You see, when you have this sort of insane production model, over time it becomes a question of which dries up first, buyers of product or bankers to finance production. So, we shareholders are basically a hedge.
Unless you own AM1 or AM100, you're not a shareholder, you're a customer. It's about time that shut down, payments have been negative for weeks by most reports I've seen. If those customers wanted to get back into cloud mining then the logical choices are AMHash and Hashnest so there could be spurt of buying on both/either which could increase the price. |
|
|
|
No, it´s not a question of buying. They send ice sculptures as payouts. Sounds good to me. I have the right shelf ready here for it.
I was talking about the contract you'd have to purchase to be able to withdraw. what is that all about?
4k BTC hacked but where from???
Inputs.io. It was a web wallet that got hacked last year or the year before. No idea why it's being posted here though. |
|
|
|
no it says you got a beautiful ice sculpture or some shit. from what others have mentioned. there was a reference in the automated support on hashie.
So they´d send me an ice sculpture ? Sounds good, I could use a nice ice sculpture in my living room. Then go right ahead and buy one then. What's the worst that could happen? |
|
|
|
WoW. Seems it is the highest paying one on board. Sad that I cant join in  You can't even use your RussianRainbow or SpanishSoldier accounts either.  |
|
|
|
This is really disappointing. I just wrote them another PM. Can someone just confirm I still have my signature up till now? I believe I'll change it within the next days.
Also leaving a negative trust, and I'll make people on default trust aware of this.
I confirm that you have had the signature till now. Also, I've PMed AMHash to see if they can do something about it. |
|
|
|
Let me get this straight. The "service" that refused to provide any evidence of legitimacy hasn't paid out for the last few days and has stopped answering emails? What a surprise!  |
|
|
|
Just be a boss or owner, put your balls on your shoulder and get this train moving again. bitcoin don't sleep.
Your balls on your shoulder, really, in which country is that an expression  I'd say England, Yorkshire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZu9N8qMKjA |
|
|
|
Well, fortunately I have ignored the help from people that have been telling me to buy and hold BTC for a year now. So chances are that this will work just as well for me as other helpers in this bitcoin mess are concerned.
Well, unfortunately for you, you also ignored those who warned you against "investing" in ponzis that refuse to provide any evidence of legitimacy and got ripped off by pbmining and hashie, and you're just waiting to get ripped off by a couple of other ponzis too. Investing in legitimate cloudmining without even a basic understanding of how mining works is just asking to get burnt. |
|
|
|
Variance is a hand tool popular among Bitcornians which allows them to easily achieve seemingly difficult tasks like fitting a square peg into a round hole.
Here's a chart of the difficulty round from 02/12/14 to 17/12/14  Here's a chart of the difficulty round from 17/12/14 to 30/12/14  Here's a image of the current difficulty round from 30/12/14:  What exactly are those images supposed to be saying for themselves? What they tell me is that you haven't got a clue what you are talking about. Those images show "mining variance" which is why the hash rate fluctuates up and down. It does not show people hashing the shit out of bitcoin then switching off at the end of the round like you claim. |
|
|
|
AGAIN: Told you...
AGAIN: What is "mining variance"? |
|
|
|
I know you are foreign and its tough for you to follow plain English but the feedback I left had RISKED BTC at 1000. I didn't risk BTC therefore untrue. I deleted that and put up feedback that has no risked BTC but is very true.
I find that hilarious coming from a Yank foreigner that can't read, write or speak actual English. Also, why did you enter 1000 in the first place? |
|
|
|
Galdur, pay attention: The activity number is determined in this way:
time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration
activity = min(time * 14, posts)
Rough summary of what this means: If you post once per day on average, then you will eventually get the maximum number of activity points that you can get. Posting more than once per day on average is useless for increasing activity. The maximum number of activity points you can get is 1 per day, but your activity score only updates every two weeks. Therefore, it will take about 100 days to get 100 activity if you post once per day on average.
|
|
|
|
And the house always wins, right ? Spikes, spikes. Well, except briefly in december while they milked paycow, sorry paycoin
Are you having a mental breakdown or something? I've no idea what you are even talking about now. You appear to just be spouting gibberish to increase your activity. |
|
|
|
Yeah, and the fact that they balloon the hashrate and then turn it down when a few hundred blocks are left resulting in a flat rate but increased difficulty is not any kind of manipulation in your opinion, right ?
No, it's not manipulation, it's simply mining variance, a.k.a. luck. Like I said earlier, look it up. It's not some personal opinion, it's the mathematical reality of bitcoin mining. Seriously, you need to look up "mining variance" right now. |
|
|
|
What a friggin nonsense. I guess it´s just another bitcoin scam. Nothing to see here, stay calm it´s just business as usual. Turn the equipment up like crazy but when a few hundred blocks are left they turn it off, ending flat as hashrate is concerned but with 8% diff. increase, scamming 8% off customers´payouts next period.
LOL, look up mining variance. |
|
|
|
Anyone know how FC&Co vet the platforms before deciding on passthrough options?
AM never ran any of the passthroughs. Burnside ran the passthrough on BTC-TC, DeadTerra ran the one on BitFunder which TAT later took over. TAT also ran the one on Havelock until Havelock took over. |
|
|
|
now a question, why is it under gambling, games and rounds? IMHO I think this deserves to be moved...
Because it's not a cloud mining service, it's a ponzi with no mining hardware that refuses to provide any evidence of legitimacy. |
|
|
|
|
What do you call a company that refuses to provide any evidence of legitimacy?
|
|
|
|
Where do you come up with these lists? For example...
Basically, because I've got an AMHash sig and criticised a cloud mining ponzi he invested in, everybody else who criticised the ponzis became a sockpuppet for AM - those Chinese scammers led by Havelock/Friedcat that are running the real ponzi. In other words, he's stark raving bonkers. |
|
|
|
Smart move...
Refusing to send money to a "company" that flat out refuses to provide any evidence of legitimacy is simply common sense. Can you provide any evidence of legitimacy? PBMining couldn't. Hashie couldn't. You can't either because there is nothing legitimate about TeraBox. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
