Balances were previously incorrectly calculated on UVC, and they have now been corrected -- no one is stealing anything.
That is your problem, we are just mining and calculating on the numbers you provide. Correct it with your own coins. Some people have rented rigs to mine, doesnt matter how you put it, in this case you are stealing money! If you were overpaid, correcting your balance is not stealing. If you have a negative balance now that means you should be sending coins back, and if you don't then you are keeping coins that don't belong to you. In effect stealing from other miners. These things happen and everything ipominer is saying is verifiable in the blockchain, it's not upon him to provide proof, the data is all there on the site and on the blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
Where is the grostl library for Unix? Is it available somewhere?
|
|
|
|
Just a quick update on the DDOS attacks and mitigation I've been doing over the past few days. I'd first like to thank whatever script kiddie who's perpetrating these for the time I've had to spend away from my family over the past few days. The last status update I posted about the DDOS attacks being over was inaccurate. The standard DDOS attacks against the non-protected pools had ceased (but were started again shortly after that status update). I've moved all of the front end proxies away from Digital Ocean, who are content to null route us at the drop of a hat. It's understandable, since the attacks have the potential to affect many droplets if they're not blocked. The front end proxies are all now hosted on dedicated servers as well. During and after the standard DDOS attacks, we also sustained layer 7 ddos attacks on the DDOS-protected pools that I was forced to code around. The pool code now bans by IP as well as workername after a few failed authorizations. In addition to these attacks on the pools themselves, the DOGE, MOON and TIPS network seem also to be under some kind of attack at random times, I don't think these attacks are directed specifically at us but at the networks as a whole. The attacks are also at layer 7 and seem to be spamming many tx requests and block inventory requests through the coin networks, causing high cpu, bandwidth and disk writes on the pool servers. This has the effect of lagging the coin daemons to the point where they're not responsive to requests from stratum and stale blocks shoot up quite a bit. I've been talking to the doge devs about a potential fix for these attacks ( https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/issues/476) and they suggested updating to 1.7 Beta which appears to be based on the Bitcoin 0.9 code. This is now up and running on our East servers and assuming there are no major issues I will roll it all to the other servers in a few days. |
|
|
|
i am the previous operator of the mineworks scharmbeck pool (yes it sucked)
I can vouch for both sagefit and xodianbarr. as everyone knows i sold out and told nerdcustoms i dont wish to continue due to the situation with wdc and scharmbeck. and so it was merged with nutnut's nut2pools.
The state of WDC is a complete shambles. the current wdc devs originally focused on wdc as a general and scharmbeck was treated as a completely DIFFERENT entity. however as of the recent months it has become clear that wdc + scharmbeck are one and that without scharmbeck wdc is a failure/ UNOCS v2 . both me, sagefit, xodianbarr and numerous other people have put this to the devs with very little action taken.
The End result here is: wdc and scharmbeck is dead, move on. (You can't call people scammers for doing their job especially when things were different at that time)
For WDC its a coin, it dies no big deal. As for Scharmbeck, no one would have cared if it died if they didn't crowdfund half a million dollars at cryptostocks and pretending to be legit al the time. If they claim its not a scam they should buy back all their shares at least with whatever BTC they have left. Or wait, let me guess, they burned $0.5M in 2 months? EXACTLY!!! Where is all of the money?? Why is no one addressing this question? The second round of shares conveniently enough started to be sold at the end of January instead of second week of Feb (I believe) Like originally stated. Why the RUSH? And why offered with some weirdo hanging carrot prize? Can ANYONE explain this at all? All of you in charge now who were on the board when this happened a few short weeks ago were around. WHERE did all of our money go for those shares?  I'm not an attorney, but I did consult with one and it's likely that their cryptostocks offerings were noncompliant. People who invested should file a complaint with the SEC. There is the potential to get at least part of your money back. |
|
|
|
|
Quick update since I haven't been on bitcointalk lately - we have moved to proxying to cex.io/ghash.io for our BTC hashpower and we've broken 100TH of SHA-256 mining power.
We are about 1% of cex.io's hashpower now and paying out NMC, DVC and IXC as well on the Bitcoin port.
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone else see the irony in the Spaincoin dev coming in here and calling anything a 'scam'?
But anyway, to state that Multipools earn less than mining a single coin is not accurate. If it was, nobody would mine on them. See, there's one thing miners are very sensitive to and that's profits.
Miners have a choice in pools, and some are more transparent than others. You can get a general sense of how profit-switching pools are doing (vs. LTC at least) by using a site like poolpicker.eu, or test yourself. But if someone wants to throw their hash down a hole and get a payment in BTC who are we to judge.
|
|
|
|
You're missing the point of a multipool. They are designed to be "high profit" and "low maintenance." They are mostly not intending to target true crypto currency speculators. They are targeting those looking for income... now.
If you are a speculator, who is looking to mine coins that have future potential, then do your research, pick a couple solid coins that look good and find a reliable pool that mines each of those coins. Don't flip flop around. Don't let someone else pick your coins. That's not what speculators do. They use their brain and make good decisions, and when the value of your coins go up, you did that... you win.
They're two separate things, really. If you want to invest in certain coins, it makes more sense to mine the coin that is most profitable, and trade it for the coin in which you want to invest, than to mine the coin in which you want to invest directly (assuming the coin you want to invest is currently not the most profitable coin). In this way, you not only get more of the coin you want to invest in, but you actually increase its value by buying it rather than mining it. |
|
|
|
You make no sense. Even if he had sold a bunch of his own coins that he supposedly stole from himself, he had any right to do so at any given time. It would be disappointing because he would really have to be a total idiot as he could have sold them AT ANY FUCKING TIME over the past year when they were worth much much more than over the past two weeks. Extremely weak motive, esp as he is working as hard as ever to improve DGC at the moment.
He needed money, plain and simple. The third party verification is undeniable. His only option in retaining any hope of continuing in this community is being straight with people. ~BCX~ Stop making accusations without proof. No accusations made. Stating what I know. Let's just say I took your advice and chased down some addresses I found on my own. I found more than I was looking for when my third party contact confirmed address to user names. You should probably ask Baritus if he wants the undeniable truth posted. His silence is more damning than anything I can post. ~BCX~ If you have something why not just post it? |
|
|
|
HE stole them.
Pretty fucking simple.
He stole his own coins? He couldn't very well admit to selling them so he came up with this "rogue employee steals my wallet" line of BS. The reason he won't publicly list the addresses is simple, they were sold at Cryptsy and as long as he doesn't openly admit which addresses is his, he can always deny anything we can logically point to as the address. Basically if you invested in any of Baritus' ventures, you made it possible for him to cash out $30K USD of his coins. ~BCX~ If he had coins and sold them why would he have to admit it at all? It's not like anyone would know unless he told them anyway. |
|
|
|
One feature I love in Multipool that is missing in ipoMiner is the ability to manually change the workers difficulty from the UI. Any chance this feature will be added to ipoMiner?
vardiff makes things much easier on the database. Custom diff is actually a feature I wish I hadn't implemented.  |
|
|
|
HE stole them.
Pretty fucking simple.
He stole his own coins? |
|
|
|
Good luck! That interface looks familiar |
|
|
|
I've forked the code here and updated the checkpoint (still says too old) and the IRC server. If the dev doesn't step in and make needed updates I'll look for a new maintainer for this coin. https://github.com/flound1129/bottlecaps |
|
|
|
It seems this coin has gone unmaintained. I've forked the repository and made 2 simple changes: updated the irc host and the checkpoint on the main chain. I've also updated the build # and changed the -caps suffix on the version display to -flound. Please test: https://github.com/flound1129/bottlecaps |
|
|
|
|
Is this coin still under active development?
|
|
|
|
|
Multipool has opened an Auroracoin pool on port 3362. 1.5% fee.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
is it posssible to deposit fiat into mtgox?
I lol'd. |
|
|
|
they are testing withdraw now
Yeah they're 'testing' by sending cheaply bought bitcoins to their accounts on coinbase, bitstamp, and other exchanges to sell. Why do you think the price is dropping on other exchanges? If bitcoins weren't getting out, prices would stay the same elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
It looks like my cold wallet somehow lost around 250 NVC after downgrading.. Any way to recover these coins?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
