Jel ima kakvih informacija oko fee-ja, limita i po kojem tečaju obračunavaju? U svakom slučaju, super vijest, za turizam i crypto općenito. Ja sam uvjeren da ćemo jednog dana vidjeti "bitcoin accepted" u svakom dućanu i da će sve ovo postati sasvim normalna stvar, samo da se neke sitnice promjene iz "imovine" u "valute". Eto, brži sam od Buga, mogao sam im poslati vijest prvi  Baš...Ovakve vijesti su vrijedne merita - nažalost, nemam više od 2. Mogao bi promjetiti naziv teme u "Hrvatska holda bitcoine"  |
|
|
|
My favorite would be "pontrazi"
Smartzi  The country should in the law ban Ponzi (USA banned) or not ban (Many Asia and Africe not banned). And fraud as a crime is of course forbidden in any country.
Then you won't mind me asking 3 questions. Which countries? So you have registered ponzi business in one of many Asia and Africa countries? Which one? |
|
|
|
but there's never really been anything concrete presented
There is something in Meta https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3112348.0, however, some posts are missing from forum. Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.
No idea. He either removed it himself or theymos did. Is removed trust feedback stored somewhere?
Latest mental gymnastic: If the definition for a red flag is " high risk of losing money" why do not all the casinos promoted on bitcointalk.org get a red flag? Are you able to see the schizophrenia? Game Protect is not a casino and victims can not lose money! |
|
|
|
Branko odakle ti točno ova informacije?
Reče slackovic u drugom postu da je slika na fejsu. Tražio jesam međutim nisam nigdje našao nikakav članak o ovome niti na stranicama pošte ništa ne piše a ovakva stvar bi vjerovatno bila po svim mogućim i nemogućim medijima, vjerovatno ispred onih vijesti o novom grudnjaku lidije bačić |
|
|
|
SCAM is when all 100% of money is stolen from people.
Investing money enough times will make all money disappear, don't try to teach me math. About legality - yes, in many countries Ponzi is not a crime
In which countries fraud is not a crime?
A Ponzi-contract?
or
As-smart-as-ponzi-contract
smart pyramid |
|
|
|
Yes it decreasing but it sure needs to be decreasing to zero right after each winning because by hitting mini jackpot you will always get 10.00 payout right? Meanwhile the jackpot approx stay between 8.00-10.00. Do you get what I mean?
progressive jackpot starts from specific amount raising until player hits it goes back to start until another lucky player hits it I just want to know actually how this things is going to be because I have not even hit it once after 4th day of playing
explained it was many times, spinning the wheel with dose of luck.
@FJ why is your support trying to convince me that SegWit address is not valid bitcoin address? |
|
|
|
If you don't mind, cite me where does it say that you are supposed to enforce KYC because of AML regulation when user's IP is changed? Are you trying to say if there is no sign of suspicious activity you won't perform identity verification?
That is correct.
You are avoiding to provide clear answers.
Post all criteria under which you will perform identity verification and post "several thousand dollars" using numbers.
We can list using different IP addresses and multiple transfers between accounts with subsequent withdrawals as such criteria.At this point, we will not be able to specify exact amounts. Our KYC policy will be reviewed and I hope to get back to this thread with more transparent information afterward. You have been asked several times already so I will take this as your final answer. So user signs up, exchange $190K to btc, withdraw funds and according to you, if IP is the same and there are no multiple transfers - you won't perform identity verification. So how all this complies with Hong Kong AML regulation? It does not. You stated this: Will you admit that not all credible AML algorithms (including the software) adhere to these guidelines?
We know that thanks to our system we identified a lot of suspicious transactions, which prevented our customers from losing money. That's a mere practice.
And this: You are playing on AML card so I will assume that you have reported lots of suspicious transactions to authorities because of AML regulation, especially because you are operating under Hong Kong's law which is part of FATF. Is my assumption correct or wrong? There are no "AML cards". From time to time we have to address the legal requests of public authorities. I am pretty sure that you have to report suspicious activities to authorities to comply with AML law, it doesn't really work on "request from authorities". Here is another useful link to read https://www.sfc.hk/web/EN/rules-and-standards/anti-money-laundering-and-counter-terrorist-financing/Reading your posts I came to conclusion that you know nothing about AML regulations and you use word "AML" to selectively enforce KYC. |
|
|
|
~
You took wrong screenshot, look:  Taking money from one depositor to pass it to another depositor (plus interest) is not legal. Bonus part is "5% advertising fee" and "5% technical support", which is money you steal from naive people presenting this scheme as legal one. This will eventually collapse and many depositors will lose money. Just because you scumbags started creating smart-contract-based-ponzies doesn't make it less scam.
Hm...maybe we need new term for this scheme? |
|
|
|
But it is one of the criteria.
Please post amount above which freewallet has to perform identity verification because of AML and CTF regulation and all criteria for which you ask users to verify identity to comply with AML/CTF regulation.
Hello, There is no specified amount. We pay particular attention to the amounts from several thousand dollars being transferred with signs of suspicious activity. Are you trying to say if there is no sign of suspicious activity you won't perform identity verification? Or? You are avoiding to provide clear answers.Post all criteria under which you will perform identity verification and post "several thousand dollars" using numbers. |
|
|
|
I do know about the random for the triggered jackpot but it does not give the same payout everytime I saw people hitting the mini jackpot. Lets say for the current pot is 10.xx but when it announce someone winning it the number is only decrease just a little bit here
It is progressive jackpot, it goes up until someone hits it - then it goes down a bit. Then up until someone hits it again. There are 4 pots IIRC, mini - mega, if you hit jackpot spin you will win one of these jackpots and you will win amount which is showed under one of them, don't break your head too much about it. I played for 3 consecutive days and it does not trigger anything
It won't trigger often, however, as I said, bigger bet - higher chance to trigger it. |
|
|
|
It is not plagiarism, we are discussing QS's tags which you claim they are 100% false, all flags are linking the same topic, besides, xtraelv placed source - which is not needed anyway because source is already in your thread. OP should instead spending time on ad hominem's and off topic posts spend some time to edit this thread which is very misleading, unless it does not suit OP's agenda to show that flags are active and not false. I mean, whole thread should be redacted with latest information OP has received. (post archived http://archive.is/hRdsh#selection-11132.8-11132.11) |
|
|
|
That's not fair, you are a DT and you are aware of the trust abuse
Tagging scam advertisers is not trust abuse. I also see that hhampuz has removed negative from some accounts so it is not all black and white like you see it. Next time try to post from real account and maybe people will take you more seriously. Editing this, I noticed accounts who have their negative removed got positive instead. I can only say that this is not the right way. Neutral is appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
They could say that they removed spam from their thread/don't want user to post in their thread/name whatever reason you want and continue to "fight against spam/bump/whatever". There is probably no way to prove it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, so user who posted in self moderated thread can't remove post, topic creator can't remove their own posts but can remove posts from other users.
So basically user create self moderated thread and removes posts posted by bumping bots and they bump thread again.
How is this exactly stopping bump abuse?
|
|
|
|
Self moderation is meant to stop spam, it wouldn't make sense if you can't delete spam for 24 hours.
Why user can't? |
|
|
|
Why users can't delete their posts posted in threads in services if it didn't pass 24 hours but user who created self moderated thread can? |
|
|
|
That was a bad decision on my part and would like to ask what needs to be done so the red tag is taken away and hoping that I can still stay on your campaign.
Why would you want to stay in campaign which you wanted to resign? I was about to delete my application there but unfortunately, the thread was locked yesterday will have to wait a week before it gets unlocked.
 Why would anyone believe you now? Do you believe in your own words?thanks @wwzsocki for correcting me, I forget that it is impossible to remove post within 24 hours. |
|
|
|
I was Hero member when merit was introduced (1.5 year ago), I feel very happy because with today's date I have received 1000 merits which made me, like some users like to say, "self-made legendary member". According to https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=marlboroza, I have " received 1000 merit 464 times, from 158 profiles", so I just wanted to say Thank You! |
|
|
|
1) put all scam promoters on ignore
2) Don't make any deals with them
3) Campaign managers ban them from joining campaigns you are running
I feel sorry for some users,but I think there should be a limit on whom should be blacklisted from campaigns, the fact that some are just good posters and might be just applying without knowing that there are some issues going on the said Exchange. Not all should be excluded, just think of it, they should be just warned, and as for the shitty scumbags who doesnt care about a thing, I support the tagging and the blacklisting of them from the campaigns of the reputed CMs. Campaign manager has negative feedback pointing to scam accusation which is pointing into red flag - there are enough warnings, thus some of them responded in this thread. Ignorance is not excuse. At this moment they are knowingly advertising service which scammed user, you are basically suggesting selection of users who should be blacklisted because they are not eloquent like some other users, well I can tell you that this is simple wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
