thats nice and might be a step ahead
but for normal users the point they understand is
NEXUS addresses are more than double as secure bitcoin addresses
CC2 will be able to say maybe we are 15x more secure than bitcoin
but as NEXUS didnt get a big impact by higher security CC2/SigmaX wont get just because of that too
the real point that make curecoin great is the combination with folding and valueable research rewarded with this coin
SigmaX would canabalize CC2 (by take away a industry first feature from CC2) and damage it way more than it helps
as i explained before if u have no partnership with universities and the certificate part
make CC2 have a addition POS part with fixed blockrewards (POS3) and send 80% of that rewards (and 80% of POW rewards too) to the dev managed reward folder pot which each day will be split between folders
this way no premine needed no certificates needed u have a hybrid POW/POS secured coin and u reward folders
all needed for this solution is existing already in bitcoin based coins and u sure can adopt the code logic towards ur codebase
in my opinion u win nothing by utilize that certificates thing u just add a point that u required university cooperation
for now all u need is visible folding statistics no further cooperation needed
and manage a 1 days POW/POS folding pot to split need trust but lot less that u manage a 80% of total coins premine as in CC1
dont waste time and move on with a solution that u can do and give us CC2 this way and move SigmaX back where it belong to into lab as a prove of concept that should never see the market