I go the exact opposite route that people are suggesting above. I always want to use an android phone and it has to be rooted. That's literally the only way that I can remove all of the company spyware, override invasive permissions, etc. Ie, it's the only way that I can ensure that the software I'm running is not malicious. I also only keep small amounts on mobile phones, the kind of amounts which are useful for buying a beer or a meal. But as to security: if you don't have root, then you know that someone else does. My suggestion for better private key is printed, because it could be your phone is lost or get stolen.
But if you don't have too many btc, blockchain android wallet is safe enough to store all of your bitcoin.
Seems like you weren't around or weren't paying attention when the blockchain wallet was losing everyone's bitcoins by using random.org as a source of entropy and not checking the http status of the reply before hashing the page. Literally, I think you just recommended the one android wallet with the biggest known security problems to date. Good job. |
|
|
|
@Hippie Tech - I am not sure I am understanding the context of your quotes in relation to dooglus supporting ponzis.
These and the posts that followed depict how he manipulates people and/or their coins/ponzi. The easymine/stakes, the fork and "the digger" are examples as to how he goes about his business. I don't know if I understand either. Are you saying that dooglus caused or was "the digger". As I recall, that digging whale, as he was known, caused clam price to drop by an order of magnitude. What would dooglus stand to gain by devaluing his own money by 90%? |
|
|
|
You already can with *.
The dot is a separator? So if I'm trying to find a user "Ted", how do I use the star-dot syntax to avoid finding "unitedpx"? |
|
|
|
You have a point there when you say that its the competitors that were the loudest group when it got to accusations.
The only thing that concerned me personally in the whole fight was that there were other dice sites that went through similar path before running off, but still, you're right - it's long way from being a scam.
Indeed. Either way DaDice is long gone and the people behind it have abandoned their project
But apparently you're not done trolling here, are you? Anyone who doesn't think that Quickseller has a long history of trolling just-dice with unsubstantiated attacks using many alts only has to look back in this very thread. |
|
|
|
Kyle's site was actively deceiving people because it was trying to get people to believe that there was no risk to send money to his ponzi.
The script that dooglus designed is something that is primarily used to scam and is designed to scam. There are "legitimate" non-illegal uses for cocaine, however that does not mean that a cocaine producer (or maybe someone who designs a way to more efficiently produce cocaine) is not breaking the law.
And on the topic of Kyle's ponzi not scamming anyone, maybe you should look a little closer.
The address that players were to send their CLAM to was xWSg3afDSs7gRr5uDBWiUcpS7rJpmv8nra
On the first transaction the above received 1f1717abceb479a5948a3a5e8ee87731f3ff2543c586157d40d653fb108176c0, the following addresses used inputs to fund this transaction:
xH3Kh6WDTgdAnY3rAnMdonShezHLJgitt7
xHLd7SgohBXzqR271L3vZSr8Ha9dg8wE5K
xETZYYYZumiZLFxj2fqfzuftKaXLufYpsv
xDkh9AeqJBPxo1e3v12GZunJDbyXi7CL4C
xNogJskant1BznVFKvJEpSFGqmKVRLtaJg
x8XPofV7sUxACPPBvob6UPBxL6k8fCmmJ7
xWnYCzLWWfhkdqFp4hpAJWqyrbQd7J9jnV
The amount sent to the ponzi was 0.000337 CLAM
The amount the ponzi promised to return to the players was 125% of the amount sent, which works out to 0.00042125 CLAM.
None of the above addresses have received a transaction in this amount. (there is nothing in the thread that says that tx fees will be deducted from the amount sent). Therefore it is reasonable to say that Kyle scammed the first person who played at his ponzi out of 0.0004225 CLAM. Just because no one in the thread (or anywhere else) was complaining about getting scammed does not mean that no one was scammed.
Since we're apparently enjoying the world of baseless wild speculation, we might just as easily speculate that the first transaction was KLYE himself, testing things out. And that the reason none of those addresses received their returns of a 10s of satoshis is that the script was broken and needed fixed. We can also speculate that if these were legitimate players who needed paid back, that KLYE did so later to their satisfaction. We can also speculate that QS's mom has a beautiful moustache, but then again, since wild speculation not based on facts isn't really that useful, maybe we should leave all of this aside. I am not speculating. The first person to send CLAMs to that ponzi really did get scammed. There are also exactly zero transactions spent from the ponzi CLAM address that paid out the amount promised as outlined in the OP of the ponzi thread. This might be a leeeeetle convincing, if say, you had someone claiming that they got scammed, and that that person wasn't just one of your alts. @Your Point Is Invalid -- the dooglus supporters/fanboys are simply trying to derail this thread with off-topic ad hominem attacks. Any discussion about me belongs in a different thread and these people know this, however these people choose to post them here to distract from the fact that dooglus did work on a script that was designed to steal from people.....in other word they are trying to distract from the fact that dooglus helped other scammers steal from others. Or, it might be that some people in here are merely drawing attention to the fact that you've been spamming lies using multiple accounts in an attempt to damage dooglus' reputation for nearly a year now. I dunno, I think it's kinda relevant that the OP of this thread is your alt and that you opened a thread with the same thing under your main account right around the same time. I would suggest that you take 30 seconds to read the OP and see who posted it  Okay, whoops, forgive me for confusing this thread with the other one you started on the same topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1389916.0 I guess at least you're only bumping one of them now so that's nice of you. Kindly refrain from posting ad hominem attacks while trying to distract from the fact that dooglus has a long history of helping scammers steal additional money from others. Kindly refain from non-sequitor in attempting to distract from the fact that your many threads on this topic are all bascially ad-hominem sour grapes. bought accounts can be used to do a number of things, code built for scamming can only be used for scamming
Not true, code "built for scamming", as you say, can be used to educate people about how to code. If you show me some broken code and I show you how to fix it then I think it's pretty easy to argue that I just used that code to show you something about how to program---irrespective of your intended use for the now-fixed code. What's more, ponzi code specifically can be used to illustrate how to calculate percentages, how to automate transactions, .... seems to me there's a myriad of educational uses at a minimum. Not true. The script was specifically designed to steal money from others via ponzi scams. The code on GitHub by dooglus even contained HTML regarding ponzis. I haven't reviewed the script, I have reviewed your long history of false accusations and nonsense. I am also familiar with dooglus' kind attitude towards those who are trying to educate themselves about technical matters---anyone who looks through his post history can see that for themself. That's kinda where I'm coming from here. Furthermore, no reputable educational institution will provide direction to work on something whose only non-educational use is to scam/steal/is illegal. I would think that is something that would be taught at the University of Washington....
I wonder what you have against the University of Washington. Is the University of North Carolina better in some way? |
|
|
|
I would like to invest into the house edge but how do I do that? I can't find the link
This site was pretty much undoubtedly a scam, although they denied as much for months until they shut down several months ago (late last year IIRC). Says the guy with a -15 trust rating and a "trade with extreme caution" tag under his name who pretty much spent months trolling these guys incessantly. In fact, IIRC, they never scammed anyone but had to deal with mountains of trolls who said they were gonna do so simply because they honored their investors' privacy. Dont mean to argue too much, but i gotta say that, from what i was reading up on dadice, that they were given an option to show their bankroll with no attack on investor privacy (if im not mistaken, dooglas was the one suggesting it). The suspicion of insolvency with no evidence otherwise is enough to avoid the site for most people. At the least, investments on such sites should not be encouraged. I think you're correct that several people stepped in to say "okay, you only have to show it to me, not to everyone" and that they still refused. It's crucial to note, however, that dooglus and Stunna (the people who offered to help validate their bankroll) are competitors. You could argue that they had every right to say, no, i'm not going to show all of my funding sources to my biggest competitors in order to convince them to vouch for me. My point here was that when QS says the site was a scam that I want to point out that I'm not aware of a single scam they've perpetrated. They did suffer from low public image after not working with the competition to validate their funding, but that's a long way from "is a scam". Yeah you can ignore those people completely. The fact that they did something to get negative feedback shows what kind of individuals they are.
Indeed. |
|
|
|
Kyle's site was actively deceiving people because it was trying to get people to believe that there was no risk to send money to his ponzi.
The script that dooglus designed is something that is primarily used to scam and is designed to scam. There are "legitimate" non-illegal uses for cocaine, however that does not mean that a cocaine producer (or maybe someone who designs a way to more efficiently produce cocaine) is not breaking the law.
And on the topic of Kyle's ponzi not scamming anyone, maybe you should look a little closer.
The address that players were to send their CLAM to was xWSg3afDSs7gRr5uDBWiUcpS7rJpmv8nra
On the first transaction the above received 1f1717abceb479a5948a3a5e8ee87731f3ff2543c586157d40d653fb108176c0, the following addresses used inputs to fund this transaction:
xH3Kh6WDTgdAnY3rAnMdonShezHLJgitt7
xHLd7SgohBXzqR271L3vZSr8Ha9dg8wE5K
xETZYYYZumiZLFxj2fqfzuftKaXLufYpsv
xDkh9AeqJBPxo1e3v12GZunJDbyXi7CL4C
xNogJskant1BznVFKvJEpSFGqmKVRLtaJg
x8XPofV7sUxACPPBvob6UPBxL6k8fCmmJ7
xWnYCzLWWfhkdqFp4hpAJWqyrbQd7J9jnV
The amount sent to the ponzi was 0.000337 CLAM
The amount the ponzi promised to return to the players was 125% of the amount sent, which works out to 0.00042125 CLAM.
None of the above addresses have received a transaction in this amount. (there is nothing in the thread that says that tx fees will be deducted from the amount sent). Therefore it is reasonable to say that Kyle scammed the first person who played at his ponzi out of 0.0004225 CLAM. Just because no one in the thread (or anywhere else) was complaining about getting scammed does not mean that no one was scammed.
Since we're apparently enjoying the world of baseless wild speculation, we might just as easily speculate that the first transaction was KLYE himself, testing things out. And that the reason none of those addresses received their returns of a 10s of satoshis is that the script was broken and needed fixed. We can also speculate that if these were legitimate players who needed paid back, that KLYE did so later to their satisfaction. We can also speculate that QS's mom has a beautiful moustache, but then again, since wild speculation not based on facts isn't really that useful, maybe we should leave all of this aside. @Your Point Is Invalid -- the dooglus supporters/fanboys are simply trying to derail this thread with off-topic ad hominem attacks. Any discussion about me belongs in a different thread and these people know this, however these people choose to post them here to distract from the fact that dooglus did work on a script that was designed to steal from people.....in other word they are trying to distract from the fact that dooglus helped other scammers steal from others. Or, it might be that some people in here are merely drawing attention to the fact that you've been spamming lies using multiple accounts in an attempt to damage dooglus' reputation for nearly a year now. I dunno, I think it's kinda relevant that the OP of this thread is your alt and that you opened a thread with the same thing under your main account right around the same time. bought accounts can be used to do a number of things, code built for scamming can only be used for scamming
Not true, code "built for scamming", as you say, can be used to educate people about how to code. If you show me some broken code and I show you how to fix it then I think it's pretty easy to argue that I just used that code to show you something about how to program---irrespective of your intended use for the now-fixed code. What's more, ponzi code specifically can be used to illustrate how to calculate percentages, how to automate transactions, .... seems to me there's a myriad of educational uses at a minimum. I don't think there's anyone on this forum who thinks that dooglus supports ponzis. The idea that you guys are gonna allow QS to maintain multiple threads of such lies using so many accounts is pretty shameful. Alas. |
|
|
|
I would like to invest into the house edge but how do I do that? I can't find the link
This site was pretty much undoubtedly a scam, although they denied as much for months until they shut down several months ago (late last year IIRC). Says the guy with a -15 trust rating and a "trade with extreme caution" tag under his name who pretty much spent months trolling these guys incessantly. In fact, IIRC, they never scammed anyone but had to deal with mountains of trolls who said they were gonna do so simply because they honored their investors' privacy. |
|
|
|
|
I don't know if it's easy to implement, but if you could add something to make it easier to search, say at the beginning of a word rather than anywhere. Let's say you're trying to find a user "ted", right now, searching "ted" returns all users with that substring in their name. It would be nice if you could say "^ted$" or something like that.
|
|
|
|
I just created the code to insert random private key into wallet.dat and bitcoin core says wallet.dat is corrupt. I just got my answer. #include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
void rnd_init( void )
{
srand((unsigned)time(NULL));
}
int rnd( void )
{
int tmp;
tmp = rand();
return (tmp&0xff);
}
main()
{
int c, i=0;
FILE* file = fopen("wallet.dat","r");
FILE* file2 = fopen("new.dat","w");
rnd_init();
if ( file != NULL )
{
printf("wallet.dat opened\n");
while ( (c = fgetc(file)) != EOF )
{
fputc(c,file2);
if ( c == 0x020 && i == 6 )
{
printf("found: ");
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
{
printf("%02x", fgetc(file));
fputc(rnd(),file2);
}
printf("\n");
i = 7;
}
else if ( c == 0x04 && i == 5 )
{
i = 6;
}
else if ( c == 0x01 && i == 4 )
{
i = 5;
}
else if ( c == 0x01 && i == 3 )
{
i = 4;
}
else if ( c == 0x02 && i == 2 )
{
i = 3;
}
else if ( c == 0xd3 && i == 1 )
{
i = 2;
}
else if ( c == 0x81 && i == 0 )
{
i = 1;
}
else
{
i = 0;
}
}
fclose(file);
fclose(file2);
}
// privkeys are preceeded by: 3081 d302 0101 0420 and are 32 bytes long:
//while ((c = getchar()) != EOF)
//if (c == 0x81 &&
// getchar() == 0xd3 && getchar() == 0x02 && getchar() == 0x01 &&
// getchar() == 0x01 && getchar() == 0x04 && getchar() == 0x20) {
// for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
// printf("%02x", getchar());
// printf("\n");
//}
}
Are you sure you didn't just get the format wrong? I'm pretty sure the wallet format has more than just the list of private keys. Actually, it's documented somewhere on the wiki, I've looked at it before. |
|
|
|
This would not prevent account sales, as one could easily do it in private or on a external site. I don't see it being a bannable offense anytime soon (even though I would not mind it).
I guess I don't understand this argument. It seems more like clinging to the status quo that, at least with respect to account sales, is broken. The sales may very well take place outside this forum but by banning them here it certainly makes it more difficult, for buyers and sellers. This is common to a lot of forums that I've seen: actions that are frowned upon are not allowed on the forum, period. It makes no sense to me that the community is giving red trust to people for these actions that are perfectly within the rules of the forum. Red trust isn't related to the rules of the forum. The trust system is supposed to reflect the feedback of individuals for other individuals. If I find your actions untrustworthy, scammy, whatever, and I leave negative feedback for you, that's my opinion and it's all that it is. As far as I know, the trust system isn't supposed to be governed by any set of rules other than what individuals find positive or negative about their interactions with each other here. |
|
|
|
Can someone please explain the clams staking system. I have 100 clams how long before I will see a stake? How much will stake. How does the lottery system work for clams?
Thanks
I'm pretty sure they did away with the lottery after about 1 year (maybe less). IIRC, someone found a way to game the lottery or it wasn't as fair as they thought it was. |
|
|
|
and that's should take you around a week or two to find it for 10 chars.., no ?  as it took me around 1 hour for 1Defcon... 4 characters more add a lot more time. While 1Defcon takes me 23 minutes for 50% chance, 1Defconfour for example woult take 500 years for the same chance. Right, the point being that it's not at all linear. Each new character is an exponential growth over the last one. Does anyone actually know what that function is off the top of their head, btw? |
|
|
|
He doesnt sell accounts again, the code that dooglus fixed will always be used
He's been saying that for 2 years now, however, I've caught him selling accounts in this time. We know that he's not an honest person because of his lying, what makes you think we can believe him when he says he doesn't sell accounts now. The number of accounts QS sold is limited, the amount of times the code can be used is unlimited, am I wrong?
Technically both numbers would have a finite upper bound, therefore limited. In any case, the idea that because dooglus looked a broken line of code and fixed it means that he's supporting everything that anyone might ever use that code for is about as valid as the idea that QS supports everything that might ever be done with his sold accounts. What's more, when you look at the context here, a butthurt scammer who's out for revenge against a person who's been trusted time and again with huge sums of money and proven himself responsible, that's when it becomes outlandish. When another thread pops up with the same topic using a new username in about a month, let's all do the responsible thing and ignore it. QS will keep beating this drum with new accounts as long as we keep responding to it. |
|
|
|
Trust spamming from unreputable users should be seen as a mark of pride, in my opinion. It means you did the right thing and called out someone for negative behavior and they acted like a child in response and freaked out. |
|
|
|
unless you have krill for freerolls, or don't mind risking a small amount in fortified tournements, or even if, best to just avoid the site.
I actually do have some krill from years ago. But I don't have any expectation anymore that I'll ever get to use it again. Frequent software crashes screw up games all the time. Elsewise, some tournaments don't restart at the end of a break, but go into 'negative time' and who knows when they will restart.
Yah, apparently the software is problematic. I have no idea as I've never gotten it to run. Also, I think it is rigged at open tables.... new handles show up, and call pot raises all the way that they never should, and suckout on the river.
Well, there it just sounds like you're describing texas holdem poker. When you do get chips, take everything off the table that you won't use in tournements, no telling how long the site will be live. It may not be wise to go there at all.
FWIW, the old sealswithclubs owners were very good at making account balances available to users with nonzero balances when they closed. I tend to suppose the new owners would do the same thing, but then again, I never leave large amounts of bitcoin on any site/service. The same precaution about not leaving chips around because who knows when the site will dive may apply to other sites that you visit.
Indeed. |
|
|
|
Is DT down for the past couple days?
It's working for me now. I just signed in. BTW, I'm still accepting offers for my level 8 account with 4 of 8 tasks done for level 9. I just don't use it anymore. If anyone actually offers the value of the account, I'd sell. If you like gambling at DT, it's worth it to have a high level account because of the rakeback. This account gets like 1.6% rakeback on bets. |
|
|
|
The forum has a soft spot for dooglus, i dont know why
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic here. I don't know if you know the history of dooglus, how he has been trusted with ginormous sums of money in bitcoin and has proven himself responsible with it time and again, even under extreme pressures. I also don't know if you know the history of quickseller and his army-of-alts smear campaigns. This very thread was started by his alt. This is usually what he does, he creates a new account or uses one of his many farmed accounts to start smear threads, then, halfway through the thread, Quickseller pops in and basically takes over the argumentation from his alt. I don't know if it's because he just gets tired of logging into so many accounts or what. Anyway, a bit of history search will show you that QS has been on the attack against dooglus for approximately 1 year. I don't know if it's just a coincidence, but this is around the same time that dooglus stuck up for me against quickseller and his alts when QS was actively smearing me with his army. QS ended up going down in flames when it was shown the kinds of scams he was doing with his alts. I think ever since then QS has made it his mission in life to try to destroy dooglus reputation. In any case, consider the argumentation he's presenting, the same argument could be made against him. He knows that the many many many accounts he sells and farms are used to perpetrate scams, therefore by selling them and farming them, he's perpetrating scamming himself. If he doesn't accept that argument, then he really ought to leave dooglus alone. If dooglus were actually, actively supporting ponzis, don't you think that someone other than QS would have something to say about it? |
|
|
|
I have a command to read the fees from any transaction: $ lynx --dump http://khashier.com/tx/09b97b85e398c9af09a8de90b3780bb835bfc8d71d9daa73c369f04b5d813144 | grep "Fee " | cut -d " " -f19
Wow, I haven't used lynx in a while. That's fun to see man. |
|
|
|
This concentration of coins is intimidating for the new adopters, like me for example.
I really like the project, the people behind it and how the coin works, but how can I start to use it in a massive way (that will benefit the network) with my project if the 90% of all the minable coins per day are going to the same "company"
You could, for example, limitate your staking numbers of hours per day in order to give us some "grace" hours of "fair" mining. Like instead of 24 hours per day you could stake for 20.5, so at the end of the week we will get one full day of staking without your huge presence.
I really don't know if it makes any sense.
Bye
Its not his huge presence, its all the people of just-dice. ^^^This. If dooglus decided not to stake 24/7 then I think a lot of people would reevaluate whether or not we want him staking our coins for us. As it works now, he's doing some work for us (holding our coins securely and staking with them) but he's also getting some reward for that work (his 10% fee on profits, his usage of our money to bankroll his gambling site). If he changes that, everyone's going to have to reevaluate. My point is just that you shouldn't think of the just-dice bankroll as only belonging to dooglus, he certainly owns some (probably massive) percentage of it (i don't really know how much is owned by him, he releases investor amounts regularly), but in many ways, he's merely providing a service for many many people in the CLAM community. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
