The current implementation of the MACD is based on this step:
- Calculate divergence between them (Short - Long) (This is the MACD)

When the MACD passes the 0-line there is a crossover of the MA lines and then a signal is given by the indicator.

This is the implementation running right now. First i want to get things fully working without bugs and then i am planning on adding more and more indicators. One of them will be called "MACD-MA Cross-over" and that one will work as you have described, based on an smooth MACD cross-over momentum.

About the suggestions;
- Yes i will add the fee to the benchmark tool, at this moment it is still missing because my focus was on other things. But good thing you remind me of this.
- Transaction fees are up to date with the new version. I am polling them on a bigger interval, but it is polled and updated at the next version.
- Loading historical data from the internet is a feature i really want to add, but again my focus was on other things. I will rush this feature for the version after the next version.
- I will investigate the "Trailing Stop-Loss", at this moment i am working on a equal concept that monitors if the order gets filled and if not after X time then it will cancel the order. This this is stuff coming in the future. Maybe the Trailing Stop-Loss is better, i will have a look for sure. Thanks!


@nowywbitcoinowymswiecie:
Sorry, but i will never rush a release or do a pre-release. Sometimes i will do a Alpha release, but that is for big changes to the trade-engine only. I can understand people may want this version already, but if it does not work as expected or if it makes wrong trades then i will get a lot of complains. I can better avoid that and make sure first everything works first.

Hey ,
  I think I see what you mean, a sort of "step" stop loss. I will tell you up front that I am not the trading consultant so I can not judge how effective this would be, but I will bring it up with the appropriate people, strikes me as a sane suggestion .

Pablo.

Hi Saan1ty ,
   Interesting question. The bots Trailing Stop Loss (TSL) feature, does exactly that, it takes the highest value since you turned on the bot and sells all your BTC for fiat if price falls by the percentage specified.

I say this every couple of pages:  It is an easy feature to understand in principle, but it is very hard to use in combination with EMA and can result in losses if improperly set. The argument on this can go either way, if it were me, I would have my bot on a 30 or 15 minute interval and not use TSL; I would just rely on the bot to act correctly.

Now a lot can go wrong in a flash crash/rocket recuperation, there is no magic setting that will protect you against all cases. A shorter time frame will make the bot more reactive, but it could follow false signals and incur some losses. In the end, you can't look at this in single trades, even if we are discussing large market movements, you have to look at it in aggregate over time or you are really just looking at noise.

Please let me know if you need anything at all .

Pablo.

YES.

Ex-trader, that's enough. You have made your point 1,000 times.

Stop being an idiot.

Stephan I think you misunderstood my post. The benchmark tool shows several trades but the active bot (pictured on the left in my previous post) only made 2 transactions in the same time period on the same settings.

For instance it bought at interval 2411 at 193.21 and then didn't sell it even 8 hours later after the price had gone well above the target price twice, the benchmark indicates atleast 2 instances that would meet the requirements to sell.

Too easy.

Both suck.

Both suck.

Both suck.

Dear Stephan224 - I think I found one issue with internet connection. When internet connection drops TradeBot stops refreshing rates BUT it shows last update time continuosly.
I have internet connection through 3G modem. Connection is very stable but once per day modem reconnects. Today I was trying to recieve samples from exchange portal so Ive started trading Bot and put window in background. After few hours Ive checked and found that currency graph are not updated.

I'm not an Oracle licensing expert, but my understanding is that it is "too expensive for a (crowdfunded) startup". If anyone can correct that assumption I would be interested to hear it.

I think you're missing the point. $47k per CPU is not an acceptable expense for a company that has raised maybe $1-2M. Every one of these initial dollars are precious. If they are all gone before NEOBEE is cash-positive, it fails.

NEOBEE has painted itself into a corner. No dilution. ALL of the public shares are up for sale at the current price point.

If they cannot succeed with the cash they have now, they will not succeed at all, because they have no way to raise more. And they sure are being careless with that cash.

Vycid gives NEOBEE a "don't buy" based on the way they are burning their capital and the absurdly optimistic business plan.

klee, as anonymous as any retard in this forum, how confused are you about databases and what is used and where? Never mind, this is a rhetorical question.
If those clowns are going for Oracle... pff. good luck and thank you for a early warning. You sure know how to piss yor investors money away.
Have a nice ride to...

ex-trader accountants do not evaluate "business models". You probably meant "business plan" with shiny predictions for future income (aka fiction)