Giving them the benefit of the doubt and assuming that they are a newbie, you clearly know that they haven't read the rules. If they have read the rules, then they have broken them willingly and thus deserve the ban. If they haven't read the rules, then they're probably going to come back with another account, evade the ban, and then break the rules all over again.

Plus...


They probably got the message when all their posts were removed.

Perhaps this time, they'll read the rules. Not like the whole "no ban evading" has stopped anyone on the forum.

I have never heard of this sentimental analysis before in my life. Perhaps it would be better to fall under the umbrella of your 'fundamental analysis' section, since mapping it to a type of news would make some sense. It's kind of like guesswork, though: trying to study whales and predict what trades they're going to make?

Maybe only in smaller market caps, but any time you're trying to speculate, you would probably be better off doing technical analysis and reading over news regarding the market. Sure, we have market manipulation here and there, but trading based on that is one sure-fire way of getting manipulated yourself. If they know you know, can't they change their strategy?

My ignored boards make viewing his post history return 5 results. Any time that happens, it's a bad sign... no wonder he didn't get merit if the user spent all their time in the Bounties section. What were they expecting, someone to say 'wow, nice Twitter reports!' ?



Well, those one-liners in the sections that I haven't ignored are sure to be removed soon.

This is what we call "plausible deniability" when they do not directly say something but rather equivocate it through dog-whistling. Even if you complain about the act that they are actually performing, they can easily say "that's not my intention" and thereby have a claim which dissolves them of responsibility.

I don't think anyone who actually deserves merit will PM others about earning merit, or their lack thereof.

Lock button is in the bottom-left, you can close the thread yourself.

Which threads are these, and who exactly is your friend?

How many times are all of these users' friends going to keep making threads for them when they can just as easily create the threads themselves?

If the probability is non-zero, then the result is possible.

If the result is possible, then you have no basis upon which to call it a scam. Are you denying the possibility of 25 reds in a row? Are you saying that the probability is 0%?

The potential number of losses for any chance of winning that is less than 100% has no maximum. When you gamble with a house edge, eventually you will lose. That is a result of basic mathematics, something that you repeatedly seem to deny.

How are 25 reds possible at 85% chance?

Well, you lose one. Then you lose another. Then you lose another. Then you lose another.

Why do you assume that at a certain point, you're guaranteed a win? That's not how probability works. You could even lose 10000 times in a row: it's not very probable but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be prepared for it to happen.

Extraordinary claim: TMAN is probably making some of these accounts.
Justifiable evidence:

Could it be that the newbies are actually just newbies?

---

Why say things just to say things?

Y'know, it's possible that theymos is running an underground dark ring of black market trading and thus the DefaultTrust network is filled with his cronies that establish the external drug network, thus patching his central operation to an international level thereby facilitating the addiction of millions of individuals.

Answer the question.

Is it possible to lose 25 times in a row?

Here: I'll make it easy for you.

The answer is YES.

---

Why are you complaining about something that happened to you, when you know full well that it could happen? That's like me taking my dick out in public, slapping a cop in the face and then complaining that I got arrested for assaulting an officer and public indecency.

85% chance is 85%. Do you mean to say that it's impossible to get 25 losses in a row at 85%, or are you just a belligerent and indignant degenerate gambler that tossed away their life savings and is now looking for any and all excuses to try and wring that amount back?

Seems to me like you're tossing shit into the turbine and trying to catch some flies with the backsplash.

Did you ever consider that there was a possibility for you to lose a bet?

OK. So if you could lose one bet, could it be possible for you to lose two bets?
OK. So if you could lose two bets, could it be possible for you to lose three bets?
...
and so on.

If you, for some reason, think that at any point you could not lose x bets in a row, then please provide a justifiable reason for doing so. If you are unable to make this rationalization, then you should eventually come to the reality that you were unlucky and lost that many times in a row.

Who gambles with their life savings? One of the core pieces of advice for people who are using any amount of money is to consider any amount they wager already lost. That way, you won't be suddenly shocked when one of the two outcomes (that being losing rather than winning) happens.

The whole "Bitcoin and me" question could have used some additional context.

Just dropping "Bitcoin and me" without stating that it's a thread or that you were supposed to choose the author of the thread is incredibly unfriendly in terms of UX.

This is when we get pedantic and try to work out the rigor of what threshold of reward:effort is required to deem the term free. Once we get to this point, semantics and linguistics break down into pathetic squabbles over definitions. I'll stick to my "no monetary cost" definition and you can stick to your reward/effort ratio definition and we'll have a good time.

After all, does something stop being free when I have to put in a few extra joules of work into it, or does it just require a bit more effort?

I hope we don't go overboard with needless animations and "swoosh-ping" effects. (https://moneroworld.com/whysougly.html)

I would rather have a page that I can load quickly and easily than a page that looks like another blog template that was shoehorned in simply because the site-owner wanted a "modern look" rather than focusing on functionality.

Is this supposed to be your appeal? It's looking more like you trying to swindle your way out of the situation via a number of bad excuses and complaints rather than an actual appeal.

Warnings for what? Insubstantial post quality? If this is true, then your account was most likely banned for spam. You had four tries to get it right: how bad were your posts? I rarely see anyone getting banned for spam, so you must be at the bottom of the barrel despite your "years of work".

You need to understand what is happening right now. Some random account shows up in Meta, says their friend is banned, backpedals to say "no it's actually me", and then refuses to share any information regarding the ban. Keep rolling those boulders, Sisyphus. You may well reach the summit of ignorance yet.

If we draw from simplicity, you wouldn't tell random people that you won the lottery, nor that you hold precious metals or high-value stocks. The same should be applied to any financial instrument, bitcoin or not.

Considering the esoteric nature of bitcoin, there are a number of quite involved scammers in the industry, and I would even say that the ratio of scammers to regular users must be higher in the space considering the fact that there are no chargebacks on non-centralized blockchains. Users have no scam protection but their own intelligence, and with increasingly advanced accessibility options for new crypto users, the number of potential scams grow quickly.

Why are you interested in increasing your rank, and what will it do for you? Is it because you want to earn money on the forum, or is it for some other reason?

The thing with merit is that you shouldn't have to seek it out if you're the type of person who will receive merit. If you are merely constructing high-quality replies for merit as a means rather than acquiring merit as a byproduct of your good posts, then that will be a problem. Especially given that certain ilk have nothing better to do than post spam across the forum to collect their signature campaign payments (and that we have new users aiming to direct themselves towards that path), I will heavily advise against thinking of the forum as a financial collectathon.

You'll see a few exchanges or casinos do this, where they'll provide a bonus upon deposit and then just prevent you from withdrawing.

Honestly, though? I would much rather learn from being scammed for a small amount than to have never been scammed and to have never educated myself on preventing scams. Of course, it's possible for many people to avoid scams their entire life, but since they are dynamic and develop constantly as people learn to avoid them, I think it's better to familiarize yourself with the structure of a scam and then learn to overcome that. Learn the scammer mindset, and keep your money tight.

After all, any time you're not sending out money or downloading something external, the risk of losing money is pretty much nil.

What is your account's name? A simple mistake?

Tell me: did you get warned for any previous rule-breaking activity, or was this immediate?
Did you plagiarize content, or did you instead break some other rule?

Did you buy the account?

---

And no, you won't transfer anything to a new account. This has to be a troll, right?