Das ist erst der Anfang von ETH.
Nur zur erinnerung, wir sind erst bei Frontier
schon bald kommt Homestead (Q1), danach Metropolis und wenns fertig ist, dann kommt Serenity.
Eth wird mit leichtigkeit das BTC Volumen überholen!
PS: Ich werde in einem Jahr diesen Post zitieren und dann können wir drüber lachen wie billig ETH zu diesem Zeitpunkt war ;-)
Und was denkst Du über Casper? |
|
|
|
When it is completed Milestone2? How much can you have to wait? I think that this year we will not see a working version Milestone2.
Project Ethereum and Factom were launched almost at the same time and look at how much better now looks like Ethereum, and developers The Factom alone make that correct their mistakes and do not see any finishing work on Milestone2. I stayed only a month before the end of the first quarter of 2016, when the developers Factom have promised to complete Milestone2 and I believe that they will not have time to finish it on time. Therefore, we do not see new information. Let the Factom developers may learn Ethereum developers how to work and to promote his project. Simply if we compare these two projects is how profesiionaly Ethereum and students Factom. Factom developers while only disappoint.  The first quarter of 2016 ends on March 29. We have February 10. ;-) Too soon to make bets if there will be a delay. And even if there should be a delay, Factom-Investors have not that much reason to complain. In just 2 months: 1. Azure 2. yuanbaohui 3. Chinese Hackathon third place to a Factom-idea (medical records) and the first place wants to use Factom (CargoChain). 4. iSoftStone And most important: Every(!)day(!) updates in the github. And just by the way: I don't see that big reason in Ethereum for the price-rise. My opinion is that it's mainly the Bitcoin-Blocksize-Debate that brings uncertainty in Bitcoin and motivates ppl to buy one of the most promising other projects. And Ethereum could be that but it's too soon to be sure about it. They will have to switch to their PoS-System and if you read this: http://bytemaster.github.io/2015/08/08/Review-of-Casper-Ethereums-proposed-Proof-of-Stake-Algorithm/ .....if that analysis should be correct, it could end bad. But either way: Ethereum is two years old. It's not about the time when it hit the exchanges. I don't see much reason not to be excited about the progress or even to be uncertain. If we compare Factom and Ethereum we see to great and very ambitious projects, but Ethereum seems to me more like a bet and Factom more solid. And: Bitcoin won't stay where it is and when it rises, Ethereum will most likely drop in price. Factom will benefit of Bitcoin and could even benefit of the blocksize problems. Thank you as always for your great comment.  Everytime man! If this is true: "I now have more 4% of all FCT coins." ...it would be a risk for the price not to calm you down  Yes, it's true, I have now 392k FCT (4,47%) and of course I want to price the FCT grew that will provide me a good life in the future I wish you all the best with that! But please be carefully and if not, pm me first.  |
|
|
|
When it is completed Milestone2? How much can you have to wait? I think that this year we will not see a working version Milestone2.
Project Ethereum and Factom were launched almost at the same time and look at how much better now looks like Ethereum, and developers The Factom alone make that correct their mistakes and do not see any finishing work on Milestone2. I stayed only a month before the end of the first quarter of 2016, when the developers Factom have promised to complete Milestone2 and I believe that they will not have time to finish it on time. Therefore, we do not see new information. Let the Factom developers may learn Ethereum developers how to work and to promote his project. Simply if we compare these two projects is how profesiionaly Ethereum and students Factom. Factom developers while only disappoint. The first quarter of 2016 ends on March 29. We have February 10. ;-) Too soon to make bets if there will be a delay. And even if there should be a delay, Factom-Investors have not that much reason to complain. In just 2 months: 1. Azure 2. yuanbaohui 3. Chinese Hackathon third place to a Factom-idea (medical records) and the first place wants to use Factom (CargoChain). 4. iSoftStone And most important: Every(!)day(!) updates in the github. And just by the way: I don't see that big reason in Ethereum for the price-rise. My opinion is that it's mainly the Bitcoin-Blocksize-Debate that brings uncertainty in Bitcoin and motivates ppl to buy one of the most promising other projects. And Ethereum could be that but it's too soon to be sure about it. They will have to switch to their PoS-System and if you read this: http://bytemaster.github.io/2015/08/08/Review-of-Casper-Ethereums-proposed-Proof-of-Stake-Algorithm/ .....if that analysis should be correct, it could end bad. But either way: Ethereum is two years old. It's not about the time when it hit the exchanges. I don't see much reason not to be excited about the progress or even to be uncertain. If we compare Factom and Ethereum we see to great and very ambitious projects, but Ethereum seems to me more like a bet and Factom more solid. And: Bitcoin won't stay where it is and when it rises, Ethereum will most likely drop in price. Factom will benefit of Bitcoin and could even benefit of the blocksize problems. Thank you as always for your great comment. Everytime man! If this is true: "I now have more 4% of all FCT coins." ...it would be a risk for the price not to calm you down |
|
|
|
When it is completed Milestone2? How much can you have to wait? I think that this year we will not see a working version Milestone2.
Project Ethereum and Factom were launched almost at the same time and look at how much better now looks like Ethereum, and developers The Factom alone make that correct their mistakes and do not see any finishing work on Milestone2. I stayed only a month before the end of the first quarter of 2016, when the developers Factom have promised to complete Milestone2 and I believe that they will not have time to finish it on time. Therefore, we do not see new information. Let the Factom developers may learn Ethereum developers how to work and to promote his project. Simply if we compare these two projects is how profesiionaly Ethereum and students Factom. Factom developers while only disappoint. The first quarter of 2016 ends on March 29. We have February 10. ;-) Too soon to make bets if there will be a delay. And even if there should be a delay, Factom-Investors have not that much reason to complain. In just 2 months: 1. Azure 2. yuanbaohui 3. Chinese Hackathon third place to a Factom-idea (medical records) and the first place wants to use Factom (CargoChain). 4. iSoftStone And most important: Every(!)day(!) updates in the github. And just by the way: I don't see that big reason in Ethereum for the price-rise. My opinion is that it's mainly the Bitcoin-Blocksize-Debate that brings uncertainty in Bitcoin and motivates ppl to buy one of the most promising other projects. And Ethereum could be that but it's too soon to be sure about it. They will have to switch to their PoS-System and if you read this: http://bytemaster.github.io/2015/08/08/Review-of-Casper-Ethereums-proposed-Proof-of-Stake-Algorithm/ .....if that analysis should be correct, it could end bad. But either way: Ethereum is two years old. It's not about the time when it hit the exchanges. I don't see much reason not to be excited about the progress or even to be uncertain. If we compare Factom and Ethereum we see to great and very ambitious projects, but Ethereum seems to me more like a bet and Factom more solid. And: Bitcoin won't stay where it is and when it rises, Ethereum will most likely drop in price. Factom will benefit of Bitcoin and could even benefit of the blocksize problems. |
|
|
|
Da hier gerade von PoS die Rede ist würde ich gerne meine Frage noch mal stellen: Ich versuche gerade nen besseren Überblick über ETH zu bekommen. Bin zwar investiert aber mit relativ wenig, da ich das Konzept zwar genial finde, aber zu wenig von der gesamten Technik verstehe um Risiken einschätzen zu können. Eines der größten Risiken erscheint mir der Switch von PoW zu PoS (Casper) zu sein. Weiß jemand inwiefern diese Analyse richtig ist? http://bytemaster.github.io/2015/08/08/Review-of-Casper-Ethereums-proposed-Proof-of-Stake-Algorithm/Denn falls sie stimmen sollte, dann wäre das auf lange Sicht definitiv ein großes Problem. Gedanken dazu? Hat sich hier irgendjemand mehr Gedanken darüber gemacht wie das laufen wird/soll, und was daraus folgen könnte? Ich habe etwas nachgelesen und irgendwie erscheint mir das Thema zu wenig diskutiert, gemessen an dessen Bedeutung. |
|
|
|
Didn't have much time when I linked it but listened today, and it's one of the best and most interesting interviews of Paul Snow I've heard so far. So, recommendation for everybody and not just Factom-Investors, also those who are interested in the Blocksize-Debate. And: There is also some entertainment-Factor besides education. ;-) |
|
|
|
Is everything Ok with Factom network?
Explorer doesn't show any blocks for the past several hours and last several blocks are not anchored.
Transfers of FCT to Poloniex from multiple places like Bittrex and from yuanbaohui didn't go through either
How do I check incoming/outgoing transfers for a given address? Explorer doesn't show anything but the balance
2016-2-08
Factom is down for maintenance right now. It will be back up shortly.http://factomstatus.com |
|
|
|
Total Factoids today: 8753715
With each passing day becomes less factoids.
Why less and no more than in other coins? Every time the system is used, Factoids are converted into Entry Credits which means that they are out of the system. And until Milestone 3 there is no inflation. And milestone 3 how much inflation it will bring? 10% of the initial amount per year, which will be approximately 73k per months. Only we must also say that, about the same 73k factoids will be converted into Entry Credits every month, so we'll see constantly the total amount 8.5 -8.8 million factoids and inflation would actually be zero. Yes. Will depend on the use of the system and on the price of Factoids. |
|
|
|
Total Factoids today: 8753715
With each passing day becomes less factoids.
Why less and no more than in other coins? Every time the system is used, Factoids are converted into Entry Credits which means that they are out of the system. And until Milestone 3 there is no inflation. And milestone 3 how much inflation it will bring? 10% of the initial amount per year, which will be approximately 73k per months. |
|
|
|
Total Factoids today: 8753715
With each passing day becomes less factoids.
Why less and no more than in other coins? Every time the system is used, Factoids are converted into Entry Credits which means that they are out of the system. And until Milestone 3 there is no inflation. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure what exactly this means, but it seems to be interesting. Chinese - Google-Translator: Factom to join iSoftStone, tile-based chain to build "smart city"
Recently, iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as: iSoftStone) and Factom (through notary) jointly issued a memorandum of cooperation, the two sides iSoftStone smart city solutions and Factom block chain technology fusion entered into a collaboration. Factom will provide commercial and technical support to assist the use of iSoftStone block chain technology to further expand the company's business strategy. As iSoftStone smart city part of the solution, Factom's Apollo product will provide data storage, audit and authentication services, to promote the use in several parts of China. (...) http://www.8btc.com/factom-isoftstoneEdit: The quote of Jack Lu (Factom) is a good sign that it's more than just a rumor (also google translator): We very much look forward to this time with iSoftStone innovative cooperation projects. ISoftStone as the industry leader will help us more quickly into the Chinese market, and to build a support frame connected to the modern city.(...) Ye Yuping, executive VP & CTO of iSoftStone, said: "By applying Factom blockchain technology to our financial services, smart cities big data services, and construction of data exchange, we will drive more innovation in China. By leveraging the advantages of both parties, we look forward to seeing a brighter future. We are sure that the integration of Factom and smart cities will bring more development opportunities for both sides." http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/factom-signs-smart-city-deal-roll-out-blockchain-verification-across-china-1542059 |
|
|
|
I'm not sure what exactly this means, but it seems to be interesting. Chinese - Google-Translator: Factom to join iSoftStone, tile-based chain to build "smart city"
Recently, iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as: iSoftStone) and Factom (through notary) jointly issued a memorandum of cooperation, the two sides iSoftStone smart city solutions and Factom block chain technology fusion entered into a collaboration. Factom will provide commercial and technical support to assist the use of iSoftStone block chain technology to further expand the company's business strategy. As iSoftStone smart city part of the solution, Factom's Apollo product will provide data storage, audit and authentication services, to promote the use in several parts of China. (...) http://www.8btc.com/factom-isoftstoneEdit: The quote of Jack Lu (Factom) is a good sign that it's more than just a rumor (also google translator): We very much look forward to this time with iSoftStone innovative cooperation projects. ISoftStone as the industry leader will help us more quickly into the Chinese market, and to build a support frame connected to the modern city. |
|
|
|
Speakers announced for Blockchain and Bitcoin Africa Conference 2016
(...) The speakers announced so far include: Alakanani Itireleng, CEO of SatoshiCentre Pty Ltd. Jared Tate, founder and creator of Digibyte. Jonathan Levin, co-founder of Chainalysis. Marcus Swanepoel, co-founder and CEO of BitX. Tiana Laurence, CMO of Factom.
Verengai Mabika, lead business developer at BitFinance. https://coinreport.net/speakers-announced-blockchain-bitcoin-africa-conference-2016/
|
|
|
|
Ich versuche gerade nen besseren Überblick über ETH zu bekommen. Bin zwar investiert aber mit relativ wenig, da ich das Konzept zwar genial finde, aber zu wenig von der gesamten Technik verstehe um Risiken einschätzen zu können. Eines der größten Risiken erscheint mir der Switch von PoW zu PoS (Casper) zu sein. Weiß jemand inwiefern diese Analyse richtig ist? http://bytemaster.github.io/2015/08/08/Review-of-Casper-Ethereums-proposed-Proof-of-Stake-Algorithm/Denn falls sie stimmen sollte, dann wäre das auf lange Sicht definitiv ein großes Problem. Gedanken dazu? |
|
|
|
I'm waiting for FactomDark. With the promise to record maybe-(not)existing-data and nobody will ever be able to find it anywhere, or to figure out if it really exists, and it anchors in DarkEther and some other shadydarkscams. Maybe I'll do it myself, because if it's done right it won't even need code, just dark magic! Full anonymity s one of the worst traits of Bitcoin. It s attracted lots of scammers and ponzi pumpers. Having something like that in any other coins is something I really would not like to see. Seems, my sarcasm was too subtle... ;-) |
|
|
|
"[...]not approved at least by Microsoft company, it is not necessary to say that this project is worth the attention". My god, my eyes are bleeding !! So microsoft azure is now the only way to tell if a project is nice or not ?? Ahaha
No, it's not. But at least it is one of many signs that Factom is on a really good way and taken seriously. Why? Because it's obvious that Factom is not just about future promises. The team delivers, is highly active and I never saw a project that is so thought-out in every aspect. With that said: It's not possible to compare a PoS-Coin that started 2 weeks ago with some promises with Factom and to say that it would do more with less money and all the nice words. I don't say it's not with good intentions, but while it's easy to sing the correct words of "I want it all" it doesn't make anybody to Freddie Mercury. ;-) Great song btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFDcoX7s6rEThis "PoS-Coin" was actually launched 9 months ago on May 17, 2015; 7 months before FACTOM. Only 2 weeks the coin rebranded to a more professional image. Also, only 2 weeks ago the first SmartChain phase was released to the mainnet for public use. I think Phase 2 should be coming tomorrow or so. It took over 9 months to develop this ground breaking technology. The Radium development team delivers and is active. And already have delivered/are continuing to deliver on their promises. I have nothing against that project and I wish you all the best with it. I just wouldn't compare it with Factom because there are reasons why Factom is where it is. And if you believe it's just about money: That Factom is well funded is also a result of work. They started over 12 months ago with it. You seem to believe Factom started when it hit Poloniex, but you just have to look when this thread started: November 07, 2014, 03:55:09 AM, and it needed also work before. It's about every step. There may be similarities regarding the base-idea, but it's not just about that. It's about the whole concept and every detail and how it's done and sure, than it's also about money-backing. There are also reasons why Radiom is where it is. There must be reasons why it needed a re-launch or why it needed even a new Twitter account with actually 35 followers or why the coinmarketcap shows a chart since Jan 18 and so on. That are also the reasons why I believed it's a new project. But again, I wish you all the best with it and maybe it will be a success and maybe it's helpful to get some attention for it in the Factom-thread. ;-) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
