Do you think that Trump is still a popular leader in united states ? He has taken many decisions in his tenure which are not been popular amount the public.
I don't think people will again vote him to be their president for another 5 years.
I would argue with that. He has made many decisions that have not been popular with the media, but that doesn't reflect the the view of the public. It's become far too obvious that the media has been against him from the very beginning, and the American people see through the deception. Rich media moguls don't care what's best for the American people, they care what's best for their pocketbook, and their powerful allies in Washington. Since most of the American media streams are relatively liberal, and therefore against Trump, much of what gets broadcast overseas is tainted with a liberal bias. It's unfortunate, but I've seen it first hand when vising the Middle East. I hate to say it, but American media is not to be trusted. |
|
|
|
It's been two days and we still don't know what's coming (with all due respect to nutildah I'm sure what TECSHARE had in mind is far more cringy).
He's working on it. I'm sure it will involve clown cars though... That would be a step up from bestiality. |
|
|
|
modifying the derivation path will not do it. This is true, I just tested it. Despite the fact that the text in that Electrum window states you can override the suggested settings, the radio buttons above must have your desired script type selected. If you modify the script type in the derivation path, and it's in conflict with the radio buttons above, you'll get a wallet that complies to the selected radio button. It appears that editing the derivation path is only effective for selecting the account. I didn't check the main-net/test-net switch. |
|
|
|
Actually, in the lastest Trezor T update, they introduced SD card protection. A randomly generated secret is stored on an SD card which along with the PIN is used to decrypt the data stored on the device. I have tried it and it works well. Without the SD card, the device is practically useless for the attacker. That's a pretty cool feature, but I have't played with it yet. Honestly, I've been using my T1 mostly in recent months since it's smaller and more easily portable. I have a very strong passphrase set. I'm confident I'll have ample time to notice if it goes missing. |
|
|
|
You should read the rest of the text on your own, especially if you are disappointed with the recently found vulnerabilities in Trezor.
Are you talking about the vulnerability discovered by Ledger about an year ago? https://news.bitcoin.com/ledger-reveals-physical-exploits-against-trezor-hardware-wallets/Or is there any other? This is not a huge vulnerability imo, as the attacker would need pyshical access and you can use a passphrase which would make it much harder to exploit. Isn't it? I don't want to speak for BitCryptex, but I believe that is indeed the only vulnerability known to afflict the Trezor. And yes, It can be mitigated by assigning a strong Bip39 passphrase. I'm not overly concerned about this particular vulnerability either, but if Trezor can do something to eliminate it I would be all in favor. It sounds like all of our Trezors will become obsolete once Trezor finds a workable hardware solution. I wish them much success. |
|
|
|
I'm just mad at chipmixer team because it's the second time they gave me unconfirmed chips. Why the hell on earth did you do this?
Just imagine that I sweep a private key, which occurs to be unconfirmed and it's parent tx has damn 3 sat/b fee! So now I have to wait uncertain amount of time while a 3 sat/b tx will get a confirmation in a 83MB mempool! What the f*ck?!
Chipmixer, you do not have to give clients unconfirmed private keys goddamnit!!!
You can still sweep or spend the funds from that private key, even if the funding transaction isn't confirmed. If you sweep the key and apply a high fee to your transaction, the parent transaction will very likely get confirmed faster. It's known as "Child-Pays-For-Parent." https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4odi90/can_someone_explain_cpfp_child_pays_for_parent/ |
|
|
|
Got it, thanks for a bit extra, and please forget about the dust. I got the BTC you sent also, I'll send WU tonight. Thanks for that as well.
Username: reza7777
Loan Amount: 1.5 ETH
Purpose: Personal issue
Repayment Amount: 1.65 ETH
Repayment date: june 20 or before
ETH Address: 0x7D6776462c478D689852A15c52F21Bd943D87b10
Hi reza7777, Thanks for the request, but I'm afraid you do not qualify for a no-collateral loan. |
|
|
|
|
72 - DireWolfM14
Thanks, and good luck all.
|
|
|
|
As of this coming June the KeepKey Chrome app will no longer be supported. I knew this day would come once I saw that KeepKey LLC, the company that makes the hardware wallet had been purchased by (or merged with) ShapeShift. The KeepKey was the first hardware wallet I ever bought, and it was just months before this merger, so I've been keeping an eye on development of the wallet and the ShapeShift service. The loss of the Chrome app isn't such a big deal, it is very limited in functionality and can only access legacy addresses. It does offer access to ETH and ERC20 coins, if you're into that kind of stuff. I almost exclusively used my KeepKey wallet with Electrum, anyway. But it does limit the options that available, and that's a drag. Here's the official email I recieved: KeepKey Update: Chrome Apps Support Ending
What This Update Means For You
Beginning in June, Google will be ending support for the Chrome Apps. We recommend all KeepKey Chrome App Client users move to the the ShapeShift Platform. The platform allows you to send, receive, trade, and securely hold your KeepKey assets.
The following assets will not be supported on the ShapeShift Platform when Google ends Chrome App support - BTG and the following ERC20s: AELF, CyberMiles, Kucoin Shares, QTUM, ODEM
We recommend using the KeepKey integration with MyEtherWallet for ERC-20 support.
For BTG support we suggest moving your assets to a different wallet, though they will remain safe on KeepKey after support ends.
Here is a guide for getting started with KeepKey in the ShapeShift Platform. If you have any questions during this transition, we're here to help! Contact our support team 24/7.
ShapeShift
Apparently it's not just KeepKey, Google is ending support for all Chrome apps: https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html |
|
|
|
People have been flagged and tagged for much less. If you feel I've done something that warrants a tag and flag, then by all means, tag&flag away. Good thing you got your special boy pass The ceremony was lovely. You should have been there, but you weren't invited. |
|
|
|
Too frustrated and unable to make an argument, you start insinuating I am a racist, exactly like leftists do. I wasn't calling you a racist, you flaccid tool. I know you're not a racist, which is why I referenced the most preposterous conspiracy theory I could think of; to illustrate my point of how preposterous it is to constantly jump to conspiracy conclusions. Don't believe everything you think. |
|
|
|
I'm getting a feeling that Sir Dire won't be helping this shitposter:  Lol, he sent me two PMs 10 minutes apart, I think that's his quota for the day. |
|
|
|
~
I see, so when you hear hoof beats you think it must be brainwashed zebra-minions of ZOG, and anyone who questions that logic is not a patriot. Got it. |
|
|
|
I haven't been following your escrow service so I don't know what kind of trades you were escrowing so I'm going to assume you escrowing many kinds of trades. But I think instead of closing the entire escrow service you could blacklist account sales, or at least just SES account sales, from using your escrow.
I very likely will reopen the service with restrictions at some point. Right now I am quite busy and tired of all the time wasting notifications on Telegram. I'm not going anywhere, if a couple of members approach me for help with a trade I would not refuse them. Just as long as it doesn't involve any kind of shady account sales. |
|
|
|
Also DireWolfM14 you can explain further about this and why you feel you should provide escrow services here? "Allegedly".
It's not alleged, I did provide escrow for several of these transactions. If you're asking me to justify it, I won't because I feel I shouldn't. I was naive to provide my services for account sales in the first place, and it's not a mistake I intend to continue. |
|
|
|
The most effective way for the actual conspirators to squash the truth would be for them to shower so many bunko conspiracy theories around it that it was effectively buried. With a noise-to-signal ratio high enough, a post that made sense would be effectively buried.
A good example is this post and this thread.
This is a great point. The ignorance displayed in this thread is astounding, really. Even those who are likely to agree with the premise of my post are rabidly spewing noise that drowns the message. Digging for conspiracy theories to make this seem bigger than it is can only serve to make it seem like it's not a big deal when those conspiracies are debunked. |
|
|
|
Username: elmanchez
Loan Amount: 0.17 eth
Purpose: personal
Collateral: none
Repayment date: 16th May or before.
Repayment Amount: 0.19
Funding Address: 0x8e73cf0acc8f1c4d10b662c469679494cf5ec059
Hi there Dire, i need additional loan of 0.135 ETH Payback 0.31 total. Date untill 20th May, as we have discussed. Thank you for helping. adress : 0xaf17802debaa63f4165fcEB797Cbad6920B38B03 You got it. TxId: 0x7af9cc697547412e9ed9499d6d9eaf2b7cea3673cb3157505670692ee142dea7 |
|
|
|
|
Vod is within his rights to leave negative reviews for whatever reason he sees fit. Reviews are not moderated, and the only recourse you have is convincing him to remove the tag.
If the community determines that Vod's reviews are unwarranted and inaccurate, then maybe enough DT1 members will exclude him, and his reviews will become "untrusted." I would venture to guess that will not happen as a result of this situation. I don't think SES sellers are going to conjure up a lot of sympathy or community support, and Vod's review is actually pretty darn accurate. The review states that you're scamming Amazon Web Services, and it's true that selling these accounts violates Amazon's terms of service.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
