I have been doing DCA for a long time and in this regard I wanted to make two points.

The first is that DCA is the most feasible for most people, because few, especially retail investors, have a good lump sum to invest all at once. So, investing little by little as you save money is the most logical thing to do.

On the other hand, the DCA does not have to be exactly the same all the time. If you have $100 to invest per month, you don't have to limit yourself to that amount if at some point you have more money available, especially in bear markets like now which are better times to buy.

He is indeed describing the Martingale. But the main problem with that strategy is not the one you mention, the main problem is that with that strategy, we risk an increasing capital, doubling every time we lose to gain in net the initial bet. Risking more and more, doubling each time, to win a little is a sure recipe for disaster.

I don't know if you mean the shitty altcoins you promote and your scams are more tangible?


Bitcoin certainly has nothing to do with tulips or your scams. As a means of payment in terms of speed, as you point out, it is not the best, but that is what second layer solutions are for. Otherwise, it is the best invention for storing and transferring wealth.

Yes, well, personal finance I would say. But that does not interest the public authorities. They are interested in people who are financially uneducated, who spend a lot, who get into debt and are always in debt. They want them to be financially dependent on the system.

But that's not going to happen in most of the world, because educating people about money is considered fascist.

Educating about Bitcoin within that curriculum would be ideal, but, again, this is not in their interest. They are not going to promote a currency that attacks their power.

Early why?

What I see here is a serious project, well worked, and that has made a serious investment from the beginning. A casino is a money-making machine as long as it is able to attract customers, give them a good experience and properly manage their bankroll. The first part is already there, at least as far as this forum is concerned.

On the contrary, we have repeatedly seen crappy projects, with a crappy Ann, with a forum account that doesn't even buy a copper membership to post images, and as a result, those projects don't usually succeed.

It is much better to start as Metaspins has done than as these shitty projects do.

Well, as you can see, casinos have already been recommended to you. In general the casinos that we wear in the signatures are reliable, like the one I wear, Metaspins.com, the only one I would not recommend is 1xBit, which I usually call 1xCrap, which is a casino widely known for scamming its customers.

The rest are generally reliable. What I would recommend you before trying them is to visit their threads to know what is being said there, and to read their T&Cs.

Hi Hhampuz, I've just changed signatures and the avatar but as you will know, the avatar may take a bit to be shown.

Current post count 4194.

Thanks.

I already got a grip but after that, suchmoon has said that
And you have agreed. I have put the quote and the screenshot so you can see that it is 100% true.


Well, I hope you agree with me that I was right to reveal the secret. And it was a bit by chance, because for the same reason you say, I had put the Reputation section on ignore, and when a thread was moved here, I unignored the section because I was interested in following it.

Then I saw what had happened with that disgusting being called naim027, AnotherAlt, whatever scumbag and that's what triggered me to reveal the secret and I red tagged Royse777 and CC.

 
You better not blame others for what you brought on yourself. The little funding you got is not my fault, and as suchmoon says, telling so many people to keep a secret about you, makes it quite likely to be revealed.

What I don't understand is what kind of trust you had in me. We hadn't exchanged a single PM before you offered me the chip, and we had barely interacted in threads either. Too long I kept it a secret for the little relationship we had.

Debunked NotATether? I can't believe you would say that coming from a quality poster like you. I think you are blinded by personal empathy.

Well, you're forcing me to do something I didn't think was necessary.

Gift Chip for Poker Player
« Sent to: Poker Player on: September 08, 2022, 11:56:27 AM »
« You have forwarded or responded to this message. »





I'm done with dramas. You won't see much of me in this section. I have done what the voice of my conscience tells me is the right thing to do, and I am not going to enter into endless discussions about my tag and my motives.

You take it for granted that the Republican nominee is going to be Trump? I hope it will be someone like Ron deSantis, who I don't know if you would consider a Trump apprentice. He certainly doesn't lack personality.

Yes, probably a middle ground as you propose would be ideal.

It is not a good reason to give, and probably, with that mentality you will get the opposite result.

I started giving when things started going well for me financially, without expecting anything in return, and things started going even better for me financially, as I described in this thread:

    
What about the role of giving in personal finance?

My reason for giving is that it is a good action in itself. I don't have to think of complicated arguments to justify it.

I think exactly the same as you. And I am surprised by this lenient policy with those who break the rules. It seems to me too socialist or liberal in the American sense, because leftist people tend to think that if you steal, rape or kill is that you are a poor victim of circumstances and that society has failed you, and that those circumstances have forced you to steal, rape or kill. Therefore society has to impose a low penalty, oriented to reintegrate you and release you as soon as possible.

We are seeing something like this on a small scale in the forum regarding plagiarism and bans. And I am surprised, having an ancap in charge. Although no one, including myself, is free of apparent contradictions.

If I remember correctly, that happened to me as well.

Incidentally, I have deleted my application for this campaign because I have been accepted in another one, and I don't care that much about the difference in payment.

I would like to take this opportunity to say hello to my former colleagues of the Best Change campaign and to Best_Change.

Yes, he has assumed that in this campaign there are slots reserved for Senior Member and others for Hero/Lengendary. Nice argumentation from him, but wrong.

In the article, they explain that that game has a higher HE. Losing money in the casino is normal, because the odds are against you. If the HE of the casino is higher than in other games, losing streaks are more common.

The article ends by saying that they cannot assure 100% that it is rigged, although neither that it is not. In these things I tend to think that the most likely thing is that it is not rigged, a casino is a money making machine simply by being able to attract customers. Mathematics does the rest (although you have to have a good bankroll management and set bet limits accordingly, for example). But then you look at casinos like 1xCrap, and you see that there are many who choose the dishonest way to make money, when they could easily do it in a legitimate way.

In principle, I am not interested either for the reasons given. I don't want people to know that I have Bitcoin.


Although I do have a PO box and at some point I might use it to buy some forum collectibles. Obviously, I wouldn't put my real name, preserving some privacy, but the person sending it to me would know what area I live in and my zip code.

It would have to be something very worthwhile to do so.

Do you want them to subsidize agriculture more than they already do? It's the other way around, what they have to ensure is free competition, which is what has led to billions of people having the most abundant and cheapest food in human history in the last decades.


Yes, so they should not subsidize.


I hope we don't get to that Mad Max-style situation, but if we did, guns wouldn't have to be used only for hunting or fishing.

It is a curious case of the nuns, but in reality, that they have been able to build the church has been done by donations, which in this case have been in Bitcoin, but could have been in fiat currency. It is not that the nuns have done any work or any investment to get Bitcoin. They simply received the funds in Bitcoin and used them to build the church. What I find quite positive is:


(from the article quoted in the OP)

I am not very religious but I welcome actions like this.

I don't know what you call "from time to time" when the reality is that he has been quite absent. His only post on this thread since January of this year, was the one on October 07.

I for one have nothing personal against him. I hope that he really has recovered from his health problems, if he really had them (I can't prove it) and that he can carry out fruitful projects. In any case, if so, I hope he avoids the problems that have recurrently occurred so far.