Hello and thank for your work,
I have two rigs with claymore v6, 385+h/s each = 770 H/s DevFee 2.5 then average hashrate must be 770x0.95 = 750 but 6h average on pools is about 706 H/s
We are loosing 5% in devefee process or in some place. (v.6 shows 0 rejected on both rigs, great job!!)
Similar with claymore v5 and other pools (tried zcash nicehash and nanopool) Maybe you can fix or it. Thank you
Same here. Got two rigs with ~850 sol/s rate . But on nanopool its reporting ~780 within 12 hrs. And that was noticed long ago. Dont know why is that. Any ideas ? 0 reject. BR. I use nicehash. with v5 i had about 420-425Sol/s reported by the miner (3x 270 and 2x 470) but pool averaged only 400Sol/s over a 24hr period. with v6 i get about 500Sol/s on the miner, but pool seems to be reporting 420-450 only over the past hour or so. obiously variance plays a role, so ill see what happens overnight and if the average increases
|
|
|
Hello all, Can someone please explain to me how my S9 had a spike to 20.03 TH/s ( 5 Min Hash Rate ). I have had other spikes to around 18+/- TH/s also so this is not a one time occurrence. I am no hardware expert, so someone please clue me in...but if this thing can hash for 5 minutes at 20.03 TH/s, then is it not possible to figure out how I achieved that hash rate and then modify to retain that hash rate? I am running 650 freq. with the November 07 firmware. http://imgur.com/a/Z2X8Lit could just mean it had a streak of shares being submitted really fast to the pool. it happens sometimes. sames goes on the pool end...you will sometimes see large spikes pool side of speeds almost double what the actual miner speed is but it evens back out shortly after...nothing that comes close to lasting for hours. its just statistical varience, as expected with the way bitcoin hashing is done. youve probably also seen moments of <7TH?
|
|
|
I get so jealous everytime I come to this thread. If electricity prices weren't sky high where I'm at I would be mining. The days of profitable GPU mining are long gone so I can only hope for cheaper electricity or move some where else. It's still great fun to look at awesome setups. Good luck mining guys ASIC mining only makes sense when electricity costs <$0.09/kwh, whereas GPU mining can be practical up to ~$0.14/kwh
|
|
|
sorry it took so long, life is busy and i was transitioning to a new computer system.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- To demonstrate klondike_bar got his bitcointalk account back
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 17ztqVKWEg1j25D3AoX87W66rYJApasPLK IGPad3YneDrmMSasQeKDWEZ/CzWBOcLtdPeC8acBD50uJLVcs4Z/VahWYoBp0XUuYmDyOVfPkAG4pt7m5gaibc8= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
sorry it took so long, life is busy and i was transitioning to a new computer system.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- To demonstrate klondike_bar got his bitcointalk account back
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 17ztqVKWEg1j25D3AoX87W66rYJApasPLK IGPad3YneDrmMSasQeKDWEZ/CzWBOcLtdPeC8acBD50uJLVcs4Z/VahWYoBp0XUuYmDyOVfPkAG4pt7m5gaibc8= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
I have 10 1070 and I don't really like to calculate the profibality of the coins since the lbry disaster ( I think it still going on and I have thousands of useless lbry. So what is good news to tell us because nvidia comminity is idiot enough to buy these cards although like you.
should have sold them as you mined them. rule #1 of pump/dump. i´m also regretting buying these 1070s.. bad move.. at least they will resell at a good price.. i hope.
I got my GTX 1070 cards just as library was fairly new, and have recouped about 60% of their cost so far (mining to an exchange and selling every day or two gave me ~0.42BTC per card), and are still making an okay earning of ~$1.50/day until another algorithm is optimized or we see lyra2 take off again
|
|
|
how do these results sound?
3x 270x (modded bios for low-voltage ethereum), ~1150/1450 clocks = ~42-46 Sol/s each and 2x MSI rx470 4G Gaming (modded strap bios), stock/1750 clocks, reduced voltage 980/1050 for core, mem voltage untouched = ~65 Sol/s each
|
|
|
put $20/day into bitcoin. youll have almost a full coin after a month.
if you're broke, go prostitute yourself for $20/day
|
|
|
for some reason, first time i used 2.1 with "-i 2" on my 270x cards, now im having all sorts of problems.
2.1 wont mine (no text past the [CLAYMORE] header), and nicehashminer crashes the system when initializing devices.
|
|
|
Thats why I like the 10603gb cards bether than the 1070. I get 23 sol/s on the 1060 with only 43 watt. Compare it to claymores the 280x use 250.watt and.produce 45 sol. I do 133 sol with the same watt.
I can't speak for the 280, but my 270x cards are giving 38Sol and drawing well under their 150w design (probably 100w usage) So by your numbers, the 1060 (@$400) is barely better than a used 270x for $70. The price of a 1060 (23sol / 43w) you can have 5-270x cards (180sol / ~500w)
|
|
|
What's the easiest way to do the strap mod on an msi 470 gaming?
Is it with winflash, doing 1 card at a time?
Followup: my 470 cards don't like running headless and it forces the resolution to 640x800 (which makes teamviewer annoying to use, and prevent the use of atiwinflash)
|
|
|
Stop mining and start minting. Switch to Mintcoin [MINT] where your coins essentially are the miners. And as long as you don't sell your coins, you'll keep minting, and your hash power so to speak will always scale with time no matter what. The mintcoins keep minting. They don't go obsolete like investing in mining gear.
they just go unwanted
|
|
|
it will take months to build even part of this structure, probably 2 years for the entire facility. Its not like you can build the first shed and immediately power it up. cables are all underground and its uncommon/unsafe to energize part of a facility like this while still excavating/building other areas. then there's the fact it will take months to populate it with hardware and get everything online and hashing. A major limitation will be the speed at which bitmain can manufacture the hardware. *and they will prioritize sales since its immediate revenue, rather than sinking all thier money into a longer return from mining* IMO it will take a minimum of a year to reach 500PH, and probably 2yrs to reach 1500PH (if not longer). by that time the network will probably be in the 4-6 Exohash range anyways PS: I adore the empty glass cube. no mining facility is complete without a transparent 5-storey box
|
|
|
The 7950/7970/280x were always the best mining cards due to their large memory bandwidth.
If it wasn't for the DAG file in ETH they would still hash at 27MH/s.
During the Litecoin days they hashed at 80% of the speed of a 290 and cost only 60% of the price. They were forgotten with ETH mining but are now back and killing RX480s.
Do you think it's worth hunting down some second hand cards and build a cheapo Tahiti rig for Z? i dont think so. if zcash fades away, those cards will suck at most other algorithms
|
|
|
-ct 96 -cb 105 have no effect (are already defaults) -ot 2 has no effect (does it even work right?)
-ct 64 is the default value. -ot is for the opencl kernel. You can reach 36.sol with proper memory settings. And -ct 96 i found using the ct 96 dropped me to about 27Sol/s (down from ~32)
|
|
|
-ct 96 -cb 105 have no effect (are already defaults) -ot 2 has no effect (does it even work right?)
|
|
|
So at the end of the day all of us will pay more for electricity, but will earn the same - only Claymore and my electricity company wins (and some people for a day two, but that's nothing...) we will earn more at the expense of CPU miners and nvidia miners. where are the GTX 1070/1080 miners at?
|
|
|
holy shit this miner is almost 100% over genoil on 270 rig, went from 80~sol to 150~sol! i would gladly pay 2% fee.
nice work man!
that much? i went from 22Sol/s per 270x to 32Sol/s how high are urs clocked? mine are the non x version underclocked /undervolted from ethereum mining (where it was about 12.5MH per card)
|
|
|
holy shit this miner is almost 100% over genoil on 270 rig, went from 80~sol to 150~sol! i would gladly pay 2% fee.
nice work man!
that much? i went from 22Sol/s per 270x to 32Sol/s
|
|
|
|