I have seen some interesting responses to the thread. Sorry that I'm out of merits atm, otherwise I would have given some to replies here.


Me neither. I don't care how many accounts they create, what bothers me are those threads complaining when they have repeatedly broken the rules and on top of that they have been dumb enough to get caught. And I'm not even a moderator here, so I can understand how annoyed the moderators can be about this topic.

Please give us some data to back up the garbage claim you have made. The short term thing I could buy, but only in a biased way. Many shitcoin lovers like you see that there are shitcoins that give spectacular returns, while bitcoin only made 3.5 from last cycle to ath of last year and wrongly deduce that in the short term shitcoin is more profitable.

That is garbage argumentation, and if you want to compare well, what you have to compare is the shitcoin returns with the returns bitcoin gave the first years since its inception.

And that in the long term there are shitcoins more profitable you do not believe it yourself. If you reaffirm this, I challenge you to put concrete data on which shitcoins are more profitable.

That's the point. We should only use to bet the money we can afford to lose, just as we should only invest the money we can afford to lose, especially in volatile investments.

The OP has not logged in since he created the thread yesterday. I guess he is resignedly assuming what has happened, as two months of hard earned money lost in just a few moments, are enough to make an important reflection.

I hope he can take action so that this does not happen to him again.

I don't want to be hard on you because you are new to the forum and you seem young, but what you say seems to me to be nonsense.

I don't know why you say that it is difficult to withdraw from Pokerstars in China, I understand that gambling is forbidden there, except in Macau. If that's why, don't take your particular problem as something general.

When I request a withdrawal from Pokerstars and it is approved, it arrives to my account almost instantly, so no problem with that. Besides, creating a free casino but charging doesn't make sense. You complicate everything a lot.

Whoever wants to play for free can go to Pokerstars and play with play money. The casino you can create is not going to have better software or more traffic than them.

The point is that what we call "trends" doesn't exist, they are patterns that we make for ourselves to better understand reality..

I am always amazed how trend analysis is often abstracted from what can happen in the real world. If a war starts, or there is a ban on miners in China, or a simple statement from the Fed chairman, they set the direction of the market much more than predicting how a line is going to follow based on how those lines have behaved so far.

Although I know that there are people who use pattern analysis and make money with it, statistically they are very few.

Hey man, sorry about your loss. Has this happened to you before?


When I read the OP, I thought that he probably used martingale or one of its variants, but I am not sure. In any case, I would recommend that if this happens to him more often he take action because it is normal for a responsible gamble at some point in his life to have lost more money than he had originally set out to lose, but if this starts to happen with some frequency, you have to take action to stop it however you can.

What's funny to me about this is:


I don't know if there are other sites that put "restrictions" when playing the lottery, but if a lottery game only returns 70% of the collected prizes (to give an example), no matter what strategy you use, they will keep 30% of the collected prizes.

On the other hand, I agree that the OP's proposal does not seem very professional.

Well, with so many socialists on the forum, I'm glad to find someone who thinks like me, as there aren't many around here.

Leftists tend quite a bit to ban and force, as in this case. I particularly, although I'm not a big supporter of regulations, I do believe that the gambling industry has to be regulated, but in this case it's silly. Are they going to ban slot machines in bars and pubs when today everyone has unlimited access to slot machines from the mobile? Lol. Idiots.

Yeah, I thought it was better to avoid the scammy ones, like 1xBit, than to think about the more trusted ones, because after all most of those who advertise in the casino are trusted and have been around for quite some time.

OP, go to the scam accusations section and avoid those who have true accusations there. In some cases the accusations are unfounded but if you read the threads it is a good way to rule them out.

Yes, that one also, but not only that one. Mainly to the one in the OP. Besides, even in that case, I don't know why they are so stupid to enroll two different accounts in the same bounty that forbids it. In this forum it is allowed to have two accounts and participate in two different bounties or two different signature campaigns. Or in the same signature campaign or bounty that does not have this prohibition. And yet there are still cases like the one mentioned above.


I guess so. And laziness.

Well, as I said before:


But I did think that would be the main statistic to look at.

Do you mind sharing what other factors are taken into account, and if there are any more important ones than that?

I have been reading this thread:

Stop Spaming and making Red Trust on Baseless Facts.

Where for the umpteenth time, someone has been caught after being banned for creating another account, and on top of that he complains.

I don't know how they are so stupid that they get caught, because I think that if that happened to me and I wanted to create another account I would not get caught.

I don't want to go into details to give people ideas, but don't you think it would be very easy?

What happens is that it would cost you more work, if for example you have a Facebook account with a certain number of friends that serves you for the bounties, then you would have to start from 0 and create another new account and get friends.

Anyway, I don't know if it's just my impression or if they are just stupid.

I think you are generally correct, but I would qualify: it is not that high rollers get their money back faster, trading or otherwise. It is that they are two levels of money.

Regular gamblers, who are not problem gamblers, know that in the long run you lose more than you win, but they benefit from the gains. If they lose, it's okay, because it's money they can afford. But if they win, they have extra money for enjoyment. The difference with the high rollers is that they have more money, and therefore they bet more heavily, just like they go to more expensive places for dinner or drive more expensive cars.

Hi,

First, this should be in scam accusations, but I've already reported it to be moved.

Second, if you want to be taken seriously you should provide some kind of evidence and not just your word.

Third, what you say regarding Royse777's reputation is pure garbage. There are as of today 59 people who trust her judgement, and they are from all over the world, it is laughable that you say they are her friends.

Well, first of all I'm not sure if this thread belongs to this board, if you think it doesn't, tell me and I'll move it or report it.

The title is not quite accurate either because due to the maximum number of characters I have not been able to put everything I wanted.

It has happened to me sometimes that when I have seen the people accepted in signature campaings I have not understood very well why certain people have been accepted and not others. This has happened to me only when there are vacancies, like 1 or 2 and with decent signature campaigns, I don't mean the crappy spam like 1xBit and others like that.

In the decent signature campaigns, as I said, sometimes I have seen members with little merits in relation to the activity, for example, chosen over people who have a much better ratio, and I think the main reason could be that it is taken into account that they are customers of the business. Probably at least part of what they are going to earn in the signature campaign they are going to spend in the business (or even more if it is a casino).

I don't know what you think about this. It is clear to me that the campaign managers will not only take into account the merits in relation to the activity, but also if they post on certain boards for example and other factors.

As I say, this has only happened to me in certain cases, in campaigns that I consider decent and that, in general, have quality posters.

Is this my guess or do you think I might be right?

Is there any reliable list out there of exchanges that are truly decentralized and where these things can't happen?

My country is not there either, but there is one thing that has caught my attention.


It is normal that it is more or less the same, since gambling is a game of negative mathematical expectation, which means that if we consider the big numbers, as in this case, which is considered what a whole country bets in a year, there is a direct correlation between the money bet and the money lost.


I am struck by the case of the United States, which although it is not the first in terms of gambling per adult, it is the first in terms of total losses. I guess it is because being a rich country, there are many whales with money that gamble and end up losing a lot of money. . This is consistent with my experience with poker. Although one may think that US players are good at playing poker because it is a tradition in their country, the average player there is very bad, he is more of a recreational player who plays for fun or to pass the time.

I like to eat organic products apart from following a keto/carnivore diet, mainly because I think it's healthier, but I recognize that the world is not ready to move on to what I do in a short period of time.

The OP is right, although I don't like the way he expresses it.. Mass production is what has made 8 billion people live in the world today, and that there is less and less hunger in the world and that is based on intensive agriculture with large extensions of monocultures and chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

I hope that the shift is made little by little. As countries become richer, the population tends to grow less and even decrease. Gradually, with improved techniques, I believe that more and more crops will be grown ecologically, but also because of an increase in demand and not so much because of political will.

Again? We have had several such queries in this section recently. If you had simply looked at a few threads you would have the information:

new bitcoin casino system

Do You Think New Casino Should Partnered With Bounty Managers To Gain Trust?

How do you advertise your casino?

In short, crypto gambling is a very competitive space and if you want to try to launch a casino you will have to make a good investment, not only to set it up, but also in advertising to attract customers. Now, if you manage to make it work fairly well, casinos are money making machines, but for that, once you have attracted customers, you will have to give them a good user experience.

I believe that Musk's influence on the price of Bitcoin, as of today, is small. He had it last year, and it is inevitable that people will look at what he does and react in the short term to actions such as when he announced he was buying Bitcoin for Tesla and accepting Bitcoin payments. I personally don't care what he does and I don't think he's going to move the price of Bitcoin much some tweets.