Profile.

I have found this guy who has written the last 4 or 5 posts in about a 5 minute interval.

What should I do? Should I report him? Should I tell his campaign manager?

Do you think this way of posting is acceptable?

Edit 10/23/2022: I've found another burstposter.

I don't know what your mania is with seeing conspiracies of millionaires everywhere. In this cycle in which there has been institutional takeover and more millionaires buying than in the previous one, which was known as the retail cycle, there may have been a greater influence of millionaires if they have bought or sold but in the short term.


I agree, and what we saw in the previous cycles is the norm for a highly volatile asset, without a major influence on the price of millionaires or Hedge Funds.

In this cycle we did see the influence of billionaires, like when Musk bought and sold, but the drop in these months is more due to cascading liquidations of leverage positions and panic selling when it was revealed that Celsius and others had problems.

In my case I am not looking for it at all, because I play poker on fiat sites and being perfectly identified makes it much more difficult, although not impossible, to cheat. The poker crypto casinos without KYC make it too easy to cheat. When I have occasionally played at crypto casinos it has been without KYC. If I had been asked for KYC I would not have gambled.

I understand on the other hand people who bet with cryptocurrencies looking for anonymity, because in some cases they are in a country where gambling is prohibited, or where the offer is not varied and due to regulations and taxes the RTP is low, among other reasons.

It was clear. Almost nobody likes to pay taxes, and if they are in favor of certain taxes being levied, what they really want is for them to be levied on "the rich" which happens to always be people who get paid more than they do, even if they get $100k a year or more.

If all those in favor of 0% tax  vote for politicians who raise taxes on them I expect them not to complain.

I knew about Germany:

Germany Affirms Crypto Sold After One Year Is Tax-free

What's the other one?


Not everyone. Many politicians are so narrow-minded that such a measure will be a matter of a few isolated countries. With the global trend towards more and more public spending and taxes, exempting a tax is not something that is going to be generalized.

Well, Marx already spoke of the inevitable end of capitalism, and not only has it not happened so far, but it has made humanity reach a level of prosperity and welfare that would make him turn over in his grave if he could see it.

These moments of crisis have always been and will continue to be, what we must be prepared for them, for example by not having excessive debts, especially of consumption, or having some Bitcoin holdings, as you comment.

I think I'm going to leave this thread open for the rest of the month at most, and maybe close it earlier because I don't want it to become a spam megathread.

In general, I prefer rakeback for poker, and that's what you usually get. The bonus usually implies that you deposit, and that's something I haven't done for a long time. Anyway, both are a form of cashback, the house gives you back part of the rake they are charging you, so it doesn't matter that much.

Your plan has too many odds stacked against it, as you have seen.


At least you laugh it off, as it should be. Taking betting in the casino as a system to win money, unless it is with poker or a specific sport is usually a good system, paradoxically, to lose a lot of money, exacerbated by tilt.


Remember to try this one.

I am glad they have removed that clause because of the negative response from people and the controversy generated. Many people believe that censorship is acceptable nowadays, but that a private company could act in that way has a component of arbitrariness that is closer to feudalism than to an advanced society.

Who decides what is correct information? If we talk about things like that the earth is round we will enter into a consensus, and even so, there are those who deny it and say that it is flat, but when we enter into topics that have an ideological component we enter into dangerous terrain.

For example. When CBDCs are soon to be implemented, expressing the opinion that Bitcoin is more reliable and more secure than them could be considered misinformation. And so we could find a lot of examples.

I used paypal a bit in the past and stopped using it by deleting the account, because of some charges they wanted to put if I remember correctly. Now I have them sending me emails saying they will give me some free pennies if I come back. Let them sit tight.

Don't be so afraid, the death of the dollar has been talked about for a long time, and so far what has happened in this crisis is that it has revalued against other major currencies because countries around the world use it as a safe haven. The headline of the article is clickbait and that rag does not have much credibility. Another thing is that there is a slow loss of hegemony of the dollar with respect to the power it had, say 20 years ago, but it is not an overnight thing and neither are its effects.

If it's just a matter of shame, it shouldn't have to be. I imagine that in reality the OP wants to make money with signature campaigns, but if not, there is nothing to be ashamed of. This is a forum and if he posts in the sections he does and in the way he does to pass the time there is nothing wrong. His posts don't have much merit, yes, but a lot of the traffic on forums is a form of entertainment without much effort or merit in what is written.

The only thing I would do if I were her, and therefore what I would recommend, is not to sell everything. If she's tempted to trade it for fiat, she can sell half a Bitcoin and wait another 10 years. I'm sure it will be worth it.

On a related note, yesterday I saw that according to the US National debt, every US citizen would owe almost $100k, and if we only count taxpayers, almost $250k. This does not seem very sustainable, especially if we take into account the deficit, and that the negative numbers keep growing.

https://www.usdebtclock.org

So far, things have been sustained by a forward flight, as the world's richest and most powerful nation and having the dollar as a reserve currency, but the debt cannot continue to increase ad infinitum.

Regarding the possible scenarios, I think there are two, and a priori we cannot know which one would end up happening: that the Bitcoin would fall precipitously and deeply in price, or that in the face of the crisis the Bitcoin would become a refuge and rise in price. I think it would be a mixture of both: a first downturn to rise quickly, as happened from March 2020.

It is legal to sell that in most countries, if not all of them. The point is they have to be sold by prescription, which I doubt is required in these threads.

Why don't you post links? Those threads break the rules and you will make it easier for the mods to find them to trash them.

I had a look in the goods section but I didn't see those threads.

This has nothing to do with freedom of speech.


Because they are busy, and the threads are not so easy to find, I guess?

The OP's claim, aside from the fact that he has not been able to prove it and is most likely false comes from the communist minded garbage that comes to say that the world is very unequal and the solution is going to be a politician confiscating wealth from those who have the most to distribute it to those who have the least.

The nonsense is such that I get tired of repeating it ad nauseam but here we go. To begin with, it starts from the false conception of wealth according to which wealth is like a cake, and then, if the rich get richer, they take part of the cake away from the poor and then they are poorer. The garbage of this conception cannot explain why then today almost 8 billion people live on earth, poverty has been reduced everywhere, especially hunger, and there are more than 60 million millionaires.

According to Marx's capital this is impossible to have happened.

In order to deceive people into believing that the world is in a very bad way because of inequality, they change the terms and want people to believe that a poor person today is like a poor person in 1800, when the quality of life of a poor person in a developed country is much better.

As for Bitcoin, the same people who complain about inequality are those who from the beginning said that Bitcoin is a scam, a ponzi scheme, etc. and who now see that Bitcoin is not going to disappear, but has come to stay, they start to protest about how unfair it is that some have more than others. But above all, what pisses them off is that a redistributionist politician cannot confiscate Bitcoin to supposedly redistribute it. I say supposedly because in the redistribution the politician is much more favored than the others to whom he redistributes. We only have to look at the inequality between the billionaire politicians of Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea and their poor citizens.

Because of course, they don't like to talk about merit and things like that. Like the merit of having bought Bitcoins 10 years ago and HODLed them, at least a good part of them to this day. No, for them that's unfair and the state, through a socialist, or worse, communist politician, has to confiscate it and redistribute.

My God! Not surprisingly, the OP's nickname is: "fishy". I'd like to see him at a poker table. If we look at the other threads he has opened, they are nonsense like this one.


It's just that the OP doesn't seem to understand, or doesn't seem to want to understand the difference between short-term and long-term results. Let him come here with results after a year of betting every week at least consistently and if he shows winning numbers we can start to believe him about his systems. But in another thread he recommends garbage martingale as a good system to earn money:

I find way to win on dice

The patterns set out by the OP are a good summary I think. Although perhaps it would be necessary to qualify the variance, because it is not the same to play games with low probability of winning than safer games with a higher probability. Simplifying, it would be like the difference between playing roulette on a single number or on red or black. In the first case, most of the sessions will be more similar to pattern II than to pattern I. Pattern III and IV will be more likely to occur in games where there is a higher probability of winning on each bet.

It's been a while since I've been in the reputation section, and, in fact, I think I'm going to end up putting it on ignore because I'm a bit fed up with the unnecessary drama, sometimes stirred up by alts. At first I enjoyed coming here more, as it's like the gossip on Bitcointalk, but I'm getting fed up.

I would like to make a reflection that has been going through my mind.

I know what Casino Critique's main account is.

And I think that hiding it in the end has been detrimental, because, in my opinion, that person has a pretty decent reputation, I'd say. Although not perfect. That person sent me a PM telling me about the project and offering me a free chip. I did not promise them that I would not tell who that person is, although I understood that they preferred not to disclose it. I didn't remember anything the PM said about no disclosing and I had to look at the PM again before writing this post to realize that it said:: "...Casino Critique is my official account. Please keep it unpublished."

In my case, I have not disclosed it but not for money or anything else, because I am not involved in the project and I have had little to no relationship with the people involved during my time in the forum. I simply understand that the people on the project prefer not to disclose it, and I respect that.

The only thing I could have been involved in would have been to invest some chips, but it didn't convince me, as it didn't convince almost anyone else. It seems that the project will continue despite the adversity of lack of funding and if it is finally a successful project will be mainly due to persistence, effort and faith in the project that have those who make up the team.

Although I think it would have been better to say who Casino Critique is, I don't think this issue has had any influence on the funding. I think such big numbers on a new project is what people don't see clearly.

I just prefer to improve my financial situation in a boring but safe way: DCA to the S&P 500, DCA Bitcoin and some RE.

What you call scam I call mathematical certainty. There are some sites that are scam, but not even close to 95% and in this forum, in general the ones you see in the signatures of forum members are legit with some exceptions like 1xBit or 1xCrap, as I prefer to call it.

Learn concepts such as expected value or mathematical expectation, House Edge and RTP and you will better understand how casino games work. You never have to take them as a good system to win money. Think of it as entertainment, like going out to dinner or to the movies, but with the difference that from time to time you may come out with more money than you went in.

No, and I don't know why you say that.

What I imply is the following: the countries forming the European Union have had a generally social-democratic political orientation, which had very positive results after WWII and until the end of the last century with high welfare quotas and reduced inequality among its inhabitants. Compared to other parts of the world, the reduced crime rates can clearly be attributed to these welfare quotas and the reduced gap between rich and poor. But for at least a couple of decades now, the regulatory tangle and elephantine bureaucracy is leading to a system more akin to that of the USSR (to exaggerate a bit) than to that of states that allow the private sector to create wealth and then redistribute it.


Do we know in a practical way which wallet providers and services we are talking about? Is there a list?