Not unless we are talking about megathreads post counts in a thread are irrelevant if you aim to earn merits in your posts. Instead what you want to look for is the ratio o replies over views, the greater the views that thread has simply means that the thread has a lot of readers, the more readers you have the more chances that one of those readers will see your post valuable and will reward it with a merit. Although I gave you this tip, I hope that you don't avoid threads you find interesting simply because it has few views, still post in this threads as other members might find it interesting and who knows maybe a lot of members will engage in the topic later on.

And just like that the bullish momentum of Bitcoin suddenly went into a stop. Bitcoin as of right now dropped -5.83% from its recent high and it confirmed that they are rejecting to enter the bull market yet again, as a result majority of the altcoins in the market are down more than 10%. Re-visited the chart of Bitcoin yet again and I saw on its 2 Hour and 4 Hour chart that there is a big H&S pattern forming and with the recent drop we have, BTC is currently in the right shoulder now, MACD is also way below zero which means your bullish sentiments is over for now. This market is really a roller coaster ride, one minute you think everything is calm and fine but then it will fall down unexpectedly.

^ I won't do this one, buying of a list of emails online is a risky move as it might label all emails coming from you as spam and as for a man doing email marketing you never want your emails to be labeled out as spam by spam filters, your promotions would really be nothing by that point on. Email marketing in the first place is really a risky way to promote your business as you have to comply a lot of prohibitions of CAN-SPAM and observe everything from the header of your email to the persons subscribed in your mailing list, as even an IP address who has been used to spam will label the rest of the emails you are sending as spam emails.

Even if you have a lot of money to start with, there is no guarantee that one of your bets will win first before you run out of money. The problem here is a lot of people who tried this technique where they put a lot of money in their bets turns out losing them all as they got into a losing slump. And of course these persons complaining will start blaming the gambling casino for their misfortune but the real ones to blame are themselves as they are using an unproven strategy for their bets.

What sucks here the most are ICOs who don't disclose or mention anything about KYC during their pre-sale but after the TGE took place they will suddenly have a KYC requirement before they even send the tokens you have bought from them. I remembered in one of the Telegrams group of the ICO I participated in thousands of the members got shocked and furious at the same time that they are suddenly requiring KYCs out of nowhere and it took awhile for us to receive our tokens. They somehow hide the fact from people that KYC is an important step for you to receive the tokens you have bought from them during the token sale. This is probably why they hide the KYC requirement in the first place as it is highly unappealing to a lot of people.

I don't think that is necessary as cryptowins.online literally copied the web design of CEX.IO and they did it poorly as even CEX.IO is copied on the first page. Some other flaw you will notice is that they even copy the Our History page of CEX.IO, it shows the exact dates of CEX.IO's history and only changing the names with their own which is absolutely a red flag for a scam/fraud waiting to happen. Another thing they copied is the logo of CEX.IO which is shown in their favicon logo. Anyone who tries to counterfeit any web design has a high chance of being a scammer, they obviously don't have any money to spend on their own web design what made you think they will pay for your profits in their scam website?

I agree with panjul07, just by even putting up some graphical designs with your ANN thread will help you gain more attention compared to your plain and simple text ANN thread now. Just by the looks of it there is only one person actively playing at a time every 5 to 10 seconds, which for a roulette game is very low considering some gambling sites where roulette is not their main attraction they actually have more players compared to what they have. And that one active player betting is not a high roller. If you really want to swing some players to your site you should start giving promotions and also what other websites have like a referral system and even a chat box for your players to interact.

Usually when I visit the Bitcoin Discussion Section, I don't come there to post in threads anymore but I am there to report members that are contributing to spam, my help might not be effective but if we band together the spam in that section will be wiped out clean in no time. But before the problem of spam in the section even starts I wish there was a some kind of screening process or a thread approval in the section first, before it gets shown in the section. By doing so we can filter out threads that are easy to answer or threads with misleading titles that are often answered by newbies right away. The moderators can easily reject them in the screening process and this leads to newbies only finding topics that can't be easily answered by generic crap.

Before, I am always the one who would start the conversation about cryptocurrencies but it often lead to negative comments. So now I play itself by letting them open up first to me if I am somehow involve in cryptocurrencies and I happily keep the conversation going. In my situation I know that this is a safer way to know who among my friends are interested in cryptocurrencies. Because it is really hard to find someone (in my group of friends) these days who is open to cryptocurrencies as they are most likely involve in traditional ways of investing and they are not comfortable to assets that has the potential to fall down fast.

Ever since I read this news about RBI creating their own government backed cryptocurrency I know their plan could backfire and a lot of crypto exchanges as well as their members might see this as some kind of unfair competition being shown by their own central bank. Ordering local banks to prohibit online bank deposits coming from exchanges shows how they want to damage/hinder their own cryptocurrency market yet they still manage to have an idea of creating their own crypto shows a different agenda.

If the opposition will build a case they might actually have a good chance of winning as this shows a big motive for unfair play in their part. This also shows that RBI is only showing up its first move to the industry and is contradicting their own views to the market before.

If they successfully registered the patent under their company I wonder how they will use it, will they become innovators and fight head on to a new industry or will they just sell it to a bigger fish like Amazon? Because from what I know Jeff Bezos already is planning to launch a drone delivery system in the USA sometime next year and this patent might actually block their progress. In the world of Patent claims this is not a new strategy and Walmart might be using this as some kind of leverage to another company especially we know their business is greatly affected by the e-commerce giant.

Try putting up a scam accusation thread in order for us to know your version of the story, looking at your post history you are just repeating what you are saying without providing anymore information about what happened to you, also just by opening up a scam accusation you will probably be getting their attention more which you have not gotten so far. Remember your accusation must provide some proof in order for it to be a lot more convincing to other members here in the forum.

The way I see how news works is sort of near the saying "hindsight is always 20/20", as they will always link the news whether it is good or bad after the price movement has already happened, making the majority of the people think that the good/bad news really affected the price movement when the real thing that had happened is news media reporters are trying to make articles with recycled content to make money and the rest of the people will be believing that this news might be really affecting the prices as a lot of people are convinced it is the reason why.

I think your red trust or merit abuse has been removed but you still need to prove to ThePharmacist that you don't own the other two accounts (Krypt211,meloman4u) connected to you in the bounty campaign, and sadly linking your social media accounts is not proof or a way to unlink you that you don't own the other accounts, at best it is just a proof that your account is owned by a man named Aleksei Malevich, and maybe the other two is owned by the same person. You must provide a reason why all three of you received ETH from the same address as it is the reason why you are tagged under in bounty abuse.

From the looks of it so far it seems like RBI is acting on its own or at least the way they showing it so far as their executive department is not intervening nor showing any signs that it will stop the RBI from doing memorandums against cryptocurrencies. The way I see it is that the RBI don't see cryptocurrencies in the picture of their future economy. Not unless some other branch of their government intervenes like the Supreme Court or Legislative department, RBI will act as if it was placed above other big branches of their government and this might hurt their economy for awhile.

Yup it works, good job OP, if you can't provide free ebooks in your links, providing their Amazon link is the best way to go.
Done!!! Thank You for sharing the link, it didn't even cost me a minute to sign up and download the pdf version of the ebook. The website is pretty straightforward unlike the previous links the OP has provided in his post.

Hey there, do you mind changing the links you provided in your post? Because aside from the first one you gave us all of them goes to a website (varemedia, cloudofbooks) that is hard to navigate and requires a sign up in order to download the book, but the weird thing is both of the websites wants me to sign up in a movie streaming website which is by the way a different website from where we needed to download the book. In other words the download links you gave us contains a lot of spammy websites and will redirect me to another website with just one click.

That is what I also see, what he is doing right now is like hitting Bitsler right in the face even though he clearly is the one who has broke a rule and he still even have the guts to accuse Bitsler on being a scam because his payments are somehow delayed. To tell you honestly it won't even be delayed in the first place if you only stick to one account. He didn't even provide a detailed background of what happened in order for other people to understand your accusation, he just claims that Bitsler is a scam and provide some imgur links which is not enough to prove anything.

Even though necro posts aren't technically breaking any rules, in most cases the ones who are necro posting are ,like what you said, posting generic crap, and most of this threads that are necro bumped are most likely worthless and easy to answer threads that is why the spam will be a lot in a short span of time. I just hope that there is a system where old threads that died already are not bumped back up to the first page of the section, as this will also help you and the other mods on your work cleaning up the forum.

What concerns me the most is necro bumping on threads, these threads that died down from 3 or more months (or even years) are brought back to life because of this low ranked members randomly reading the title thread and then try to make a post in it. These threads will of course be put back in the first page of the section and a chain of members will follow and try to post some more spam in that old thread. I just wish there is a feature where threads (on certain sections) that didn't receive any new post for a given period of time will not be eligible to be bump in the first page anymore.