, and it would just grow and spread everywhere.
Perhaps devs should award Penisium also to the funniest posts on thread. Proof of LoL has escaped their exclusive control now that thread partecipant are starting to perform Proof of LoL by themselves.
So just widen your Proof of LoL concept and so make more Penisium hodlers, devs!
LoL.

This breakout is amazing. I estimate 12$ this year's target unless the whole cryptos double, in this case 24$

FUDhash is skrinking all aspects of Penisium, E-peen becomes invisible, wallets become dry. I think I will create a ViagraToken to be analairdropped on every proud holder or semi-holder of Penisium. This should revitalize the nework.
Or not.

This is excellent news. I hope you'll be even more creative this time in your bounty designing, so that you'll establish new best practices also in the crypto bounty sector.

I'm looking forward to get a look at the bounty campaign... when it'll be online.

July 19 has been lasting for quite some days already

My little advise: not do promises that you are not able to keep. If you can't deliver in time something as simple as a bounty campaign, how do you believe people will trust you'll deliver in time something super complex which even needs proper AI to actually function?

What does it mean "a DM"?

One question: will the top 1000 rule still apply for the distribution in november? Still mentioned on the first page of thread.

I too didn't find my Twitter and Slack stakes in the spreadsheet. Actually I didn't find even myself in the social network bounties spreadhsheet even though I had got my "stars" inside my bounty account.