Get 5 BTC for proof who Game Protect scammed and for how much? First come first serve!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5164892.msg51810283#msg51810283May I have 5 btc? It is 3AM and I can't sleep because of this defamation feedback you have sent me. Tomorrow my work will suffer because of this and I will work at less capacity than I usually work and it will reflect my paycheck. I hold you accountable for this. Also, you have caused me other damage, I have been shaking since I have seen this lie in my trust wall. Proof that I was shaking (quoted by actmyname, my post was edited later): This is outrageous lie and this is just another rad flag Damage was so hard that my finger slipped from "e" to "a". I hold you accountable for that too. |
|
|
|
Fair enough, I don't see this warning so wasn't aware of it. I take it back; it clearly does affect their work, and therefore a flag would seem more appropriate to me.
No worries. It works on users who have been tagged in old system and have more negative than positive ratings. Thanks for sharing. Now there just needs to be a post with the image and reference link in order to amend the feedback.
Unfortunately cache is not available  It looks like a valuable lesson in archiving references too, in order to avoid spam feedback in the future.
Yep, threads/posts should be archived. Anyway, I don't think this is spam feedback, thread was removed, that's all. Admin could restore it but I am sure he has better things to do. |
|
|
|
I can prove you that I am not a scamer
I need Europe Americans verified neteller account.. please let me know if someone can do this
This is contradiction. I don't see any valid reason why would anyone buy verified neteller account and as for second account, they said their client wanted to buy ranked "trusted" account so I don't think you should remove -ve. A flag seems more appropriate now instead of negative feedback, if you (and other members) believe that all users who have queried accounts to buy aren't to be trusted that is. Either way, your feedback doesn't affect their "work".
It doesn't look like it does not affect their work:  With saifulbdit91, the reference link intrigues me, as it's missing or off-limits. It just seems like you were promoting your ideology and clicked on the negative button in error while leaving feedback, so should be corrected at minimum. From reading the OP I'll assume they also queried about buying an account, but otherwise I would just consider it spam feedback (no substance) or no evidence feedback. Google showed this:  |
|
|
|
I was unaware that time when my client asked me to look for an account where I could buy. Because he said that posting on this forum requires a ranking member to be trusted.
Who was your client? Or, better, is project still alive? |
|
|
|
questions asked
Does anyone know difference between rhetorical question and question? I told you my opinion and you don't like it, well, that is fine, go and ask for another opinion until you find person who will agree with you. Perhaps if you really would like to benefit the board the most sensible thing to do in your case is delete your account. Ok. If you can point me to delete button I will maybe delete my account. |
|
|
|
The border was crossed, time to take responsibility!
I agree that you have crossed border:  This is outrageous lie and this is just another red flag that you should not be trusted. Can someone archive game-protect's trust page for record of defamation and slander? |
|
|
|
It absolutely disgusts me to see what has crypto come upto.
With all these regulations sooner or later every service will ask for personal information. You need document verifications to have access to your wallet? From a company whose team is anonymous? Op, you're an idiot to be using such scam service in the first place!
I can't say it wasn't expected: Buy cryptocurrency with a credit card on Freewallet
[...]
You may be asked to provide some information about yourself — that is our payment provider’s requirement. How to buy crypto in the wallet
[...]
You may be asked to provide some information about yourself — that is our payment provider’s requirement. Documents
To get crypto, you have to prepare some personal information. We are required to take these precautions to comply with “Know Your Customer” (KYC) and “Anti-Money Laundering” (AML) regulations. We will use your data for verification purposes only. https://freewallet.org/buy-------------------- In your case, the risk-scoring algorithm has detected suspicious activity. For security reasons, we are not able to reveal all the details of this process.
Our guidelines are compliant with international AML regulations and standards.
That's the main reason why this procedure is in place.
I don't really understand this. Was it because of security issue ("suspicious activity") or AML? |
|
|
|
2. If you are unable to ascertain which red tags they are (the clue is all of them)
You said lauda's tags and flags so lets stick to it: Shill account used to spread defamatory bullshit and attack established forum members. Untrustworthy. I have read thread in reference and feedback is factual. You attacked hh because someone rented signature space, and you call them liars, scammers etc. About flag, I have read thread linked in flag but I will have to wait for: moronbozo
...to come from vacation and see what they think about it. |
|
|
|
~
That will be great improvement, although I would call it "true provably fair" rather than "modern"  Just small question about client seed, will you allow players to chose any client seed or it will still be something like this: Seed length must be even (divisible by 2) |
|
|
|
I have been told that there are other cases in court / being settled but not yet any specific news on my case.
Told by who? Did lawyer contact you or you have been contacted by game-protect? Also can you post txID for that 5% you said you have sent to game-protect? |
|
|
|
Clarify what happened to your posts.
Can you do that? Actually, I have change my mind. Don't. I have already wasted months talking to a brick wall. Lots questions - almost zero straight answers. No proofs of anything, only words and insults. Many post have been removed from announcement thread, many relevant posts, which is also red flag. Whatever is posted here by GP I have already read (mostly) so I probably won't respond here any more. |
|
|
|
My understanding is that @theymos stated two flags cannot be created for the same issue.
If a flag has incorrect info, a new one can (and should) be created with the correct info. The old one should be withdrawn though. You'll have to take that up with @LFC_Bitcoin who's post (announcing he had created a flag) you use as proof for your own flag creation. I don't think suchmoon created flag, but I have to recheck this. Anyway, that post has some useful information therefore it is linked in this thread, together with other 2 links you missed. As it is written in topic: I suppose you have read all 43 pages before you decided to oppose flag and you missed suchmoon's post which is only 2 posts under post you have archived [1]? 
[1] (archived timelord's post: http://archive.is/0mKdA#selection-3979.92-3983.1 for the record of archived LCF's post) |
|
|
|
Or are you suggesting The Pharmacist is funneling merits to sockpuppets?
Perhaps The Pharmacist is a foxpuppet. I think he is trying to say that randomness was introduced because The Pharmacist has received too much merits from Foxpup: Take a look at how much merit Foxpup has sent The Pharmacist. I think this is why the random feature was introduced.
|
|
|
|
Yeah... I remember one of the websites that he promoted was on his "scam list".
If it was only one site  |
|
|
|
How has game-protect not got a newb/guest type 1 flag yet?
It wasn't necessary to flag them as they had big red box on top of their thread because of old trust system. I can only say that there isn't any proof that their service helped anyone, however, there is no proof that they didn't but many things in their thread, site and behavior raised many red flags and I personally would not trust them. I mean look at this shit - Game Protect was recently approached by an UK lawyer who is expert for Bitcoin enforcement and we likely can enforce the crypto currencies scam artist Dean Nolan has scammed!
And there is no proof that lawyer did or didn't approached them and knowing GP they won't say anything except this. It seems I can’t create a new flag with the link you provided (a better link) for another 180 days as I’ve already done one. Somebody else will have to do it or hopefully others support the current one.
I would not suggest anyone to support this flag because it will be abuse of system - as suchmoon said, link is not good. Give me a few minutes, I will create new one. Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435 |
|
|
|
DT member sent negative feedback to victim and opposed red flag together with some other signature participants 
Maybe social experiment system needs additional changes? |
|
|
|
What you can do is to fix all the your wrongdoings from the past,you know it by yourself which system you abused and do not think countering lauda's feedbacks from the past will clean your hands.You have been part of his campaign to tag those who oppose them,we arent dumb enough to think that you are now opposing him its clearly just because he was outcast from the table and now losing his power ....and here you are now!
Hello Mr. sockpuppet, for someone who claim they are not dumb you are very dumb. " And I am here now" because...read topic. If you want to discuss unrelated things create new thread for them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
