Says the guy who wrote two desperate articles back-to-back trying to convince people to buy back in to Razorcoin.

Actually that's pretty huge but we do need better info on what rates are being used and whether there are limits to the number of coins that can be sent this way.

For instance, if someone was holding 100BTC-worth of VRC that they needed to send to someone as BTC, could they, when the service is fully released, do so without affecting the overall rate of exchange? The equivalent of a 'dump' of VRC to BTC normally has an effect on the market but I'm assuming that the currently centralised nature of VeriBit has these transactions taking place outside of the normal exchange conditions.

If VRC can achieve this degree of liquidity without the rate of exchange applied being negatively affected for large transactions, then it really will become harder to justify being in BTC at all, given that one can earn interest while staking VRC.

The point was that institutional investors absolutely could not support a coin with an anonymous dev team and before someone shouts 'Satoshi!', BTC has had a number of known and widely respected people develop the coin since it's inception.

So the issue is not whether 'institutional investors' are, or will be, considering a buy-in to Vericoin but, rather, whether they ever actually could. In that the dev team is not Anonymous and are open, accessible and respectable, means that VRC is not ruled out of potential institutional investor-class interest.

Please elaborate on how the three, public, open and respected, technical minds behind this coin are creating an 'obvious' scam.

That they have chatted with the guys at Blackcoin on occasion doesn't mean the guys at Blackcoin have any involvement with Vericoin. Just because you've arrived at this coin late it does not excuse your ignorance of it's background and development, particularly when you are employing that ignorance to make bold scam assertions that are based on nothing but whatever erroneous assumptions you are throwing together.

You are delusional. Your plan was based on a project that was being entirely constructed by inept programmers who had dreams far larger than their abilities.

What exactly is the 'best in all crypto' that you are offering?

Care to expand on that?


@X-Lab
You have to pay a fine now, no TA 'woo' allowed here anymore.

Somebody better inform the exchanges about this little 'find' of yours. I don't think they would be happy about continuing to allow this coin to be traded for BTC if it reports transactions as completed at 0 confirms.

So are you saying that this error also exists in Blackcoin then? Or is it unique to the mash of code thrown together for Silkcoin and was specifically added by your programmers?

Given that Silkcoin has just imploded, I'd say that the crypto community is learning the importance of trusting in coins with dev teams who are willing to actually be open about who they are and what they do.

DRK will probably survive it's issues, because Evan is a respected tech, but if he was an anonymous dev there would be no way this recent round of "Oops" upgrades would be survivable.

But. . .but . . .you assured us there would be significant pull-back, or pull-off, or something because, because, Charts . . .?!?!!!!?!

Now you are saying we should Hodl when anyone who listened to you would already, surely, have Sodl? You know, what with the assertion about double-tops, stairs and elevators and bollinger bands and . . . .and . . . . and. . . .

As has been so astutely pointed out, if TA was actually a science, then TA would rule the world. It doesn't, because it isn't.

Dude, if you actually are a professional PR guy and not, as I suspect, just some spotty no-hope Herbert trying to persuade people you are a shit-hot PR guy, then you truly do suck at being a PR guy.

One look at your post history and I see it's full of the biggest immature-tells in crypto posting, namely, Cars,Boats and 'Wolf of Wall Street' screen caps, along with promises of what you are going to do and how anyone reading your post should follow your instructions because you absolutely promise that you are legit.

Nobody who actually is worth listening to needs to post repeated promises in loud shouty red lettering.

@GiftEncounter I already pointed out the lack of substance in your claims and the flaw in the whole 'TA' shtick, namely, by citing Chaos Theory and pointing out how your TA 'predictions' are akin to Astrology because, well, they are.

Getting it right for a percentage of the time is no different to everyone else here who does also. Only most don't go around posting graphs with wiggly lines and ad-hoc-ergo-propter-hoc logical fallacies in order to pretend that they have a deeper understanding of wiggly line and graph pattern shapes that predict, well, what do they predict? Really?

The market changes for an extremely wide variety of reasons and humans have an inherent fault of seeing patterns in everything because that's how our brain is wired. It does not equate to those patterns actually being representative of predictive outcomes, only proven pasts.

With the moon in . . .nah, too obvious . . .oppositional boundary line of quarj, we can see quite clearly that you are the type of person who doesn't suffer fools gladly, aims for the stars, is gracious in defeat, except when not, lazily ambitious yet easily led as a front-runner at the back.

I see interesting times ahead for you.

Am I close? Close enough, I think you'll find.

Oh look, cryptoarticles is so balanced and not biased at all, as we can all clearly see:
http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/razorcoins-open-source-sms-gateway-rzr-added-to-moolahio
http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/razorcoin-investors-may-have-sold-off-too-soon

Cryptoarticles dot com, your number 1 source for misleading misinformation of questionable intent.

Don't forget kids, this is the same 'news' source that shilled Scharmbeck and Worldcoin at the start of the year.


That'll explain the skeevy feeling I got at seeing yet another "here's a news article" post by jdebunt.

^^^^ Genuine LOL!

Google Dan Kaminsky, then check his Twitter feed for his comments about Patrick Nosker.

As well as all the other resources that show these people to be who they say they are.

. . .and other gems.

By all means trade how you want to trade, but please drop the "I predict . . .the market will be . . .volatile!" garbage. Evidence suggests you praise a coin to the moon on the upswings and then immediately start throwing around 'predictions' of downswings once it tops-out.

These are not the actions of somebody who is ahead of the curve and your posting history shows you to be as efficacious as placebo.

So, as I said, please can we avoid 'TA' graphs and associated buzzwords, as well as the multiple pictures of expensive Houses,Cars,Boats,Women and, in particular, anything from 'Wolf of Wall Street'.

Now, back on-topic, can we get some more reports from people who have tested Veribit?

Given the multiple bad calls you've made in your post history, if 'TA' is your day job I'd suggest you give up your day job.

How's DRK doing for you these days? Your 'Vericoin is dead' assertion was based on what, exactly? Tea-leaves?

people have a tendency to pick a round number to act on.

There, FIFY.

The present describes the future. The approximate present, however, does not describe the approximate future. - Chaos Theory.


For every thousand 'TA' call of what will happen and why it will happen, there are 999 explanations as to why it then didn't happen and, therefore, why the 'TA Expert' would have been right if the thing they referred to as being the basis for their prediction had done what it 'normally' does but because, on this occasion, [insert other market behaviour here] happened, then it went as they would have expected it to because [insert other market behaviour here] causes that to happen.

This whole forum is littered with 'Expert' chart analysis predicting every possible permutation of what's gonna happen in the market, so *someone* gets to crow about how their call was right. Everyone else is just armed with the usual Astrological excuses and reasons to explain away their incorrect call.

. . . and Astrological 'TA' nonsense too.

Can we please avoid all the dumb pictures of Supercars, Megayachts and, the worst offender of them all, cheesy caps from 'Wolf of Wall Street'?

Seriously, it absolutely robs a coin's thread of any credibility whatsoever.

Oh dear, as soon as the repeated reposts about the wallet appear, you know the fleeting moment of reasonable discourse has now passed.

As you were.