I don't see it the way OP see it. I'll pick one random flag (Plutonium): Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic Ponzies are mentioned in that topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1046791.0. I believe that anyone dealing with Plutonium is at a high risk of losing money This thread is mentioned in topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=906261.0;alland guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so Indeed, guests and everyone, because Plutonium is ponzi scammer, as it is visible in thread linked above. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. Connection between other accounts might or might not be true (I did not check everything yet) but this is irrelevant for this flag. Relevant factor is that they are ponzi scammer which is, again, mentioned in QS's thread. Evidence of scamming exist. I actually see flags that should be supported, not bashed. |
|
|
|
~
Hello IQ-6, thanks for increasing visibility of my rental spaces. |
|
|
|
I'm selling a Bustabit script for $30 in BTC that I personally created. If you play super safe and follow the instruction that I provide in this script, I guarantee you'll earn money with it. Been running this script for a while now and have made over $1,000. Depends where you run it, but this script is easy profit.
So why don't you go and make million $ with your super safe script? Q: Is it guaranteed profit?
A: Of course not, it's gambling. However, with the script and you not having an IQ lower than 6, you'll make profit.
Why do you need IQ if you are running a script? Don't trust this user, don't buy this script because you will very likely lose money. Money making method and easy profit in gambling does not exist, whoever is selling such script is trying to scam you. |
|
|
|
Just for fun, I compiled a recent "Best Of" list for game-protect, centered around the word "brain."
Reminds me of this... |
|
|
|
@freewallet can you confirm or deny this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5165363.msg51836767#msg51836767 ?
In scam accusation you have stated this: Hello, As per our terms and conditions, we are authorized to perform the verification procedure: https://freewallet.org/terms (please read the 5th paragraph) However, we are making sure to have our customers' accounts verified as soon as it is technically possible. In your case, the risk-scoring algorithm has detected suspicious activity. For security reasons, we are not able to reveal all the details of this process. Thank you for preparing the requested documents; we'll definitely get back to you today. User transfered $190000 and exchanged them. Tried to withdraw BTC and then you performed KYC. First, KYC should have been enforced at step 1 (user transfered 190000$ exchanged them). Second, KYC should have been enforced at step 2 (user tried to withdraw BTC worth $190K) I will quote this again: [...]we are authorized to perform the verification procedure[...]
In your case, the risk-scoring algorithm has detected suspicious activity. For security reasons, we are not able to reveal all the details of this process. It is not that you are authorized to perform the verification procedure, you are obligated to perform verification procedure for $190K. Things you mentioned in this thread, KYC because of different IP is pretty much nonsense. Things you said in scam accusation thread, that you have performed verification procedure because your algorithm has detected suspicious activity is also pretty much nonsense. All this means that you know shit about AML regulation.
|
|
|
|
the campaign would be to advertise AGAINST the company.
Read between the lines  |
|
|
|
Don’t you see that a buyer could have a legit lawsuit?
He could force kyc on the website. Saying that bitcointalk is practicing deception by allowing the sale of accounts and then allowing tagging.
How many people have been tagged more then 100 means a class action lawsuit can be done.
You understand my thought is to protect bitcointalk. I feel this policy of allowing sales and allowing tagging of a sale could create a legal issue for the website and for the taggers .
 Hypothetically speaking, if I place negative feedback on your account because I think you are high-risk to trade with, you can't do anything about it. System is made in such way that I don't have to give my reason why I think you are "high risk":  All I have to do is to think that trading with you is high risk. If it comes to law suit, correct defence will be "I think trading with anonymous person is high risk". Basically every member can have this tag. Saying that bitcointalk is practicing deception by allowing the sale of accounts and then allowing tagging. That is not correct, according to forum rules: 18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.  Q: I saw a guy selling Bitcointalk accounts. Why is that allowed?
A: Since we can't effectively prevent these sales (proxies, TOR, sales on other forums), we don't because otherwise we would be giving the users a false sense of security. No one is deceived here, forum does not approve account sales but they are allowed because they can't be effectively prevented. |
|
|
|
Yea, I completely agree. It's absolutely annoying. I mean, I've received 9 negative reps from the guy when I had otherwise perfect trust before. It definitely wasn't a fun a time seeing the 9 negative reps.
9? Damn, I have only 3. Look at it from bright side, you have received 1 positive feedback. On serious note, just look at feedback you have received because of my post and you will notice how GP is taking things out of context. |
|
|
|
What are the exact requirements for you to request a KYC procedure?
If you cannot outline these details (and subsequently record them in your terms of service if they are not already) then how do we know you are not selectively enforcing it in order to fill your pockets?
Some useful information and links https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-functions/banking-stability/aml-cft.shtmlIf I understand this https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-functions/finanical-infrastructure/infrastructure/svf/Guideline_on_AMLCFT_for_SVF_eng_final.pdf correctly, they have to conduct KYC procedure if amount is equal or above HK$8,000, which is cca $1,000 at the moment. I couldn't find information for cryptocurrency but I believe it should be the same procedure. Look at the flailing excuses (emphasis mine): I got the following email from them, We’d like to inform you that our security system has detected suspicious activity on your account. In case it was a hacking attempt, we had to temporarily suspend withdrawals from your account – this way your funds will be absolutely safe, and the access will be restored once the verification procedure will be finished.
In your case, the risk-scoring algorithm has detected suspicious activity.
Our guidelines are compliant with international AML regulations and standards.
That's the main reason why this procedure is in place.
marlboroza pointed that out and some other stuff here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5164369.msg51801073#msg51801073Sleazy AF. Not to mention that the 15 BTC case did not involve fiat (Tether is not fiat) and their AML/KYC shit is supposed to apply to direct fiat-crypto purchases. They replied this: Reveal of suspicions activity implies we'd act within the frames of the AML regulations.
If they locked funds because of suspicious activity (which they claim they did) they have to report it to authorities, they can't just say - " hey, we suspect that these funds came from criminal activity, send us your selfie and you can have your funds". Normal answer would be " we need your personal information because under the AML regulation and law we have to enforce KYC if amount is equal or above (insert currency)x,xxx which in your case was." Everything should be correctly stated in ToS. |
|
|
|
|
Spaces available for rent:
Avatar
Personal text
Website (profile page)
I accept BTC.
PM me offers or post offers in this thread and I will contact you.
I can refuse your offer for whatever reason I have.
I can remove advertising material at any time if it turns out that it was malicious (scam etc).
|
|
|
|
^ stavi onaj "reserved for post" pa se vrati za pol sata i napiši post i onda reci menadžeru da si napravio edit nakon pola sata. Bude forum pun rezerviranih mjesta za postove  Ma gluposti. Evo vam još jedna kampanja https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161935.0 ( nisam išao u detalje) navodno plaćaju 0.5$ do 1.75$ po postu maksimalno 20 postova i ne piše da ne plaćaju postove po lokal djelovima pa prema nekoj logici moraju isplatiti. |
|
|
|
If you can not grasp the very clear difference here moronbozo
I am not sure why have you quoted my post and replied to moronbozo. We need not present anything.
Yes you do, you created this thread so you need to present everything. If you wish to believe we knew only hhampuz so far had adopted this new approach and were referring only to him that is fine. And where I have said that? Please don't seek to derail our thread with speculations on the " motivations" for posing a question.
You said this: More reading in the scam accusations forum .... research there for your answers and possible fixes.
I will need specific case for possible fixes. Thing which I mentioned is not it because you said it is speculation, so I have no clue what are you talking about. How can you fix something which does not exist? Unless you want to say what has to be fixed, or you want to fix things which are not broken? That does not make any sense then. |
|
|
|
Još jedna stvar koju treba napomenuti je da ovaj bounty manager traži da između postova prođe najmanje 30 minuta. To mi djeluje kao previše strogo pravilo. Maksimalno 2 posta u sat vremena.
Zapravo ima dva stroga pravila: 9] Anyone completing 70% of posts or more in 1 day will be kicked
10] Must be active and maintain your post gap at least 30 minutes To bi trebalo biti drugačije složeno, recimo, "neću brojati više od 2 posta po satu i više od 15 postova po danu". Uvijek se može dogoditi neka zanimljiva rasprava gdje će korisnici napisati više od 2 posta/h i vjerovatno više od 15 postova/danu. Nego, kakva je situacija sa ovim bountijima i ICO, ima li što zanimljivo u zadnje vrijeme? Sve nešto čitam da se svuda traži kyc nakon što se trebaju djeliti nagrade, a i slabo viđam altcoin signature u zadnje vrijeme. |
|
|
|
What is the purpose of advertisement if there is not someone watching it?
The three members you mentioned are getting a lot of trusts feedbacks and sending a lot to so that it will be more like what happens in Altcoin spam boards.
So I do not think its purpose is an advertisement.
Then how I ended up on their site recently if it wasn't advertised on someone's trust page? then theymos is going to set minimum rank/merit before one can leave a trust feedback I already see threads in Reputation: "users A & B abused merit system to advertise site in trust page" The advertisers now can advertise their products for free! No paying for forum advertising or any signature campaign. I see Yahoo, Hhampuz, DarkStar_ and other signature campaign managers are going to lose some business in the future 🤪
Maybe they will run "trust campaigns"? |
|
|
|
It is trust rating, not message. It doesn't mean feedback is spam just because comment was copy/pasted. For example:  It might look like a spam but there is really nothing more or less to write in each profile. 50 users advertising ponzi scheme - all 50 get the same feedback, writing each one for each user and changing word or two is very time consuming and actually makes no difference. If I, for example, have sent all these ratings without proper reference link to random accounts, in that case this could maybe be considered as spam, but very likely as trust abuse. Seeing "account sellers are not to be trusted" my logic tells me that user has tried to sell bitcointalk account, the same as "account buyers..." for forum account buyers. Of course, there should be reference link - without it feedback is pretty much pointless.. Anyway, account trades have already been discussed several times so I won't start another discussion about it. Take a note that many forum accounts have been sold and used to scam(and spam), many forum accounts have also been stolen/hacked from owners and sold. I know we all make mistakes as we are not robots but that should really be updated with correct reference links @TP. |
|
|
|
I don't believe it's about restoring the thread, it's about leaving accurate feedback with a working reference.
I am sure it was accurate feedback and reference before thread was deleted. You will sometimes see these kind of things, they are not spam it is just something was removed and wasn't archived. We're supposed to make our own assessments based on evidence and feedback of other users, not based on someone else's accusations.
That is correct. This is still spam feedback to everyone apart from those who read this thread.
Elaborate this. |
|
|
|
Why is this report marked as bad: Where can I see more news about this project? I see, that the team is working. Some results and updates are available. but I want to be aware.
Only thing Mariia wants to be aware is to make as many posts she/he/it can (I said "IT" because I am pretty sure some posts which are reported look like they are posted by a bot).  It is post burst:  I am having hard time to understand why this one is bad and all others are good. |
|
|
|
If you have any questions about our wallet & services or have any requests, feel free to post them in the comments!
I don't have question but I have special request, if you would be so kind to update topic of this thread with following features: - users who use this wallet don't have access to private keys
- Freewallet will very likely enforce KYC procedure before you withdraw your fundsThanks. |
|
|
|
As a custodial service, we chose not to share private keys with individual wallet addresses. As you can see, we always provide step-by-step assistance should any claim be addressed.
So the name is misleading and freewallet is not a wallet, rather some kind of financial institution? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
