If by the latter part you meant $750 in BTC and another $750 in Eth, then you might want to check the following "list of gift card providers" that have Amazon gift cards.
^{- If it's the other way around, ignore my post.}

If by the highlighted part, you meant in a way that the choices that you get are compatible with each other, then I believe "newegg's PC builder" only shows you compatible choices if you choose your components starting from the top, then simply add those to the cart and pay with BTCitcoin.
^{- Having said those, they use BitPay as their payment processor [unfortunately].}

It's a fairly new platform that was created roughly 2 months ago. I doubt anyone has purchased anything from it ^{[I did some digging but couldn't find a single review]}.
^{- Ignore it if TCW003 can't provide proof of some sort [apart from the escrow part].}

It doesn't look like you've integrated a BTCitcoin payment to your website ^[yet] and since you're trying to sell your products here, you might want to mention if you're willing to accept BTCitcoin payments through this forum as opposed to ordering from your website.

I collected a list a couple of years back but decided to go the local route instead, so I can't vouch for any of the names I'll be listing but they might come in handy...
^{* Kindly DYOR before using them.}

• Bullion79
  
  • Ann thread
  • Uses OpenNode
  • They tried selling their company back in "2018" but in "2019", they mentioned still being in the business.
• Coaex
  
  • Ann thread
  • Uses CoinPayments

^{Note: Some of their listings are out of stock [might have a hard time finding what you want].}

---

A few more names that use BitPay ^{[unfortunately]}:
^{* I prefer to not vouch for any of the following names as well.}

• Veldt Gold ^{[formerly known as Agora Commodities]}
• Provident Metals

As stated in OP, I'm not escrowing for such things...

• Read announcement threads of other escrow providers and see if they're handling such trades:
  • ₿ LIST ₿ Bitcointalk's ESCROW providers: Ranking & Blacklist ☠ Avoid Scam ☠
  • Quote from: SFR10 on November 14, 2016, 08:00:06 PM
    Escrow lists:
    Recommended bitcointalk escrow services (updated)
    

Is it possible to just get rid of the direct integration part and have everything hosted on your website ^{[not referring to a live version that actually works in real life]}? Something like building a similar interface and let users interact, without having to worry about downloading anything or certain consequences if they mess up something in the process ^{[since you're targeting beginners, as long as you're capable of replicating the experience, it'll surely have a better impact than if something was on the line]}.

---

Big fan of these

I watched one of your lessons and it was good but if you could make it more fun, it'll be better for the viewers ^{[as it stands, IMHO is a little bit boring [sorry if I sounded harsh]]}.

We ^[Gunners] would gladly accept the full credit for how Man U turned around their club after losing at home to us <sup>[Arsenal]
- A devastating blow that changed everything for them, you're very welcome united fans</sup>

---

I have a feeling Burnley is going to get thrashed by Liverpool today ^{[long-awaited win for them]}.

In addition to their Trustpilot page ^{[given by Slow death]}, Ratimov did post a link to someone reviewing ^{[among other services]} their services ^{[a bit old but a detailed one [you have to scroll down to the middle part]]}...
^{- Seeing that they have so many negative reviews, I don't think much has changed since Coinsutra's review so I would advise going over to Ratimov's thread and look for an alternative instead.}

Not sure if it's just a visual bug or something else but I spotted some anomalies when using fees that are less than 100 Sats: SS of the bug
^{- Am I missing something?}

Looking forward to the TX accelerator feature ^{[hopefully it's not just one of those fake accelerators [aka TX broadcasters]]}.

I kept a tab open for roughly 10 minutes and looks like I still had to refresh ^{[not in real-time]} in order to get the updated recommended fees.

This has already been done before and there are still a few that are still going strong ^{[having said that, similar to Findingnemo's comment "most failed"]}.

You can come up with countless other versions and still find yourself the need for another change...
^{- It's not your token, it's everything else. Put yourself in someone else's [performers] shoes and ask yourself, why would you be using a platform with fewer functionalities and possibilities for earnings? You might charge less but in the long run, they would earn less as well [e.g. audience and etc...].}

Not sure which one you're referring to but there's still one that was rebranded a few years back: BitiFy <sup>[formerly known as Cryptothrift]
- I haven't used it for a very long time [DYOR before using it].</sup>

I wouldn't recommend Bitpay. Go with either BTCPay or Blockonomics ^{[list of BTCitcoin payment processors]}.

Sapta on week 103.

I don't think Lauda posted a farewell message of some sort in here ^{[perhaps in another thread or I might be wrong]}.

Exactly. Here are users that left this campaign ^{[for those that are interested]}:
^{- Personally, "I didn't leave" because of its rate but rather due to not having enough time [I was about to relocate to another country] and it felt wrong to occupy a spot while not giving back what ChipMixer deserved.}

IMHO, I don't think there's enough demand for another cryptocurrency crowdfunding platform since other alternative platforms, have little to no campaigns...

---

I had a quick look and it appears you're not using a unique address for each campaign and I'm sure that's going to lead to a big mess in the future.

---

What assurance you'll be giving to campaign starters to not run away with their funds?

Then you might want to update your "accepted payment methods" on your FAQ page since there's no mention of BTCitcoin whatsoever and that might lead to losing some of your potential customers.

Based on reports ^[source], it's going to be for a "three and a half year deal" and from the same source ^{[and a few others]} he mentioned playing in Turkey and the US before he retires so more or less we already know his next destination after Turkey ^[USA] but I don't think they'll be able to sell him close to that amount when he reaches the age of 36.

---

Rumors:

• Atletico renewing their interest in Lacazette <sup>[source]
  - I hope he stays, Arsenal really need him.</sup>
• Barcelona not allowing Neto to leave for a loan ^[source]

---

Before this window opened, Arsenal was looking to maybe get Stones from City but with his recent form, I think it's safe to safe that's not going to happen any time soon.

Brings back the good old memories when both of them were competing together but IMHO, I don't think Man U will be there at the end of the season.

It could be less than that if Everton wins their game in hand ^{[what an unpredictable year]}.

---

As for today, if Martinelli plays for more than 60 minutes, I'm sure Arsenal would be able to win against Newcastle...
^{- If Auba, Pepe or Willian start, it's going to be another home draw.}

I went over the list quickly and it looks like apart from me, OgNasty's minimum fee isn't also accurate ^{[both of us have updated our fees recently]}...
<sup>- Kindly include our updated fee structures whenever you'll be adding back the temporarily suspended users to the list
- Btw, thank you for continuous updates.</sup>

Same to you and everyone else

Are you sure that 0.0002BTC was added and not 0.0001BTC only?

As mentioned "before", there's an added 0.0001BTC fee for funding ^{[or direct purchases]} your accounts with less than 0.004BTC.

IMHO, listing cryptocurrency websites while not accepting payments in those forms defeats its purpose ^{[you might want to reconsider that part]}.

I'm not a moderator but as long as you follow the "rules", you'll be fine...
^{- You should also lock the other thread you created back in 2019.}