Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 02:53:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 »
341  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: The reason we do see long delays between blocks on: December 14, 2012, 11:27:30 AM
(Nothing in this post except ultra simple math - feel free to skip it if you already know how many blocks take more than 53 minutes to be mined)


I just happened to spot this block, 53 minutes after it was created. There was no other block in site ... 53 minutes without any blocked being mined.

Wondered a bit about what the odds for this event are. So here are my (very simple) calculations, in case you were curious.

1. I dug up this old question, which reminded me Bitcoin block times followed the exponential distribution. It's basically like radioactive decay - each block has a "halflife time" of 10 minutes.
2. Realized that gamma = 10 minutes, and inputted 53 minutes into the cumulative distribution function.
3. Got 1-(e^-53/10) = 0.005

So, about 5 out of every 1,000 blocks take > 53 minutes to confirm. Nothing unusual about spotting a block like this every now and then.

A few interesting numbers:

1. The chance a block is not found within 10 minutes = 36.7%
2. Not found within 20 minutes = 13.5%
3. 30 minutes = 4.9%
4. 40 minutes = 1.8%
5. 50 minutes = 0.67%
6. An hour = 0.24%

(Divide by e = 2.718 to get the next number in line)

So it should happen roughly 10 times every difficulty period, not too unlikely.

I wonder how often this occurs though

Quote
Height   Age   Transactions
212168   52 minutes   677   25,884.30 BTC   Deepbit   260.72
212167   1 hour 34 minutes   535   10,720.04 BTC   BTC Guild   243.20
212166   1 hour 30 minutes   501   6,880.35 BTC   EclipseMC   326.54

EDIT: Fairly often I guess

Quote
212149 (Main Chain)   2012-12-14 05:39:51   00000000000002d26537d9eb939ed212171b45f2d70eccbf5b0d0939ee1e80e2   BTC Guild   189   104.49
212148 (Main Chain)   2012-12-14 05:31:39   000000000000039ca22d7de84a951c305535ec8f08449e5b059575308c266456   BTC Guild   365   226.70
212147 (Main Chain)   2012-12-14 05:33:58   00000000000002b54baa99eb63d0fd8b7e07d8d277be713257a7c23098a99b66   69.121.83.181   300   103.45

Silly timestamps.
342  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: the first miners on: December 14, 2012, 11:19:17 AM
The entertaining story of the guy who sold 10,000 BTC for a pizza in 2009. Imagine how silly that must feel today Tongue
343  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 5,210 stream processors - Dual-GPU AMD Radeon HD 8990 on: December 13, 2012, 04:57:48 AM
Omg, I need this....will trade my gtx670 ...
hm run spoutcraft on full settings...I wonder ^_^

Crossfire only works in full screen mode, and also is still plagued by microstutter unless you get at least THREE GPU's. If thats fine with you, then by all means go amd for gaming. I know I won't when I upgrade.

I don't see where you coming from with crossfire? I did not say anything about that.
Unless of course nvidia comes out with something as powerful. So it all depends.

Maybe he thinks that Dual GPU solutions function the same as crossfiring two single cards.
344  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Corporation Self Mining on: December 13, 2012, 12:29:38 AM
...
If Bitcoin grows large enough and mainstream enough it is inevitable that there will be first privately held and then publicly traded professional mining companies. 
...

I agree that it is probably inevitable.


However, do you feel that this might be a 'bad money driving out good,' situation?  What I mean to say is what would happen if a bloc of large, private mining operations appear.  Each operation taking advantage of a) at cost hardware and b) economies of scale.

Keeping in mind such large entities would be so invested that their debt would influence them to keep mining at razor thin margins would a bloc of these entities force less efficient miners (i.e. pretty much all independent miners) out?


What I feel differentiates this type of situation from the idea of 'professional, efficient operations,' is that these self mining operations by definition are producing their own hardware.  The playing field is no where near balanced.



That's kind of a nightmare scenario that would require bitcoin to grow a lot larger and more stable than it is now. The current total valuation of bitcoin is something like $100M USD? And mining today is worth $17M USD / yr? People already speculate that > $17M will be spent on ASIC hardware in the first year alone, by regular ol' joe-consumer. And to knock out those with the sunk cost (if just that 17M sticks around), requires maybe 10x more investment than that due to high efficiency. For manufacturers to potentially load out 17M for hardware, coloc, staff, to get 8.5M / yr, seems unlikely, especially given the wide swings in valuation of bitcoin (could be worth $100, could be worth $1 2 years from now, and you might be coming up on the halving soonish).

In the long-run, years down the road, if bitcoin were looking at Billions of USD for market cap, and coins value was much higher, perhaps TX fees playing a larger role as well, you could see serious large scale business push out the casuals, certainly. I suppose part of it depends on the profit-margins for these machines (cost vs selling point), demand, and whatnot as well.
345  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: New cooling solution on: December 13, 2012, 12:07:56 AM
Here is another cooling concept.
Already licensed the technology to partners.
We will see this within a year
http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/sandias-floating-spinning-heatsink-promises-30x-better-cpu-cooling-20120625/

Seems cool (ha ha pun!), lots of limitations though, can only be placed horizontally, and in immobile situations (heaven help you if your 2500rpm spinning heatsink is tilted). Will be interesting to see what kind of casing they come up with as well, as again, unlike many traditional fans, touchy = baddy.

The piezo fan I like, though I don't think that it's a given that it will be quieter, as you are creating a jet stream, and depending on your application this will require some sort of jiggery-pokery, as mentioned in video. I'm also curious if there are any problems with air re-circulation in ultra-thin, cramped-quarters applications (say the inside of a phone or tablet for example), especially as these devices trend higher in power consumption.

346  Bitcoin / Hardware / [Archive] BFL trolling museum on: December 12, 2012, 11:27:45 PM
Oh lord, now I have to dig through a centralized BFL thread for updates? Hurray...

Random BFL related fact

Quote
BFL Fab is not located in China
https://forums.butterflylabs.com/bfl-forum-miscellaneous/519-10-dec-2012-bfl-asic-update-13.html#post7983

Bury it my pretties. Bury it so deep no one will ever see it again.
347  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Difficulty decreasing? on: December 12, 2012, 02:43:27 AM

That link returns: 3405980.70883142 for me.
348  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Raspberry Pi / cgminer for your BFL BitForce on: December 12, 2012, 02:41:48 AM
Seems it's not completely dead - but the whole USB system will fail (including the USB based Ethernet controller..)

Same issue / topic: (there are a couple more)
http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=16280

It seems that some older Raspberry Debian Wheezy images did not have such issues, however I have no older images to try.

FPF

Uhm... hmm... mine lately seems to be dead sadly. I can't even boot anymore (no video), so might be a different issue. I got a rainbow frozen output with the OPs image though, so maybe there is something to this link you've posted. Most disappointing though regardless.
349  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AeRIUS X2 bitcoin mining server at intratechmontreal.com on: December 12, 2012, 02:32:49 AM
I don't think it's a scam, I think it's the funniest joke to come out in a long time
350  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: New ASIC project on: December 12, 2012, 02:24:57 AM
This thread changed from making me chuckle to making me hungry in like .5 seconds flat.
351  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ASIC shipping dates on: December 11, 2012, 08:41:49 PM
Nice to see this thread.  Its hard to sift through the posts and get a clear picture.  So many claims of people being a troll...  Roll Eyes  People keep using that word.  I dont think it means what they think it means.   Cheesy

Its nice to keep the original post updated with 'official' claims by the sellers and let the speculation as to further delays be in the replies.

Agreed, I'm not invested enough to sift through all the forums and redundant posts of this and rebuke to that. So I appreciate a thread that will track this stuff for me.

The next thing I'd kind of like to see, just for sociological purposes, would be a thread tracking the general sentiment of customers/detractors throughout. For example:

July -- Hooray we gonna get ASICs! // ASICs cant be real!
August -- Cant wait for those ASICs! // You're not gonna get them, scam!
September -- OMG ASICs almost here! // I bet you that you won't get them!
October -- ASICs delayed? That's ok, its gonna be awesome! // Ha told you suckers!
November -- Another ASIC delay? Hmm... well still hoping for the best // Look at those delays! Chumps!
December -- Another delay, but I still have faith // Haw haw scammity scam scam scam!
Jan -- ?? // ??
352  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: bASIC graphic renders and diagram on: December 11, 2012, 09:17:45 AM
Thought I'd repost these here:


Source: https://www.btcfpga.com/forum/index.php?topic=355.0
I actually see it as very good news. I just wonder if these are complete renders. (As in detailed)

The good news I can gather from their renders is that the solution Tom has gone with is extremely simple scalability. His board is the same in every direction. As in a uniform design. So if he wanted to, he could probably just make a bigger board and scale his hashing power in clusters.

If he would put in some controlling logic like BFL did with their boards (for the tethered/interconnected boards of the mini rig), he would be able to scale his hashing units to an incredible degree.

Quote
please keep in mind at the time these renders were done they were incomplete.

source: first post of the linked thread.

353  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Using renewable energy to mine? on: December 11, 2012, 12:52:57 AM


Google nuclear boyscout before you try to build a reactor for your rigs.
354  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin Network Hash Rate Begins Massive Tank on: December 11, 2012, 12:06:54 AM
The total network hashrate seems a little too high for a monday.  I was kind of expecting it to be in the high teens, or lower 20s.

Like a good girlfriend
355  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Raspberry Pi / cgminer for your BFL BitForce on: December 10, 2012, 11:15:29 PM
Def. no temperature issues.

Right now - I don't display the cgminer screen anymore over ssh / the main display and it has been stable for 8 hours. Will do some more tests and let you and the other guys know.

About the watchdog, cgminer does auto restart in case you quit it - so that one works.
About the other ones - I have yet to try them somehow.

In the beginning the raspberry just randomly rebooted from time to time. However yesterday I also had it freezing twice... (without the watchdog kicking in) As mentioned earlier I assume that's because I had the cgminer screen running on the host display / ssh all of the time.

fpf

I had an issue similar to that, without running cgminer, so I'd be interested if you figured something out about it. I would come back and Pi would have rebooted for no reason that I could. Lately it has begun freezing completely. I'm hoping it is a software issue and not a hardware issue.
356  Other / Off-topic / Re: If you preordered a BFL ASIC rig back in August and paid for it in Bitcoin... on: December 10, 2012, 09:21:25 PM
The difference is that when you buy those things, you get a product. It's an even exchange at the time, and you have the chance of your product either making you money, or growing in value itself.

This really is not the difference you are making it out to be, but if you think this is that important, imagine putting a large contribution towards an Ouya or any number of kickstarter projects.

The problem here is treating bitcoin strictly as an investment, when it is more functional as a currency. I have an ASIC preorder from the first day, meaning I took $800 in fiat that I had sitting in my Mt Gox account and converted it to bitcoins and then bought an upgrade. At that time, I guess I could have bought $800 in bitcoin and sat on it and I'd have over $1600 now, but I really didn't have plans to buy more bitcoin. If I did have such plans, I would have bought the SC upgrade and bought some bitcoin. Fundamentally, though, buying bitcoin as an investment and buying a miner are different actions and it doesn't make sense to comingle their finances any more than comingling the cost of an Ouya with bitcoin.

Quote
At any rate the clock is ticking and the premium paid by BFL customers that paid for products months in advance is rapidly losing value.

I agree with this. Really, it was delivery after the halving that dealt the largest blow to profitability because no matter how many other ASICs were out there, everyone was still getting twice as much.

Though I see what you are saying, I disagree. But first I will say that I expect your situation doesn't apply to what was being suggested by the OP (they can correct me if I'm wrong). Taking fiat, exchanging to coin, then purchasing an ASIC is basically buying the ASIC in fiat, you simply used bitcoin as an electronic exchange medium, the same as if you used a credit card. If someone has already gained bitcoin, either through mining, or trading, and has been floating the coins around, for whatever purposes, and used those coins to secure an ASIC order, that is more akin to use as a currency (as you hold dollars in your wallet, until it is time to use them, rather than holding Gold doubloons).

Now on to the separate idea. One of the primary motivations behind investment is the idea (fact?) that your fiat tomorrow will be worth less than it is today. To push fiat out the door in the form of investment, purchase, whatever, is supremely logical, as you will not see such a great return ever again. If you can see potential for your money to be worth more in the future, it only makes sense to save it.

Whether you invest in an Ouya, a house, a prostitute, you are secure in the fact that you made a wise decision buying now rather than later. Bitcoin, clearly not so much, be it an investment, or as currency, the valuation fluctuates wildly such that it is difficulty to know what the wisest course of action is. So in this radically different situation, placing coin down on something now, with the expectation of return later, is not wise as it is with fiat investment. You either need to be using it as you said, as an investment (so in this case it was a poor investment), or as a currency (whereby you receive product for your purchase). As to whose fault it is, I don't know that I can say it is BFLs fault, aside from missed target dates.

The part that I agree with however, is that you *did* make an investment, and a poor one, which has cost you, had you plunked down bitcoin on a promise.
357  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin Network Hash Rate Begins Massive Tank on: December 10, 2012, 09:21:40 AM
There was a huge spike in hashrate at the beginning of the week, followed by a huge drop later, both rectifying towards the norm.

Difficulty is calculated roughly as expected_time/actual_time, so if it averages out to having taken the same amount of time, difficulty will remain roughly the same.
358  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: HardwareQuestion on: December 10, 2012, 03:11:00 AM
That board looks... delicious.

Well I can't really say what recommendation I would have for GPUs, as your requirements are somewhat contradictory. Cheap GPUs will typically suck for both gaming and mining, more expensive GPUs will only pay back like 1/20th their cost before ASICs are likely to arrive.

But, here we go anyway, 7970s are apparently very efficient miners, and great gamers, however they are quite expensive, on the order of $300 USED, and $400+ new. You certainly wouldn't want 6 of them.

For cheapness in mining and gaming, I would say since you already have a 5870, why not go for more or a 5970?  They're about $110 plus or minus 20 depending on seller, and about as efficient as you're going to get outside of the 7xxx series. They're still beast for gaming too, which is crazy since they're like 4+ years old at this point.

My recommendation would be to avoid creating a GPU mining machine of any kind, but if you really want to for fun and giggles, the above is my recommendation.
359  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: [POLL] If BFL has ASICs made, is it more profitable for them to not sell any? on: December 10, 2012, 03:03:11 AM
Well if it were me I would at least test some for a little bit before selling. That is actually a totally legitimate practice and would probably be lost in normal variance for a while.

It is not legitimate, as there is a testnet, and they also promised that would not do such a thing. To do so would not be surprising, but it would be unethical at this point.
360  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin Network Hash Rate Begins Massive Tank on: December 09, 2012, 12:50:53 PM
Variance or no variance, for whatever reason the halving of blocks has provided for the largest short-term swing in estimated hashrate calculated by blockrate in the past year. Obviously it will be weeks before the ramifications sort themselves out though.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!