Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 02:04:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 ... 367 »
2681  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: MN-WORLD - FAKE TEAM on: January 12, 2019, 11:18:29 PM
It's not my job to look something up to justify your scam. When you or your shills are making statements like "they've been doing this for year" and the domain is registered a couple of months ago - that's a red flag. It's your decision to bring that up, just like it's your decision to put fake pictures on the site.
there was a site
one year old
www.mn-world.eu
now it is cold.

https://whois.eurid.eu/en/search?domain=mn-world.eu
Domain name mn-world.eu
Status In Use
Registered 14 Mar 2018
Registrar Tucows.com Co.



https://twitter.com/MnWorld5




http://www.mnworld.co.in/



http://whois.domaintools.com/mnworld.co.in
Registrant Org    MN World Enterprise Pvt Ltd
Dates    3,806 days old
Created on 2008-08-11
Expires on 2019-08-11
Updated on 2018-09-25
IP Location    Singapore - Singapore - Singapore - Digitalocean Llc


https://www.linkedin.com/company/mnworldenterprise/about/
https://www.indiamart.com/mn-world-enterprise-ltd/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rajesh-bharadwaj-1b76b844/
(not related, similar logo)

I can't find anything about www.mn-world.eu. Where was it advertised?
2682  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitsmo - SCAM ICO - Fake Team on: January 12, 2019, 10:35:41 PM
I posted content about them, and I removed it 24 hours later after I received your complaint, but yet I NEVER received your reply over it or the negative feedback removed. So, can you tell me what was my fault exactly?

So, ICOEthics, can you please tell me what was my FAULT here? You said that I didn't took action, but I did for Arbitao and that WITHIN 24 hours of the "POSTED" time and only FEW hours after receiving the complaint, yet nothing changed.

June 11, 2018, 10:07:20 AM --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4455437.0 0.75% daily
2018-06-16 ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2084637 first -ve
June 17, 2018, 09:31:38 PM --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4486941.0 scam accusation
June 17, 2018, 11:56:18 PM --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4486941.msg40344351#msg40344351 give us 24 hours
2018-06-19 --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2084637 second and third -ve

23 days after...

July 09, 2018, 10:30:04 PM --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4632175.0 http://archive.is/1uIbT shilling hard for arbitardao
2018-07-10 --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1187801 -ve

Buddy, did you even checked your inbox?

July 10, 2018, 04:26:35 PM
Quote
Hey mate, what's the problem? Why did you left a negative feedback??? What's the problem?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4907727.0 bitsmo thread remains open. Team failed KYC. Questions in this thread - not answered.

2018-11-02 --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1187801 -ve for shilling for bitsmo
January, 12, 2019, 06:38:36 PM --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5062208.msg49197145#msg49197145 "WTF??"
2683  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: GCOX did not PAY me After doing Months of Bounty Because of KYC on: January 12, 2019, 08:23:56 PM
I'm a bounty Hunter for almost 2 years now and as far as I know only GCOX is the only project that even the bounty hunters need to pass the KYC
This is completely irrelevant.

I don't know why they are not letting me to pass another document's I still remember that I only submitted twice, but they said I submitted 6 times, It's not my fault because their system is not optimized and very lag when doing a KYC.
I don't understand this part. Submitted 2 (6) times with the same papers or different papers? Or you hit "submit" button 2 (6) times?

I did not manipulate any documents and if the document is blurry
Was it blurry?
2684  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: VENJOCOIN: Blockchain Based High Value-Asset Decentralized Tracking and Trading on: January 12, 2019, 08:10:53 PM
Quote
Joan Francisco
Leading the initial construction of multiple blockchain projects, from the blockchain token concept to the technical level.

Where can we find multiple blockchain projects?


Also address this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096508.0
2685  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: 🌟🌟🚀[BOUNTY]ATLANT PLATFORM🚀🌟🌟 on: January 12, 2019, 06:49:05 PM
To repeat:

KYC & Whitelisting are described in the whitepaper which is over 1.5yr old.
Notice of requirements appeared in every social media/channel/announcement board that the firm has 2 months before being implemented.
We encourage you to follow ATLANT news and releases on Telegram and blog.atlant.io a little closer. The project has more to offer than just bounty.[/b]
Can you point me part of whitepaper where it says that bounty hunters have to pay 1 ETH to receive their rewards?

Whitepapers are meant to describe the business case and detail underlying technology, not bounty or up to date costs of the service. Also, 1 ETH is a whitelisting fee, not a bounty hunter fee.
Under whose jurisdiction are you allowed to do that?
2686  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: 🌟🌟🚀[BOUNTY]ATLANT PLATFORM🚀🌟🌟 on: January 12, 2019, 04:03:27 PM
To repeat:

KYC & Whitelisting are described in the whitepaper which is over 1.5yr old.
Notice of requirements appeared in every social media/channel/announcement board that the firm has 2 months before being implemented.
We encourage you to follow ATLANT news and releases on Telegram and blog.atlant.io a little closer. The project has more to offer than just bounty.[/b]
Can you point me part of whitepaper where it says that bounty hunters have to pay 1 ETH to receive their rewards?
2687  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Atlant does not want to pay participants in the atlant bounty campaigns on: January 12, 2019, 03:59:13 PM
@Frogman, @Fdanconia (managers) are not painted red because Lauda is not a DT member anymore.[/b]
Or, because you didn't paint them red.

So you guys basically payed 1ETH to give your KYC to strangers. It is not bounty reward which would worry me.
2688  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Socialremit - Adviser with fake picture - stealing people's identity on: January 12, 2019, 01:49:17 PM
Which company refuses to make video of their project to say couple of words to potential investors?

I suppose you don't won't to do video interview either?

Quote
STOP LYING SAYING THAT THE COMPANY KNEW IT WAS A PHOTOGRAPH OF SOMEONE AGAIN TO THE PROJECT
No one is lying, you knew it and you kept holding fake picture at your site, everything is archived:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5075610.msg48954493#msg48954493

Quote
As far as Mr. Wazin is concerned, he is a good programmer and I know him personally by traveling to Russia to meet him in September and he is a good person
Quote
Someone has archived site 3 times between 6 Aug 2018 and 12 Dec 2018 and as you can see, on August, 6. http://web.archive.org/web/20180806000527/http://socialremit.com/ blockchain advisor used picture of some random guy, on December, 12. http://web.archive.org/web/20181212075713/http://socialremit.com/ the picture was still there.
Quote
Here nobody directly from the company lied to anyone.
Mr Wazin He said he was an employee of his development team.
STOP LYING SAYING THAT THE COMPANY KNEW IT WAS A PHOTOGRAPH OF SOMEONE AGAIN TO THE PROJECT

Very professional company.  Grin



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2481571

Looks like:
a lie
a gossip.
defamed

INCREDIBLE THAT THE ECO ICO ACCEPTS THE PAYMENT OF 100USD OF AN EX-EMPLOYEE TO SPEAK BAD OF THE COMPANY
instead of calling by phone or sending an email or visiting us in London, but of course, it is easy to say falsehoods about projects or people when you hide your face and find yourself behind a computer screen
Ethics ICO little professionalism
Do you have proofs of this? If this is not true maybe ICOethics should sue you?
2689  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Ethereum Classic Vision scam on: January 12, 2019, 01:38:59 PM
Trading pairs with ETCV appeared on the Yobit exchange.
Does it prove that they are legit ? I think Yobit itself is a scam. Lots of Accusation against them.
They list everything they can and they are not removing anything and exchange is full of scam coins, dead coins and "pump and dump" coins(also, not provably fair dice and some kind of weird investment scheme which looks like ponzi). I traded there in the past and I never had problem with them but users complained about waiting for withdrawal for several months, and yeah, they have shitty support. They don't care what they put on exchange.
2690  Other / Meta / Re: | Irrefutable Evidence that Lauda is running the forum with alts and "bitches" | on: January 12, 2019, 12:59:47 PM
This picture looks about right. Cheesy There may be more members involved in this cult, but they remain hidden in the shadows.
I was wondering where I am indeed, but I'm fine with keeping a low profile lurking in the shadows.
You are artificial neural network. No one was able to take picture.
2691  Other / Meta / Re: | Irrefutable Evidence that Lauda is running the forum with alts and "bitches" | on: January 12, 2019, 03:23:33 AM
Lauda wears glasses so she/he/it is Vod.
2692  Economy / Reputation / Re: 6 more Alts abusers waiting red trust from DT on: January 12, 2019, 02:52:12 AM
Since I've been added on DT from 2 DT1, I'm starting to get vindictive negative feedbacks from user tagged from me for abuse.
That is not all you will get.
I see you have sent many -ve so be prepared for threats, trolling, harassment, PM spam, framing, lies and all other things butthurts do.

Welcome to DT  Smiley
2693  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: GCOX did not PAY me After doing Months of Bounty Because of KYC on: January 12, 2019, 01:28:49 AM
I did a bounty on GCOX and After the bounty this KYC came and I did not get my tokens worth of $1100 because my KYC got rejected, the problem is when I start doing this bounty there is no warning on the bounty thread about doing a kyc here is the bounty thread link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4608750.0
and also in the bounty thread there is no warning about KYC after a month of bounty and after using me they did this KYC thing
There was rule for all campaings:
Quote
To receive tokens register an account here https://acm.gcox.com/register
Before you registered account, you agreed to ToS:
Quote
2.3 When applying for a User Account, you may be required to provide information (such as name, e-mail, etc.) to us in accordance with our instructions. You represent and warrant that (a) all information that you provide to us in accurate, true and complete; (b) you will promptly update us of any changes to the information you provide; and (c) you are of legal age and have the requisite mental and legal capacity in accordance with the applicable laws to accept these terms and apply for a User Account. We may, if required or in accordance with applicable laws, check and verify the information you provide. You agree to cooperate and extend to us any assistance that we may require for such checks and verifications.
"Warning" was there, you didn't read it.

I did not manipulate any documents and if the document is blurry or something I can Submit another document that is clear but they won't allow me
I don't see any reason why they shouldn't accept another document. Is it blurry?

not paying me with my hard work
Please  Roll Eyes
2694  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitsmo - SCAM ICO - Fake Team on: January 12, 2019, 12:41:36 AM
But I guess most people LOVE using their Power regardless of whether the person is correct or not.
You do realize that you have been tagged for different things, right?

1) RAISEX
2) Arbitao
3) VEIAG
4) Bitsmo
5) Gold Bits Coin

I am not sure how these negative feedback are meant to helpful?
They are helpful, people will see that you are promoting scams and they will stay away from you which will save them few bucks.

What happened to bismo? They fail KYC test and disappeared from BCT.


2695  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: VaultMeX - Cluster2k on: January 11, 2019, 10:36:46 PM
I noticed this feedback in Cluster's trust wall:



They paid for what? A bald faced lie?
So, you're not removing it because:
A) They paid for it
B) You're still afk
C) ?
I think it is ?.

In addition to your finding

Quote

IamNotSure joined coincaps signature campaign:

I'd like to participate in your signature campaign! I like the website a lot, it's a true and usable alternative to coinmarketcap and similar websites.

I really enjoy the ICO list and news page within such kind of capitalization website.
But I can't find account in spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E45T0YxPYTngHK8oa4O769kijYKkQyPQPPB2zwUVMJU/edit#gid=0



And, was active today:



In IamNotSure's lending thread http://archive.is/vYtMT rondex posted this:

~
Any staked address with this account on the forum?
Your account only is not enough for such amount. Any altcoins?
But, few minutes later IamNotSure is not sure why:

~
Why is this guy messing with my lending? Are you rondex ok? Please leave my thread.
[...]

------------------------

Quote
A few days later a VaultMex shill name of chromosoma turns up with a "review"

Chromosoma is interested in Cluster's domain:

I am interested in some of your domains for sale. I sent you a PM.  Smiley

Feedback on trust wall is pointing to this:


...but I don't see any records:


--------------------

Some merit stats from https://bpip.org/

Rondex to Cluster2k:


Cluster2k and chromosoma to VaultMeX:


IamNotSure to Cluster2K:
2696  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: VaultMeX - Cluster2k on: January 11, 2019, 11:13:59 AM
They paid for it until June 2019, I won't remove it until it is scam confirmed in any way. I think is not fair to remove that paid service.

EDIT: I'm also afk so I'm not able to make any changes to coincaps.ai website from here.

You have removed my post from self moderated thread and locked thread after it:

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
As already explained they paid for that service and I'm not gonna remove it until the end of the promotion.
First of all, this is referral link:



This is nothing but lying and misleading people, based on what is VaultMeX number one exchange? Your referral link? Payed shilling?



To update post with quote:

VaultMex is a great exchange, I never had a single problem with deposits, trades or withdrawals.

I recommend this exchange with 0% trading fees and great support for all the users who behave normally and correctly.

Did you noticed that VaultMex posted on their discord that PLT server was under maintenance, you prick?



I agree.

I transacted more than 25 BTC in and out from this exchange and more than 1M DOGE, I traded so much with 0% fee and I literally love this  Grin. Althought wd fees are not the lowest on earth saving on such big amounts of trading fees is amazing for medium/big traders.

It's just a matter of time and all the big volume traders will move to https://vaultmex.com. Also I enjoy a lot that the exchange has no KYC nor identity verification to move funds nor limits on deposits and so on.

Privacy offered by the VaultMex platform is an amzing feature too!

Vaultmex is a good exchange and can't be distrusted for two FUDders in the posts above.
Archived http://archive.is/oQg5G

Strange, IamNotSure also wears CoinCaps's signature. Coincidence?
..but I don't see that you have answered question:
Quote
based on what is VaultMeX number one exchange?
You can do it here now.
2697  Other / Meta / Re: Please stop make new topic regarding "DT" complain until Monday. on: January 11, 2019, 03:44:20 AM
Meta and Reputation board are full by shit post.
There are some shitposts but I woldn't agree that boards are full of shitposts.

I counted 4 shit-threads based on my personal view.
One user is ranting.
Something about DT is infested.
Need cure.
Much medicine.

Other threads are fine.
2698  Economy / Reputation / Re: All topics about Lauda in Meta and Reputation on: January 11, 2019, 01:18:02 AM
     5. Theymos wssp
This one is about Lauda  Cheesy
2699  Local / Off-topic (Hrvatski) / Re: eobot2019cc on: January 10, 2019, 11:49:59 PM
SCAM
Ja sam ulozio 0.05 Btc i posle par dana, zatrazio sam isplatu na 3000 doge i nista od toga. Ljudi nemoj se lagati ovo je SCAMMMM.
Undecided

http://whois.domaintools.com/eobot2019.cc
Dates    22 days old
Created on 2018-12-19
Expires on 2019-12-19
Updated on 2018-12-19


Novi sajt i registriran na godinu dana.

Evo par linkova vezano sa ovu prevaru:
https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/eobot2019.cc
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sitereport.html?url=eobot2019.cc
https://www.spamhaus.org/query/domain/eobot2019.cc
https://quttera.com/detailed_report/eobot2019.cc

Ovaj zadni link pokazuje nekakav malware(nisam išao gledati detalje):

2700  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Ethereum Classic Vision scam on: January 10, 2019, 11:04:04 PM
This is not completely proven to be a scam, although there are many signs that says it is.
What proofs do you need?
Launched wallet, got caught, domain suspended, another wallet launched.
let's see what will happen tomorrow i tried to sell account or get loan for it i received a lot of negative feedback but they can't do it for the guys who scam for millions of dollars (scam ) not even accusation like me
Who are "they" and what this has to do with scam accusation?
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 ... 367 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!