I did some more digging and I believe the following information would come in handy when it comes to reporting them to their registrar ^[Namecheap]:
^{- In case you still haven't reported them, please do so: Submit a ticket > Abuse Reports > Fraud > Fill in the needed data.}

• They're nothing but a rip-off:
  
  • Original = BazeBit main page ^[archived] + BazeBit about page ^[archived]
    
    
    Quote from: https://www.namecheap.com/domains/whois/result?domain=bazebit.com
    Domain Name: bazebit.com
    Creation Date: 2021-02-22T12:58:49Z
  • Rip-off = QuicklyBTC main page ^[archived] + QuicklyBTC about page ^[archived]
    
    
    Quote from: https://www.namecheap.com/domains/whois/result?domain=QuicklyBTC.com
    Domain Name: QuicklyBTC.com
    Creation Date: 2021-06-13T08:03:09Z

@Theb
I wouldn't label him as a BTCitcoin critic as well and IIRC, it's not the first time that Cointelegraph has used attention-grabbing content/headlines.

@ruthbabe
Regardless of him being one ^{[a BTCitcoin critic]} or not, it's quite normal to see someone changes his stance on something that they don't fully understand ^{[not sure if that's the case here, but there were a few prior to him and I'm sure there will be more in the future]}.

---

My OCD kicked in as soon as I saw there's a big range in regards to how much he owns; Didn't he disclose everything ^{[why there's still an uncertainty?]}?

I looked around and in addition to mk4's ^[Paxful] and dataispower's ^{[LocalBitcoins - taken from the provided link]} posts and also those you've posted, I found a few more:
^{- I didn't mention eToro because it's no longer an option [link].}

• Binance
  ^{- Found "Mauritius" on the "Supported SMS countries" list.}
• Okcoin
  ^{- Supported countries}
• Kraken
  ^{- Found "Mauritius" on the list of countries that can use "Visa and MasterCard".}

Take note: DYOR prior to using any of the above platforms.

"Transparency concerns"? It's 2021 and they're still making fallacious arguments ^[SMH]... By that logic, they should've been more concerned about fiat transactions as opposed to BTCitcoin transactions but for some weird reason, they're not!

AFAIK, printing money requires energy as well, so why this one isn't bad ^{[am I missing something]}?

#10, please

---

Happy 10^th forum anniversary to you <sup>[you're the second person that has reached that milestone this month, that's crazy]
- Just saw your CCC thread now and I'm really impressed with what you've achieved in a span of 18 months.</sup>

Yes, it has ^{[Multibit is Deprecated - Stop using it]} and there's also a statement at the top of its wiki page.

---

I had a somewhat similar suggestion but got no response and by the looks of it, nothing has changed so far...
^{- Having said that, you can still try suggesting those changes on "The Bitcoin Wiki Modernization Project - request changes and edits here".}

You're already off to a good start, but if you want to have full control over those funds, then you might want to consider using a self-hosted processor ^{[e.g. BTCPay Server]} as opposed to a custodial one ^{[e.g. Coinbase]}.
^{Take note: Most of the self-hosted processors are a bit more complicated and that includes the conversion part as well; In other words, just ignore my suggestion if you're after an automated process.}

---

You can find most of the other processors in the following link: Awesome Bitcoin Payment Processors

I don't think you'll be getting any clients unless you showcase some of your previous works ^{[there's a huge competition when it comes to such niches]}.
^{- You can use "Imgur" for uploading images here.}

You might want to think twice before shifting the conversations to other platforms ^{[scammers love to take advantage of that]}.

---

Good luck

Powell has a point but the fact that EM bases his judgment purely based on data, clearly means he never fully understands some of the things ^{[e.g. BTCitcoin]} that he talks about ^[SMH].
^{- I'd love to see one of the developers [or anyone with good knowledge about BTCitcoin] having a 1 on 1 conversation with that freaking clown, but at the same time, we should really forget about that attention-seeking whore}

You might want to mention which PSU model is in your possession...

---

You should consider posting pictures of the items in question, together with your forum name and the date on a piece of paper ^{[follow "this" thread]}, and don't forget to mention if you're fine with using one of the escrow providers ^{[except me]} from this forum.

I don't think you should blame Coinsbee for your own mistake ^{[unintentionally underpaying]}.
^{- You probably sent it from an exchange or an online wallet of some sort, since there was a deduction; In other words, you didn't read the payment part from their "FAQ" page.}

---

Use the following link instead: Contact > Click Shopper > Click Next > Choose the appropriate one and fill in the missing/needed data.

Yeah, right!

Keep dreaming

In other words, you don't need it ^{[it's not a necessity, but a luxury]}.

Perhaps it's the right time to start talking with a piece of evidence, as opposed to words...

As always, great job but I'm interested in knowing how you keep on successfully finding their next scam platform? Is it a certain group on Telegram?

I'm starting to think that they're just taking down the domains themselves, while their hosting has remained unaffected.
^{- I tried looking for a way to report them through their registrar but had no luck in finding a way}

That explains his bold move, but does anybody know if he was forced to receive his salary in various cryptocurrencies or he specifically opted for such a salary?

Although he mentioned being a hodler, I still enjoyed reading the first part where he mentioned using it as a normal currency

---

An interesting tweet from him:

In addition to what @Yogee posted, they could send out electronic questionnaires to their previous customers and also do in-person/face-to-face surveys.

I completely agree with you, but I don't think there's any harm in keeping that option alive for potential buyers ^{[unless I'm missing something]}.
^{- Regardless of the demand, it's always better if they could offer more options for purchasing their cars.}

AFAIK, they never looked into the investment side of BTCitcoin...

It looks like it didn't have any impact

Let me stop you right there! This is one of the cases that I'd even suggest to completely forget about the existence of BTCitcoin...
^{- Why would you gamble all of that hard-earned cash in exchange for the words of a random person [regardless of their status]? It doesn't make sense.}

None of us have visited the future, so don't expect anyone from this thread ^{[or other places]} to answer that question accurately.

Only you can help yourself.

Just to be clear, I'm not a trader ^{[can't vouch]} but I did look around and it appears that TraderSync supports it, but that's not the case for TraderVue; At one point they were considering it, but that's it ^{[read the comment section of the "following tweet"]}.

---

The following link might come in handy ^{[it also confirms the above quote is the case]}: Top 5 Crypto Trading Journals to improve your trades

That's a good start.

In terms of expenses, how much you're willing to spend? For little or no amount, you can try guest posting on cryptocurrency blogs ^{[if it's a known blog/website, prepare to pay a lot]} and if you're willing to spend more, you can try purchasing ad spaces in here ^{[Advertise on this forum]} or run some sort of campaigns instead ^{[e.g. Signature campaign, Twitter campaign, and etc...]}.

Have you tried targeted ads?

I watched the whole interview and at first, I thought there were some positive signs ^{[first few minutes]} but by the time I finished the interview, that was no longer the case ^{[I still saw bits of his past in him and there were a lot of moments that it felt like he was still living in a different world]}.
^{- Don't get me wrong, everyone deserves a second chance and I even smiled and laughed on many occasions but I didn't see a completely changed man [I hope I'm wrong].}

The main issue with what you've said in that paragraph is the fact that you've combined both the asset part ^[hodlers] and the currency part ^{[normal usage]}. If someone truly uses BTCitcoin as a currency, then such problems wouldn't exist in the first place.

It will never come close to being centralized ^{[even indirectly]}; Regardless of the amount someone has accumulated, take some ^{[not even all]} of the parts that help the network to function properly out of the equation and all of those accumulated BTCitcoins becomes pretty much worthless ^{[that wouldn't be the case if it wasn't decentralized]}.

As much as I would love to see everyone using it as a currency, most aren't ^{[especially most of the newcomers]} while as for the rest, some of them use it for both and a small percentage ^{[based on what I've seen]} use it as a currency only ^{[like me]}.
^{- It's a dynamic world, so both of those coexists.}