|
Bump! Genius and very smart indeed.
I'm following this closely.
|
|
|
|
|
Dont forget to use a referral key to save 6 BTC (check my sign.)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes indeed, any new features or game could be directly a great game changer in the market imo.
|
|
|
|
|
IPO funds were mostly used to avoid bankrupt if a month or two months are really unlucky for the house. Happily since the IPO, SD runs pretty well and pretends to massive earnings. SD is almost sure to never meet a bankrupt. But back in time of the release of the IPO (in august) this bright present was not known.
This is smart as most of the clones are in highly risks of bankrupt without fresh cash or they have to stick with ridiculous small bet limits.
|
|
|
|
With that discount, you've just "evoorheesed" the game  |
|
|
|
Bonjour, ASR, linuxien, fan de contre-cultures, alternatives, underground, marginales, avant-garde, etc... Je redécouvre Bitcoin. Et c'est décidé, je viens de faire le premier pas en installant Le logiciel officiel. Une expérience nouvelle à vivre avec probablement son lot de découvertes et questions. Je compte sur vous  Bienvenue. Ne sois pas surpris si le logiciel met plus d'une journée pour télécharger et vérifier la base. C'est en cours d'optimisation mais actuellement c'est très long. Heureusement ça n'est à faire qu'une fois. Je dirais même plusieurs jours. Entre temps si besoin est, tu peux toujours utiliser soit des eWallets, soit Electrum. |
|
|
|
That's a steady good run  |
|
|
|
I will bet on 2 nd option all day long
If it's a one time play, I still keep betting on the same choice.
It's not about gambling or be greedy, it's about to take the most +EV decision.
You have 3 different results; Option 1: +100 BTC (100% probability) Option 2:0 BTC (75% probability) +1000 BTC (25% probability) It really isn't a EV case since this is a one time play, I think. EV doesn't take care about the occurences; EV is +250 Btc on the option 2. May be you ought to propose +250 BTC (100% probability) on option 1 to offer a real deal or decision versus current Option 2. But anyway, this kind of greedy study and willingness to take risks has been already studied a lot of time. The conclusions are these: 1) On winning, people react to be more conservative (take the short profit). 2) On losing, people are more about to take risks (prefer to gamble to avoid loses). too lazy to find publications... but I'm sure there is a ton about that. |
|
|
|
Never thought about it like that. Interesting.
Fundamental for gamblers, especialy poker players but also in real life. |
|
|
|
|
EV+ second option, why bother?
|
|
|
|
Erik, Fix that cell or I won't sleep  |
|
|
|
I refuse your definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_%28finance%29 the practice of selling securities or other financial instruments, with the intention of subsequently repurchasing them ("covering") at a lower price. In the event of an interim price decline, the short seller will profit, since the cost of repurchase will be less than the proceeds received upon the initial (short) sale. Adam, you did also the same mistake on a S.Dice shares thread... |
|
|
|
... The high roller uses the following 8 addresses, by the way: 15HJgkvj6roZQvNRC3pUJNKP2YgfEuD8wo
17sjYPaYJAvtwXM2q5ojzrCiYewnQMBi9y
1A3z7M6GhpUejQ5eqgSyjVWRuezeepdKKV
1B5h9sf6xNLYGa3NBk48hwYbxyNZ22PRJk
1DBH7Xum2re7LXd8YNSe1uRznttsqeMXGK
1Di6ux3CQBNXCZLD76BsnYWDo6XnFGzQah
1EP4rM8hLZCRSWPNZDWJp9zdvmoWYkkgbQ
1MxgyKiKiHEemMUTJuq9NAbjmhKnUL5Ric
You obviously know what you are doing  Can you figure out, how and where did the coin get to those accounts? I still like my "idea" (more like a speculation) that this mysterious whale is sdice guy(s) himself and he is only trying to make sdice looks stronger and more profitable to possible future investors. Only problem is, he "fucked up" and sdice "lost" a boat load of coin Even if S.DICE was being fluffed, it would come at 10% expense to the "whale" while losing, because 10% of the dividends are public. Anyone can bet what they want on the site, even majority shareholders with less to lose (because they'll see some of their losses come back thru dividends). This is only a problem if the odds are in the whale's favor, I think... Actualy long term it's 10% of the house edge (=0.19%) given to stakeholders. So less tah 200$ lost for the whale every 100,000$ bet. That's cheap for a good advertising (even if i don't trust the conspiracy) |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the deep analysis dooglus.
+0.5 tip
|
|
|
|
|
Btw in less than "only" 100 rounds the gem will hit 1M (75*1.1^100).
|
|
|
|
|
Where do you think the money comes from ? From air ?
Yes scam 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
