address already shared
Strange - it seems to be missing from your post. (and you would not be advised to ever travel to China as it seems you might end up with some trouble) |
|
|
|
you started it dick head, and 80 year old, LMFAO i believe that millions wouldnt, but yeah carry on, and your address will be passed on to your local militias, its brilliant being part of the truth movement, get friends all over the globe hahahaha
You are clearly a retarded piece of shit - but if you do threaten my parents then I will be after you (and I never give up). |
|
|
|
LMFAO RETARD, look back, already have done, carry on got your address now prick, want me to make it public??? shame your not in the same country though ehhhhh
If you want to threaten an aged couple (around 80 years old) publicly then please do so (it will just show everyone what kind of a piece of shit you really are). You see - I don't give a fuck about bullies like you. |
|
|
|
Dont care if NSA, microsoft or wahtever spy on me, dont have anything to hide
I guess you'd better hope that they would never decide to steal your BTC then. BTW - are you going to share with them your bank account details and any other financial details as well (as you seem to trust them so much then I guess you should)? |
|
|
|
get real, you called it, address or fuck off???
Sorry asshole - but you don't get to call anything here - got that? You have zero control here and are just a piece of shit - if you think you really have some control then why don't you prove it to us all? |
|
|
|
gimme your address, dick head..... your the idiot spoiling for a war, you called it now you backing out already, typical retarded keyboard warrior shitbag is what you are, big enough to call it but not big enough to follow it thru LOL fuck off
 Why don't you just give you yours then - tough guy. (yup - not tough at all - just an internet pussy) |
|
|
|
keyboard warrior with no argument lol grow a brain your retard
Repeated again - my my - you really don't have much going on upstairs do you. |
|
|
|
retard, keyboard warrior, grow a brain you clearly need to LOL
Getting repetitive already - not much energy for someone who was just trying to act "tough" a post ago. (guessing this little mommy's boy is not really actually up for a fight after all) |
|
|
|
bit like your opinion fucktard, i nor anybody else care not about something which is as retarded as you demonstrate you want a fight gimme your address prick, keyboard warrior???
Haha - you really are a wannabe aren't you? Come and find me asshole. |
|
|
|
if you want me to shut up on my own post, dont give me reason to reply its not rocket science
Hey - fucktard - you want a fight then you get one. Once you've grown a brain then maybe you'll work out how to post something of > zero IQ. (yes - your topic is now rubbish and no-one is going to give a fuck about it - now it's just about you and your trolling) |
|
|
|
and i keep posting as i dont wish to appear to be an ignorant cretin
And yet - you do - again and again and again. Hey - ignorant cretin troll - no-one here gives a fuck about your bullshit. (but keep on trying to entertain us with your posts - you might want to make them look a bit more intelligent though if that is possible for you to do) |
|
|
|
|
I think the OP is wanting to create a non-coinbase tx that either has no outputs or perhaps an output with 0 as the amount (for what purpose?).
If it is non-standard then the only way you would be able to do this would be to send such a tx directly to a pool that allows for non-standard txs (are there still any of those around?).
|
|
|
|
"Sacred Protocol"
Bitcoin is not a religion and has no such thing - as has been pointed out many times to you already the answers are *in the code* which you can find here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin |
|
|
|
i'm not a fan of installing something from the web to protect my coin, i have nothing against your software, but one never know
You can find the source code here: https://github.com/ciyam/safe(the download is just a SUSE "live" distro with the CIYAM Safe source code and Bitcoin - also remember this is purely for offline usage) |
|
|
|
I suppose that you will not tell me where in the original design the non-mining relays were introduced as guardians of the Sared Protocol.
The what? You have just made yourself look even stupider than I could have possibly made you out to be with that (enjoy being an old fool - and at least I have saved others from wasting their time with you which I had realised needed to be addressed some time before which is why I bothered to do this). If you want to leave this forum with any respect left at all then you'd best not reply. |
|
|
|
The non-mining relay nodes were added later, without any justification. They break that security argument.
Rubbish. I'm sorry but you have not tried to understand one thing but instead tried to just post rubbish again and again and again. I would recommend that you retire as you have zero understanding of this technology and we have zero tolerance for your ignorance. (and I 100% expected that you would post such a response as I know that you are just a paid shill - seriously you should be ashamed of yourself - if you have any self-respect at all then just stop posting) (even your grandchildren would be saying "don't post more crap grandpa") |
|
|
|
A valid transaction is any transaction which, when the scripts are run, returns true and nothing in the stack triggers a failure. A valid transaction does not have to be standard.
I think this is the crux of the misunderstanding that others have been having. Valid and standard are not the same thing (but something that is standard is also valid). Because Bitcoin has introduced an entirely new paradigm (that of P2P consensus) it has had to introduce some new software concepts and I think at this stage this is not being well understood (perhaps not surprisingly). |
|
|
|
|
Gamblers are the type who would do the most posting (especially when they get themselves into debt they generally start trying to scam others via Ponzi's and the like).
There is another whole side to the Bitcoin user-base which seemingly you know nothing of but I'm not really worried if you only want to pay attention to the gamblers (if you want to refer to the others as the "elite" then fine you are welcome to refer to me as an "elitist" then).
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
