More people need to trade on the exchange. It's moving really slowly.
because in reality its not worth anything (from someone mining it on 3 comps). its just a novelty experiment I have some LTC that says it is. bet you understand the price of everything but you fail to understand worth |
|
|
|
my question is why do people call ltc going to mtgox an IPO? That's saying prior to listing on mtgox everything is premine  |
|
|
|
More people need to trade on the exchange. It's moving really slowly.
because in reality its not worth anything (from someone mining it on 3 comps). its just a novelty experiment |
|
|
|
such headlines just scream sh$tcoin  |
|
|
|
Thanks for help, but problem persists!
Here is what shows when i go to help, console, getpeerinfo:
01:57:25 getpeerinfo
01:57:25

[
]
Peers do not populate within brackets.
I added nodes from this thread with and without :port# in a cryogenicbullion.config. Where is this config file to be located. I have it in a folder on my desktop with other CGB files. This is what was in that file:
{
addnode=97.89.174.206
addnode=69.85.86.195
addnode=46.150.89.173:55437
addnode=97.89.174.206:5263
}
That is it. Am i doing that wrong? There were more addnodes, but you see what I am talking about.
So, within the client, when i go to settings, Network. The box is checked for "Map port using UPnP". However, this grayed out...
Maybe a clue.
Hate to be a pest, but would love this working, so i know I am not sending the cgbs into the ether. Feel free to provide wallet and I will send tip for helping I can get this thing working
what os? c:users>"yourcompname">appdata>roaming>CryptogenicBullion (add cryogenicbullion.conf to that dir) if in win 7 etc |
|
|
|
|
damn ppl paying a tad too much for a coin wit nothin.
|
|
|
|
gamed already, guess i'm late to the party  |
|
|
|
lesson of this thread; never point out the bleatingly obvious to diehard fanbois |
|
|
|
But if miners are willing to beta test one, I'd have a crack at it ... Host the site on it.. Food for thought...
if u wanted to have a play setting one up, I'd help test it from my end. |
|
|
|
The pool at http://66.172.10.55:19337 is up and running, though because the pool is running the old client, the network hashrate isn't being reported properly I have about 1 M/h mining.. The pool looked dead, but the graphs show a jump in hashrate at about the same time the clients were released. It might be that nobody was mining on the pool, or it could be that the pool was having problems and just came back online .... I've been mining it constantly for ages, with regular payouts (except when big miners joined in), last 2 days no blocks found, which at the current dif isn't realistic. I went off it when was pm'd its not working properly, when the client was released I jumped back on. |
|
|
|
I think any closed source crypto-currency is doomed to fail since success requires wide spread adoption which will not occur. Not in the enthusiast crypto-nerd communities who need to serve as the base for these types of projects and are critical to helping them get established. A pre-mine, even though not an automatic fail, definitely greatly reduces enthusiasm for the system.
The logic of the debates on this forum all seem to be way too btc universe centered. If it was me starting such a venture, and wanted it too be adopted as a proper currency worldwide, god the crypto-nerd communities are the last people I'd want as my base for getting it established (obviously this is my view and not that of emunie). As for insta/pre mine, relative to that big wide world outside, all cryptos started within this community are instamined. If you'd spent time within the emunie community you'd quickly become aware that emunie's communities main focus is developing a useable stable crypto currency for joe public. There's no focus within the community about loading everyone up with premines and pumping it up as high as they can in value vs USD or BTC etc. |
|
|
|
|
For the record it wasn't the developers idea to start it as closed source, it was, debated apon, then pressed apon him by the early members (and for many good reasons).
|
|
|
|
Great job getting this up and running again, thanks guys for all the hard work  Pretty sure the mining pools are broke |
|
|
|
I decided to step up the game and bring Messiahcoin into the Scene,
It will end all this madness with new alt coins, More info coming soon (As i think it through)
Anyone interested? irc.freenode.net #messiahcoin
Here are my ideas: - Fee's Dynamically Linked to Network Difficulty, So Higher the Difficulty Lower the Fees.
- The coins name will start with M, as a Symbol to its Messiah, but it will be a single word Currency Name without the word "Coin" in it.
- OMG this is getting serious, i got some followers
Come on people, he's not the messiah, he's just a very naughty boy |
|
|
|
JwN5gtqr9MFQsmJQ32TwBytX4iR5By2XCX |
|
|
|
I signed up to check you guys out, then jaw drops, seriously have you guys done your research on this? You know why there's no others doing this?
There's been a few attempt at this by others you do know that? You know why they've failed?
Care to point out some hints? We're VC-backed so I'm fairly sure that we (and our investors) have done thorough research on everything we've done so far. At the very least we have access to professionals in the field. It'll be great if you can be more specific in your questions. ok then so you don't know and you never actually did the ground work......OTHERWISE YOU WOULD NOT ALLOW DIRECT TRANSFERS INTO YOUR BANK ACCOUNT FROM CLIENTS BANK ACCOUNT......101 of trading btc in Oz dumbass and don't even comback saying oh but we sat down with the banks business advisors told them what we were doing and its all cool with them....lol cause that means squat. BTW not attacking what you guys are doing, your platform is good, your fees are great and a breath of fresh air in Oz (but trading via bank transfers will be your undoing). |
|
|
|
You reckon it's still July?
you been drinking again? |
|
|
|
|
5eB2vX2jPci1CiQchsZzfqjzuGH1oLfgkd
thanks
|
|
|
|
MCg8tzCNRKyvpddBxzSLUASrwsP3MUsUCm |
|
|
|
I've spent a lot of time, invested a lot, will continue to invest a lot more, and have a long term plan of where I want this to go. Putting it out as open source to start with would leave eMunie and that goal open to being undermined by "script kiddies" that just rip it and copy/paste it and throw out their own. Wrong. As long as it's closed source it is by no way worth of any trust, hence nobody will use it, hence you will have wasted your time spent coding. Keeping it closed source will have exactly the effect you think it is preventing instead. Either you release the sources or don't bother releasing at all: it may or it may not be successful, but as long as it's closed, it's certain it won't be. Damn someone better get out there and explain that to all the worlds top software companies before its too late.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
