Zergpool have halted a lot of Neoscrypt coin, including some of the ones used for benchmarking with Megaminer

Any idea where I can find in europe some p106 ? ( 6....)


Or I need to source in Asia ?
I did find some there but they are MSI and not Asus.

Will they work ?

You were right, I changed and results more or less confirm the feedback you received


All card with basic timestraps meant for Etash, not cryptonight, as I'm not good enough to change (yet):

I had to remove the  rx 550 to test with higher intensity  otherwise it crashed  after 30 minutes at 25

I can confirm of 450 H/s with intensity 14 double thread with the Rx 550 stable and 21 W
 
I can confirm  a little more than 900 with intensity 22  for Rx 570 Pulse and crash after a while when intensity >30 

Rx 580 pulse 8 gb its a little bit below 900 with intensity lower than 28.

More to follow, Higher intensity for sure,and I will have to increase the core speed compared to etash and  I will see how it goes, and let you know

There is some strange pattern on some card results at certain difficulty.
 Can you confirm that hash rate is calculated for each card ?
 
I think so , but I saw this pattern  only once before. prva vrata manje vrata  ? I'm italian so translation isn't accurate..

But what I know, I am not even a miner , just   a farmer 

Additional question as I am waiting while a second rig is completing the benchmarks:

I notice that the benchmarks for Neoscrypt  for Ahashpool and Zergpool are quite a lot.

I don't think that they are really necessary. Those two pools are "autoexchange pools"

So, whatever coin the benchmark is testing, by pointing at the 4223 port, the pool redirect it to the most convenient coin.

By extension: Zergpool and Ahashpool have 27 different algos, so 54 test maximum (but Megaminer doesn't support all of them and some of them are obviously Asic) and the benchmark is done.
Lets say 108 if you have mixed rigs,  Plus 20 if you have nanopool for zcash and etash/blake2/kekkak, etash.
total 130.
Instead I have 296 minimum combination and I already remove the Asic algos.

Sorry for the rant, but may be you can save 15 h benchmarking ... for next release.

Did I miss something ?


 

Our pool, that is a cryptonight pool is making the calculation based on the number of share  each one is sending.
The local pc is just calculating the hashrate as it is.

If  you receive very high difficulty request from the pool, you will send back less share.


The split of most of the pools are based on ppls, that among other things. rewards higher difficulty shares.

Pay attention if you choose  a fixed diff. if its wrong for the combination board/algos  it may result in lower hash so lower income.

The demo its easy to understand , even on my phone. I don't know if I will use it on my phone as I prefer to be in the front of a big screen when I  decide about money

Hi.
 I Let it run  for a while:

Rx 550: around  270/330 h/s  per card depending  if its Asus 4gb / Sapphire 4gb

Kindly note that the Asus 4gb  I have is a non optimized card with some problem

Rx 570: around 860 h/s per card

I tested at intensity 0 /25/50/57(RX 550 stops here) / 75 /90/100 with no visible increase /decrease of performance

Bad news: 330 h/s on the sapphire Rx 550 is 150 h/s less than the software I use that also comes with nice graphics and overclocking... . Same software, Same RX 570 delivered 925 h/s.

Good news :

There is a saving at the wall of around 35 watt and also have very small impact on the cputilization

Few explanation:
I started  mining very late and with little money. Motherboard available were just 6 / 7 PCIe slot, so every of the few(..) rigs that I have  its with 4  Etash card, Rx580 8gb and Rx 570 4Gb, mostly, and I fit some Rx 550 4gb in order to fill the Pcie slots and  having the PSU  running at 75 %

Needs:
Minimum  to be able to set up intensity/ card. Not just one / rig. Or its already possible and I am a newbie then.
Tryied 25,50,50,50,50 25, argument for intensity but didn't work

Better: to be able to choose which card to use  0,1,3,5,
Perfect: gap with other software  <10 %. Saving on the bill will outsmart the higher speeds

Not sure if I was clear as English isn't my first language

You can count on this rig if you need it

ciao

I will .
As a Thank you for SRBPolaris

I have a mixed rig with 3rx 550 2GB, 3rx570 and 2GTX 1050

Can I use XMR STAK to mine only with the Rx 550 and not using the RX 570 ?

I m a little worried. In a market where some  investor gained 300 % in few month and other lost 80 % in few days, I think that I will reconsider having someone helping me

Thank you for the answer, I will try then.
An easy one ?
No plan for a sort of remote monitoring ? I don't know something like  a Telegram bot that sent you: Up and runnning ? already up to xy % of today target ?

I Created an account in the CREP exchange for depositing CREP and PKNS
my windows wallet say that the deposit address is invalid
and the address:
adYmfgZDKq5XetfyeosKgMT7erQrNiXPV1FX7tEvgXNG9KUTEXcv85n8ruKkso6SsjPDmDWRgAo6471 EmtLLohVb2RqYY9Qy9
does seem correct

anyone experience the same ?

Ok, 48h hours later... test is finished... on the 3 Mixed Rigs we have for testing

and I got plenty of question and few remarks:

Claymore dual with NVDA doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 135 for the GTX 1070
Claymore dual with Amd  doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 14 for Rx 550, 35 for Rc 570 and 51 for RX 580




1) There is an easy way ( not script programming) to set up DCR for each board ? And also VCCC, MCCC etc? Because everybody have his own overclocking ( I just try to find the lowest power consumption, but some else may just look for performance)
2) Ideally will be wonderful, lets say to be able to change intensity in Claymore  Neoscript, and just Benchmark that one and not all the algos for AMD

3) Ideally will be wonderful to be able to choose on the fly one particular algo. Today for example, I don't know why , but in Ahashpool  for 2 hours Neoscript went Crazy for Nvda doubling the earning of the benchmark, well, I was there  and if I was able to "force" to use the AMD card on Neoscript, they will have better ROI than Dual mining.
Or  "pairing" benchmark result between groups" when the "live" performance of one group set a +X% ?

A simple yes/you can do it already solution is alreay in the discussion/NO /No way will be helpful


 

The 550 is modded or you have just changed the timestraps?

No Link, please add it

K, thanks

Sorry, Tutulfo.
I am ashamed that you spent your time for such a stupid question.

I will let it run ( as its working now, even if its not really "fool proof"  tested by me-fool )

and then I hope I will have better question

First of all, very good idea indeed  to include electricity cost and euro!

I am trying  to have a   couple of "BTC" pool (Zergpool & Ahashpool) working:

Autoexec:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

:LOOP
del "Stats\*_Profit.txt"

powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -command "&.\core.ps1 -MiningMode AUTOMATIC -PoolsName ahashpool,zergpool LOOP

Config:
 
WORKERNAME=EOLO

--Autoexchange pools preferred currencies.
--You can set a generic currency for all autoexchange pools @@CURRENCY=XXX or a specific currency for one pool
CURRENCY_NAMEOFPOOL=BTC valid only for that pool
--pools without autoexchange (yiimp, suprnova...) need a wallet of same coin you are mining
--You must be sure selected pool support pay that coin or you can lose your money.
--You must set wallet for this currencies on "Wallets Section"

CURRENCY=btc
CURRENCY_Ahashpool=btc
Currency Zergpool= Btc

LOCALCURRENCY=EURO

USERNAME=1MfauXbYE9pbRgU4qAzZQf75XjENatkJn6


WALLET_BTC=1MfauXbYE9pbRgU4qAzZQf75XjENatkJn6
@@WALLET_XXX=ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

DONATE=10


CPUMINING=DISABLED

--Electricity cost, you can use this converter to get your BTC cost http://www.xe.com/es/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=0%2C012&From=EUR&To=XBT
--Example for all day cost [{"HourStart":0,"HourEnd":23,"CostKwh":0.105609}]
--Example for two periods cost [{"HourStart":12,"HourEnd":21,"CostKwh":0.105609},{"HourStart":22,"HourEnd":11,"CostKwh":0.703759}]

ELECTRICITYCOST=[{"HourStart":0,"HourEnd":23,"CostKwh":0.11}]

But I receive this in RED:

New interval starting.............
ConvertFrom-Json : Impossibile associare l'argomento al parametro 'InputObject' perché è null.
In C:\mining\Megaminer-master\core.ps1:297 car:63
+ ... ostValue= [double](($config.ElectricityCost |ConvertFrom-Json) |where ...
+                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidData: ( [ConvertFrom-Json], ParameterBindingValidationException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentValidationErrorNullNotAllowed,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.ConvertFromJsonCommand
Loading Pools Information.............
ZERGPOOL API NOT RESPONDING...ABORTING
NO POOLS!....retry in 10 sec ---

So, I didn't make one mistake, I make two ...at least.

Any expert may look at it please ?

I was thinking to join the bounty for twitter.

But there is a minimum numers of followers to partecipate ?

Well, there is only another way, beside the escrow :

Where is phisically located the rig and you Johnny ?

I think they stopped