~
I have no clue who is moronbozo so I can't speak in their name but I have to admit that I noticed what you did and it is priceless! Before: Moronbozo - known to his pals as malboroza or some stupid name.
After: Moronbozo - known to his pals as marlboroza or some stupid name.
I made cryptohunter to edit topic and poll  |
|
|
|
|
@OP move it to scam accusation, I am sorry for you not being payed but what can you possible expect from new unknown project having unknown manager running their campaign and not securing funds?
Has anyone noticed three very old forum accounts wearing 1smart.fund's signature on first page complaining that another investment platform scammed them?
|
|
|
|
Removed the retired one and added the new one, thanks for the heads up. Updated a year ago, but I guess that's better than literally nothing  . If something has changed please let me know and I will update topic. |
|
|
|
C******unter says that about everyone. That proves nothing.
She ( cryptohunter, the-one-above-all) posted "Im female btw" so I will have to take that as enough proof.
Lets check opinions and exclude accounts from poll who don't fit into following criteria: 1. They all cycle merit to each other
2. They all vote to include each other on DT (via their foolishly given right to be the ones to decide on WHOM is eligible for DT)
3. They all seem to be creaming off the best paying (in btc) sig spots via their pals who are campaign managers.
4. The central cluster of Dirty Turds also seem to exclude the same people from dt.
5. They will use the "TRUST" system to punish whistle blowing of their prior observable wrong doing.
Tman - included dooglus to trust list, nutildah excluded dooglus (4) Nutildah never sent merit to Owlcatz's post, never received merit from Owlcatz (1) Lauda - blank trust list (2) Vod - not in signature campaign (3) Yogg -never sent merit to LFC_Bitcoin's post, never received merit from LFC_Bitcoin Hhampuz - blank list of excluded users (4) LFC_Bitcoin - never sent merit to Yogg's post, never received merit from yogg (1) The pharmacist - as much as cryptohunter lies bad things about TP, he never "punished" her (5) SuChmo(r)oN - not in signature campaign (3) Owlcatz - not in signature campaign (3) , no merit transaction between owlcatz and nutildah (1) Malboroza - blank trust list (2) [1](this is quickest observation)Nothing to vote here.
[1]I am guessing who is account Malboroza |
|
|
|
May I suggest everyone not to reply to game-protect's posts until they respond to these questions: Right... so what license is your lottery page operating under? After all, that is something that contributes to your riskiness.
You've avoided this question many times.
Do you have a license or not? Are you hosting a casino that is unlicensed, or will you reveal what license it has?
Unless they don't want to answer question regarding their service, well, if that is the case there is nothing else to discuss with game protect. |
|
|
|
~
Who is account malboroza? I can't find them using "search members" button. Please add dirty turd aka DT cryptohunter to poll. Thanks!
Her?
How did you verify the sex
She said she is female (reputation section, page 18, post #39, hint: rambotnic). I decided to offer some backroom deals for signature campaigns in exchange for a vote on this poll! Let's hope nobody finds out because so far it seem to be working . Heey! I voted for free! It is not fair!  |
|
|
|
Also we know you have a serious English comprehension deficiency but the local rules CLEARLY state this is a thread discussing DT members ONLY. Is cryptohunter on default trust 1 or 2 or 3 ? No more off topic or will be reported.
It is not off topic post. You said: Without further ado - The DIRTY TURDS or as we know them DT members.
 I think cryptohunter is dirty turd therefore her account has to be included into this poll. And you also said: Local rules - this is a discussion regarding the observable instances of DT members engaging in clearly negative and untrustworthy behaviors only. Those on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 may be discussed and nobody else.
So, as far as I can see poll is for dirty turds AKA DT and discussion is for "DT1 DT2 DT3...". Default trust =/= dirty turd. I have to recheck your default trust status but I think you are breaking your local rules again, so I will maybe report you to moderator. Here: Moronbozo - known to his pals as malboroza or some stupid name.
Those on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 may be discussed and nobody else. You broke your own rule. Update: I checked your DT status http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/92110.html and you are not on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 so local rule applies, you are not allowed to discuss about yourself. Add account cryptohunter to Dirty Turds aka DT poll of yours without further discussion. |
|
|
|
Thanks yahoo for bringing this to my attention.
@Astargath I just checked my PM history, and indeed you sent me one, I really don't know how I missed it, I'm terribly sorry.
You missed PM, astargath's "last week's" posts but how could you miss this post: It says 0 eligible posts but I have made 15 in the gambling section, 'X - Posts in Politics & Society doesn't count' I understand those don't count but why am I not getting paid for the rest, you even kicked me from the campaign...
It is only 2 posts above your post: The following positions are still open:
2x Legendary
2x Hero Member
Apply now!
Makes no sense. Btw, one post is missing in spreadsheet:  There are 45 posts (16 posts with 150+ characters, I believe I counted them correctly). |
|
|
|
Big, beautiful woman open to offers, how lovely  Suchmoon aka suchmoron. Not bad BBW open to offers if wins NBBBW
OP can you update topic with account "cryptohunter", annoying spammer, supporter of scammer rambotnic, master of trolls? And please do something with poll, it seems I can't change my vote. |
|
|
|
Another "smart contract money making" scheme. A typical P3D structure involves a fixed buy-in and sell percentage paid from investors. With BitReconnect, we utilize a unique time-based sell structure to encourage HOLDING your investment for a period of at least 90 days. This helps to grow the contract as big as possible, and prevents dumping from early buyers. The percentage structure works as so (from your initial investment):
1. Day 1 - Day 30: 50% sell penalty
2. Day 31 - Day 60: 30% sell penalty
3. Day 61- Day 90: 15% sell penalty
4. Day 91 - Day ∞: 0% sell penalty They just want as much money they can get and this structure will somehow prevent depositors to withdraw funds from scheme. There is no product, money circulates from one depositor to another and at some point there won't be anything to circulate and it will collapse just like all other ponzi schemes. I created flag if someone wants to support it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=545 |
|
|
|
I thought for a sec that this a sarcasm but I read the thread and......
Nah, it was larger topic but I figured my grammar sucks so I cut some parts. I blame youtube for bad grammar.
Thanks for support everyone! |
|
|
|
~
Stalking quoted for record. My understanding is that you were/are asking for spendable merit :-P
Nop, merit. spendable merit
  No problems that I can see asking Theymos for a sMerit topping-up. I had to do it once myself when I ran out of source and earned sMerits. Since then I've been a bit conservative about handing them out, along with the ever-present problem of actually finding good posts to merit.
I usually run out of merits immediately after I receive them. It sucks to click "merit" button, knowing there should be few merits and it says 0 merit. And tomorrow I want to merit post which I couldn't and again, it says 0 merit. And third day I get 2 merits, I spend them, see good post and again I have to wait day or two to get, I don't know, 1 or 2 merits. |
|
|
|
Askgamblers and such sites won't allow a complaint against this casino because it is not in their database or they have it, but it's blacklisted. Or, because of this?  Source: https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/bitcoinpenguin-casino-review/Our system detected a fraudulent activity on your account.
That's why your account was closed and all the winnings were confiscated due to administration's decision.
Sincerely,
Bitcoin Penguin Casino Support Team. I don't think they can just say this and seize funds. Please move thread to scam accusation and send them link to this thread. |
|
|
|
^ theymos will understand my post but thanks for kind words |
|
|
|
Nego, da odem malo off topic, jel znaš možda kakav je stav prema tumblerima? Pretražio sam čitav internet i nisam našao nigdje ništa pametno.
Čiji stav? Ne znam da li regulatori uopće razumiju što su tumbleri, ali neke banke razumiju i inzistiraju da koristimo chainalysis i slične alate pa da odbijamo takve transakcije. Ipak nije off topic, OP bi mogao update topic sa ovom informacijom. Zašto bi banke inzistirale na odbijanju takvih transakcija, ljudi vole privatnost i zato koriste tumblere. Uostalom, banke jedno inzistiraju a drugo rade: https://lider.media/aktualno/biznis-i-politika/svijet/sberbankova-banka-u-sredistu-afere-pranja-novca-umijesani-citigroup-raiffeisen-i-deutsche-bank/ Zapravo me zanima mišljenje regulatora, recimo, jedan tumbler je zatvoren ali općenito kompletna priča iza je malo klimava a po svemu što sam čitao su legalni. |
|
|
|
^ Self admitted theymoses alt account. sMerits
I double checked it and it says merit. |
|
|
|
A to pranje novca je realni problem jer šta sprečava nekog da više puta dnevno digne tih dozvoljenih 7500kn ili čak zaposli više ljudi da to rade za njega.
A niš ga ne spriječava... osim što je to ilegalno. Rupa u zakonu, ne znači da je ilegalno. Nije rupa u zakonu. Zakonom je zabranjeno udruživanje zbog zaobilaženja zakonskih ograničenja :-D Zakonsko ograničenje je za traženje podataka, to sam mislio. Možda nisam dobro shvatio, ali koliko sam pročitao ne moraju vas tražiti podatke ako mjenjate recimo 2 puta po 7000 kuna. Ako baš želite skroz u detalje, vas u poslovnici mogu tražiti osobne podatke neovisno o iznosu koji mjenjate, a nećemo se sad držati samo jedne stavke a ignorirati ostale, zar ne: 
Upravo obrnuto.[...] Dobro, nisam se dobro izjasnio, sve štima. Nego, da odem malo off topic, jel znaš možda kakav je stav prema tumblerima? Pretražio sam čitav internet i nisam našao nigdje ništa pametno. |
|
|
|
You can also try archive.fo or web.archive.com If that still doesn't work, what DNS provider are you using? I know archive.is has problems with Cloudflare DNS and it's possible that it's happening with another DNS provider (for example I can't load bustabit.com while using OpenDNS).
Often tor won't open archive sites and very rare they are not available from normal browsers, usually, if one is down, the other probably isn't (I mean, archive.is - archive.fo)
OP when was the last time you used archive.to? I am not familiar with this domain. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
