"jewish racism in the State Of Palestine"
which way is that. jewish people who are racist against palestinians, or the other way around? how about "shit going on in the middle east"? Everyone there and america are fucked up, judging by the news volume they generate. |
|
|
|
What is the point of focusing on a jewish person? Do they have any privilege over muslim restaurant owners? I don't think so.
De Facto they have all privileges. World is run by jews. implication: Bitcoin was created by a jew. |
|
|
|
Racism is very prevalent in society and must be discussed. I assume you'd rather shun the issue because it might shed a bad light on your own society.
No, that is actually a good topic. Go create it! |
|
|
|
National socialism will dominate future politics.
i don't think even you really believes that. It is in the name of truth that national socialism principles to be discussed in every relevant thread. relevant is the key word here, which means that antibanker should sling his poop all around. |
|
|
|
And who are you to demand the removal of threads you don't like, because they are not YOUR pet topic?
this forum, is about bitcoin. Economy and libertarian politics are highly relevant for bitcoin. Nazism is not, and does not have a place here, except intellectual discussions about it. if you feels like your free speech is getting limited too hard, i can only say that the owner of the forum owns the forum, and moderators moderate it, and this is only a suggestion to the mods. if you don't like that: rent a server, create your own, there is a whole internet out there waiting for you. |
|
|
|
|
see you point, except for the americans.americans
|
|
|
|
On this forum everything can be discussed, even world views that are condemned in the biggest parts of the world.
This will not get you a ban.
What will get you a ban is spamming by either creating dozens of threads on the same topic, or spreading this stuff in dozens of threads.
+1! |
|
|
|
So "discussion" (in your definition) means: Discuss the topics you like to the extent you like and put a quota you like on muslim issues?
having 500 nazi and jew topics, while only having 50 topics on economics(which this whole forum is about!) is not acceptable. antibanker was spamming the forums, with every little thing a jewish/maybe-jewish/pro-jew person ever did. and he did not discuss afterwards, just create yet another thread on the same topic. not acceptable! I have the feeling that cypher-punk is the same guy.
i don't think so, cypher-punk have yet to call me jew scum... |
|
|
|
Do you want to limit the exposure of crimes, which were perpetrated by a certain people this way?
no, i want the politics forum to be more then just nazi threads. i want it to be more then just antibanker's tard-shout box. |
|
|
|
TO THE MODS: please make sticky, and remove/merge all other the Nazi threads.
I don't think that the space we give to the nazis in the spirit of free speech should be made sticky. That would seem a little odd for any new visitor of this forum. This is a keep the forum clean thread, it should be okay. |
|
|
|
first: bitcoin is grate and it will be used for a long long time, this is not a critic of bitcoin.
first we had simple trading of goods: "if i give you 1 fish, you give me 2 apples".
then we had investments(i think...): "if you give me 2 apples now, i will give you a fish tomorrow".
then we had store of value: "this piece of gold, even if it does not have any intrinsic value, can be traded for one or more fish".
and then paper money: "this piece of paper can be traded for gold".
after that you was forced to use paper money, as fiat: "you are forced to accept fiat as payment".
and finally bitcoin: "reverting back to digital gold".
so i think bitcoin will become obsolete at some point in the future.
what will come next?
actually, that is not quite true. Gift economies, obligations in communities, aka forms of promises or debt, came before barter. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt:_The_First_5000_Years Might be true, but not the point. The point is: things change. Even if im fucked in my understanding of stone age history. |
|
|
|
|
Please people, i know that some of you have really strong opinions about jews, but please do not make so many threads about them.
you people are crowding the politics board, and its not fun to troll you any more.
(i know that im going to be flamed with some free speech propaganda, bring it on!)
TO THE MODS: please make sticky, and remove/merge all other the Nazi threads.
|
|
|
|
|
first: bitcoin is grate and it will be used for a long long time, this is not a critic of bitcoin.
first we had simple trading of goods: "if i give you 1 fish, you give me 2 apples".
then we had investments(i think...): "if you give me 2 apples now, i will give you a fish tomorrow".
then we had store of value: "this piece of gold, even if it does not have any intrinsic value, can be traded for one or more fish".
and then paper money: "this piece of paper can be traded for gold".
after that you was forced to use paper money, as fiat: "you are forced to accept fiat as payment".
and finally bitcoin: "reverting back to digital gold".
so i think bitcoin will become obsolete at some point in the future.
what will come next?
|
|
|
|
Government does everything badly. It's a monopoly. Monopolies always give the worst service for the highest price.
wrong. The government is for the people by the people, and people have absolutely no interest in providing bad service. |
|
|
|
yeah man, fuck the rest! should properly stop now, before my drunk brain embarres me anymore.
I'll be back!
Probably a good idea. In the meantime, think how you might get a stoner to produce for the community instead of sitting on his ass all day smoking and eating. Here's a hint. They can be Philosophers, and create some new philosophic views called dankism. |
|
|
|
The first Jews probably hadn't much trouble here because the Germanic Tribes (and Nordic ones) where not really barbarians like people assume they were.
are you telling me Asterix and Obelix did not exist? |
|
|
|
Mathematicians are often "inventing" stuff that are useless, just for the lulz, and then the stuff gets useful.
 tell me what use there is for algebraic topology, other then the lulz. Good one, focusing on a tiny, easily backed up part of your statement, and ignoring the rest of what both of us said. yeah man, fuck the rest! should properly stop now, before my drunk brain embarres me anymore. I'll be back! |
|
|
|
Mathematicians are often "inventing" stuff that are useless, just for the lulz, and then the stuff gets useful.
tell me what use there is for algebraic topology, other then the lulz. |
|
|
|
first dude: "hey i have way too many potatoes, here is some".
second dude: "i have too much milk, here is some."
First dude: I have too many potatoes, but sure would love some milk. Want to trade? Second dude: Sure, I have way too much milk, and I'd love some potatoes. What do you say to 5 potatoes per gallon? First dude: It's a deal, and any time you want more, just come on by. Of course, this is inefficient, and there's no guarantee that the guy who has milk wants potatoes. Maybe the guy who wants potatoes has corn, and the guy who has milk wants corn, but not potatoes. That's why we invented money. To facilitate trade. simpler solution: put it one big pile, take what you need. That might work. Except: How do you deal with the people who inevitably take more than they "need"? Or who takes, but doesn't add to the pile? For that matter, how do you decide how much you "need"? change the "need" to "want", does not really matter. if people are unwilling to trade, there would be no gain for a "thieve", except having rotten potatoes laying around. I see. Doesn't really answer how you deal with the "free rider" problem. Bill, Alice, Carl, and Dave all contribute what they can to the pile, and take what they need. Edward, however, takes their produce, and goes home, adding nothing. After a while of this, Felicia sees that Edward is getting away with it, so she starts just taking from the pile, too. Perhaps Dave see Edward and Felicia just taking, and, fed up, stops adding. How long before no one is adding to the pile any more? people are easily bored, and people wants to support the pile-community. maybe there are nothing for Edward to do, or his "job"/function is another one, he fixes houses or something. Edward would be free to do what he likes. and he will not forget who fed him, while he was working on some potato farm research. Edward would be bored if he does not do something, and that something could be productive for the community. Consider Edward a investment. Mathematicians are often "inventing" stuff that are useless, just for the lulz, and then the stuff gets useful. They are fed full even when they don't contribute with anything useful. and Alice would not quit, for the same reason. what would she do instead? (oh god, im hungover. feel like im shit in explaining) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
