Not only Ratimov.
taikuri13 was removed too. taikuri13 wrote a lot in the Russian locale. Now they stopped paying him and in the Russians had almost nothing to read. Never mind the fact that Ratimov and taikuri13 were removed a month apart: Did you know that you can always find a minority group in a dataset where there exists a majority? It's true! There's always exclusion, everywhere! I guess the universe is biased or something tautologically. Invalid comparison. There are more Russian users on this forum than all the others combined. Alternate comparison: there are more users posting bullshit in Altcoin Discussion and Announcements than the other boards in the forum.
It's also interesting, the concept of "lost money" in this scenario. The loss of opportunity (for wealth generation) is directly comparable to scamming? I don't see the equivalence here. It's as if I owned a bakery and you sued me for not having a position in the company. I thought contractual obligations only incorporated the initial rules, which allow for removal - should more people be given ChipMixer spots? |
|
|
|
where did you see that? he received payment, is still on the CM spreadsheet, and he sure hasn't mentioned that. scroll up |
|
|
|
satori txin -> txout, low fees txout as input -> CPFP bundled tx, higher fee compensation
This is one avenue when I approach many denominated coin outputs.  Alternatively, you could look for some parasitic transaction chain/sequence where you can use a platform that cycles through coins (unconf. inputs) often. Fees are not that big of a deal just yet. |
|
|
|
It's okay for victims to create red Flags for confirmed alt accounts of a scammer: Yes, one of the victims can. Good find, though any response will be delayed (waiting for victims) and you can have certain situations running into plausible deniability something something, making a fuss and smokescreen until the next alt comes up with another flag-free thread Endgame would just be to constantly prop up those threads - what then? Users (in particular, new users) on the forum get scammed despite flags and tags (eg) and obviously unless you understand the trust system (i.e. are not new and are not at risk of getting scammed by Adkinsbet), the forum mechanics have a hell of a learning curve. Here's the umpteenth time I'll mention that old welcome message. Eliminate the false sense of security for incoming members. "Trust no one" should be a much more widely-spread mantra.
And again: Of course, the thing is, if other members were allowed to create many, many threads before being banned... what would happen if someone wanted to actually maliciously spam and troll the forum boards? Give this a thought. |
|
|
|
|
Well, I guess this is, "good luck, fuckers" as the red flags are gone and now you're only left with type one flags for Newbies.
Good luck finding someone who suffered a written agreement with "mikelsmith2020"
Scammer paradise - just get rid of your problems by making more accounts.
|
|
|
|
Weren't they pissed at theymos and mods at some point for not banning the rainbow troll? Seems the relationship might still be strained a little bit even though he's banned now. Usually, trolls that take a long time to get banned will piss off the residents of any board. Just think about how long some users last. |
|
|
|
Not only is it not helping, it's actually causing further harm to the AdkinsBET brand. With a flag and several negative tags, it's only up from here. Hard to damage something that's been broken. |
|
|
|
I got scammed by them too. They ask for KYC then still keep your account locked. It's completely a disgusting website. I am very suprised that bitcointalk hasn't banned this scammers yet
Did they pay you your money? I don't know why you raised this thread again, honestly speaking @Verial isn't gave any evidence with his accusation... all of his statement is only a words. I just feel like this user is an alt from someone or want to accuse sportsbet.io because he only woke up to post this, after that he's inactive again. Last Active: August 10, 2020, 07:10:30 PM - this is OP's last active date. The thread shouldn't be bumped if the accuser isn't even going to do anything about it. And... this is the last activate date of the person gadado decides to respond to: February 12, 2021, 04:25:25 PM. These aren't replies that are meant to facilitate a meaningful discussion. |
|
|
|
Not fluent in English? Here's a possible solution: use the Local section or learn enough English to be constructive?
How does one determine he is now fluent in English and ready to spam the forum with better English? Someone must be better than you at English and according to them you should be learning now, so are you moving to local sections?  (Please don't, we need some good posters) You are the one who brought up fluency: I love the idea but I think forcing your standards to other users who might be not as well educated and fluent with English is not the right idea.
I'm simply responding to the notion that the lack of English proficiency can somehow serve as an excuse for spamming the forum. I certainly don't wander into the Local sections with broken grammar talking about how the bitcoin will go up or down and that it's unpredictable and that you should buy the dip.
Maybe someone starts the same trend as you have here in the local boards, then where shall the user go? Is that what the Local boards are like currently? If not, then I don't see how this is relevant. I also don't see the Local boards getting as many posts as the main boards nor a reasonable likelihood for your hypothetical situation. Seems to me like it's a bit of a false equivalency - especially comparing a current problem with a future potential problem. Doesn't make sense to enter a signature campaign that primarily asks for English-based board posting without the skills to do so, wouldn't you agree?
There is a designated signature campaign manager to moderate that and if you don't trust the manager to remove the spammers then the feedback shall be more suited to the manager as opposed to the participant. How is that relevant to the constructiveness of your posts? The signature managers are not the same people who moderate the forum. You can see that from the users on the blacklist: plenty have joined campaigns and yet have scores of posts that are considered unsubstantial? You don't get to spam just because the manager accepted your spam. You receive the consequences for your own actions.
EDIT/MAR24: February in full. 167| tiang_tower
153| Sadlife
79 | Bitcoin Seller
76 | guydin
71 | Lantind
71 | Iceblast
50 | SistaFista Total reports: 1058 Total users: 31 Average reports/user: 34.12 Worst offender: tiang_tower January in full. 266| Google+
246| semobo
237| Kasabus
227| daniahya
223| reliable
201| lobo13hf
195| monineklutak
173| Vishnu.Reang
171| royalfestus
152| XCANA
140| $anounimus$
139| sangjoewara
138| Wildwest
134| memed97
121| Distinctin
121| bigcash2011
117| devil2man
117| Desscount
116| laredo7mm
108| ngocdhbk2
101| Willitivity
99 | kesmex
98 | miningguru
98 | bitbunnny
96 | bitpotter
91 | Oceat
89 | molsewid
89 | ipanks
89 | Henrobakkara
86 | rahmathidayat93
84 | preikaler
82 | ife2020
81 | pantek talacuik
80 | Wahyuihib
80 | DeadCoin
79 | lousie9
79 | imteaz
77 | desticy
73 | grandpix
71 | sniveel
71 | ice098
70 | thienlonghue
64 | Anonylz
61 | Jocuserious
60 | Surrapatt
60 | Rahman11
60 | GatotKaca
60 | Astvile
59 | shanghai
58 | Mahmudmach
57 | Rana590
56 | amonymous
55 | swordking
55 | rhodelmabanal
54 | Ludmilla_rose1995
54 | jaocoincrypto18
52 | killerfrost
51 | crazy-pilot |
|
|
|
The website crashed so I was unable to download the LoG and I have proof of sending the transaction through to MCM. But okay. LoyceV is simply implying that the sequence you should have followed to ensure security was to download the LoG first, then to deposit. |
|
|
|
|
Hinging on how much something originally sold for... in 2016.
You're going off the BTC premium at the time and fixing it despite the actual price of the asset going up 100x. Moreover, instead of marginally decreasing the BTC equivalent of $68.32 in premium which would be worth over $5000 today, you decide to increase the premium by a USD value of over $80,000 and a BTC premium of over 1000%
|
|
|
|
FYI, picture links don't work. Also the asking price seems orders of magnitude above the market price today. A 9900% premium is mighty interesting, don't think I've seen that one before |
|
|
|
This is also before I made the transaction.
The 24 hours will be up by the time I hear from him but I am sure he can still track the transaction and process mz mix should he choose to. Assuming that everything follows normally from your deposit to the desired output addresses, I see no reason why the transaction wouldn't go through if the owner decides to go through with the mixing process. It's not like you have to prove anything for the coins to be mixed properly: you'll still get them at the end of the day. No need for any verification, really. |
|
|
|
Writing again because the 24 hour window expires in 4 hours and although I've sent countless emails I haven't head back from MCM
</3 They haven't been active on their forum account either: last active time (GMT) is February 23, 2021, 02:22:24 PMFYI this is before you even started your thread. |
|
|
|
2-23-2021 forum collectables. Now sure how i can post a photo showing that? Easiest way: piece of paper right beside the Kialara. Write down the date and "rexscates". Done. |
|
|
|
   If you can do just one more photo by attaching one of the following, to make sure that you actually have the item, then that would be ideal: A) current date + forum name B) most recent block #, hash + forum name
Cheers. |
|
|
|
You're right. I redacted the information, do you think that's the right thing to do? Make sure to remove it from the image-hosting service as well. In the case of any verification, you can do what I said and sign a message. If you sent from some service, there are most likely ways to prove that as well - for the sake of your privacy, I think obfuscating the transaction details is fine. Once they reply, then you could disclose it discreetly via PM. |
|
|
|
I tried but since I am a new member it’s not going through. Could you perhaps send this thread to the them? Would appreciate it so much. Sent. For the record, someone could probably find the exact transaction details from the image you published: with just an address and a transaction amount/time, anyone using the public ledger would most likely be able to pinpoint it within minutes. |
|
|
|
scams happen in crypto and as far the forum is concerned, it's nothing to concern oneself with. Emphasis mine.Emphasis mine. Rule-wise. Administrative-wise. I want you to think about why scams are apparently unmoderated on the forum - the reason that was given - and then try to imagine how that would apply when Newbies aren't given any welcome messages or warnings about all members (especially outside of the convoluted trust system). Might be a bit cynical but it's not hard to notice some glaring things that are missing. How about this funny little board, too? |
|
|
|
I see your point.
Just being extra cautious because the amount is so high. Again, i'm happy to show any images once a mod hops on the thread.
I'm literally in tears over the prospect of not knowing where my 600k is. If it's still a one-man operation as per this post, then it's possible that there might be something that requires manual intervention on their end (read the subsequent post in that link). You can come up with a variety of reasons for why this might be the case, but conjecture wouldn't help in this situation. I'd like to wait and see before jumping to any conclusions directly, although the wait time is definitely not something that should be happening regularly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
