Lowest ask Wnobt on dex is 6 satoshi , but if you check " trade history " , you'll see " sell & buy " at 100k satoshi or greater. Wierd , who is doing fake trading ?,
This is a huge shortcoming in the Waves platform! - Anybody (say "you" do it) can create a new Token called "Bitcoin" for 1 Waves ($2.65)
- This Bitcoin-token won't have a green "tick" in front of it to show it's official, but apart from that it looks the same
- After that, you can trade WNOBT (or any other token) for your own Bitcoin-token
- So far so good, but there's the shortcoming: the trades with the fake Bitcoin-token show up on the trade history between WNOBT and (the real) Bitcoin token! This shows the real "BTC" abbreviation and there's no way to distinguish between the fake and real Bitcoin-tokens in the trade history
- In short: don't trust the trade history to decide how much you're willing to spend on a token.
|
|
|
|
BITCOIN IS DEAD!!
SELL EVERYTHING!
IT ONLY WORTH WHAT IT WAS WORTH 12 HOURS AGO! PANIC! THIS IS THE END!
sell it to me!!!
I noticed your signature and it indeed suits you well. You are just scamming everyone, especially those who are not fully aware of what things happen around here. You are giving baseless claims then starts scamming people about bitcoin being dead and sell their BTC to you. What a big load of crap we have here. Only fools will be trapped in your bait. Oh and one more thing, get a life dude. the use of irony to mock or convey contempt (quote from Google) Edit LittleBitFunny beat me to it. Back ontopic: let me put it this way: every (fraction of a) Bitcoin I ever sold in my life, is worth more now. After every price dip Bitcoin has ever had (up to 3 hours ago), it reached a higher value eventually. I have no doubt it will reach a higher value again. It could be tomorrow, it could be next year. |
|
|
|
Nobody here who could answer my questions? 4) How many Blackbytes will there be in total? Like Bytes 10^5?
answers this question: Total Supply 1,000,000 GBYTE (10 15 bytes). |
|
|
|
Look at the graph at coinmarketcap:  It has a typical annual pump and dump history. I may buy some at 20 sat. |
|
|
|
Someone recently showed me Changelly (and used it for much lower amounts, say 0.1% of what you did), and I was surprised their rates are almost 1 on 1 compared to an exchange. The last time I used Shapeshift I got a lower rate, so that could be the reason to use it. 60 Bitcoin on the other hand is a hell of a lot of money to entrust to a stranger, and it could be very motivating to run away with. This thread: Changelly.com legit service ? ended a year ago, but doesn't make me trust them. Their forum account was last active today. Their last post: Due to dramatically increased user queries, our support team is being heavily overloaded. Anyway, we try to answer as fast as we can. Hope for your patience and understanding! Thanks.
Needless to say, waiting 3 days for a response after losing 60 Bitcoin is too long. |
|
|
|
Can waves make preventive controls on these airdrops for prevent the scam dev?
I only started using Waves because of an airdrop on Bitcointalk. It was indeed a worthless coin, but it also contributes to the number of Waves users. Since then, Waves' value went up by 150%. |
|
|
|
Do you get more GBB for your existing GBB, in the next distribution?
No. D3m0nKinGx and European Central Bank are wrong on this. When in doubt, just read the OP: The snapshots of Bitcoin blockchain and Byteball DAG for the 6th round will be taken on the Full Moon of June, on June 9, 2017 at 13:10 UTC. What you receive, is proportional to your balances in BTC and Bytes:
BTC to bytes: 1 BTC of proven balance gives you 62.5 MB (0.0625 GB)
BTC to blackbytes: 1 BTC of proven balance gives you 2.1111 * 62.5 million blackbytes (money supply of blackbytes is 2.1111 times more than that of bytes)
Bytes to bytes: 1 byte on any Byteball address gives you 0.2 new bytes
Bytes to blackbytes: 1 byte on linked Byteball address gives you 0.42222 blackbytes
You only receive GBB (blackbytes) if you own GB (bytes) and have the address linked. Owning GBB doesn't get you anything extra. |
|
|
|
How many % of the prizepool that will be paid to the winner? Good question! We take only 0.003% from each deposit. Yes, I know is so low  Your site says "transparency" several times, but I couldn't find this information. Are you sure you don't mean 0.3%, and not 0.003%? You're saying you take $0.00003 from every dollar now. I think it's won't work this way, I'll tell you why. I just ended a giveaway for free lottery tickets that had been running for almost a year, because barely anyone bought tickets anymore. And there's Bitcoin fees. If I pay your Lottery $1, I have to add at least $0.50 in fees. If you want to pay me my prize, each $1 input costs you another $0.50 in fees. Your 0.003% can't pay for that, so it comes from the prize pool, right? |
|
|
|
No,the premine as same
I know the premine is the same amount, but if PoW stopped early, that means the premine is a larger percentage than 10%, right? The total number of coins is lower. Edit: Total coin supply 233333333 coins How is the rest of the coins going to be created if PoW stopped? If it's going to be from 10% PoS per year, that will take a while. And it once again means premine is much more than 10%. |
|
|
|
The Pool seems to have removed NOBT. Unless this is intentional: is it staking only now? This is still not clear to me. Also, mine stopped staking 4 days ago. Total coin supply 233333333 coins Total coin supply 233333333 coins
Premine percent 10%
Premine amount 23333333 coins
Which is it? Coin supply is currently 48457082, which means the premine is now 48%. |
|
|
|
Thanks for taking care of them so quickly! I'll stop archiving them. lfwjaw deserves a ban too: Copy/paste: It seems that this project just picking up the pace in true senses now after this distribution. I see many new people are active in the thread and are sharing their experience of getting some piece of pie from recent distribution. Untraceable transaction and highly secure network is going to be main reason of the success for the byteabll. Community is growing rapidly now which is also very important as it will become community driven project soon.
Original: It seems that this project just picking up the pace in true senses now after this distribution. I see many new people are active in the thread and are sharing their experience of getting some piece of pie from recent distribution. Untraceable transaction and highly secure network is going to be main reason of the success for the byteabll. Community is growing rapidly now which is also very important as it will become community driven project soon.
Always nice to look the cleanup in modlog once you're on to them Jenny Moll is a total shitposter. I did find a copy/paste, but to be fair I think it's a failed quote: Copy/paste (failed quote?): The problem is, most noobs use web wallets because they are too lazy to download Core, or any of the wallets that will give you proper options like -zapwallettxes, RPF or whatever.
Not too lazy, but take up too much memory。If the memory footprint is small, I will choose CORE wallet.It's really big.Is this the cause of the obstruction?
Original:The problem is, most noobs use web wallets because they are too lazy to download Core, or any of the wallets that will give you proper options like -zapwallettxes, RPF or whatever. The "asking for miners" resort is pretty lame and not very user friendly... it's a problem. Web wallets should be forced to give more options in case this happens.
|
|
|
|
i have two questions, when the next distribution will be? and can i link the same bitcoin address to another byteball address for the next distribution or i need more bitcoin linked with new address
Déjà-vu  (..or bot) I had the same feeling, Not only for this post btw. He has been banned already. Just like I have a feeling the post above yours will get the same. I've reported them in Meta. |
|
|
|
Feel free to report plagiarism in this thread. But please make it easy on the moderators by checking modlog the next day (or a few days later) and edit your post when the account has been banned.
Example: username banned!
UpdateBelow is the answer by mprep (Global Moderator). 33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e] - Does this rule apply to images? AFAIK no, it doesn't apply to images.
Thank you, can I quote you? Feel free.
UpdateTheymos wrote this: Nobody is banned strictly because of "the rules"; it's always handled case-by-case, but almost always, plagiarists deserve to be permabanned.
If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.
Most plagiarism from copy/pasting spambots or shitposters deserves a permban. However, Admin can make exceptions if it's better for the forum if the user in question returns. Example: redsn0w got a 30 day ban, and 2 year signature ban. Signature bans are displayed on the profile page, and have been handed out before. I'm quoting the image to draw attention to this update:
You can use Vod's BPIP.org to check if an account has been banned (thanks Veleor).
Update to this topic
See |LIST| Banned users for a list of 159k banned accounts. See which one suits you best, so we don't report them again.
I just stumbled upon a proven case of framing someone for plagiarism:The scammer can take the original text from the forum, post on his website changing the date and write a complaint, and also delete it by editing it. We need to study this problem. After investigation, and with help from the rest of the mod team, I've determined that inbizin = bitkoinguru$$$. He created that blog post (registering the domain in June) and then made that post in Meta in order to frame you. The moderator who actually did the banning was not a Russian moderator, but was acting upon what seemed to be a clear case of plagiarism. The thought of this type of attack had occurred to me before, but this is the first time that it's actually been done successfully. I'll have to think about countermeasures.
Users lhmrij and xca900174 deserve a permban. Update: banned. lhmrijI noticed this post ( archived): I wonder how the recent BTC TX backlog will affect future byte distributions.
This is a direct copy/past from this post ( archived): I wonder how the recent BTC TX backlog will affect future byte distributions.
I checked the post he made before this one ( archived): Blackcoin's growth is actually quite modest compared to many other alts. I wouldn't read too much into this without context.
It's also a copy/past from someone else ( archived): Blackcoin's growth is actually quite modest compared to many other alts. I wouldn't read too much into this without context.
Edit: xca900174This user does the same. Copy/paste ( archived): i have two questions, when the next distribution will be? and can i link the same bitcoin address to another byteball address for the next distribution or i need more bitcoin linked with new address
Original post ( archived): i have two questions, when the next distribution will be? and can i link the same bitcoin address to another byteball address for the next distribution or i need more bitcoin linked with new address?
I doubt they speaks English. Both are Chinese, both use the same SONM ICO signature.
|
|
|
|
There is one flaw in your service: how is someone going to pay you for your service, if paying you can take just as long as the original transaction takes to confirm? I suggest migrating to a better wallet with less inputs.
The wallet has no influence on how many inputs you received. Do you even know how Bitcoin transactions work? |
|
|
|
I recently paid $11 for a $20k transaction. I still think that's not too bad. I also paid $24 for a $50k transaction about an hour ago.
On a big transaction it might not matter much, but that doesn't change the problem high fees cause for small transactions. The amount of money you send has nothing to do with the fee you pay. I can show you a $550 transaction with $27 fee, and at 231 sat/byte it's not even enough to confirm fast. needless to say the days of making paper wallets of .1 BTC and handing them out to people are gone with these fees. When Bitcoin was worth $200, a 0.1 BTC paper wallet was a nice $20 gift, and could be spend without fee at all (if the coins had matured enough to have medium priority). Now 0.01 BTC is (almost) $20, but it requires $1 on fees. And another $1 when the receiving party wants to spend it. I'm using what I believe will be bitcoin's replacement, XEM, for cold storage wallets This one (and many other altcoins) goes up by many (dozens of) percents per day. You don't need cold storage to make a quick buck there. But I think the rise of alts is mainly caused by Bitcoin's limitations. Everybody still wants Bitcoins, but it's much cheaper and faster to use altcoins. |
|
|
|
Byteball White Paper Page 1:
.. Witnesses are reputable users with real-world identities, and users who
name them expect them to never try to double-spend. ..
Byteball White Paper Page 9:
.. some of the participants of our network
are non-anonymous reputable people or companies who might have a long
established reputation, or they are businesses interested in keeping the network
healthy. We’ll call them witnesses...
(I would also recommend anyone to read till page 11 ..)
ByteFan is posting his witness on a French server in this topic a lot. He registered his account on Bitcointalk just last month, which is no where close to being a reputable person or company. Posting it over and over again seems to be his way to get people to use his witness, but I see no reason for trusting him. It could be he's just a honest enthousiast, but I can't know for sure. What would be more interesting is to be able to decide how you can trust a witness. A high level green trust Bitcointalk user could work, but also exchange Bittrex could decide to run a public witness. |
|
|
|
This give away will be awarded if the prize of btc will be for more than 4 hours 2000$ at bitstamp value.
That can be any moment now! I'm in  1PjpEgknyKxQKXtMcYFDym8odkfohFGkui |
|
|
|
I can do this, but let's keep it in public for the sake of discussion. After all, you're a Newbie with zero trust. I am looking for alpha testers for a new bitcoin mixer.
Required:
- you can use Tor
- you can use Bitcoin I love your last requirement If you are interested send me PM with following information:
1. Which wallet do you use? Core, Mycelium, Electrum, Blockchain.info 2. Do you split funds to multiple wallets for privacy? Say I have 1 Bitcoin, and I split it up to 3 different wallets. That barely improves privacy. If anything, it links those 3 wallets together. 3. Have you ever used other mixers? I don't use the ones that call themselves mixers. I have used several other methods to "mix" coins though. 4. Have you ever used Bitcoin private keys? Let's put it this way: if you don't have the private key, you don't own the Bitcoins. However, this has nothing to do with a mixer. Why do you ask? I am looking for testers with mixed ability and experience. Responding "no"
or "i do not know" to one or all questions does not disqualify you.
I will contact only selected testers with service address and additional information. Here too: keep this in public! If you think people will start sending funds to a random address a Newbie calls a mixer, well, you're probably right, people get scammed in many different ways. I will pay 0.01 BTC for your opinion about idea, functions and
usability of new service. Original and insightful review may
get tip of another 0.01 BTC.
Once again: why hiding in PM? |
|
|
|
The signing-problem above was solved in a separate thread. I currently have 1.3 BTC linked for the next round. I might add Stellar Lumens to this thread, starting from the end of June. |
|
|
|
|
Username : dsffdssdf
Bet ID : 16,811,162,710
Fifth click at 1.13x was red.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
