Zanima me zasto bas mora biti Wirex jer mislim da se da naci boljih kartica na trzistu.


Da. Po mogucnosti se nadjes na nekom javnom mjestu tipa birc, odradite razmjenu i popijete par piva. I najcesce se transakcije odradjuju sa stablecoinima, bar na ovoj balkanskoj TG grupi koju sam linkao.


A mozes uvijek povesti nekoga sa sobom za svaki slucaj. A i nemoras odmah ici razmijenjivati 5k eura, nego odradis prvo neki manji transfer. Dobra stvar kod ovakvog tipa prodaje/kupnje je sto ne ostavlja nikakav trag a i fee je uglavnom nula (osim ako ti bas nije hica pa onda recimo ponudis 1% fee u korist druge strane da sto prije nadjes nekoga).

Problem is that outside of this forum 1xbit doesn't have a reputation of straight up scam so Coingecko and Mycelium probably don't think that they are doing anything wrong by allowing 1xbit to advertise there.


Yeah I didn't know about it either up until recently when I got new PC and checked the website while forgetting to get adblocker on Mozilla. I thought that Coingecko is better than CMC in that regard but I guess they all like the money.


I don't think that Trustpilot has any credibility so having bunch of fake 1xbit reviews won't damage them much.

Well that's another story, and looks like @Docnaster is at least guilty of ban evasion. I am surprised to see that he hasn't been banned already since lovesmayfamilies found that connection with banned account  year ago. Maybe the fact that he hasn't been active at that moment saved him for getting banned, but now that he is active once again I expect it to happen very soon.

Da, bez ikakvih problema. Bas malo gledam na wirexovoj stranici i izgleda da je tamo dnevni ATM limit 500 eura sto uopce nije lose, a mjesecni limit im je 5000 eura. Sjecam se kad sam prije 4-5 godina trazio jeftiniji nacin za izvuci lovu (dopizidilo mi je davati 5-6% BATMu) Wirex kartica je imala puno vece feejeve ali izgleda da je i njih konkurencija natjerala da se prilagode.

Cisto da znas da je prodavanje kripta preko tih servisa na kojima moras odraditi KYC uvijek rizik sto se tice porezne, tako da je direktna prodaja vjerojatno najsigurniji (i najjeftiniji) nacin za izvuci lovu. Bar sada ne fali ekipe koja je uvijek zainteresirana za kupnju kripta.

This user is known for baseless accusations so don't expect him providing any info why he thinks that account changed hands. For him its enough to someone change the email address (like in this case) to think that account has been sold, while people can do that for myriad of reasons.

Nema sanse da dignes takav iznos odjednom na ijednom bankomatu, sa ni jednom karticom. Bar ne karticama za nas obicne smrtnike.


Pa ako kazu da stranici da je tolika provizija, onda i je valjda tolika. A 2% uopce nije pre malo, pa recimo Binance kartica koju ja koristim ima 1% fee, ali je dnevni limit samo 290 eura ali cisto sumnjam da i Wirex ima puno veci
dnevni maksimum.

Hoce ako prijavis poreznoj.

Sto se tice vadjenja vece kolicine novca odjednom i anonimno, baci oko na balkansku grupu https://t.me/KriptovaluteTelegram. To je vjerojatno najjeftiniji nacin za izvuci lovu, ako nemas problema naci se sa nekim uzivo.

Not just them, but almost everyone who has a chance to take something for themselves did that, from top to bottom.


I wish I share your optimism but unfortunately I don't, and the fact that they are doing a much better job than anyone expected is not any proof of that. We did an excellent job too during our war (and all that without help outside, at least not at the beginning) and that didn't prevent thievery on mass scale, from our generals (who were selling gas to enemies) to politicians and since Ukrainians are probably similar to us when it comes to corruption, I don't think that its better situation there.

All this of course doesn't mean that people (and countries) shouldn't send help to Ukraine, but I am just being realistic as I've been old enough to see how it went in our country that was in a very similar situation.

If you really care about Backed Finance investors and want to prevent them from losing the money, why don't you provide the negligence evidence right now, instead of waiting for them to reply?

Or are you maybe one of those bug hunters that are spamming projects with vulnerability reports and then asking for payment?


edit: now I see that 5 days ago you threatened them to expose their vulnerability. They ignored your demand, 4 days passed since the deadline and vulnerability not disclosed yet. I might be wrong but to me this looks like a feeble attempt to get paid for that report.

Because using money for weapons while your country is invaded is somehow a bad thing? You know the saying, "those who are reluctant to feed their own army will feed a foreign army".

I don't think that Finland would have any problems if all money is used for weapons since they already sent military equipment to Ukraine. After all, Finns experienced what Ukraine is going through now back in 1939 when USSR invaded their country and trust me, they didn't forget that.

Maybe because those bitcoins were seized and they had to be sold, like anything else that governments seizes so I doubt that they can just send the bitcoin even if they wanted to.


I really doubt that 1900 BTC can impact the bitcoin price that much when bitcoin daily volume is ~40 billion dollars.


Regarding the aid that we received during the war, majority of it didn't reach those that actually needed help and while those who were assigned to distribute it got rich instead. My guess is that similar thing is happening in Ukraine with donated money and goods.  

Even if you report it, I don't think that Coinzila will share our view when it comes to 1xbit as they are advertising literally everywhere. You can find their banners on Coingecko as well, which is usually considered more reliable than Coinmarketcap. They are simply buying everyone they could and I am sure that many here would carry their signature if they weren't afraid of getting tagged.

You don't have to explain her how Bitcoin works, just that piece of paper contains the sort of password that you need to access your bitcoin.



My parents know that I am into crypto but they don't have any knowledge about it and they never created wallet/sent bitcoin or anything similar. That didn't stop me though from storing a copy of my cold storage seed phrase in their house as I explained them its a fail-safe in case something happens to me, my wallet and/or other seed phrase copies.

Yeah, the thing is that people rarely say that, and instead keep going on that they are into bitcoin for the technology and same thing can be seen here. In reality, majority of Elon haters wouldn't mind if he started shilling bitcoin all over again if it means bitcoin price going up.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like Musk but I don't hate him either because I never fooled myself that he is in bitcoin for anything else other than making more fiat, same as majority of others. And they would probably do the same thing if they have that kind of influence. This is just the beginning though as in the next bull run I expect more big names doing the similar thing. Its inevitable.

Ah yes thank you, that 2nd case I heard about was @hacker1001101001, just couldn't remember his name as I don't see him around anymore.


Its true that RegulusHr got unbanned after 2 years, but in that period he wrote only 6 posts and I don't think that he went around PM people asking for support. The more active you are, the more desperate you will appear.


If he is here only for the money, "moving on" would mean creating the new account and starting from the scratch which I think many of those permanently banned do, and that's one of the reason why I would like to see signature ban being used more. It of course doesn't mean that people would stop making alt accounts after getting banned, but I do think that some would rather continue being active on the main account.

I don't see how can this make it any better as the new owner might as well come here and create the similar thread and then change the email. I mean, if we are being so paranoid.


I don't think that changing the email address will automatically make people think that account changes hands (at least it shouldn't) but if there are more changes beside that like a drastic change in posting habits/posting quality, that will certainly make people suspicious. Otherwise, I wouldn't worry much about it.

Just because he is rich and successful doesn't mean that he can't make mistakes that will cost him money. Take for example those 3AC and Celsius people; those are smart (and rich) people that were blinded by greed and made stupid mistakes. All I am saying is that its wrong to judge this move (and gloat) based on the price when this news leaked because both of these things happened earlier.

Yeah I know that "haha stupid paper hand Elon lost money on Bitcoin" is the narrative on social media, but when you check the prices around the time he bought and sold (which are different from the time that info was released) you see that him selling with loss is unlikely. Or even if he had some loss, it probably wasn't big.

I meant in his view of bitcoin as a way to increase amount of fiat as majority of ordinary bitcoin holders use bitcoin primarily for that, they are not interested in bitcoin "philosophy" and that's why in my eyes he is not worse than anyone else just wanting to profit from bitcoin. It's just that he is doing it on a much larger scale and that's about it.


Judging by the comments here, I am not so sure that people understand what's his goal in crypto and I think that many are taking him way too seriously.

That's one of the rare things I don't like about this forum, that mods don't answer on such threads. I do understand that no answer is also an answer, but it would make people speculate way less so instead members talking for years (like in RegulusHR case), they could just give a simple answer and end the conversations. Its not like there are many ban appeal cases anyway.


I only know about one case of signature ban and that's lovesmayfamilis (who I remember was quite active on forum despite the signature ban) but I think I saw at least one more but can't remember the name now. I think that measure is seriously underused here, while it should be the obvious choice for the first time offenders.

Why do you think that they made a loss on those 75% BTC that they sold? Afaik they bought Bitcoin before December 2021 when price was around 20k, and they didn't sell yesterday when this news broke but sometime before that so there is a high chance that in the end they profited from this trade.


In that regard I don't think that he is any worse than a huge majority of bitcoin hodlers who only see it as a way to increase their fiat amount and bitcoin proved to be a very good for that.