You can do anything via a RPC command as you could via the GUI. So if you wanted to send a transaction to a P2PKH address for example, you can use a RPC command to do this.

I am saying it would only take a small percentage of employees to get fired for not getting vaccinated in order for major supply chain and national security issues to pop up. For example, half of Chicago's police department is at risk of getting fired, and time off requests are getting cancelled as a result, but the CPD's ability to police its city will be negatively affected if only a small percentage of these offices ultimately gets fired. We are in the middle of a labor shortage, it is not exactly a good time to be firing people left and right.

That might be true, but that does not excuse the manager. If the pay rate is too low, he should say something. I do think that Lightlord probably knows what kind of people his low rates are going to attract.

You don’t need this to be a universal issue for this to be a problem. A small percentage of employees could choose to get fired to make this a very serious issue in regards to national security and the ability for the US economy to keep moving.

We are already in a labor shortage due to the Biden inflation and the Biden incentives to not work. The Vaccine mandate will only make these worse.

There is no such thing as being “more random”. An outcome is either random or it isn’t.

It is not possible to observe if an outcome is actually random or not based on observation.

In the past (in bitcoins early days) there were wallet software that (intentionally) created private keys with flawed RNG, using a small scope of private keys. Someone looking at many private keys generated this way would not have detected the flawed RNG without looking at the underlying code.

In the case of the OPs proposal, it is possible to determine the radio raves being used to influence the generated private key. This means the OPs method is flawed.

If additional random input is used in addition to the FM input, the entropy will be reduced from what it would otherwise be.

Over the short run, it is the campaign managers responsibility to prevent lots of crap posts coming from the campaign. However, if over long periods of time, if a manager allows lots of shit posts, and doesn’t do anything about it, it will reflect negatively on the person who didn’t fire the campaign manager in favor of someone who would address the shit posts.

A CBDC means that citizens would have no reason to store any money in their bank account. A CBDC would allow citizens to do everything their bank account does via the CBDC. Banks would still have the ability to engage in fractional reserve banking, but as citizens withdraw their money in favor of the CBDC, banks would be unable to lend out money, as they would have no money to lend.

When a bank lends out money, they have to have actual money to lend. With fractional reserve banking, the bank assumes deposit holders will keep some of their deposit with the bank until the loan is repaid. Also, borrowers often deposit their loan proceeds with the bank giving the loan (or it will at least stay in the banking system). If deposit holders withdraw all their money, the bank wont have any money to lend.

Without a CBDC, the only way to remove money from the banking system is to withdraw cash from your bank account. If you have hundreds of thousands of dollars, or millions of dollars (or more), this is not really feasible, as protecting these amounts of money is difficult/costly.

If you have a physical coin with its first bits displayed, you are having to trust the manufacturer somewhat to do things such as to not retain private keys generated. If you have a funded coin that was funded prior to purchase (ie, the coin was funded by the manufacturer), you can review the blockchain, and reasonably be certain that you have found the entire address. Similarly, if you have an unfunded physical coin with its first bits displayed, if you are given a list of addresses, one of which matches the first bits displayed, you can be reasonably certain you know the full address, at least to the extent you are willing to trust the manufacturer.

It would be possible for a physical coin manufacturer to fund a coin to address 1CSn5SKix..., but have the private key behind the hologram to be associated with 1CSn5SKiz..., but IMO this is unlikely from a game theory perspective, as if the manufacturer did this, it would be easily verifiable by all their customers if they did this once and were caught because the victim should share photos of the coin with the hologram pealed that contains the private key for an unfunded address. A manufacturer whose intent is to scam their customers could simply retain private keys they generate, and there would at least be some ambiguity if the bitcoin is stolen from you.

If all you have is the first bits, and no signed statement from the manufacturer, and the coin is not funded, you should not attempt to fund the coin. There are many potential addresses the private key is associated with, only one of which is correct. 

Not for government contractors. Government contractors need their employees to be vaccinated. Private employers with over 100 employees need to either mandate vaccinations or implement weekly testing. 

Government contractors are being forced to have all their employees vaccinated. 

It is advantageous for most people to get vaccinated, but this is not the right way to do it. Biden is compromising national security.

There are many places in the US that will be without essential services such as ambulance service and hospital service because so many people are being fired for refusing to give up personal medical records. Soon the US will be without a military or pilots to fly airplanes or truck drivers to drive big wheelers. 

This is wrong, see my above post. Adopting a CBDC will prevent commercial banks from being able to lend, which will prevent companies and individuals from being able to borrow money, which will grind their economy to a halt.

I would love to see China try to implement a CBDC, as it will delay or even prevent them from being able to take over the world. China wants to issue a CBDC in order to impose further control over their citizens, but I believe this will backfire spectacularly.

Stable coins currently have a certain level of risk, (as do bank accounts with commercial banks), and this is not the case with accounts with the central bank.  

Based on your constraints, you are not going to be able to check balances of addresses of the various currencies.

In order to send a transaction to any address for any cryptocurrency, you will need to know the specific UTXO you are spending. If you have this information, it should not be difficult to create a transaction.

If you are talking about the first bits of an address that has never been used, there is no way of knowing for sure what the full address is. If you have the private key, you can calculate the entire address.

Bitcoin addresses have a checksum to confirm it is valid. It is possible that if you are missing only a small number of characters, there is only one valid address, but most of the time, if you don’t have the entire address, you might not have the correct address.

If you know for sure the address has previously received a transaction, the above changes (most of the time) because the set of potential addresses goes way down.

The project references in the OP is not collecting any data in secret. It has named the mining pools they are receiving data from, and has used data validation techniques to confirm information is correct. It then makes the assumption that the data from the select pools are representative of the population of miners.

I would be surprised if any of the pools individually have data that is substantially different than the others. If you have a specific reason to doubt the information, I would encourage you to speak up, but I don’t think it is reasonable to make the assumption it is wrong.

QueenVera first posted the address 19xMwMtNEv5iaEpxSjA85uHuB9iKoUVDKu on April 6, 2020. CryptopreneurBrainboss later (accidentally) posted the same address about two weeks later on April 19, 2020.

The address 19xMwMtNEv5iaEpxSjA85uHuB9iKoUVDKu was obviously in CryptopreneurBrainboss' clipboard when he made that post, but it is very well possible for whatever reason he was looking into that address based on Queenvera's or someone else's post.

I don't know either one of them. It is possible they are the same person, but the above does not prove they are the same. IMO this is really not even circumstantial evidence.

What is going on with this transaction?

---

You have still not answered my original question:

---

Even if CryptopreneurBrainboss is Queenvera, you have not articulated what he did wrong.

Why do you think he is the same person as The-Devil?

You can review the methodology the CBECI uses. This is not from the mining pools themselves, but is from an entity associated with Cambridge business school, which I think is reputable enough to believe they are not simply making up data. They have been publishing this data for over a year now, and I think if pools were not actually providing this information to CBECI, they would have said something by now.

I have a more important detail about the OP's message:
I think most likely the OP is shilling for what is likely a scam site funds-recovery[dot]com. No reputable business is going to say that electrum is liable in this case. It might be understandable for a frustrated user to want to blame someone else for their mistake, but there isn't anyone running a business trying to recover funds from electrum as the OP describes.

The underlying data is from the originating IP address of the miners connecting to the pools, not the pools themselves.

If someone connects to a pool with a Chinese IP address, they will show as being a miner from china. If someone from china uses a VPN located in the US to connect to their pool, they will show as being located in the US.

Your attacker could simply broadcast on all potential channels for an extended period of time. You could potentially counter this by personally listening to the channel to confirm there is no interference, however an attacker could counter this counter by learning which channel you are listening to, and when, and using this information to learn the input to your "randomness".

It is best to have your machine create a private key seed in a way that is not affected by any external variable. Any external variable you use is going to open up the potential that someone will observe when you generate your seed and can look for information generated around that time.