It isn't healthy for the currency.
Well it isn't healthy for cryptos in general to be here for the fiat
|
|
|
"Litecoin and its undeserving #2 status?"
lol and why is that?
|
|
|
probably because there are so many 'rare' crypto's that being rare is no longer rare Bitgems has been simply undervalued , and unappreciated.
|
|
|
Hello. What are your thoughts and reasoning why there is a creation of a foundation for the coin?
because most dev's lack imagination and have to copy bitcoin 110%
|
|
|
What's a new feature that you would like to see in a cryptocurrency? What new feauture in a currency if implemented do you think would push it above the other alt coins and make it stand out as a true contender to bitcoin?
One that just pumps out free USD....save all this middleman bs (joke based on the attitude of most people around this place, who base a cryptos success on its price vs USD).
|
|
|
longterm if Dev's plans take off, I'd say the height of these pumps will be considered a low
|
|
|
110% agree with OP, well put.
|
|
|
bitcoin, litecoin, nxt, protoshares, peercoin, mastercoin, eTherium. Litecoin because MAYBE there is room in the market for 1 shitcoin, then the rest because those are all of the ones that are actually innovative.
give me a marketable copy coin anyday, innovatives mainly for a very niche crowd, ltc just being the silver to btc gold will take it way further then most the 'innovative' coins as the public becomes more interested in alternative currencies.
|
|
|
What precisely are you saying - no alt-coins at all should exist?
Don't think anyones saying that here, not having an alt section on a forum about bitcoin is not saying alternatives shouldn't exist. There's other forums dedicated to cryptocurrencies, alts, and any alt worth anything has its own forum. In summary its bitcointalk not cryptocurrencytalk. Alternative sub forum was just that a sub forum, now its kinda grown too big (and mostly just spam, with little actual alternative currency talk).
|
|
|
Although I collect and trade alts, I don't disagree, the alt section now has just become a haven for scam after scam, too much work for any group of mods to sort.
|
|
|
Cryptsy will be under investigation soon, their market manipulations will not go unnoticed.
market manipulation of what? fake trading tokens? lol
|
|
|
you had me at hello but seriously did anyone even read this shit let alone take any notice of the crap being spun
|
|
|
Could we ban IPO threads as well
|
|
|
Battlecoin although somewhat under the radar at this time, is one from left field. Keen on seeing how it develops even if just half the devs ideas work out. Neat concept that could end up being alot of fun
|
|
|
Funnily enough you have a thread giving investment advice yet you break the number one rule of trading
|
|
|
Goodbye bitcoin, goodbye DOGE, good bye altcoins, goodbye fiatcoins, goodbye earned coins, goodbye lost coins, goodbye.... Hello Battlecoin
|
|
|
yeah crazy, best to hold imo as the dev's plan unfolds (well and for the decent stake rewards wow, price keeps dropping... why everyone selling so low?
|
|
|
Oh ok so they didn't add the coins you hold yet, now your argument makes perfect sense Okay then also add memorycoin and metiscoin ( site needs more CPU coins too ) and the 3 NONanimal coins with a large community behind USD-E, Digibyte and Klondikecoin Cheers
|
|
|
Yes since when has being added because of decent concept been 'corrupt' and adding because of paid votes not......funny old crowd tonite. Very true. I've been waiting for this point. It was inevitable. I'm sure bitjohn sees how many people post on here paying for votes. it makes the point of votes kind of useless
|
|
|
WTF? I mean look at all the cryptsy votes and requests 100's of them for other coins and they just go and add this?
Come on lets all be honest here, most the votes on the request for coins are bought, ie giveaway's if you vote to add on cryptsy. BCX didn't do that, but come out with a decent idea and obviously cryptsy see's the potential.
|
|
|
|