Yep, I hope they won't sabotage themselves so bad this time.


I wish to see something interesting and this can only work if Ferrari is on their good days. I don't even care if it's Ferrari - RBR or Ferrari - Mercedes.. or even both (heh...).


Iirc at some point Checo has been asking he no longer gets certain updates in his car, since it's now stable and he's comfy/happy in there. I may not remember all of it, but the lack of upgrades may be related to that. Or did he reconsider that decision and I've missed it?


I thought that you've implied that I only read the Monday newspaper and make some random posts based on that.
Maybe it was a misunderstanding from my part too.


I never said he's bad. Just he's not best (there's a very good chance there's no "best" at all in current line up).


More than welcome. We both can be wrong, but as long as we discuss it, all should be good.


Yep, can't wait. And it may be the first of the 3 I'll actually see it in time (and also at least the qualifying).

The parameter has to be either a folder, either a filename (not a file path!). You've still put a path there, of course it's not working.
Maybe nc50lc's answer makes it clearer?

I don't know what happens there. My current scenario is that with the huge development for this year and the problems afterwards, Ferrari may be short with money and try to do all they can with the current crew to not need more funds there too.

I've read some weak explanations today:



Imho it's a weak explanation because 24 - 17 = 7 seconds, while the pit stop was more than 10 sec extra (12.7s total). Imho they should have done a couple of rehearsals/drills to avoid this, especially knowing it's an oddly narrow garage.
Of course, some will argue that's easy to tell from outside. But don't they have a lot of well-paid people (including Binotto) who should think on all this way before they happen?!

This was the first thing that came into my mind. I was expecting more from Trezor, I was expecting they won't be as "hungry" as Ledger and as eager to make questionable partnerships.
Oh well, I guess that nobody is forced to use Wasabi/CoinJoin from Trezor Suite (although I'm afraid many will do).

I didn't use this, but according to the error message you may have to have either


or



but certainly not the full path.
Of course, this may mean some adaptations in filenames or paths.


All the examples on the net seem to be loading wallet.dat without a path. Is it a problem for you to put into the datadir the wallet(s) you're planning to load?

This nonsense happens because they're private businesses with virtually no competition (i.e. they're pretty much a cartel). This means they can optimize (cut) costs by not providing the services they promise without being afraid the competitors will "fill the gap". Even more, they've probably paid up politicians to "not notice" the banks make false claims/false advertising.
Depending on the country some of these (dirty) moves may or may not work.

So it's a shared guilt between the private businesses (banks) and the politicians.
The quick fix is bitcoin. The long term fix that also has to be done is be more careful what you vote for next time.

Probabil e tardiv raspunsul meu, dar deja ti s-a spus numele persoanei: TheQuin   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;user=TheQuin
Dar nu cred ca va face nimic, vezi ce scriu mai departe.


Eu as vota mai degraba pe cineva care, prin phishing, a facut rost de informatii (user, parola) - fie legate de contul tau freebitco.in, fie legate de contul tau de e-mail.
As mai vota si ca prima intrebare (daca discuti cu TheQuin) va fi daca ai 2FA activat.


Multa bafta (cu tot sarcasmul de rigoare).


Vai, dar noi nu suntem suport la acel website, deci adresa ta de mail este complet irelevanta. Sa inteleg ca pe urmele noastre doreai sa arunci toate efectivele federale ale statelor unite?


Asta ma face sa cred ca de fapt nu ai nimic securizat ca lumea. Mai ales ca de obicei cea mai mare problema de securitate se afla intre tastatura si .. scaun.

So true!

@Ratimov: while this is a wonderful topic and a nice experiment that could act as a wakeup call (no matter the issues already expressed), far too many people are too greedy (or needy!) to get smart or to think a little, at very least. So no matter how many wakeup calls people try to make, they will not listen.. until it's too late. So while it's a nice thing (hence the merit), it's, unfortunately, pretty much futile.

Avem un concurs mai aparte:

[FREE RAFFLE + CAVEAT] 🔶 7 of 8 limited edition BCB prints 🔶 Whats the catch?
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412649

Organizator: aoluain

Se poate castiga:
Ei, aici nu sunt sigur ca am inteles bine..
In prima faza se castiga un "negativ" pentru colorat. Acela trebuie colorat si trimis inapoi prin posta. Pe baza acestora se vor tipari niste postere in serie limitata.
Daca am inteles corect, castigatorii vor primi apoi un poster tiparit.


Poate participa oricine.
Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar (care nu a fost deja rezervat) de la 01 la 21
Transportul este gratuit, dar castigatorii trebuie sa coloreze "negativul" si sa il trimita inapoi prin posta pe cheltuiala lor.

Concurs incheiat.

All transactions containing an address are under that address in a blockchain explorer, it's not an advanced option.
But maybe you indeed want something (much) more complicated (which you either didn't express well, either I misunderstood). And then you may want to take a look at this topic (and related pages) : Bitcoin in SQL

Keep in mind that, at least in EU, having no-KYC cards require the card total top-up, for the entire card lifetime, is somewhere around 250 EUR. So the minimum 300$ sounds fishy (and greedy).
Of course, there can be done tricks like issuing the cards on others' names, but that is also risky, possibly illegal, and clearly overly expensive.

EU has pretty much done this - and there are discussions for doing this even better - but UK is not in EU, heh...

But I would be very careful with UK new PM. She seems to tell/promise a lot of nice things and I'm afraid she won't be able to fulfill all of that because, you know, public funds is usually a limited resource.
However, the first few "promises" getting implemented may "be lucky". Fingers crossed.

It doesn't matter much. Just look at his trust feedback (and flag).. and move on. You will probably be wasting your time for nothing if you do otherwise.

All in all, I do like it. It's my fav block explorer and putting it onto tor is a good step forward.
However, who is handling the hosting / has access to the data (logs?) in there? (is it only you?)


It works for me...

Sent you a PM. I hope it's not too bad


One culprit may be ref links and the expectation some may be earning a few pennies off it.

I think that $20k is doable in most western countries. The problem is that most of those affording $20k don't trust bitcoin so they invest so much in that.
Somehow we forget that we're still a small community; and we also forget that this is only the beginning, bitcoin is still young.

I knew about your scripts. But this time it's not only about phrases, it's also (or more) about where these posts are also located.
Do those scripts also handle this? Because if so I will start looking for phrases when this kind of topics pop up.

The only information I've found is about "custom integration"


I guess that best would be e-mail them (support@coinatmradar.com) and ask.
And if the answers you get are not what you'd like (i.e. if it's a paid service), you can look for the (few) competitors, maybe you get lucky.

That Amulet is spamming mindlessly everything, from bitcoin discussion to meta and local boards.
I keep reporting them but I wish a mod would add some keywords into a script and just remove automatically those posts, especially if they're not in altcoin discussion/announements areas.

I don't know how you plan your setup, but it may worth keeping in mind that ASICs are very noisy devices.
So if you plan to do this at "home" scale, and actually at home, ASIC may be a problematic choice.

On the altcoins mining part I cannot advise, that you may want to ask in altcoin mining sub.