Well, the rule isn't enforceable as per the mods. Also, marcotheminer turned out to be okay, if we leave out the occasional attacks.  10% bonus for avatar campaign. There might be some changes to avatar campaign from next week.  I actually enjoy reading yours and Marco's post  Not blaming anyone or taking sides as I have been a part of both the campaigns but it seems that you both keep taking digs at each other just like how two siblings argue  In a way, I find it too cute. For me, both are doing a great job in managing their campaign Sorry if this post hurts anyone. I laugh at it too sometimes (especially the way ndnhc made the first post in the this thread). Read it and you'll find digs at me in every second sentence . But no hard feelings currently Can't find any. Well, phone verification is why I left bit-x campaign. And also why I joined it much much later after finding a workaround. That is just saying why this campaign is better than the competitors same as saying the best or highest rates, or something like that. I want potential participants to know that this campaign might have the features they are looking for. |
|
|
|
The game: Send the double of the previous sent amount. (If more it is considered valid and the next person is to send double of that amount.) If it is less than 2x of the previous amount, it will be considered as donation to the prize pool. Starting with 0.001BTC.Address: 1JPxSv7bP2UzLKGtzUjEdtk3nWWtP8oGeo https://blockchain.info/address/1JPxSv7bP2UzLKGtzUjEdtk3nWWtP8oGeoFunded with 0.1 BTC prize money. Prize: Pot, the entire balance of the address minus 10% fee. The last person to send wins if no one sends the doubled amount in the next 24 hours calculated from blockchain time within 100 confirmations of the transaction. Cheers Good luck. P.S. I will not get involved with the game in any unethical or unfair manner. Edit: And sorry for using an already used address. |
|
|
|
 I even still thought they're the emoti onal icons ) You are saying they are not emoticons?   |
|
|
|
question: If you get your range upgraded during the week, do you get paid as your former range, as your new range, or individually per post? You are in. Please wear the signature. Hi, the timing of the new week, is in sync with the activity increase. On the last day of every (second) campaign period, the activity change will occur and the next day, it will be updated. You will be in the new member level only for a few hours . So, you will be paid at the level you were enrolled. The next day of the activity change, you will be automatically enrolled as the higher level. Thanks |
|
|
|
The spreadsheet is not open to public,can you open it?
What do you mean? It is working all right from my end. |
|
|
|
Affiliates will get 2% at the beginning at level 1 of play, and then, when they reach the next level, another 2% up to level 15, when it will reach the maximum of 30%. The more people you refer the more you stand to gain. That is my level, right? 30% is quite cool. |
|
|
|
Well, the rule isn't enforceable as per the mods. Also, marcotheminer turned out to be okay, if we leave out the occasional attacks. 10% bonus for avatar campaign. There might be some changes to avatar campaign from next week. I actually enjoy reading yours and Marco's post Not blaming anyone or taking sides as I have been a part of both the campaigns but it seems that you both keep taking digs at each other just like how two siblings argue In a way, I find it too cute. For me, both are doing a great job in managing their campaign Sorry if this post hurts anyone. Not a problem, bud. We have nothing against each other actually. Kinda friends atm. |
|
|
|
I am considering making both full avatar and add-on rates the same, so that participants will be more encouraged to wear the add-on. Rate will be around 8% then. What do you think? Actually I dont think that is a good idea. Are you willing to drop the avatar campaign to be add on campaign instead? Because if you are going to make the rate for both the campaign the same then there will be no more reason for someone to give up his own personal avatar spot anymore isnt it? all participants who wish to participate will be wearing the add ons instead since they got the same rate. I think that's the point, so people do not make their entire avatar the company but the option is still there for those doing it out of goodwill. That is correct, that is why Im asking if ndnhc will be dropping the avatar campaign to be add on campaign instead since there will be no different in payment rates then of course people will not be willing to use the full avatar . Well, the point was to encourage people to pick up dadice add-ons instead of giving up full avatars. Point taken. |
|
|
|
I am considering making both full avatar and add-on rates the same, so that participants will be more encouraged to wear the add-on. Rate will be around 8% then. What do you think? |
|
|
|
IMO, certain posts are considered spam because they are wearing a signature. And people who are in a signature campaign force themselves to make longer posts (in an effort to make it constructive), which is actually not a requirement at all.
But if a mod or admin will see a lot of short line/posts he will be sure take action against you, maybe you are right when you are saying it is not a requirement for the various signature campaigns but it is a problem for the forum. Sorry. forgot to add unless he makes a lot of that kind of posts.. I added that only to the first paragraph. I meant to say, posting once in a while like 1 in 20 or so, is normal. If he makes a lot of short useless posts, he won't get paid and he will also be very likely be banned. |
|
|
|
So #6 won?  |
|
|
|
We are approaching our 50th million bet very very soon. Currently just about 700,000 rolls away from the 0.5 btc bounty you could win! Join now, roll and win! You may use our faucet as well, there are no restrictions, all you need to do is to roll #50,000,000 and to report it here -> (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.0) , via PM or in our chat within 30 minutes.
Good luck, and Keep Rollin'!
|
|
|
|
If I can say my opinion, it is impossible to write all constructive posts. It's normal that each of us will write at least 2-3 'insubstantial posts', this is a forum not a place of genius and writers (as shakespeare). Take an example of my personal situation here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1022225.0 In that case the problem was only the signature ad, but I am sure that if someone who was not wearing a sig ad (did the same thing) it would not have happened. Yeah, that is right. Actually, as a campaign manager, I expect to see a small number of posts that are insubstantial. But, what to do with someone who does not post something like a thank you or congratz or a simple question that normally one would post (it may not be counted, but it is not really spam, unless he makes a lot of that kind of posts), just because he is part of a campaign and thinks that it will be called spam and will result in removing the participant or something from the campaign? IMO, certain posts are considered spam because they are wearing a signature. And people who are in a signature campaign force themselves to make longer posts (in an effort to make it constructive), which is actually not a requirement at all. |
|
|
|
Enrolled. |
|
|
|
I'd give hex color #8a7dbe a shot. It's the color I used in the below designs and it's the same color as the base of the dadice website. Here's are a few mockups. They all usea the 3:2 avatar dimension ratio so they can be shrunk to perfectly fit the current Avatar area.  Thanks Also if possible try inverting the colors, like white bg and red/blue/green in place of the white. I think it will look neat. |
|
|
|
I would not accept this user. He is a signature spammer and showed this in my campaign. I really don't know what your problem is, you tried to take advantage of me and you failed and now you are mad? You are also not allowed to post in this topic but you keep doing it... The local rule is not enforceable. So, he is not restricted from doing so. He actually has the right to do so as per his OP.
If you spam useless posts, I have the right to a) completely deny your payment or b) make a rough (probably harsh) estimate of the number spam posts I believe you made and disqualify them from payment.
Pending decision...Enrolled. Name:srgkrgkj Position: Sr Member Bitcoin Address:1HzwCYo9Lc5RadqFZUHaUb99TRJpQU42SH Link to Recent posts:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=346520;sa=showPosts note : if marco says i wasnt spamming to increase post count i was taking part in the conversations sorry marco if it look like i was spamming  Denied. Reason: Stricter enrollment requirement. Thanks a lot! I will make my posts more comprehensive and hope to bring some new people to dadice! Cool You don't have to make coprehensive posts just for the campaign lol. Just make sure you don't have any spam posts. Cheers ndnhc |
|
|
|
I suppose Spam post (supposing you are referring to "signature spam") is anything you post just for the purpose of getting paid and contains nothing constructive. In simple: Posts that you wouldn't post if you weren't getting paid but you are posting just because you are getting paid PS: This post is short but not spam because it contains my personal opinion The (modified ) question is, if the participant is really taking the effort in making the post, and the post is constructive, but he is making it look so, and he is posting actually for the campaign alone, will that be spam? |
|
|
|
A thing to add to your list, which is my personal opinion... someone who does not care about adding punctuation, correct spelling, texting lingo, and especially those who don't capitalize. I mean, spam is usually made really fast by the user because they do not care about wasting their time on a constructive post. A few errors here and there are fine but if it is all errors then it bugs me. When people delve into using texting lingo like, "U R a gr8 m4n", it shows that they do not want to waste their time making a non spammy post.
EDIT: Improper Grammar also bugs me.
I had removed that part from the campaign definition of constructiveness, simply because it won't be fair to ban all those who may not have a good knowledge of English. That would be unfair, IMO. |
|
|
|
lol. That is what I meant. OP updated. Should a campaign kick out members who do:
1. Forced posting? (i.e. making constructive posts for the campaign alone)
I wonder how you would detect that. This would imply that you could somehow reveal the intentions someone has when posting. I dont think this is possible and wild assumption would only get people pissed of. Dunno. That is why I asked. Glad to see someone who thinks like me. 2. Make posts that he usually do but are not exactly constructive.
I would not force someone to change their posting habits. Maybe talk to them about those cases and discuss a different pay rate. This would certainly require more work unless you could settle for a general terms, e.g. -10% off on all posts, but the unconstructive ones still count. I don't really like that idea though. It would be mean giving people I like higher rates than those I don't. Plus, everything will be too much in my hand. Don't want dictatorship. 3. Somewhere in between constructive and not constructive.
Since there is no fine line I would give them the benefit of the doubt and allow them to improve. Tell the participant openly what you think could be improve or what should be avoided in the future. Yeah, that is what we have been doing till now. Now going to make enrollment a little stricter, since we are 80% plus full. 4. Kicked by another campaign for spamming. But does not seem to be spamming as per the views of this manager?
In this case its probably a good idea talk to the manager what exactly they thought was spammy. It might be possible that the spammy posts had been removed by mods or the user in question. Yeah. Thanks for your opinion. |
|
|
|
Is that you? Doesn't attach the name. There's a ton of posts though. You could be the forums most wanted. I basically consider spamming. Meaningless, gibberish, time wasting and complete utter shit. No. Certainly not me lol. He was reported as spamming.? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
