The script is mine and you are not allowed to leak it. If you do so, you owe me 50 BTC. What makes you think a non-working script is worth anything, let alone 50 BTC? If you don't pay up, I'll have to take action myself - and you know what that action is. When all else fails: blackmail! This question got ignored in the other topic, so I try again here: What happened to alia that made alia_alt take over? Alia was last online 32 hours ago, modlog doesn't show anything, which leaves a temporary ban as a possibility. Or you don't want to join the select group of -9999 users and switched to be less negative? The script works. And I didn't get banned... I just chose to leave that account Seriously, you are coming back to say this shit? Didn't you already accept that it doesn't work? You told me that my point was ''irrefutable'' but in your empirical evidence you were always winning and that it was a good thing that you stopped selling it. |
|
|
|
I suppose we should find volunteer lawyers to take action against coin markets? We can't have our coins locked up for so long!
Good luck with that, after 100 pages of useless posts no one has even been close finding who or where they are, a lawsuit would be quite meaningless if you don't even know the enemy. |
|
|
|
Wrong thread buddy, this one is about proving evolution is a hoax which you still haven't, we are still waiting for your evidence.
Thanks for reminding us that evolutionists have been proving and are now in the process of proving that evolution is a hoax, by not finding any proof for evolution in countless man hours of thought about evolution and examination of natural and scientific processes over a couple hundred years and really, over thousands of years. So, thanks again for reminding us that evolution is a hoax.  Evolution is a fact buddy, do you have evidence against it? You're close. Evolution talk is a fact. But evolution has never been proven. Evolution is a hoax. It has been proven so much that even religious folks accept it. The whole scientific community views it as a fact as well. What in the world do you mean by "the whole scientific community?" If you literally mean the whole scientific community, you are completely and grossly mistaken. Evolution is a hoax. 97.3% of Biological Sciences department heads accept there is no scientific controversy over evolution.[2] Only 700 out of 480,000 earth and life scientists (0.14%) subscribe to literal biblical creationism.[3] Acceptance of evolution tends to increase with level of education.[4][5] https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolutionFew religious bodies have formal statements on their position, though many do support the idea that evolution is correct (or at least "correct enough") and should be taught in schools. This is the position taken by many mainline Protestant churches (many of which signed on to the Clergy Letter Project) and some Muslim groups. Theistic evolution is the accepted official position of the Roman Catholic Church In 1986, an amicus curiae brief, signed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, asked the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard, to reject a Louisiana state law requiring that where evolutionary science was taught in public schools, creation science must also be taught. The American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution. Do your own research, you can start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Google is your friend. |
|
|
|
At the beginning, you may get something like 2 Heads and 3 Tails. It may go to 4 Heads and 8 Tails, maybe even 10 Heads and 20 Tails. Does this mean that tails will always be more than heads? No. The more flips you do, the more likely it is that the numbers will regress to the mean (50/50). You may start with 10 H and 20 T and end up with 4050 H and 4100 T. With infinite flips, you will hit a 50/50 ratio every time.
This is correct 1, but inapplicable to your script (or any other gambling method, for that matter). In an infinite sequence of fair coins flips, the proportion of heads or tails will tend towards 50% with a probability of 1. However, there is absolutely nothing stopping the first 10 flips being all heads or all tails, even if an infinitie number of flips would be 50/50. Taking a gambling script, there is absolutely nothing stopping the first 10 runs being all wins or all loses.
1. Technically, when talking about infinite sets, having a probability of 1 is the not the same as saying something will surely happen. Instead, we use the term almost surely. Although interesting, irrelevant to this discussion.Imagine it this way. There are nine green balls, and one red ball in a bag. Every time you pick a green ball, you win a dollar. Every time you pick a red ball, you lose ten dollars. At the beginning of the game, there is a pretty good likelihood that you will make a couple dollars, maybe 3-4 (or 5-6 if you're ballsy). But, if you play for too long, you are guaranteed to go bankrupt. In the long run, you will have a balance of negative infinity dollars. Does it make more sense now? No it doesn't because it doesn't matter. You always have a 90% and a 10% chance of getting a green or a red ball respectively no matter if it's the beginning or not. What if I play 10 bets and they are all wins and I stop playing for 1 day and comeback, is that a new beginning now? Can I use the method again? What determines the ''beginning''? Ah, there's a point I can't refute. You are totally right. But in my empirical evidence, if I gamble a bit with customer deposits and stop at 20-30-40% profit, it works out well. I don't really know why, but hey, it works! Maybe I just got lucky. Good thing I stopped using/selling the script eh Well I give you props for admitting it and you probably should be locking this thread, it's getting repetitive. |
|
|
|
How do I know its false?
You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside. Even a reasonably large lake would work. You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake: Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gcWith Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet) Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet) Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches) Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches) Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians) source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/
Ball Earth says the horizon is 7 miles out with 66' missing yet we can see the shore on the other side at 18 miles. Game over man. So if a youtube video is proof, then these "proofs" should be sufficient to convince you: https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/if you can't see that video is CGI I feel sorry for you The video that notbatman linked is the same, is that one CGI too? You idiots would claim anything is CGI and yet none of you are qualified to say what is CGI and what isn't. Wake up already, people knew the earth wasn't flat thousands of years ago, stop this shit. |
|
|
|
Wrong thread buddy, this one is about proving evolution is a hoax which you still haven't, we are still waiting for your evidence.
Thanks for reminding us that evolutionists have been proving and are now in the process of proving that evolution is a hoax, by not finding any proof for evolution in countless man hours of thought about evolution and examination of natural and scientific processes over a couple hundred years and really, over thousands of years. So, thanks again for reminding us that evolution is a hoax. Evolution is a fact buddy, do you have evidence against it? You're close. Evolution talk is a fact. But evolution has never been proven. Evolution is a hoax. It has been proven so much that even religious folks accept it. The whole scientific community views it as a fact as well. |
|
|
|
How do I know its false?
You take binoculars and spend a nice day at the seaside. Even a reasonably large lake would work. You mean like this, here's a video of a day at the lake: Flat Earth PROOF !! Lake Ponchartrain -- https://youtu.be/d3_umFGu_gcWith Standard Refraction 7/6*r, radius = 4618.83 Miles (24387440 Feet) Refracted Horizon = 7.24 Miles (38252.42 Feet) Refracted Drop= 185.19 Feet (2222.28 Inches) Refracted Hidden= 66.12 Feet (793.4 Inches) Refracted Dip = 0.090 Degrees, (0.0016 Radians) source: https://www.metabunk.org/curve/
Is there any flat earth ''proof'' that is not a youtube video? |
|
|
|
Bible says earth is flat. In gospel of luke bible says that if you stand on any highest thing so you can see the everything of the world.
This is only possible if the world is flat then you can see the everything of the world.
The world isn't flat. Luke in the Bible, "says that if you stand on any highest thing so you can see the everything of the world," which means that there are some very high places on the earth, and very low places. "High" means that there is no flat. It means that there is low as well. The earth is absolutely not flat. From subatomic to microscopic to mountain tops there are hills and valleys of all kinds. Nothing is flat... especially not the earth. BLASPHEMY!!!!!! The bible does say the earth is flat: http://reflectionofmind.org/60-bible-verses-describing-flat-earth-inside-dome/You are going to hell badecker!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Wrong thread buddy, this one is about proving evolution is a hoax which you still haven't, we are still waiting for your evidence.
Thanks for reminding us that evolutionists have been proving and are now in the process of proving that evolution is a hoax, by not finding any proof for evolution in countless man hours of thought about evolution and examination of natural and scientific processes over a couple hundred years and really, over thousands of years. So, thanks again for reminding us that evolution is a hoax. Evolution is a fact buddy, do you have evidence against it? |
|
|
|
Wrong thread buddy, this one is about proving evolution is a hoax which you still haven't, we are still waiting for your evidence. |
|
|
|
Only the bottom part of the ship is obscured by the mirror line, it never goes "over" the horizon it just keeps getting smaller in relation to the mirror line; the smaller it gets the more the bottom half gets obscured. Eventually the top half gets so small it passes the vanishing point. It's all smoke (or ocean spray) and mirrors. Yes it goes over the horizon since you are not able to ''zoom it back in full view''. You can clearly see the difference at 2:09 compared to at the start of the video, of course you wont admit this ever since you are schizophrenic. |
|
|
|
At the beginning, you may get something like 2 Heads and 3 Tails. It may go to 4 Heads and 8 Tails, maybe even 10 Heads and 20 Tails. Does this mean that tails will always be more than heads? No. The more flips you do, the more likely it is that the numbers will regress to the mean (50/50). You may start with 10 H and 20 T and end up with 4050 H and 4100 T. With infinite flips, you will hit a 50/50 ratio every time.
This is correct 1, but inapplicable to your script (or any other gambling method, for that matter). In an infinite sequence of fair coins flips, the proportion of heads or tails will tend towards 50% with a probability of 1. However, there is absolutely nothing stopping the first 10 flips being all heads or all tails, even if an infinitie number of flips would be 50/50. Taking a gambling script, there is absolutely nothing stopping the first 10 runs being all wins or all loses.
1. Technically, when talking about infinite sets, having a probability of 1 is the not the same as saying something will surely happen. Instead, we use the term almost surely. Although interesting, irrelevant to this discussion.Imagine it this way. There are nine green balls, and one red ball in a bag. Every time you pick a green ball, you win a dollar. Every time you pick a red ball, you lose ten dollars. At the beginning of the game, there is a pretty good likelihood that you will make a couple dollars, maybe 3-4 (or 5-6 if you're ballsy). But, if you play for too long, you are guaranteed to go bankrupt. In the long run, you will have a balance of negative infinity dollars. Does it make more sense now? No it doesn't because it doesn't matter. You always have a 90% and a 10% chance of getting a green or a red ball respectively no matter if it's the beginning or not. What if I play 10 bets and they are all wins and I stop playing for 1 day and comeback, is that a new beginning now? Can I use the method again? What determines the ''beginning''? |
|
|
|
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition. There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science. One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true. And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory. For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory. ''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018 ''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty'' I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong. Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you? It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you. Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be. If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.
God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about. ''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body. It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science. What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok? The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show: 1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me. 2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign? 3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do. 4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them. 5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there. 6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining. And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak. You didn't disproved anything tho, you are just asking me to do things. I can't show directly anything because I need you to believe in me but trust me, I am actually god. I have done plenty of miracles, I stopped the nazis personally and I created science. Stop saying I'm not god because that is blasphemy and I do not like that, you could go to hell forever if you make me mad so be careful next time you post. Ok. Give me an address I will send muslims there. If not you have proven you are lying as simple as that. There are a lot of things one could do to prove you blaspheme. None of them you would like. If one is asked and do not answer the question - it is safe to assume someone is lying. You lie. As simple as that. Bye. You have been debunked. Until you can prove I did not create the universe what I said it's true, that's your logic. Do you have anything to debunk my claim? I don't think so buddy. |
|
|
|
I just look at the ocean and see how boats and ships fade into the horizon. the bottom starts to disappear into nothingness. Beware though, if the weather is just a bit less than clear, you will not be able to do this experiment.  You failed to notice the apparent size of the carcass in the back, no soup for you!  Is this a partially sub merged ship too? |
|
|
|
At the beginning, you may get something like 2 Heads and 3 Tails. It may go to 4 Heads and 8 Tails, maybe even 10 Heads and 20 Tails. Does this mean that tails will always be more than heads? No. The more flips you do, the more likely it is that the numbers will regress to the mean (50/50). You may start with 10 H and 20 T and end up with 4050 H and 4100 T. With infinite flips, you will hit a 50/50 ratio every time.
This is correct 1, but inapplicable to your script (or any other gambling method, for that matter). In an infinite sequence of fair coins flips, the proportion of heads or tails will tend towards 50% with a probability of 1. However, there is absolutely nothing stopping the first 10 flips being all heads or all tails, even if an infinitie number of flips would be 50/50. Taking a gambling script, there is absolutely nothing stopping the first 10 runs being all wins or all loses.
1. Technically, when talking about infinite sets, having a probability of 1 is the not the same as saying something will surely happen. Instead, we use the term almost surely. Although interesting, irrelevant to this discussion.Yes, I don't know why this thread is still here, it's clear that op does not understand basic math. The beginning can be profitable just like it can be not profitable. |
|
|
|
I just look at the ocean and see how boats and ships fade into the horizon. the bottom starts to disappear into nothingness. Beware though, if the weather is just a bit less than clear, you will not be able to do this experiment. I already showed him that but he refused to accept it, you will never convince these people of anything. |
|
|
|
people pointed out the obvious (a script can never be long-term profitable, It cannot be reasonably concluded that any betting strategy, including those done with a script can be reliably profitable in the short term a fact I had stated many times).
I would dispute this. If I'm not mistaken, it was one of my very first replies where I stated it to be EV- "one of" being the key words in that statement... Title of the thread '' proving my gambling script WORKS'' First reply of aria: it doesn't work it's EV- A few replies later: I will prove everyone wrong And so on and so on, quite contradictory statements throughout the whole thread. EV-, in the long run, holy shit. It is always profitable at the beginning. There is no such thing as expected positive value in the beginning that turns into an expected negative value in the long term, it's either positive or negative all the way otherwise how does the script even know it's the beginning? No matter how many millions of bets you have done the next bet is literally like the first one, you don't have more or less chances of anything, it's the same. |
|
|
|
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition. There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science. One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true. And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory. For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory. ''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018 ''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty'' I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong. Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you? It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you. Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be. If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.
God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about. ''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body. It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science. What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok? The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show: 1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me. 2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign? 3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do. 4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them. 5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there. 6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining. And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak. You didn't disproved anything tho, you are just asking me to do things. I can't show directly anything because I need you to believe in me but trust me, I am actually god. I have done plenty of miracles, I stopped the nazis personally and I created science. Stop saying I'm not god because that is blasphemy and I do not like that, you could go to hell forever if you make me mad so be careful next time you post. |
|
|
|
Evolution is a very simple concept to understand. It involves perfect common sense.
Yes. Lot's of other science fiction concepts can be difficult to understand. God is the reason for evolution. A lot of religious people, the majority, agree with you. I wouldn't mind that point of view, at least they are not totally insane to suggest that evolution is a hoax. |
|
|
|
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition. There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science. One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true. And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory. For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory. ''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018 ''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty'' I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong. Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you? It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you. Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be. If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.
God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about. ''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body. It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science. What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
