You have been reported to campaign manager for campaign post spam. Sure... but I think DarkStar_ knows the difference between a post that I've worked hard on and a post of which I expect no reward. I can't wait to post another 3 replies per week because I'm super desperate for the campaign compensation.
|
|
|
Wow, this is Entitlement Central, isn't it?
Whining about rain... what, are we in drought season?
|
|
|
"I believe" followed by "not based on user's opinion" is oxymoronic at best. Depends on your definition of "belief". I would be one to say that in order to honestly state that a position is true, then you would have to believe it... if you had doubt in the truthfulness of the statement, why would you deem it true? We can go into an epistemological dialogue about this but I see no issue with the wording. Despite that, I don't personally like seeing a flag used here in lieu of a simple negative trust instead.
|
|
|
To be so insecure where you won't create a platform for others to defend themselves (i.e. your local rule) but where you accuse others of misconduct and overexerting their 'power'...
By the way, the local rule will most likely not be enforced. If you really want to block their replies, you could create a self-moderated thread... but that probably won't stop anything. Here's my objective stance: There is no fucking way that you can have the same structure as an article within 8 minutes of the thread being posted without having prepared it beforehand. This post: There is a huge difference between a cryptocurrency coin and Token. Both crypto coins and Token are cryptocurrencies. But Still, there are differences.
Those cryptocurrencies that have their own blockchain are called cryptocurrency coins. Such as Bitcoin, Lite Coin, Ethereum, etc. I mean, A cryptocurrency coin uses its own blockchain to perform its functions. Cryptocurrency coins are like real money. You will be able to use crypto coins as real money even though the crypto coin is not a physical coin. It has the store value and the exchange value.
And Token is a Digital Asset. Token has no blockchain of its own. Token uses another's blockchain to perform its functions. That is, Token executes transactions using someone else's blockchain. Such as Basic Attention Token, ZRX token, etc. However, most tokens use Ethereum blockchain. The token that uses the Ethereum blockchain is called the ERC 20 token.
A token is a digital form of an asset. This is not a coin. A token can not be used on all occasions. But crypto coins can be used everywhere. The acceptance of cryptocurrency coin is very high. On the other hand, Token's acceptance is very low. So these are the differences.
It's also incredibly nonsensical. Almost looks ML-generated with the repetition of the words. For example, what in the hell does this sentence mean? "It has the store value and the exchange value."
|
|
|
But just a notification that tells him which posts are reported by people. So, no need to know who the reporter. If there is a notification, he will know to avoid such posts in the future. *sorry I edited reports --> posts. That's a mistake. Notifications for reported posts aren't great because they may not necessarily be good reports (of which moderators take some form of action, whether it be removal/moving or editing) and is susceptible to spam and abuse. You are given a notification when a good post is reported and deleted or edited together. (I found out the latter when someone else's posts were deleted thus causing my replies to be collated upon one another) An example thereof: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
|
|
|
1. How if we have the history of report to moderator in each user's profile.
Maybe I was looks this questions in other thread, someone say you can know your history report if you have at least total of 300 reports
You do get the history, yes. Also, for people who report en masse (i.e. I have 40k+ reports) the notifications would get out of hand... and aren't really necessary.
Why do reported users need to know who reported them? That doesn't make sense and could be a catalyst for irreverent tension. Similar reasoning to denying this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206142.0
|
|
|
The 40 qualified posts continue from 01-07.07.2019 -- I believe this may just be a fixed rate payment for the campaign management. The only other differences that I've seen are in previous sheets wherein mOgliE had additional posts in the Gambling column, which moved the payment from 0.014 to 0.0147.
|
|
|
I'm not totally sure about the capabilities of DiceBot (as I've only used it occasionally and don't gamble much [in dice] anymore) but if you have any method of exporting the bets live, we can try to see if they're cheating by arbitrarily incrementing your nonce.
|
|
|
If you have the bet IDs and you're able to do look-ups on the site, then providing a simple list of the bets that have not been verified would be perfect. Here are the figures we need for each bet (according to their Fair Bets page): - server seed
- client seed
- nonce
- bet result
|
|
|
9051-9100
TA: the analysis was that there were not many reasonable ranges left. In lieu of this unfortunate circumstance, I present to you a short limerick:
A joke is best told with brevity With the Wright person you have them readily Clearly, a stand-up guy So much fun one need not try Well, until you run into the zealotry.
|
|
|
can someone explain why nonce numbers are missing something to be good sequence, and some of bets are ticked verified, some are not?! If you have DiceBot set to verify that every bet is provably fair... and some bets don't verify, then you should be checking if those specific bet numbers are consistent with their provably fair algorithm. If not, then that's blatant rigging and would be sufficient evidence. Cheers.
|
|
|
Did you verify? https://www.nitrodice.com/fairbetsDoesn't DiceBot also have automatic verification, IIRC?
Also not sure how your streaks are all 301 when the "worst streak" was <200... unless Dicebot doesn't update live.
|
|
|
Whenever the whole "terms may be changed at any time" shenanigans start, it's when you know that they just inserted it it for their exclusive benefit. The same can be said for many casino ToS statements, including those of AML and prevention of "bonus fraud"
|
|
|
I've got 4192 unhandled reports... unhandled reports are no big deal.
|
|
|
Merry Christmas! Thanks, Hamp!
|
|
|
Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays.
|
|
|
Given that the maximum win is $2000 and that the maximum bet whilst maintaining house edge (in this particular instance) is $55.55, shouldn't yahoo get $2000 + ($323.949 - $55.55)? And check out this scenario which complicates things in regards to betting: Suppose someone bets $1000 on red. It would be -ev to bet on any other option that pays out red numbers. But depending on the outcome, both sides will have differing arguments...
Regardless of the result, this is the conclusion that should have happened: Payout of 36x or 0x based on maximum bet amount. Difference between maximum bet amount and wagered bet amount is refunded. Done.
|
|
|
37, thanks! Happy holidays
|
|
|
|