Don't beat yourself up. Sometimes it's impossible to predict these things. You made some money and that's good. Anyone buying at the high is not smart. This thing is coming down, so it's wiser to look for better opportunities elsewhere for now. |
|
|
|
Price has recovered. I was a normal correction because it rose to fast, people took profits.
To all the FUDers that are posting stupid reasons on why this in not a good project: anyone with 2 neurons in their brain can see through your bullshit.
FUD all you want.
I myself I'm relative new to this forum but I can say that the bullshit and stupidity from here makes me sick.
Dropping from 0.001 to 0.0001 is not a normal correction. It blew out all previous levels of support. Dev could post a solution to consensus problem, but there is none. At least post some plan for workaround, even it it means less performance. I'm not aware of the "consensus problem". If you are referring to this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60, the dev has answered all the concerns, read till the end of the thread. They've also opened a bounty program which will be incentive for a lot of good programmers to go on bug hunt to get the bounty. ALL coins are vulnerable to attacks under certain circumstances, it should be common sense, everybody should know that. XRB its not different in that respect. That is true, BTC and others do have vulnerabilities but they do not threaten or invalidate the whole system. They are weaknesses that are addressed either by waiting for more confirmations or making sure to run a full node. XRB has a more fundamental problem, of a completely different and more concerning nature, that invalidates the XRB system as unsafe and risky in a much more serious way. There is an open door here for very serious consequences and the dev should call it out. And if he can't admit it, someone else should. We must have a balanced view of these things and given all the irrational exuberance and blind speculation for XRB, someone should draw attention to it. If you truly have concerns over this matter please ask your questions on the discord channel, the devs will reply. Here you are just spreading FUD. I don't think that the devs are this stupid to overlook something like this. I have done so a while ago, but shall do again. Thanks. If you doubt, read the thread. As smart as anyone can be, security is always very hard. When very smart long trusted experts weigh in with serious reservations, this is not something to be ignored. Good luck guys |
|
|
|
Quite the donation for a project that has very little concrete information yet. This is the coin of my dreams, it's worth supporting lol. Another fresh account. Quite concerned this could be a scam. Could be a good project, but watch carefully. No yet convinced. Very little discussion from dev. Guys be careful. |
|
|
|
Price has recovered. I was a normal correction because it rose to fast, people took profits.
To all the FUDers that are posting stupid reasons on why this in not a good project: anyone with 2 neurons in their brain can see through your bullshit.
FUD all you want.
I myself I'm relative new to this forum but I can say that the bullshit and stupidity from here makes me sick.
Dropping from 0.001 to 0.0001 is not a normal correction. It blew out all previous levels of support. Dev could post a solution to consensus problem, but there is none. At least post some plan for workaround, even it it means less performance. I'm not aware of the "consensus problem". If you are referring to this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60, the dev has answered all the concerns, read till the end of the thread. They've also opened a bounty program which will be incentive for a lot of good programmers to go on bug hunt to get the bounty. ALL coins are vulnerable to attacks under certain circumstances, it should be common sense, everybody should know that. XRB its not different in that respect. That is true, BTC and others do have vulnerabilities but they do not threaten or invalidate the whole system. They are weaknesses that are addressed either by waiting for more confirmations or making sure to run a full node. XRB has a more fundamental problem, of a completely different and more concerning nature, that invalidates the XRB system as unsafe and risky in a much more serious way. There is an open door here for very serious consequences and the dev should call it out. And if he can't admit it, someone else should. We must have a balanced view of these things and given all the irrational exuberance and blind speculation for XRB, someone should draw attention to it. |
|
|
|
Price has recovered. I was a normal correction because it rose to fast, people took profits.
To all the FUDers that are posting stupid reasons on why this in not a good project: anyone with 2 neurons in their brain can see through your bullshit.
FUD all you want.
I myself I'm relative new to this forum but I can say that the bullshit and stupidity from here makes me sick.
Dropping from 0.001 to 0.0001 is not a normal correction. It blew out all previous levels of support. Dev could post a solution to consensus problem, but there is none. At least post some plan for workaround, even it it means less performance. I'm not aware of the "consensus problem". If you are referring to this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60, the dev has answered all the concerns, read till the end of the thread. They've also opened a bounty program which will be incentive for a lot of good programmers to go on bug hunt to get the bounty. I think you either didn't read it fully or didn't understand it. This is not a bug. This is a fundamental algorithmic flaw that the dev seems to just ignore and those guys gave up trying to explain to him. |
|
|
|
When was the second airdrop? I though it was new years? When is next airdrop?
2nd airdrop was on thanksgiving. Next airdrop would be on 31st December First airdrop was on xmas, how can second be on thanksgiving? |
|
|
|
Price has recovered. I was a normal correction because it rose to fast, people took profits.
To all the FUDers that are posting stupid reasons on why this in not a good project: anyone with 2 neurons in their brain can see through your bullshit.
FUD all you want.
I myself I'm relative new to this forum but I can say that the bullshit and stupidity from here makes me sick.
Dropping from 0.001 to 0.0001 is not a normal correction. It blew out all previous levels of support. Dev could post a solution to consensus problem, but there is none. At least post some plan for workaround, even it it means less performance. |
|
|
|
RaiBlocks are promising 7000tx/s.They haven't had 7000 tx in last day!! This is pure speculation and you know it.
people currently only buy XRB and keep their XRB because we all know until now there is still no real use to buy something so I think reasonable raiblocks did not reach 7000 transactions yesterday Bigger problem is consensus mechanism is flawed and vulnerable. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60Dev tried to discuss his idea with bitcoin devs and was rejected hard, so he abandoned the discussion. That doesn't change fact that XRB consensus is broken and vulnerable to serious attacks. No serious exchange can list XRB due to this. Price is pure (and crazy) speculation. this. Looks like some whales just got out of XRB. Not a good indicator. |
|
|
|
|
When was the second airdrop? I though it was new years? When is next airdrop?
|
|
|
|
RaiBlocks are promising 7000tx/s.They haven't had 7000 tx in last day!! This is pure speculation and you know it.
people currently only buy XRB and keep their XRB because we all know until now there is still no real use to buy something so I think reasonable raiblocks did not reach 7000 transactions yesterday Bigger problem is consensus mechanism is flawed and vulnerable. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60Dev tried to discuss his idea with bitcoin devs and was rejected hard, so he abandoned the discussion. That doesn't change fact that XRB consensus is broken and vulnerable to serious attacks. No serious exchange can list XRB due to this. Price is pure (and crazy) speculation. |
|
|
|
|
I thought this is launching Jan 5th. Is that still the plan?
|
|
|
|
|
What does VERE do that is new and exciting?
|
|
|
|
MACD looking bad. Running out of steam for now. Expect pullback. You've been warned. XRB is crypto with an unsafe consensus mechanism (see reference below). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60This will be a historic fail when it's hacked! Of course it is but when it's pumping nobody cares. That's the reason why no serious exchange will ever accept RaiBlocks. Because it's unsafe, from many perspectives ( every exchange, official one too, that has Raiblocks in its pairs when traffic is above normal goes down and for several hours per day, they are advertising it like 7000tx/s but in the case clients have enough bandwith and high end hardware, and still it's pure theory because nobody has flooded the network still, but floods are not needed, it goes down anyway). They should now have enough money to be listed in serious exchages but, I repeat, none of them would ever consider it, they don't want to go down because of a single unsafe crypto. Pretty crazy if no one cares. Good ride though for many. |
|
|
|
MACD looking bad. Running out of steam for now. Expect pullback. You've been warned. XRB is crypto with an unsafe consensus mechanism (see reference below). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60This will be a historic fail when it's hacked! Can you please do everyone a favor and stop posting the same thing over and over again? You've made this same post at least 5 times already in the pages back. OK. Maybe. It's good to have a balanced perspective and warn newcomers about the risks with the insecure consensus mechanism |
|
|
|
MACD looking bad. Running out of steam for now. Expect pullback. You've been warned. XRB is crypto with an unsafe consensus mechanism (see reference below). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1219264.60This will be a historic fail when it's hacked! |
|
|
|
With which exchanges are the negotiations about listing?
We are still pre-launch, so still early. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone selling DERO? Let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Multiround, egs 2 month, Airdrop based on forum activity number might work well!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
