Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 07:09:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 750 »
1221  Economy / Services / Re: offering escrow services on: June 15, 2019, 04:47:59 AM
You should consider first getting more trading experience around here before starting offering your own escrow services. In general, you should show a fairly long trading history before offering escrow services. In addition to showing that you can be trusted to handle others' money, you need to show you have the experience to mediate any possible disputes.
1222  Other / Meta / Re: Mod Rankings (how do you rank them) on: June 15, 2019, 04:44:48 AM
0/10 hilariousandco (has only attacked me and never gave me any insight) Banned me, locked my post, deleted many of my post, moved many of my post, try`s to ridicule me, used to have the title "Laborugini memeber" till I trolled him on it and he changed it now it is "hugh member" not much better. Man has a ego and needs to try doing mushrooms a few times. (very unprofessional mod), This man is a fiat loving weasel.

^in fact if I could give you a negative rating I would. -10/10
I personally like hilariousandco and strongly disagree with your assessment. With that being said, ouch lol.


I have seen your posts in various sections. My advice to you is to put in a decent amount of effort into your posts and show that you have an interest in bitcoin and crypto in general, and you will do great here.
1223  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Merit for Crypto (and other) Knowledge (no guide threads) on: June 15, 2019, 04:38:44 AM
Here are a few of my thread which I gathered, I would like you to consider them. I would also appreciate any form of feedback on them:
You show yourself to have a good technical understanding of bitcoin and crypo (currency and graphy), and an interest in both. You also put in a lot of effort into most of your posts. Keep up the good work.


Come back in a month, and reference this post (and three more of your posts). If you need less than 10 merit to rank up to Full Member, I will consider giving you sufficient merit to rank up. Keep up the good posts.



I prefer to only give out merit to each person once per month via this thread. I reviewed your posts you submitted and would have otherwise awarded you merit. You can resubmit these (or other) posts as early as July 4, and I will give you some merit (assuming you put in similar effort into the posts you submit).
1224  Other / Meta / Re: Happy birthday, theymos! on: June 15, 2019, 03:45:11 AM
HBD!

Make it a good one!
1225  Other / Meta / Re: Interested in the old trust system? on: June 14, 2019, 10:48:02 PM
If anyone can post the details on how trust used to be calculated, BPIP can [...] rank it.

I don't think the trust system was every meant to be a mechanism to rank users one way or another. It was meant to be a mechanism to gauge the ability to trust a person in a trade.
1226  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can a DT member (or any member) oppose their own flag? on: June 14, 2019, 08:35:36 PM
You can oppose your own flag. It is one additional way to contest the charges against yourself.
1227  Economy / Reputation / Re: amaclin/amaclin1 flags on: June 14, 2019, 07:09:05 PM
I believe amaclin is banned IIRC. I’m not sure why amaclin1 isn’t banned.
1228  Other / Meta / Re: Problem with Stake.com Signature on: June 14, 2019, 06:56:43 PM
In light of the changes to the stake.com signature campaign, I have withdrawn my request to have stake.com signatures blacklisted, pending the success of the changes made by Stake.

I do think those listed in the OP should be reviewed for bans, for merit abuse and ban evasion as mentioned in the OP if this has not already been done. 
1229  Economy / Reputation / Re: Stake.com Signature Campaign - A new kind of future on: June 14, 2019, 06:51:41 PM
I am glad you are making some positive changes to your campaign. Provided you can monitor your participants, your campaign shouldn’t generate too much spam (and harm to the forum).

I will withdraw my request to have your signatures banned. Although I will continue to allow anyone to continue posting in the thread for now.
1230  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer on: June 14, 2019, 06:32:03 PM
I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?
Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

So, basically what you're trying to say is that, Hhampuz took a loan from DarkStar_ (I know about that as I can see his post history) at the time when Bestmixer was going to shut all their operations? And you think he knew that before and did everything intentionally?

I am saying that I have presented substantial evidence that Hhampuz has a loan outstanding as of immediately prior to when BestMixer shut down. I have no reason to believe he knew about this ahead of time. I am saying that he took advantage of the situation to repay his debt with money belonging to BestMixer. The repayment happened either directly or indirectly with BestMixer money— meaning that he may have run the specific inputs through one or more mixers before repaying the loan and he may have used BestMixers money to pay other bills/expenses and as a result was able to use other inputs to repay the loan that he would have otherwise used to pay those bills.

I don’t think he would have taken the loan if he knew about BestMixer closing in advance. Others bringing this up are trying to create a distraction.
Quote
Well, as you said you've got txid, why are you crossing your own words (by putting those IDs in suspense) and saying that he purchased Chips from Chipmixer which ended (specifically, landed) to DarkStar's address/es? You should really come up with great evidence to prove him guilty, else you're again trying to harm "just another guy's" reputation here.


I am not sure what you mean here. There is evidence that Hhampuz
*had a loan outstanding as of when BestMixer closed down.
*moved the money belonging to BestMixer to a mixer (chipmixer) immediately after BestMixer closed.

There is also evidence that Hhampuz earns his living from his business here and as such he cannot use all of his earnings to repay any loan he takes out. He must use some of his earnings to pay for things like rent, food, utilities and other bills he may have. 
Quote
Even more assumptions.

Moving funds =/= spending. You can't conclude anything about his income or spending pattern by looking at 1 address. You're just pissing in the wind here (as usual).

True, people here can easily use more than 10s of 100s of addresses every single day, so it's not really easy for anyone to "assume" about anybody's spends and earnings here.

How wicked is it QS when you first claim things like you know everything and then speak about assumptions. Assumptions are not gonna work but proofs, to let you make us believe that what you're saying is actually true. I've not personal grudges with you whatsoever, but I guess we need some more drama here eh!  Wink
See above. The specific fact set that can be proven will allow a reasonable person to conclude that Hhampuz stole money for his personal use.
1231  Other / Meta / Re: Its not fair that yobit got banned on: June 14, 2019, 03:52:19 PM
It’s not fair they were able to take advantage of the forum by causing massive amounts of spammers to create nonsense posts in masse to advertise their business, harming the community in the process.
1232  Economy / Reputation / Re: Hhampuz Reputation Thread on: June 14, 2019, 03:47:33 PM
Hhampuz is known to be friends with a certain group of people who harass and try to extort people who are known to have a lot of money.

Robert Palmer? Bob? Bipolar Bob?

Hi Smiley

A couple of years ago, he asked me if I was BiPolarBob, who was known to have a lot of money and often gave away a lot of money. The above message was entirely unsolicited.

You can draw your own conclusions about the above.
1233  Economy / Reputation / Re: Hhampuz Reputation Thread on: June 14, 2019, 06:41:24 AM
yada yada

Oh I'm sorry QS but you are so far off my radar that I'd need the fucking hubble telescope to try and pick up what it is you are trying to say. Between all the jibberish and repressed anger it's difficult.. Even for someone that makes a living off of reading posts  Embarrassed
Thanks for confirming your income is made up of your work here Wink
1234  Economy / Reputation / Re: Hhampuz Reputation Thread on: June 14, 2019, 06:29:51 AM
yada yada yada

Like there's much of a reputation to harm there?  Roll Eyes
You fail to respond to anything of substance I said.

1235  Economy / Reputation / Re: Hhampuz Reputation Thread on: June 14, 2019, 05:46:26 AM
Hhampuz has left me the following rating that he knows to be untrue:
Quote
Took 20 bitcoin from another user to do a job, but did not do the job and refuses to return coins. He does not dispute this, and is just waiting for everyone to forget..
The rating uses this thread as a reference, and information within the thread directly contradicts the statement in the rating left by Hhampuz.

The above rating was left as retaliation for me calling out Hhampuz for stealing money from BestMixer when they were shut down by the Dutch government.  

As a result of the above, you should avoid doing business with Hhampuz, because if he scams you and you complain, he will take action to harm your reputation.
1236  Economy / Reputation / Re: Quickseller is a dangerous person to deal with - avoid on: June 14, 2019, 05:42:28 AM
I support this flag! Thank you suchmoon for the compelling evidence in OP which makes opposing such a flag quite difficult. Surely it could even be labelled as misuse of the new flag system?
You are a weak minded puppet. The evidence is not compelling. You are a thieving little weasel. You and suchmoon know information contained in the OP is a lie.

Both "B" and "C" listed in the OP are lies. Information in thread "B" directly contradicts how it is described in the OP. The "C" listing is a misrepresentation of the thread in question.
1237  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer on: June 14, 2019, 05:40:24 AM
I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?
Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.

No mouthbreather, all you have proven is that Hhampuz took a loan on May 10th and moved the remaining Bestmixer campaign funds to a different address on May 22nd. The rest of your conclusions are just fabrications of a clouded mind.

Since the address you posted shows part of Hhampuz's transactions you can see that he earned ~0.42 BTC between May 10th and May 22nd. He earned over 0.65 BTC before the end of the 23rd, meaning that he is roughtly earning over 0.3 BTC per week. Seems like Hhampuz is perfectly capable of repaying any loan without embezzling campaign funds.
Hhampuz has other bills to pay other than the loan. From the 10th until the 27th, he would spend all of the bitcoin he received to that wallet within a couple of days. He has previously publicly said he does not have a traditional 9 to 5 job. He went from having zero on the 27th to over 0.55 BTC to repay the loan on June 8th.

You choose to ignore the facts, and are acting in bad faith, as per usual.

No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.
He most likely took out the loan because he was in need of money at the time. He took advantage of BestMixer closing to use the money to repay the loan.


I think you're onto something. Sounds super smart to wreck his credibility and reputation, risking a steady income of ~1.2 BTC per month, to embezzle 0.5 BTC. Especially since it's a well known fact that many people pay close attention to anything that happens during a closure (or exit scam).
There is no evidence that he makes that much money. No, selling off his assets, or withdrawing BTC from an exchange is not income.
1238  Other / Meta / Re: Trust flags on: June 14, 2019, 04:57:57 AM
The negative trust by these two seems pretty shady to me. I don't think there was any credible evidence of polo scamming in 2017.
Polo was way behind on their support tickets at the time. They also had taken down their trollbox at the same time. I can see where people were getting leery that another exit scam was looming. Polo has since changed ownership, anyway. So the tags should probably be revised. Unfortunately, Zepher can't revise his.  Embarrassed
Oh yea, I definitely agree, being behind on support tickets is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, no proof beyond any doubt, that the exchange is scamming its users.
Roll Eyes
1239  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer on: June 13, 2019, 11:33:18 PM
I do have txids

Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address?
Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times.

I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.
1240  Economy / Reputation / Re: Quickseller is a dangerous person to deal with - avoid on: June 13, 2019, 11:31:14 PM
I guess what I am saying is that I would like to see some evidence of QS scamming someone and not anything that points to his accusation of Hhampuz

He would have a red box if a victim of his actions came forward. As it stands now, he is a high risk individual with a yellow box warning.

Perhaps if Hhampuz has a loss of business or a certain person in socal gets harrassing phone calls we can put a proper red box on him but for now this will have to suffice.
Let me see if I am understanding you correctly. You are wanting me to remove my accusation against Hhampuz? This is your concern?

I am not sure if you know this or not, but I have posted blockchain evidence both that Hhampuz took the money, and that he had an outstanding loan as of when he took the money.
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 750 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!