Media has both down and up sides. If good news would be caught by the media, then expect that it would be passed to more people creating a bigger and longer wave for the market value of cryptos. But also its counterpart with issues which often causes worry especially to those who are not knowledgeable enough. New investors are highly and could be easily persuaded. A normal reaction given that it is money we are talking about. But for the same reason, people should know more about their investment to not be carried away into the cliff one day.

Not always the good part of your investment. One should also know its downsides in order to be prepared for it. If an investor would only eye in the profit, then expect a shocking scenario given how volatile the market is.

It could still recieve support from its users especially those who were in that exchange for years. But unfortunately it won't be the same, obviously. What happened is still fresh and things might go the opposite such that just wasting time and money without people actually being one with them. A sincere apology would be first acknowledged if they are really regretting what happened. But if sincerity won't be seen, they should not waste effort of raising funds 'coz that won't work for sure.

Such scheme is present to many projects. To mention a few I know; cryptoblades, defipet (well yeah, I've witnessed it more on p2e era) wherein on the downfall of the game they will be tempting players for hope that the project will again rise . But things just continue like a cycle.

Control of what?
Also, if they cannot put under their power cryptocurrencies since it is naturally decentralized, then how come?Governments are also interested in this technology because they are wanting to tax every transaction given that the impression of being profitable, is known on their end.You might be referring to third party wallets or applications. But on that sense, it is not completely under their control. If they are using blockchain as a control tool, why can't they directly regulate it? 'coz that would be impossible, atleast at the present, to happen.

I'd more view it as their way to adapt with this technology rather than aiming to put this technology under their power. It's been years or a decade for this technology but still, only few countries allowed it to be used as a mode of payment.

It is never okay to generalize. There are good exchangers still, you just have to find the best one. Also, given that the issue is still recent, for sure exchangers would take extra caution with their action 'coz they might be tangled with FTX's case instead. Try to calm down, although what happened is unfortunate, it would be worse if you',d be worried that much. If it is really draining on your end, try to pull out your investments for now. Being worried is just fine, but everything that is too much would be bad for sure.

Not exactly the same as with FTX but the thing which is somehow close with what happened is rugpull of projects wherein developers chose to make use of the money and totally disregarded their users. But that's not often I think when it comes on exchangers.

"Manipulated" or 'Fixed-fighting' huh? It is not evident to most of the sports? As long as money is involved, everything is possible. There were matches wherein the results were proven to be manipulated or the outcome is planned between the two players. There's also this idea of 'mafia intervention' right? I doubt. That's just how powerful money. If 'huge' people will be interested and will be that thrilled to win, they could really pay the players to 'move'.

OP's post is a bit confusing. Is it the existence of gambling in MMA, you are trying to ask or mma players to gamble? if it is the first one, then that existed for decades already in different forms. While for the second instance, players would be able to gamble if they'd make it right. They may use people to bet for them as easy as that. Maybe not in pro boxing given that their profession is already compensating, but with small tournaments, such thing is really happening.

Actually many people are aware of what Bitcoin is but were left with misinformation such as easy money, risky investment, fraud and such without even checking what it really is. For us in this industry, it is oroginally an alternative currency to be used on daily transactions but since its market price is volatile, people took advantage of it and saw its potential of becoming a profitable asset. Problem here is that, "non-crypto " people only sees it being profitable but not with the high risk involved from doing so. They are often having high expectations and when instability occurs, they are throwing scam acusations and such. Sharing its true nature might help to those aspiring crypto users in the future.

Some people say that it could go low as $13k while some says it would be at its bottom at $14k. Fact here is no one really knows. But higher tendence to happen is that market behavior could stay at its present state for more months given that there are still no 'event' which could hype up this industry.
Foreseeing is impossible especially to such assets having too volatile market price. Unlike with gold and ither assets which are continuously rising over years. In this industry, not only with Butcoin, there are just seasons or periods wherein the demand increases continuously but also periods wherein it is low such as with the present, caused by factors.

On my end, yes. Not because you are the employer means you know it all. That is why there are different positions on the company; skills fit position. Employers' task is to hire people who would perform best for the company not someone who'd be an underling for the employer. Well, considering different jobs wherein employer is also the owner of the business. Still, hiring someone who's better than you doesn't mean that they will replace you, rather, they would perform better for your company. Definitely a win-win situation IF you'd be able to hire him. Given the instance that he's smarter than you, you have to make things fair on his side in order to get him right? Then that would be more of a problem than to gauge whether to hire someone or not just because he exceeds your talent. That's pride if you won't.

It is not as easy as it sounds. Buying at the early stage won't guarantee you profit. Why? How would you even hold your Bitcoin knowing that are many times it has reached its 'peak'. Won't you be tempted? Indeed there are people who managed to do so but keep in mind the some of those investors forgotten their asset so that won't count in my opinion. There are even stories such as the man who swapped Bitcoins to a box of pizza. That's how hopeless before for this industry. There are only few people who really seen the potential of this industry at its early age, 'coz if there are many, how come that only a few are holding huge amount of BTCs on their wallet and most of them are whales or simply rich in the first place.

Cryptoblades, defipet, Alienworlds, pegaxy, that 'dragon' thing. LOL I forgot the exact names, and axie infinity ofcourse which gave a lot of money to their player with or withiut investments. It's an ended era I guess although there are still ones which are still profitable but I gave up on nfts . I realized lately that in terms of profit, trading and investing to projects are more profitable. But when it comes on enjoyment, I'd go with gambling. Eitherway, risks are involved; that's just how this industry works. Another realization is that, there are really many ways to earn from this technology in general you just have to explore.

That's simply it. But I doubt they are scared of it. Governments are just being cautious 'coz they won't be able to tax every transaction if efer they will adapt such technology. I said they are not afraid simply because there are already countries wherein Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are widely being accepted as a mode of payment and aforementioned reason might be why there are countries wherein it is still not yet. Observe how this technology is allowed in countries, but are not that supported unless if it is thru third party apps. Another factor is volatility wherein they might be worried people who are negligent, would complain about profit loss, and they could take the blame if they're about to support it. Last thing I guess is lack if assurance with this technology in general.

I think Costa Rica has a chance against Spain. They've been good on their previous inspite of being an underdog to both and upcoming matches. Speaking of which, underdogs do not always lose but it is just that it is more frequent to dominant teams to win which create a bigger impact to the audiences when the least expected teams won. But on my end, I like its idea. It somehow remind the fans that sports is indeed like a round ball; time for ups and as well as downs. But for this industry, there are players who are more into underdog teams simply because the profit is bigger due to odds difference.

But for some reason I am excited with match between belgium and canada. I'm not fammiliar with them that muh so I might do a bit scouting since I'm still young in this sports industry. Let us all enjoy watching!

There are just unfortunate seasons for our favorite teams including by chance fortune and manipulated. I am hearing a lot recently about the league wherein they've really expected their teams to move on the next stage but emded up losing with an underdog team. I can relate even if I'm into a different sports. Maybe such thing could occur in any league. That's a part of it even if it would seem not to, 'coz of allegations. But as others are saying, it would be more impossible to reset the game. The results are final and we need to accept it even if it is hard. There will be another seasons or league for our biases and we just have to be patient as their fan.

Alike with the idea of centralization? that won't be as easy as that. If ever governments are about to buy Bitcoin, then they would be investors, which makes it impossible. Their only goal is to tax transactions which are more likely through third party wallets, apps, or even exchangers. Governments who'd buy cryptocurrencies will be in huge loss and the point of doing so is just weird. Unstable market value, decentralized nature; being untaxable if by direct transactions,; which are characteristics they won't like, I guess. To countries wherein cryptocurrencies are being widely used, they did not need doing such thing to adapt this technology.

As other users here have mentioned, he won't be allowed to fight if it is lethal the night they will fight. Also, Beterbiev has nothing to prove towards Yarde so for sure he won't sacrifice his own self (condition) if it will affect his career for a long time. Artur is a beast; even if he only has 18 fights in his weight class, he dominated with winning only by means of TKO/KO which is difficult to achieve if you are an average boxer.

I'm definitely betting for him on this one. Although Yarde is the underdog, ofcourse he won't be on his place if he's just a nobody. I don't know, but it seems that this would be a one sided match but hoping for the best for these two.

There are considered safe exchangers but it will never be good to be so relaxed. That is your money in the first place so you have to take extra caution with where you are putting your money with. Much better to prevent it early than to regret it sooner. Even Binance, despite of having good reputation, has flaws, but ofcourse if we would compare it to what happened with the recent issue, it would be a better exchanger. But that won't save Binance to a better place because such thing could also happen if ever owners won't br also responsible and will be negligent with daily transactions and their reserves. But since it is still a good one, atleast save yourself from worrying that much.

Not even an inch. Threat for what? For allowing people to convert their assets and make use of it simply because this technology is still not widely accepted across countries? nah.
How would centralisation of a fiat currency will even affect Bitcoin? Im confused. In short term? on what sense? Cryptocurrencies and fiat such as USD has no effect with one another. They are just interchangeable if an investor would like to liquidate an amount of his asset. Even the market prices of cryptos are still based with fiat but a sudden fall on the value of one, won't result to a change with other one's market price.

Depends on your view. How do you view ethics?

Gambling, if it would be based on religious beliefs, ofcourse it would be wrong.
If it would be based on laws, there are limitations wherein to some countries it is totally prohibited, while to some it is regulated and remaing countries wherein it is completely legal.

The thing that makes gambling bad is the idea and its manifestation; greed, frustrations, taking advantage of others and more. But we have different ways to view this activity. Some engages to this activity to kill time, earn profit, and such. So maybe it has something to do as well with one's motives?

You've made two mistakes; betting all in and depending too much on gambling. No matter how obvioud the advantage is, on your bet, it will always be better to bet an amount that you can endure losing. It might be at the edge but this is gambling man; anything can happen, such as the unexpected. Also, I think you are hoping that much to win big time (well not to be a hypocrite, for sure many gamblers as well but to be that upset is something). It is okay to hope for a better outcome, we all do. But always have a plan B. Bet only without expectations that it will make you rich. Bet because you just want to win. The higher your expectations are, the bigger its impact on your end. Much better to just play it safely. Rest if you need it, come back if you still want to.

But you have to show proof if you are really that decided and if you're sure that they are really cheating. Bottomline is, we are in online platform so that would be hard unless they made a mistake which showed their 'trick'. Some people will even say that you just cannot accept losing. Well it is a part of the game but you'd know if there is really something wrong from the game. My take on this is leaving from a specific gambling site but if same things would happen over different gambling platforms, maybe it is not just your day or the game itself is not for you. Choose something that you would enjoy playing. Or even try playing other games if you are having a feeling of being cheated to somehow ease your mood. With regards to the video, but given that no names were dropped, they won't be able to defend themselves if they are really caught, so it is hard to validate that one.