I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. True. but the NAP says nothing about courts, trials or justice. Nor does it need to. so it was okay to shoot Bin Laden? Was he aggressing? he put airplanes into buildings. |
|
|
|
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. True. but the NAP says nothing about courts, trials or justice. Nor does it need to. so it was okay to shoot Bin Laden? |
|
|
|
I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not.
and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances.
Hey, fun fact: the NAP does allow the use of force, even lethal force, under some circumstances. True. but the NAP says nothing about courts, trials or justice. |
|
|
|
For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how? You may. How then? I never said I would answer. Research trial procedures. Find out for yourself. Torture 4 teh LULZ! So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied? I think you're a bad person. Does that mean it's OK for me to kill you? No, because you believe in NAP, and i have yet to aggress. True. I think you might be starting to grasp the concept. Which of them? The NAP or killing people is bad? I understand the NAP, its inconsistent, and i disagree with it. The use of force is useful in some situations, whatever you like it or not. and killing bad people is not bad, when its done in the best interest of the society. in other words: its perfectly okay to kill people under some circumstances. |
|
|
|
For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how? You may. How then? So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied? I think you're a bad person. Does that mean it's OK for me to kill you? No, because you believe in NAP, and i have yet to aggress. |
|
|
|
This is the last time I forget to select "Self moderated topic" when I create a thread in this section of the forum.
please explain... are you saying that you wants to limit other peoples free speech? |
|
|
|
For all we know, Bin Laden was just the PR agent. A trial would have revealed that.
may i ask how? So, back to our little empathy exercise. Don't you think that would kinda suck? At least a little? Wouldn't you have preferred to be arrested and brought to trial instead of being summarily executed?
Killing bad persons is not bad. Satisfied? (no, i will not bite!) |
|
|
|
Is there anything that does deserve that kind of treatment?
The dude had some people fly air plains into buildings... |
|
|
|
No. I can understand why he is happy with SM to be ill. I just simply don't care. People was happy and celebrated when bin laden was killed too, you know.
Sad, isn't it? That people could actually celebrate a man being gunned down in his home, without a trial? I don't really have a opinion about it... OK, let's try a little exercise. If this works, you may feel your first ever feeling of empathy. Imagine, if you will, you're sitting on the couch, dick in your hand, watching a porno. Suddenly, you hear a crash as your apartment door is kicked down. If you have a dog, it's barking is silenced with a shot. You turn around, and see several men, dressed in black from head to toe, rush in. One raises his weapon, and the last thing you see is a muzzle flash. That would kinda suck, wouldn't it? Be a bad day at the Kokjo household? What did i do to deserve that?  |
|
|
|
No. I can understand why he is happy with SM to be ill. I just simply don't care. People was happy and celebrated when bin laden was killed too, you know.
Sad, isn't it? That people could actually celebrate a man being gunned down in his home, without a trial? I don't really have a opinion about it... |
|
|
|
Structure, yes. Evil government, no.
You still haven't researched AnCap in the least, have you?
Structure/Government, Potato/Potato. Nope. Government has some very specific characteristics. 1. It claims a regional monopoly on the industries of justice and defense. 2. It enforces this monopoly with violence. 3. It provides some services to the populace living within it's regional monopoly without giving them the option of opting out. 4. It extracts payment for these services from the populace living within it's regional monopoly by force. Structure can be provided to a society without those features. bla bla bla, essentially: Potato/Potato. Just ignore anything that disagrees with your opinion, huh? whatever man. Believe what ever makes you happy, its the same. |
|
|
|
(and that said, its always sad that people are dying from cancer...)
How sad is that? what? You, expressing more empathy than blablahblah. thats not empathy... its just me who have learned that its sad when people die... and even more sad when they die of a disease. I feel nothing for that dude, but i don't see why we should celebrate his disease. And i therefor just go with the general opinion: "awwww how sad that you got cancer, are you okay?" Exactly. And even that is more than he shows. No. I can understand why he is happy with SM to be ill. I just simply don't care. People was happy and celebrated when bin laden was killed too, you know. |
|
|
|
Structure, yes. Evil government, no.
You still haven't researched AnCap in the least, have you?
Structure/Government, Potato/Potato. Nope. Government has some very specific characteristics. 1. It claims a regional monopoly on the industries of justice and defense. 2. It enforces this monopoly with violence. 3. It provides some services to the populace living within it's regional monopoly without giving them the option of opting out. 4. It extracts payment for these services from the populace living within it's regional monopoly by force. Structure can be provided to a society without those features. bla bla bla, essentially: Potato/Potato. |
|
|
|
(and that said, its always sad that people are dying from cancer...)
How sad is that? what? You, expressing more empathy than blablahblah. thats not empathy... its just me who have learned that its sad when people die... and even more sad when they die of a disease. I feel nothing for that dude, but i don't see why we should celebrate his disease. And i therefor just go with the general opinion: "awwww how sad that you got cancer, are you okay?" |
|
|
|
Now, now, don't get hysterical. Lots of normal people get cancer and other illnesses every day. You call most of them Statists.
But I don't rejoice in their diagnosis, asswipe. Fuck, even Kokjo shows more empathy than you. I empathised with SM's victims. But of course you already knew that because you're so empathic yourself... Right, by expressing glee at his diagnosis with a potentially fatal disease. Ass. Glee?! I'll have you know I was sacrificing my dignity and appearances to stand up for what I believe! Trust me, your dignity and appearance did not suffer. We already know you're an asshole. U MAD NAO? |
|
|
|
and who are you to say that im delusional? you believe that a large society can exist without a state. dream on dude.
Society is required before you can have a state, ergo of course it can exist without one. In fact, a State is a parasitic entity, itself. A rather devious one, as it takes over processes that the society would normally be able to handle itself. can you read dude? is it more clear to you what i wrote now? What does the size of the society have to do with it? see dunbar number. And? I'm not a communist. the idea still applies, large societies needs structure(evil government) to function. Structure, yes. Evil government, no. You still haven't researched AnCap in the least, have you? Structure/Government, Potato/Potato. |
|
|
|
(and that said, its always sad that people are dying from cancer...)
How sad is that? what? |
|
|
|
and who are you to say that im delusional? you believe that a large society can exist without a state. dream on dude.
Society is required before you can have a state, ergo of course it can exist without one. In fact, a State is a parasitic entity, itself. A rather devious one, as it takes over processes that the society would normally be able to handle itself. can you read dude? is it more clear to you what i wrote now? What does the size of the society have to do with it? see dunbar number. And? I'm not a communist. the idea still applies, large societies needs structure(evil government) to function. |
|
|
|
and who are you to say that im delusional? you believe that a large society can exist without a state. dream on dude.
Society is required before you can have a state, ergo of course it can exist without one. In fact, a State is a parasitic entity, itself. A rather devious one, as it takes over processes that the society would normally be able to handle itself. can you read dude? is it more clear to you what i wrote now? What does the size of the society have to do with it? see dunbar number. |
|
|
|
|
lets see, talking in the other thread about psychopaths... so lets look at mr. Molyneux, shall we?
He have no remorse, is irresponsible, egocentric, and charming, shows signs of antisocial behavior, and a great manipulator...
My guess: Yup, psychopathic cult leader. Better stay away.
(and that said, its always sad that people are dying from cancer...)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
