Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 07:44:56 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... 752 »
2521  Other / Meta / Re: Is the Default trust system still working/active? on: December 08, 2018, 03:49:10 AM
I tried using my own custom trust list, but was fairly quick to find problems with trust ratings within my trust network, and frequently had to research why  certain people whose ratings I didn't agree with was in my trust network, and excluding many who either gave many ratings I disagreed with, or who included many people who I didn't want in my trust network.

I suspect the root cause reason why so many do not use custom trust lists is because so many people are bad at creating maintaining a custom list, and cannot be bothered to keep it updated. It only takes a small number of people whose ratings/list is 'trusted' that maintains a bad trust list to cause problems in the entire trust network.

I want to think about this topic some more....more to come on this subject
2522  Economy / Reputation / Re: Using a bot to complete bounty activities?!? on: December 01, 2018, 07:40:23 PM
Report them to twitter and to bounty manager.

If the advertiser is getting the exposure they are paying for this should not be an issue.
Does it apply to bitcointalk too?
If advertiser is getting the exposure bots and spam shouldn't be problem? I don't think so. It shouldn't be different with twitter or any other social media.
The appropriate response to someone using a bot to spam on bitcointalk is to ban them, assuming the posts are breaking forum rules. 

There are a couple of bots running around here that some may be interested in advertising in their sig space. If someone can develop an AI bot that is smart enough to post intelligently, a reasonable person not on a power trip will not have an issue with this.   
2523  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Where do you fall on the political compass? on: December 01, 2018, 05:36:20 AM

2524  Economy / Reputation / Re: Using a bot to complete bounty activities?!? on: December 01, 2018, 05:20:27 AM
If the advertiser is getting the exposure they are paying for this should not be an issue.

The policing of made up “rules” for bounty campaigns is ridiculous.
2525  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lutpin and his kinds are not gods so stop it. on: December 01, 2018, 05:17:57 AM
Being 6 weeks late in paying someone, especially with no communication should be a massive red flag and it would be prudent to not trust him with additional money until at least this gets resolved, possibly longer depending on the circumstances the money is paid, assuming it eventually gets paid.

He has been trusted with a lot of money in the past but you don’t know his financial situation now. You also don’t know if he has decided that his reputation isn’t worth the amount he is holding for others.

I would avoid doing business with him until this is resolved.
2526  Other / Meta / Re: hall finney last login time at bitcointalk.org on: December 01, 2018, 05:05:42 AM
This was discussed around the time it happened and I believe it was speculated at the time that it was his wife or other family member that accessed the account.
2527  Other / Politics & Society / Re: #breaking Michael Avenatti arrested (report) on: November 29, 2018, 05:25:33 AM
Ahaha. The charges were dropped in LA.

The charges were not dropped, the DA declined to bring felony charges based on the evidence. This is far from evidence of Creepy Porn Lawyer's proof of innocence.

https://www.newsweek.com/michael-avenatti-calls-jacob-wohl-complete-fraud-who-should-be-incarcerated-1229016

I wonder if Jacob Wohl will be accountable for slander laws.

Surefire Intelligence is such an oxymoron company name; might as well be Surefire Ignorance.


Quote
Avenatti also floated the possibility of taking legal action against TMZ for the story, which originally identified the woman involved as the lawyer’s estranged wife, Lisa-Storie Avenatti. He tweeted that the person who wrote and approved the article “better get their checkbook ready” because the story was “purposely malicious and false.”

“It was designed to harm Lisa, me and my family and we are going to expose TMZ for what they did,” he tweeted. “No journalist should rely on or defend garbage like that.” 
1 - I don't think there is any evidence that Wohl was behind Avenatti's arrest. I haven't seen any.

The fact that the victim was Avenatti's (ex) girlfriend instead of his ex wife, as briefly reported by TMZ is not going to give Avenatti a cause of action for libel. This discrepancy would only have a nominal impact on his reputation. The reporting that Avenatti said "she hit me first" when he was in the apartment building is most damaging to his reputation, and to my knowledge, this has not been refuted by Avenatti.
2528  Other / Meta / Re: Hero Member account locked! @ADMIN on: November 29, 2018, 05:13:53 AM
The OP has a decent amount of positive trust and trade history.

Provided there are no red flags indicating the OP might not be the owner of his account, I would recommend processing his request. 

@OP -- I would recommend that you amend your signed message to include an email address you want associated with your account. Your signed message does not specify ask to have your account unlocked. Perhaps a good signed message would be:
Quote
My account <account> has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to <email>. The current date is <date>.
or
Quote
My account <account> has been hacked/lost. I confirm the email associated with my account should be <email>. The current date is <date>. Please unlock my account.
2529  Other / Meta / Re: bitcointalk should make their own coin on: November 29, 2018, 01:29:44 AM
I've heard rumors that people who have recently been banned for plagiarism are planning to fork Bitcoin and get their own chain called:

Carry a Signature SV (SV stands for 'shitposting violator')

users should
spam.

Satoshi's Vision!
I think the first person to use this argument to have their ban lifted should automatically get unbanned.



I think this actually would be a good idea, perhaps for things like captcha bypasses, and the ability to rank up and/or the ability to wear (better) signatures. The purpose of using it instead of using Bitcoin would be so that micropayments can be used without bloating the blockchain. 
2530  Other / Meta / Re: Trust spam report + suggestion on: November 26, 2018, 05:06:39 AM
I don't think OP should worry about untrusted feedback. It will not reflect on your trust rating unless they become DT.
The problem with this is that it is difficult to pressure someone to remove the rating long after they give the rating if they are later included in the DT network. Also, if someone not in DT starting leaving questionable ratings that do not receive pushback, then someone in DT might start leaving similar questionable ratings.
2531  Other / Meta / Re: Censorship on BCT software forum is a joke. on: November 26, 2018, 04:51:39 AM
Can you post the text of what you had deleted and the threads these posts were originally posted in?

The administration (and often the moderators) frequently make questionable comments in regards to the quality of software of Bitcoin Core, however I am not sure I would say forum policies result in posts being deleted that amount to censorship. I am open to being shown wrong however.
2532  Economy / Reputation / Re: What happened to Lutpin? on: November 25, 2018, 05:55:24 AM
It doesn't sound like Lutpin was actually acting as an escrow agent to the campaign if they were delays caused by the owner of 777 casino.

If the owner of the 777 casino allowed the escrow wallet to become depleted, then lutpin should have warned participants that he was unable to guarantee payment.

He was escrow for Bitvest, also on the 777 campaign the escrow wallet was filled, he could have paid 1-2 weeks. He is unprofessional.
If he has the btc to pay participants but hasn’t done so, that would also be concerning. Especially considering he hasn’t given any explanation for the delay.
2533  Economy / Reputation / Re: What happened to Lutpin? on: November 24, 2018, 10:56:08 PM
It doesn't sound like Lutpin was actually acting as an escrow agent to the campaign if they were delays caused by the owner of 777 casino.

If the owner of the 777 casino allowed the escrow wallet to become depleted, then lutpin should have warned participants that he was unable to guarantee payment.
2534  Other / Meta / Re: Is merit abuse an issue worthy of temp banning or at least DT negative trust? on: November 24, 2018, 05:43:40 AM
I have been trying to enforce the merit abuse rules. 
Where can one find these rules? How were these rules enacted?
Rules can be implicit / common practice.
It would be nice to have someone come up with a list of DOs /DONTs regarding merit based on roughly 1 year of practice sooner or later.

So far, I guess it's safe to assume that it's considered "blatant merit abuse" if you receive merit in an "obvious" return of merit.
Since that's heavily subjective, usually only cases of "considerable" amounts of merit are sanctioned.
Also, a single merit to a newbie may be scrutinized.

Other than that, I'm at a loss when it comes to "rules".
I am strongly against telling people what they can and cannot do with things they have duely earned, and merit falls into this category by way of the fact they ultimately received merit for making a ‘good’ post at one point.

Also these ‘rules’ are something that a dozen or so people have implemented (and enforce unevenly) out of two million registered users and hundreds of thousands of active users. These people were in no way elected to make the rules and you can’t argue this is a private forum because it’s own is on the record as being against these rules.

Further, the concept of merit, or limited amount of karma that can be sent based on the amount received is a very uncommon concept and I would not be surprised to see many who are unfamiliar with merit testing it out with their alts. Sending merit is not reversible, so if someone does this and later sees it is “against the rules” they are liable to receive negative trust forever even if they conduct themselves in a trustworthy way.

Sending merit to an alt is not akin to scamming, however the presence of a negative rating implies someone is a scammer. If someone sees many people with negative ratings for this reason, they will give less weight to a negative rating to an actual scammer who has legitimately (attempted to) stolen money.
2535  Other / Meta / Re: Is merit abuse an issue worthy of temp banning or at least DT negative trust? on: November 23, 2018, 04:20:13 AM
I have been trying to enforce the merit abuse rules. 

Where can one find these rules? How were these rules enacted?
2536  Other / Meta / Re: Is merit abuse an issue worthy of temp banning or at least DT negative trust? on: November 22, 2018, 04:56:23 PM
re topic: No
2537  Other / Politics & Society / Re: #breaking Michael Avenatti arrested (report) on: November 19, 2018, 12:57:14 AM
A suspect can deny gravity if they want, they are free to, that doesn't make gravity go away or change. Also denying charges is not equivalent to rejecting the entire judicial process. Also, weren't you people fond of saying over and over again "this is not a criminal investigation, it is a job interview?" So which is it?

The kettle calling the pot black right there.

Weren't you one of the people the enjoy sucking trump's cock? Cause I'm pretty sure you do that in every thread regardless of the topic.

Avenatti respects the legal system unlike others.
Um, yea, that’s not true.

Creepy Porn Lawyer is under investigation for multiple ethical issues by the Bar. He is under investigation by law enforcement for perjury related issues.

On its face, he has taken actions that were not in the best interest of his client but would benefit him.

I am fairly confident there are other issues that I can’t think of right now.
2538  Economy / Speculation / Re: CSW's "hash wars" impact on BTC price? on: November 17, 2018, 05:12:08 AM
An assumption made by crypto holders is that miners will act in their own self interest and not risk the value of their equipment to try to attack the Blockchain of a coin they are mining, especially for a major (alt🧺) coin.

CW is suggesting this might not be a valid assumption. If BCH is effectively destroyed then I suspect there will be much less confidence in crypto including bitcoin. If BCH survives without a Blockchain related attack, additional confidence in crypto may be installed.
2539  Other / Politics & Society / Re: FBI agent’s text to lover: ‘We’ll stop’ Trump from becoming president on: November 17, 2018, 05:00:30 AM
So will we see coveted Impeachment or not? Is House of Representative enough for that, or will Lords... erm... senators block it?
Inpeachment is basically an indictment and the senate will act as a jury to the charges. If the senate votes by 2/3 majority to convict then the president will be removed from office.

The house will almost certainly impeach Trump, possibly multiple times however the senate will not come close to getting any kind of majority to convict, let alone a 2/3 majority.
2540  Other / Meta / Re: Can we sue bitcoin.com for plagiarism? on: November 16, 2018, 07:56:30 AM
I am not sure if this is a serious post or not.

There are a number of problems with your case, the largest being that forum.bitcoin.com is not plagiarizing bitcointalk.

There are likely a large number of forums with similar board names, and there is a decent chance that some of the admins of each of the forums had not even visited any of the other forums with similar board names.

I’m surprised they didn’t go any steps further.
I am not even sure what this is supposed to mean.
Pages: « 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 ... 752 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!