Côté commerces : Avec des services comme bitpay la volatilité n'a aucune conséquence pour les vendeurs.
Bitpay: prends de forte charge 0,99% des transactions sans autres frais difficile de faire plus bas dans l'industrie. Coinbase est à 1% avec le premier million gratuit. Coinbase: 0%*
|
|
|
So it's clear now that it had no effect. Bitadam failed again isn't it ?
|
|
|
No.
It has nothing to do with the price.
Next ?
|
|
|
I'd just like to bring attention to Retep's proposition at this link and Cunicula's valuable comment regarding derivatives/smart property, in case anyone didn't catch it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299679.0I really think these things need serious consideration and I'm a bit concerned with the dismissive attitude they have received. The consensus on Retep's ability and knowledge regarding Bitcoin is that of high regard from what I can tell. This seems like a potentially invaluable resource. The white paper is a good outline, but this could provide a more solid framework to build on, giving focus and direction and accelerating development. I'm sure the content of the reports can be optimized so it's effectively aligned with the projects goals, as decided by the board and community. It's at least worth negotiating, even if you don't go down that road in the end. Regarding Cunicula's comment, is there a plan to consult someone with an economics background to be sure you're building a viable system for the smart property/derivatives? J.R., you said one of the great features of the planned smart property implementation is it's simplicity. Are you professionally qualified to claim viability of the planned design in these type of systems and markets? A well working system is as simple or complicated as it needs to be. To move forward rigidly with your plan, viability be damned because you want a "simple" design, seems like a setup for failure. I realize these aren't absolute priorities at the moment. But they will be in the (near) future and it just feels a bit flying-by-the-seat-of-your-pants with the talk about some of this. You've laid out the basics with the white paper. Personally, I'd expect team building (probably more ad-hoc than structured for the moment, I know) so the goals for the respective parts of the project can be met effectively by those with the most suitable skills and knowledge. The coding contest and everyone doing the work they are is a great start. These considerations could be an important addition. About that, can the board officially prononce a statement about the retep offer?
|
|
|
Just a work-in-progress update on my (thin) Mastercoin client. I've been working on a Mastercoin client that uses a combination of the Mastercoin ruby library and Mastercoin-explorer in order to create a thin-client implementation for Mastercoin. This means that you don't need a local synchronised Bitcoind instance in order to make Mastercoin payments. Right now this is a very centralised solution but once the Alpha version is out I will create a Mastercoin-server project that will enable users to setup their own Mastercoin servers which clients can connect to; think Electrum. All the client requires is a private key of a Mastercoin address and enough Bitcoin balance to create a valid transaction. I just send my first valid multi-sig Mastercoin transaction so I figured this is as good as time as any to show some early wip screenies. The first real transaction can be found on Mastercoin-explorer and Blockchain.infoThere is still a lot of work to do but at least we are getting somewhere. I hope somebody else can send some multisig transactions soon so we can finalise the spec and start working on the next feature This will be my last post for a while as I will be leaving the country and be without internet for a few days. See you all on monday Amazing job ! Congrats and keep going it like that
|
|
|
I'm not fully understanding all the technical specs currently. But with BTC-TC who's winding down and the current developement/tools/knowledge is it possible to offer an elegant prototype solution to handle shares of an asset over the bitcoin protocol/with mastercoin protocol within a few weeks ? It's a good timing to do so I think because a lot of speculation are done also about the possible shutdown of the 2 others important securities exchanges which are Bitfunder and Havelock. And without these exchanges, a lot of people are afraid to hold only bags of non-existing shares.
With what happened to Btc-tc and the SEC inquiries, that would be a KILLER feature in a perfect timing (and very profitable).
|
|
|
BTCTC had a 30 minutes maintenance and cleared all orderbooks.
BTCTC will close next month. Please give more details about the way Neo Bee (TAT), you will solve this. Thanks.
|
|
|
excellent
|
|
|
Remember when he was a bear? Wouldn't want that to happen right after I subscribe :-)
when was that? I only know the 180-Adam. That's because you subscribed on the board the day of the bubble LOL
|
|
|
The more I click on this thread and the more I hear from its leadership, the more promising this whole pursuit becomes.
And I'm not alone.
Acquaintances of mine who don't want to get involved in mining securities are heavily looking into investing in N&B. The potential is spectacular - let's keep this up.
|
|
|
Free money ? Play with money ?
|
|
|
It has already been done, saw a similiar website in january/february... so nothing new, sorry.
|
|
|
I just saw this stock on havelock. Did people put really 29,800 BTC (~$3,819,764.00) on a 1 page amateur prospectus ? Wow.
Havelock should be discredited to offer IPO like this. Funds asked to be raised are consequent and what is offered hasn't even a business plan nor a prototype/MVP running.
|
|
|
- The surge of mastercoin protocol (?) (mastercoin.org) - Stock market crash - end of QE (FED) - emerging country currencies crash (on-going) - the new ATH price (>266$) - China statement about Bitcoin
|
|
|
It's called demurrage, one specific feature of freicon.
Cheers !
|
|
|
J'incite fortement les nouveaux venus à s'interesser à ripple. www.ripple.comTu en possèdes combien ? 20 000 du premier giveaway. Mais tu te trompes sur mes intentions... Ce système est vraiment interessant. Beaucoup de propagande stupide à été diffusée pour faire croire le contraire mais je pense que ça va s'attenuer avec le temps et les avancés de ripple. Ce n'est vraiment pas beau de mentir, booouh ! Tu as été très actifs dans des posts d'achat/vente de XRP : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=208329I'm still buying if anyone interested . Et dans le genre commercial intrusif qui met le pied dans la porte sans morale t'es pas mal du tout: Ok I confess I try to harm my competitor and I won't do that again promise but I challenge you to find one personn who hasn't made a good deal with me. I still offer the best prices and those who dealt with me knows it. Pourquoi t'en es arrivé là ?
|
|
|
|