PIVX, which is surprisingly immune to how most alts go down if BTC goes up.

Only if you get them very early.

Just look at the difficulty chart of Dash: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/dash-difficulty.html

People only just receiving their ASICs likely won't get ROI.

How about no.


Create an alt if you want without riding on the coattail of BTC causing confusion and potentially exploit people new to Bitcoin. No fork or altcoin will beat Bitcoin so it's just a cheap way of promotion using the name.

You forgot to mention the 9,400,000 premine in the first block so it's a 18.8% premined coin. Stay away.

I watched a bunch of videos and a particular video was about a 7700k vs 8700k with only 1 core enabled on both to check the difference in IPC. I'm sorry Antantti but I can't find it.

Edit: got it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSKLAaCyD2Y

Yeah, IPC is the same but at least it can go with 5+Ghz. I'm all for single core performance but still, that's pretty underwhelming.

Hopefully the AMD Action this year will force some decent stuff out of Intel instead of the lazy approach. I mean, come one, even mobo manufacturers told us that they could use the same CPUs on previous gen but no, Intel wanted people to buy a whole no rig...

I have tried to decrypt and properly dispute your seemingly moronic and overly sensationalistic post but I had trouble comprehendind WTF you were talking about, but one thing I stand behind is that you have, unfortunately, went full retard.

I went with an ASRock Fatal1ty Z370 Professional Gaming i7 mostly because of the 3x M.2 slots. I'll be using 2x 2TB 960 Pros maybe even in raid0 if I go mad enough plus the 1TB 960 Pro I have for OS.
BUT, I'm heavily biased towards ASRock. I mean I've been using an x99 Extreme4/3.1 and a Z77 Extreme 4 before that and all my mining rigs are using ASRock Pro Btc boards and all of them are flawless.
Not that other brands are crap, but I just love ASRock from the smallest details to the biggest.

My second choice would have been the ASRock Z370 Taichi but that wasn't in stock.

Though, I would have liked to have a mobo with 2x8 CPU power connectors and maybe more power phases.

Anyway, the main source of my research was this article: http://wccftech.com/intel-z370-motherboard-roundup-asus-msi-asrock-aorus-gigabyte/2/

My 1.5-year-old i7-6800k just started dying a few days ago even though it was only fed 1.3V (4.2Ghz) and was cooled properly (<70°C) so these couldn't come at a better time.

I ordered a pre-binned version with replaced TIM/IHS (silver heatspreader and liquid metal TIM) from https://www.caseking.de/pc-komponenten/cpus-prozessoren/pretested-cpu?p=1&l=table4&sSort=1 because it seems the stock IHS/TIM sucks. Can't wait.

Though I'm not going to use it for mining at all.

Sure...

OPUS 24h volume - 5.12 BTC and
OPUS total buy support: 4.53 BTC

So good luck realizing your gains.

No problem mate.

It's a bunch of weird obscured .exe files.

Is this a poor attempt to spread malware?

You have to encrypt the wallet for yourself if you want a password. It's in settings, encrypt wallet.

If you want your private key you can use the command dumpprivkey pivxaddress in Tools > Debug Console.

This is pretty much how almost all desktop wallets work.

Oh look, despite all the shilling for this shit, it's only going down:



Gotta make fun of spineless people creating shill threads.

Ahahahaha... Bwahahhaha, you're so retarded funny!

From a devs' standpoint: enough retards throwing money at their screens waiting to pay for another pull on the ICO scam/slotmachine.
From gamblers' standpoint: lol, who are you kidding?

This wallet always stops syncing on different machines under different locations. They just stop processing new blocks while all the nodes are still connected.

It's very annoying.

Yes, they seem to have a working product so it's not a scam, I apologize and I take that back.

After testing the demo, the quality and latency is as expected so this service is not for every genre; for shooter/brawlers/platformers for example where latency is critical it doesn't work well.

But it's not that bad but I feel like the whitepaper tryied hard to make it much better than it is.

Thanks for answering and after testing the demo I do apologize as it's not a scam since there's a working product - which I didn't know there was before and in the sea of ICO scams this looked another as well, still that's my fault.


However, latency and quality is as suspected which means shooters are not the strongsuit of the project. In games where latency is not critical it might work great though.


Good luck with your project I guess.

Yes, it could be done - along with changing the block rewards to keep the emission rate the same.

But faster blocks would require waiting for more blocks to trust confirmations.