I'll start tagging the participants, let's see where it ends  EDIT1: Tagged all members that applied on the first page, will do 2nd page tomorrow. I used to tag all scam ICO promoters when they have been warned about ICO being scam. I just want to say that I support your action, this applies for every service which holds users funds against their will - if there is unresolved issue with user's funds community should force service to give funds back to user. I suppose tagging and flagging such accounts won't matter much but there are other things to do - say fuck off to all scam promoters: 1) put all scam promoters on ignore
2) Don't make any deals with them
3) Campaign managers ban them from joining campaigns you are runningThey don't deserve to be part of this community. Say FUCK OFF to scammers and their promoters, lets keep this community scam free!  |
|
|
|
I won't tell him if you give me a 49% cut  It seems Livecoin Manager broke our contract, no bribe thingies for you two  A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. |
|
|
|
Hey FJ, recently I just start to play on your slot games which is mega moolah if I am not mistaken the name. Anyway, I just start to play it here and wondering about the jackpot. It seems quite confusing anyway because it divide into 4 tiers which mini, minor, major and mega. How am I getting this? Because it said that for mini starts at 10.00, does it mean the winning amount or the starting bet? Because I hit it the scatter 3 times first and second is below 10.00 payout and the last one is around 10.85 payout but it does not trigger anything here. Mind to explain?
Jackpot wheel is randomly triggered, it means you don't have to win the bet. The bigger bet amount - higher chance that you will trigger the wheel. Jackpot amount doesn't depend on bet, it is always one of the amounts which is shown at the top of the screen. Account panjul07 who posted about hitting 5 lions to trigger the wheel is pretty much spamming: To win the jackpot you need to hit a 5 lion symbol in the first payline (middle) then you will get the chance to spin the mega moolah jackpot wheel.
[...]
Afaik no matter how much your bet amount, you have the chance to win the jackpot as long as you get 5 lion symbol on the first line. I have won few times the mini jackpot with the minimum bet $0.25.
Besides, I doubt that you have won 5 wild cards few times. edited |
|
|
|
TLDR: There is currently a hole in the flag system that does not allow you to report one sided damage done such as theft. Another example, if I just throw a metaphorical baseball through your metaphorical window, there is nothing you can do about it because I onesidedly damaged you, there was no contract to breach, so you can't flag me.
That is correct. On my honor, I affirm the following:
1) This user violated a written contract/(a casual/implied agreement - flag type 2), resulting in damages;
2) I have not been made whole by the user;
3) no existing flag covers this same incident;
4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic;
5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above. If only 1 of these 5 things is not valid user can't create flag type 2 or 3. Not only that, user can't create flag type 2 or 3 on the behalf of another user. Case we were arguing about, user "A" created red flag against bob123 and then account which user A's friend tried to sell created flag against user "A" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=322 That is all they can do, to create newbie/guest flag. |
|
|
|
Pinkie promise?  Looks like contract to me. |
|
|
|
Don't tell Darkstar_ and I will maybe send you half funds which livecoin will pay me: * Users should not remove signature during the campaign period. Funny actually, reading the rules and finding out that you can be payed just because you won't remove signature  |
|
|
|
|
Some anonymous person on internet said that they will give you 1000$ if you pay them 300$.
You payed them 300$ and instead giving you 1000$ they offered you more money if you send them more money.
And then you sent them more money and again they offered you more money and you again payed more money.
WHY?
|
|
|
|
But you didn't confirm nor deny correct amount above which you are enforcing KYC. Can you write exact number using USD?
As we mentioned, amount is not the criterion. But it is one of the criteria. Please post amount above which freewallet has to perform identity verification because of AML and CTF regulation and all criteria for which you ask users to verify identity to comply with AML/CTF regulation. |
|
|
|
I have read rules I like your troll level I don't know what are you talking about |
|
|
|
Prije će biti ono prvo, taj topic je vjerojatno najduži u povijesti tema za ukidanje permabana (i najdugovječniji) i teško da će si netko dati truda da sve pročita, na žalost.
Hm da, evo tvplus-u su unbanali acc (čitajte od ovog posta https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147004.msg51863438#msg51863438) čini se da je theymos pregledao koliko je zapravo bilo reporta protiv korisnika, pokazalo se da je samo jedan koji se u neku ruku i ne mora gledati kao plagiarizam (post je u istoj temi, nije za signature itd). Ja pretpostavljam da regulusa ne žele unbanati iz razloga što je bilo više od jednog c/p posta.
Nego, ima li kakav zanimljiv za poslati merit? |
|
|
|
I just want to say that I have joined ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166711.msg51880431#msg51880431) livecoin signature campaign, according to signature campaign rules: Rules
* Only Hero & Legendary members may apply.
* Users with negative trust is not allowed.
* Minimum 8 Post & Maximum 50 Post will be counted.
* No minimum characters but the post should be constructive for payment.
* Users should not remove signature during the campaign period.
* Boards excluded - Games & Rounds, Off-topic, Politics & Society.
* Each Round starts from Sunday to Saturday. (Forum Time)
* Payments will be made on Sunday. HOW TO JOIN Btctalk name:
Btctalk URL:
Rank:
Current post count:
BTC Address :
Merit : I have read rules and I accepted them, I will not remove signature during the campaign period. Joining was easiest, I only had to put some info from this coded thingy. So I am in signature campagin! |
|
|
|
creepy how he's stalking me from one thread to the next
Have you followed me here to say that I am stalking you? Somebody feel free to PM @theymos to come have a look at this thread
timelord said someone should contact theymos to look thread and I don't think this system will work if we will call theymos for every single flag so I am using this opportunity to invite other valuable members to join discussion and share opinions about flags
So you don't want to hear other opinions? I do. his duplicate Flag
It is not my fault that you don't want to accept reasonable explanation why this flag is valid, the same way you don't want to except why QS's flag is valid. Perhaps you need more than 2 confirmation that flag is not duplicate? |
|
|
|
Looking at it from a mod's perspective, I don't actually see a reason to unban you.
Interesting. Then how all other accounts are getting unbanned? Looking at it from my perspective I see: account is banned because they c/p post and that maybe wasn't malicious attempt to blatant copy/paste someone's hm..."work"? for post count, maybe user really wanted to be helpful but instead putting things under quotation marks they just c/p post. Maybe it is just me and I am defending scam busters (60+ scams exposed), well, I'll be damned if that is not millions dollars saved in investards pocket. That is net positive. It is damn time consuming, I can tell you that from first hand. It is much easier to go to gambling section and spam 20 messages to say how you agree that LUCK IS NEEDED for fucking win! Banning users who are exposing scams while keeping users who are discussing " If I gamble and I pick nose at the same time, will I win?" is wrong! It would be OK to say why this user does not deserve a second chance! |
|
|
|
I am trying to have some nice ad hominem conversation with timelord here and he said " yes, yes, you are wrong, I am right" and then I said " no no no, you are wrong and I am right" and timelord said someone should contact theymos to look thread and I don't think this system will work if we will call theymos for every single flag so I am using this opportunity to invite other valuable members to join discussion and share opinions about flags Punctuation marks soon. |
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing your knowledge and understanding of the process: it's very determined.
But you didn't confirm nor deny correct amount above which you are enforcing KYC. Can you write exact number using USD? Will you admit that not all credible AML algorithms (including the software) adhere to these guidelines?
Why are you asking me questions? Fuck me if I know why. We know that thanks to our system we identified a lot of suspicious transactions, which prevented our customers from losing money. That's a mere practice.
You are playing on AML card so I will assume that you have reported lots of suspicious transactions to authorities because of AML regulation, especially because you are operating under Hong Kong's law which is part of FATF. Is my assumption correct or wrong? |
|
|
|
I can do that too, you know! Given marboroza has already started a thread asking us to distrust him it's little surprise he has only now gone back and supported the flag all these weeks later. He doesn't have anything to loose by supporting a flag that was created incorrectly. Timelord opposed this flag: 
Update topic, this line is false: This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with That ponzi thread linked by QS raised enough red flags and that should be more than enough to support it. And...  "Due largely to the factors mentioned in topic (scammed people) I believe that anyone dealing with account Plutonium is at high risk of losing money."You don't see red flags in that thread?  Ok, why don't you oppose these flags then, the same way you opposed flag against GP? Go ahead, oppose flags created against scammer(s). The only two times the word Ponzi are mentioned in the Opening Post by Quickseller is in this first paragraph How many times one has to mention word Ponzi until it become valid for you? 3 times? 4? 10? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
