i care more for our ERC wallet
bitsend is set up in a way that u have to run shitload masternodes so it become rewarding
i like coins when one wallet is enough to get rewarded for ur investement

its good to reward people who have wallet open and support network
its not good if u have to abuse the system and run multiple nodes simultaneous at same PC
to be able compete for masternode rewards
for example dev anounced he need to run 90 masternodes to farm the rewards for the giveaway promotions
i guess its clear to everyone thats not 90 different server supporting the network


but its ERC thread here so lets stop that
his devskill is very welcome
his coin might be interesting for some
maybe even me if some coin specs adapted but not now

additional the unlock "for minting only" option is missing at unlock
which would at least lock the gui elements for tx
so when someone have access to ur minting PC he cant send coins without know PW even if its unlocked for POS

it all about have just the nice stuff for the user
(see incoming POS rewards)
and automate all the boring work
(split and merge coin piles)
to optimal utilize ur ERC coins in POS

in fact a user should never be required to activate the advanced feature coin control
that should be as the nae say just for advanced users who love to look at gears while they rotate inside a maschine

every normal user should just get the same POS income without study 2 years POS wallet maintenance

a finding and feedback for DEV

coincontrol have some issues
custom change address is not used
and selftransactions where u select what coin pile he should use
are not executed with the coin piles u selected
instead he seems to automatioc select them like no coincontroll used

(windows wallet)

1 min blocktime is no issue

code examples for  configureable combinetreshhold and splittreshhold u will find at this github

https://github.com/Crypto-Expert/HoboNickels

should be a easy adoption in fact

or energycoin for example have this console command (also be able to set as conf parameter)

setstakesplitthreshold [max=5000; min=1000]

if the amount of transactions require a adaption of blocksize
u can be sure DMD Diamond Foundation would manage a decision and release update in like 14 days
and not is paralyzed like bitcoin about this simple question

the transactions we manage now with our network we could have a blocktime of 1 hour and still manage them all and more easy

what is ur opionion to block time versus blockchain size and synctime

u would love a smaller chain and faster sync and accept slower blocktime?

we run now average 52sec blocktime
one of the fastest coins

but i have to say from my perspective we see not much advantage to be faster than others
beside faster raise of blockchain size and longer sync times for people who open wallet just once every 14 days

i full agree 10 min blocktime like bitcoin have is stoneage

what u think would be a good blocktime and keep in mind slower is always more slim chain and faster sync time


52 sec (like now)
100 sec
150 sec (like LTC)
300 sec
600 sec (like BTC)

this is wrong
constant decreasing inflation
it is the reason why DMD stay at a stable $ value around 30 cents

look around all the hyperinflation coins who failed
because their plan was never designed to cover more than a half year or a year income for people
and then a collapse of price was clear as a market response to craizy raising amounts of daily new created coins

and galactus ur opinion is important to us like any others even utahs

it will have impact on the final dmd 3.0 coin specs

over all people can expect to see if they behave as they do already and stake twice a month
no significant change in POS income

less frequent staking will earn a bit less

more frequent staking will earn a bit more

just a little incentive for network support

nothing big

this topic is closed for now i want to open a new one in next posting

one question towards wallet devs

i see coin pile still split at POS

do u have already a zero user interaction required methode implemented

like a set able value in conf that below that treshhold coin pile dont split when create a POS block?

or even better a mechanism that automatic like in DMD POS split or merge coin pile dynamic based on
coin age and size

at least some methode of remove the work to merge coin pile manual by hand via coincontroll should be added asap

maybe its in already then please explain how it works/ or if needed how i can configure it

i was also afraid that chain have again a issue wasnt sync

was sad and went sleep

but in the morning i see i am sync

so it seems in this time where still lot people have not updated their wallets it can take very long until

u can sync

situation should become better and better

regarding sync from zero without the downloaded chain
yes thats needed too but thats something a new wallet can fix that
create rules for all the troublesome to sync blocks

for now most important is that chain is running and working and even for windows users
who use the chain that is part of installer

well spoken

POS as a way of energy saving secure the blockchain together with  hybrid POW
with low rewards to not attract to much energy waste on POW side too

DMD Diamond concept is really designed with a limited amount of coins and constant decreasing inflation

because POS timebombs that explore in hyperinflation where enough on market and we survived them all and are more successful than them

because their concept is shortterm

and ours not

with DMD 3.0 we will go the next step and add even more industry leading additional security features

and much more

litte update from wallet 2.1

good news one blocking issue fixed
one more to go

we did run this weekend tests again
we confirmed one blocking issue fixed
we detected a second one which was not detectable before the first one fixed

any issue found while in testing lab have to be seen as success
if we learned one thing the last few years
that testing is the most important part of develop a cryptocoin wallet

very good explained  and transparent style
respect!

szenekonzept and metamorphin are the reason why i still have hope

that alberto have a communication disability and no understanding of customer support is clear

but they will for sure find company structures where its not needed that he do more than care for the technology part

even now i believe staisybit or whatever the name of the follow up company after rebranding will be

can be a success

for sure he should start to think about some goodie pack for all users after services reestablished

some fee free deposit and withdraw weeks is the absolute minimum

i see bittrex is in maintenance on ERC now thats great so situation is monitored by them too and no issues will arrise


this is perfect

a few days and we will have a stabilzed network andall services up2date

in a few weeks we will see chain runs like a clockwork now

get explorer up on right chain make sure he is also one of the seednodes

then everyone should be easy able to see the true chain
i got my withdraw from bittrex now so maybe they are on right chain

maybe because that transaction is visible on both chains the bad one where explorer stuck too

this is a clear sign that the chains interchange data and transactions creating a unhealthy combination

but more and more nodes update and get the right chain synced should help us overcome this

im sorry if i post some red light be carefull message about this

but i still have the opinion to be very carefull with tx from and too exchange until situations like this are stabilized


how they say

BTC at 400+ bucks and there are still discussions even different dev teams ......
if u see how paralyzed BTC is because a little decision about max blocksize
i think in fact that coins like DMD will be able achieve lot more improvements
and steps ahead  into future with much less discussions

if u believe what u wrote u should leave DMD
basically u stated u dont trust the team
which should make u rethink ur investment

or i could understand it the way that u want me to leave

which in fact is for me easyer than u might think

i spend most of my crypto business time into DMD
because all my hearthblood is in this project

from financial point of view i have many more projects i could focus on

it would be easy repay all L10 BTC which would be used to develop DMD v3
dont release wallet 2.1 and stop work on wallet 3.0

are u the men who will lead DMD and create a new foundation?

i think the luxury to have high active team working for u
is not valued and respected the way it should be by u

i see there a big problem


the chain u send out is not only different from the block explorer chain its also different from the bittrex chain

u should request bittrex set ERC into maintainance without deposits and withdraw until this issue is solved


we talking here about a major issue

no one should deposit or withdraw from exchanges until that situation is solved

http://rokos.space/cryptocurrencies.html

thx